Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Escape & Escape Hybrid
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Escape & Escape Hybrid Ford Escape, Ford Escape Hybrid, Mercury Mariner, Mazda Tribute

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-23-2011, 08:15 PM
ElbowJoe ElbowJoe is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 38
ElbowJoe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Escape Alignment Controversy

I have had my '03 Ford Escape Ltd for about 11 months now and have learned a lot about this neat little truck. So far I have replaced right and left front control arms (including the ball joints), the anti-sway bar linkage on both sides, the drivers side axle hub and bearing assy and axle shaft, a tie rod end and took it in for an alignment. For the most part, I am very happy with the Escape but one thing that is proving to be a bit frustrating to me is tire wear.

I just replaced the Conti's that were on the Escape when I bought it. (From the previous owners records - it looks like they went through quite a few sets of these.)The tread was very worn on the inside of the tires that were primarily used on the front and one of the tires had severe cupping. Obviously the cupped tire was very noisy. I am well aware that these issues seem to be common on this vehicle, having researched this quite a but - but I am not finding a solid stated reason and fix for the premature tire wear condition.

My theory is that Ford designed the Escape with a camber negative condition built in to improve handling and help to prevent roll overs and that this was most likely spurred by the nasty roll over issue they had with the Explorer. I can understand this from a pure corporate liability reason but as the owner of this vehicle, I am a bit frustrated with the premature tire wear this causes. (Tires are not cheap.)

Having just spent North of $550 for a new set of Cooper Tires and hoping to get 60,000 mi out of them, I am on a mission to try to get to the bottom of this and see if others can confirm my theory. If so, I am wondering what the negative ramifications would be to purchase a camber bolt kit that will allow the front camber to be set to Zero degrees and also what measures (such as adjustable upper control arms?) would be required on the rear end to prevent the cupping that I noticed.

Would setting the front camber to Zero adversely effect the performance of the vehicle to the point of being dangerous? If not, I would prefer to maximize tire life and set it to Zero as I would with what ever condition on the rear is causing cupping.

Hopefully someone who is an expert in either the design of this vehicle or an alignment professional can provide some answers. Thank you in advance for your help!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2011, 10:59 PM
FireMe FireMe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northfield, MI
Posts: 667
FireMe has a very good reputation on FTE.FireMe has a very good reputation on FTE.FireMe has a very good reputation on FTE.FireMe has a very good reputation on FTE.
Cupping is common on rear tires of front wheel drive vehicles, regardless of make or model. The use of soft-carcassed tires, which the Continentals certainly are, only increases this tendency. The solution is to use sturdier tires, ensure that rear toe is set perfectly, and rotate the tires at no more than 10k intervals.

As for the front camber, setting it more toward positive will not do anything other than introduce torque steer. Setting it outside specs isn't necessary for good wear characteristics.

I certify a dozen or two used Escapes each month for our dealership's used car department, and it is clear that the vehicles that didn't have rotations performed as required will have the wear problems you pointed out. The others will have some minor feathering of both shoulders and will be evenly worn.

If you could provide the data from the alignment printout, we could probably provide further guidance.

Jay
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2011, 05:53 PM
ElbowJoe ElbowJoe is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 38
ElbowJoe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks Jay!! I will see if our friends at Belle Tire have the records of the alignment. They did not provide them when I picked it up and shame on me for not asking. I can see the negative camber with my eyes so it seems a bit excessive. However, let me try to get the documented results.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 05:53 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front end alignment question tonefordays 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 12 03-02-2013 08:53 AM
Will 1 degree of negative camber... vbxt Expedition & Navigator 1 07-26-2011 10:16 PM
Ford Truck alignment procedure and tips cantedvalveFord 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 0 02-19-2009 02:35 PM
72 F-100 tire wear HillbillyHellcat 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 3 05-19-2004 08:53 AM
Camber Problem with 1996 F150 2wd Leveling Springs. F150_Luvaa Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels 4 04-06-2002 09:59 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Escape & Escape Hybrid

Tags
2001, 2009, alignment, camber, connect, escape, excess, excessive, ford, front, negative, premature, tire, transit, wear

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup