1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

What's the hole in the intake spacer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-01-2011, 02:52 PM
mktsc's Avatar
mktsc
mktsc is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the hole in the intake spacer?

('73 F100, 360 2bbl, MT)
I bought these two gaskets because I'm getting a leak after rebuilding and reinstalling my carb. I'm thinking it might be because I put the gasket with the hole on, and I need the one without the hole. My spacer has the hole, what are the disadvantages to blocking it off?

Two gaskets:

 
  #2  
Old 11-01-2011, 03:01 PM
JB78f150's Avatar
JB78f150
JB78f150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll take a guess and say its the EGR hole. If the Intake manifold and carb don't have the same hole, then you just bought a spacer with EGR holes. If your running the stock manifold, then because your truck is older than 78 you don't have EGR setup. I'm not sure if it matters if the gasket has the holes because the EGR is probably not functional. I would say you need the one without the hole. I'm sure someone else will chime in but that's my limited knowledge.
 
  #3  
Old 11-01-2011, 03:06 PM
mktsc's Avatar
mktsc
mktsc is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Truck is a '73 with stock intake and carb, so I'm guessing no EGR. I bought both gaskets, so I'll just install the one without the hole.

Hoping it's the source of my leak.

-MK
 
  #4  
Old 11-01-2011, 03:09 PM
JB78f150's Avatar
JB78f150
JB78f150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Luck Carbs are Fun.
 
  #5  
Old 11-01-2011, 03:11 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by JB78f150
I'll take a guess and say its the EGR hole. If the Intake manifold and carb don't have the same hole, then you just bought a spacer with EGR holes.

If your running the stock manifold, then because your truck is older than 78 you don't have EGR setup.
Sorry, that's incorrect:

D7PZ-9A589-H (replaced D3TZ-9A589-C, D4TZ-9A589-C & G) .. EGR/Carburetor Spacer Plate-Carburetor to Intake Manifold-Cast Iron-Use w/2V Carburetor (Motorcraft CM-3034).

Applications: 1973/76 F100/350 360/390 / The original factory installed spacer plates were aluminum. Heat caused them to melt internally, they also were notorious for carboning up.

So...in 1977, FoMoCo came out with service part replacement cast iron plates for all 4, 6 and V8 engines. The same gaskets used w/the aluminum plates were used w/the cast iron plates.

EGR valves were introduced in 1973. AFAIK, all Passenger Cars, Trucks, Bronco's & Econolines came with one.
 
  #6  
Old 11-01-2011, 03:16 PM
mktsc's Avatar
mktsc
mktsc is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well one thing I'm sure of is that the EGR is not present. So I'm guessing that blocking off that hole should have no detriment to the truck, since all the other EGR equipment is long gone.

-MK
 
  #7  
Old 11-01-2011, 06:14 PM
JB78f150's Avatar
JB78f150
JB78f150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Huh, Learn something everyday. NumberDummy I wish I had all your knowledge of Ford Trucks.
 
  #8  
Old 11-02-2011, 11:33 PM
DKW 86's Avatar
DKW 86
DKW 86 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 453
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
EGR should have been part of the 72 or 73 Emission regulations for everything less than an F-250, IIRC.

Anyone know what the important difference between the F-100 and the F-150 was?
 
  #9  
Old 11-03-2011, 02:42 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by DKW 86
EGR should have been part of the 72 or 73 Emission regulations for everything less than an F-250.
1973/79 F100/350, Bronco, Econoline and Passenger Cars.

The only carb to intake manifold spacer plates listed for these vehicles are for EGR valves, so all had one originally.

No such thing as an EGR valve prior to 1973.
 
  #10  
Old 11-03-2011, 04:18 AM
DKW 86's Avatar
DKW 86
DKW 86 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 453
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
EGRs for the 49 states other than California came with Legislation that occurred in either 72 or 73 OR in 72 for 73 model year.

After 72 the Feds start mandating 5MPH bumpers for the front of cars. Front and rear in 1974, sterring columns that collapse during crashes, etc.

In 1972, the advertised hp was taken from the rear wheel rather than the flywheel. 72 starts the beginning of thr SMOG motors with lower compression and milder cams, etc.

I just wasnt sure WHEN the EGR made its way into the 49 state cars. I have worked on California Emissions equipped cars that had EGRs earlier than 73.

What was the difference between the F-100 & the F-150?
 
  #11  
Old 11-03-2011, 05:09 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by DKW 86
EGRs for the 49 states other than California came with Legislation that occurred in either 72 or 73 OR in 72 for 73 model year.

After 72 the Feds start mandating 10 MPH bumpers for the front of cars. 1974: 5 MPH for the rear.

Collapsible steering columns were introduced in 1968-Passenger Cars only. F100/350's, Bronco's and Econolines didn't require same until the mid 1980's.

I just wasnt sure WHEN the EGR made its way into the 49 state cars. I have worked on California Emissions equipped cars that had EGRs earlier than 73.
Impossible, no 1972 CA or any other state vehicle came w/an EGR valve.
Historically since the 1930's, new vehicle introductions begin in September of the previous year, so production begins in Auguat.

EGR valves introduced in all 50 state 1973 models...PERIOD!

Take a look-see in the 1964/72 Ford Truck, 1965/72 Ford & L/M Passenger Car Parts Catalogs...see how many EGR valves and related parts you can find listed.

Lotsa luck, because there aren't any!

The only way a 1972 or earlier vehicle could have EGR, is if the engine was swapped in from a 1973 or later vehicle.

I was a Ford partsman for 35 years (1962/97), have every FoMoCo parts catalog from 1928 thru 2001, so I know what the hell I'm talking about.

Where were you in 1973? I was the back (shop) parts counterman at Wright Ford in Marina del Rey CA
 
  #12  
Old 11-03-2011, 06:04 AM
DKW 86's Avatar
DKW 86
DKW 86 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 453
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ND, i was talking in general, not specifically about trucks in reference to EGR valves. They were introduced on the 1973 vehicles so you are clearly wrong about when they were made. Here let me help you out with your facts...

Since the MODEL YEAR starts the previous Sept, they would have had to be introduced in....1972! Sorry you dont understand this!!!

As for EGR Valve...
What is an EGR Valve?

"The first EGR valve was installed in cars in 1972."

EGR Valve - EGR System, EGR Valves

"The EGR valve first appeared in automobiles in 1972 to counter this phenomenon."

Possible that the CA cars i worked on were transplants. But for the record. EGR was introduced in calendar year 1972, WHEN I WAS 10 YEARS OLD and obviously a lil bit more aware than you were.
 
  #13  
Old 11-03-2011, 06:53 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Historically since the 1930's, new vehicle introductions begin in September of the previous year, so production begins in Auguat.

EGR valves introduced in all 50 state 1973 models...PERIOD!

Take a look-see in the 1964/72 Ford Truck, 1965/72 Ford & L/M Passenger Car Parts Catalogs...see how many EGR valves and related parts you can find listed. Lotsa luck, because there aren't any.
Are you dense? Look in any/all of these Ford parts catalogs for any EGR valves or related parts.
You can lead a jackass to water, but you cannot make it drink. Some people just don't get it.
 
  #14  
Old 11-03-2011, 11:03 AM
DKW 86's Avatar
DKW 86
DKW 86 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 453
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No Sir, i was speaking generically in CALENDAR YEARS. My reference to 5MPH bumpers above should have been the clue that i was not talking specifically about just the Ford F-Series. Obviously in your world you are under the delusion that Ford trucks have 5MPH bumpers on them. They do not.

The reason that i was talking in non-specific terms was because of the huge numbers of transplanted motors within the trucks owned here in the site.

Again, the Fed Govt and Specifically the state of California were mandating emissions and other things back then. The change from gross or break horsepower to net horsepower, the evaporative emissions equipment, the pcv (1967 depending on the model and where it was sold), and the egr produced and sold in 1972 on 1973 models. All of those things were mandated and can also give you clues as to what motor you might have, etc.

Our conflict was simple difference in reference to the CALENDAR years or MODEL years. Humbly apologize for not being clearer, but i thought it was really fairly obvious.
 
  #15  
Old 11-03-2011, 11:21 AM
DKW 86's Avatar
DKW 86
DKW 86 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 453
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Whoa 10 MPH bumpers? You gonna share what you been drinking with the rest of us?

Bumper Questions and Answers

<DT>
<DT>3) What are the Federal regulations for bumpers?

<DD>49 CFR Part 581, "The bumper standard," prescribes performance requirements for passenger cars in low-speed front and rear collisions. It applies to front and rear bumpers on passenger cars to prevent the damage to the car body and safety related equipment at barrier impact speeds of 2� mph across the full width and 1� mph on the corners.

<DD>This is equivalent to a 5 mph crash into a parked vehicle of the same weight. The standard requires protection in the region 16 to 20 inches above the road surface, and the manufacturer can provide the protection by any means it wants. For example, some vehicles do not have a solid bumper across the vehicle, but meet the standard by strategically placed bumper guards and corner guards.

<DT>4) Are all vehicle classes required to meet the Federal bumper standard?

<DD>No. The Federal bumper standard does not apply to vehicles other than passenger cars (i.e., sport utility vehicles (SUVs), minivans, or pickups trucks). The agency has chosen not to regulate bumper performance or elevation for these vehicle classes because of the potential compromise to the vehicle utility in operating on loading ramps and off road situations.

<DT>5) When did the bumper standard first come into effect and how has it changed over the years?

<DD>On April 9, 1971, the agency issued its first passenger car bumper standard -- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 215, "Exterior Protection," which became effective on September 1, 1972. This standard called for passenger cars, beginning with model year (MY) 1973, to withstand 5 mph front and 2 � mph rear impacts against a perpendicular barrier without damage to certain safety-related components such as headlamps and fuel systems.

<DD>In October 1972, Congress enacted the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Saving Act (MVICS Act) which mandated that the agency issue a bumper standard that yields the maximum feasible reduction of costs to the public, taking into account the cost and benefits of implementation, the standard's effect on insurance costs and legal fees, savings in consumer time and inconvenience, and health and safety considerations.

<DT>
</DT>
That is verbatim from the NHTSA website, those folks that wrote the regulations. So, if there EVER were any 10MPH bumpers they were freebies from the car companies.


OOPS! No 10 MPH Bumpers there either...
ARnews: Re: 5 mph bumpers?

The term 5 mph bumper is terribly misleading. Prior to 1973, there was
effectively no bumper standard. In 1973, the feds put in place a standard
that protected cars in 5 mph front and 2.5 mph impacts to the rear. In
74-75, the standard was changed to protect cars front and rear to 5mph.
In 76-79 a 3mph corner standard was put in place. In 80-82 the same
standards were in place, but the definition of damage changed. In 83,
the standard was rolled back to 2.5 front and rear adn 1.5 on the corner.
(see FMVSS 215 or Title 49 C.F.R 571.215)
Consumer Bumper Quality Disclosure Bill

In portions of two major pieces of federal legislation -- the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 and the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972 -- the U.S. Congress acted to protect consumers and provide information to new car buyers about crash-worthiness and repairability of cars sold in the U.S.

Acting under this direction from Congress, in 1973 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued the first bumper standards for automobiles sold in the U.S. The standard required automobiles to be capable of sustaining a 5 mile-per-hour (MPH) frontal crash and a 2.5 MPH rear crash without damage to safety systems. In 1974, the standard for rear crashes was raised to 5 MPH. Phase I of the standard was first applied to model 1979 vehicles. In Phase II, beginning with 1980 models, the bumper itself could sustain only superficial damage in a 5 MPH crash.
Sorry, no 10MPH bumper there either. Maybe you need to go search the web, or the regulations, or maybe GET A LIFE. This site was supposed to be about helping each other out, not shouting each other down. And if you must know, my father worked at/for the Ford Sheffield Casting Plant and built the casting mold sets that made the aluminum egr valve plates, although not all castings were done in Sheffield.

Now, if You or i make a mistake, wouldnt it be better to just humbly correct it rather than be a dick about it? i have been working parts for all brands on and off for 33 years. Cut my teeth in the engine rebuild business actually making them run, not just handing out parts. i have run several of the busiest repair places in the area. Even ran my own shop where i made them run not just threw parts at them. And i worked on them all, not just Fords. i bow at your knowledge base Sir, but neither you nor i hold the monoply on parts nor service info on this forum nor any other forums. You or i being right about a part or topic doesnt mean that the rest of the board are morons. It just means that we have some knowledge base on that one particular area. 33 years in parts just makes me knowledgable, not the parts buddha, nor better than anyone else because of my knowledge or their lack thereof. the same goes for anyone else on the board.

i am done here.
 
The following users liked this post:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
daveinva
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
17
11-07-2018 07:52 PM
WW2N
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
09-28-2015 04:30 PM
db9397
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
11-02-2013 06:54 PM
LARIAT 85
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
07-26-2011 11:14 AM
reed1951
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
6
10-30-2006 10:18 AM



Quick Reply: What's the hole in the intake spacer?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.