Offenhauser heating plate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #76  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:35 AM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone ever tried or thought of using an electric heater? One of the stick on silicone heaters? I think the right company could make one tailored to our needs. Their cheap enough you could keep a couple in your glove box for backup If one would fail. (Just a thought )

Tom
 
  #77  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:10 AM
1986F150six's Avatar
1986F150six
1986F150six is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sheffield, AL
Posts: 6,477
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
I believe AbandonedBronco investigated this some time ago. The biggest problem is the amount of current needed to supply the necessary watts/BTUs of heat required.


I found another discussion: [see attached link]


https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...-new-idea.html
 
  #78  
Old 02-27-2015, 08:20 AM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
The biggest issue that I kept getting told by the companies I contacted was how long it takes for them to heat up. They aren't a quick fire setup, and can take a good 30 - 45 minutes to come up to temp. WAY past the usable average time one would need them in.

I'd still be interested in looking into the idea from other perspectives, like maybe a coffee pot coil or something, but once I finally figured out a way to attach coolant hoses to mine (I bought my intake used and the P.O. welded a plate onto the bottom of it to "cap it off"), I kinda stopped pursuing the idea. I'd be curious what someone else would come up with.
 
  #79  
Old 02-27-2015, 09:49 AM
TheDudeAbides's Avatar
TheDudeAbides
TheDudeAbides is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
i forget AB...was the entire cavity filled in was it just capped off? if its just capped off, i can shave it back off of there with a vertical mill at work. wouldnt take long. just a thought. then you could bypass the coffee coil/PFM/unicorn tears contraption brainstorm altogether lol.
 
  #80  
Old 02-27-2015, 10:42 AM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...t-finally.html

Here's a writeup I did when I finally got it working.
 
  #81  
Old 02-27-2015, 11:23 AM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just talked to offenhauser about the casting. They gravity test all manifolds with water NOT pressure test. That is the only reason why they put the new casting "not for use with water heat plate". If someone was to put a water heat plate on it, under pressure, offenhauser is not responsible for failures. I didn't ask what they do for v-8 manifolds, that wasn't really my concern.

Tom
 
  #82  
Old 02-27-2015, 11:35 AM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as the electric heat goes, I'm really thinking that the manifold, being aluminum, would absorb the heat rather well.? If it was set to say 180 degrees? Just flip a switch and a couple minutes it would be warm enough to run? just my thoughts.

Tom
 
  #83  
Old 02-27-2015, 11:56 AM
The Frenchtown Flyer's Avatar
The Frenchtown Flyer
The Frenchtown Flyer is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,638
Received 61 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by rbtom
... I'm really thinking that the manifold, being aluminum, would absorb the heat rather well...
Tom
By the same token, wouldn't it "give off" heat to the vaporized fuel, quickly cooling back down?

The best application for electric heat would be as a preheater(110 volt), making initial start ups quicker and initial driveaway surer.
 
  #84  
Old 02-27-2015, 04:23 PM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My opinion, the water heat would be best. Provide a stable environment, heated and cooled.

Tom
 
  #85  
Old 02-27-2015, 05:09 PM
The Frenchtown Flyer's Avatar
The Frenchtown Flyer
The Frenchtown Flyer is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,638
Received 61 Likes on 49 Posts
I think so too, except for the short time after startup where it takes time for the coolant to start to warm significantly, whereas if it is exhaust heated the heat source is there virtually instantly.

The downside to exhaust heat is, as you alluded to, it can supply too much heat leading to carb vapor lock and associated problems. Hence the existence of the bimetal controlled "flapper valve" in the exhaust manifold.

Like most things, everything's a trade-off.
 
  #86  
Old 02-27-2015, 07:18 PM
TheDudeAbides's Avatar
TheDudeAbides
TheDudeAbides is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
i have an idea derived from a temperature transfer device used on many military helicopters. granted, they burn jp8, jp4, 100LL, AVGAS, etc....but i'd think the theory still applies.
it basically has two liquid coils packed pretty tight together on one apparatus. plumbing nipple provisions for an inlet and outlet of both oil and the fuel. it allows the exchange of heat from the oil after it has passed thru numerous turbine bearings, transferring it to the fuel to allow for better atomization once it enters the combustion chamber at the multiple nozzles fixed to the behemoth.

Figure 3-11. *Turbine Engine Fuel/Oil Heat Exchanger Cooler

not exactly the design on a 714 honeywell...but you get the idea.
might be better on high fuel pressure applications...but it might help someone, who knows?
 
  #87  
Old 02-28-2015, 09:04 AM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a bolt on heat exchanger? And just plumb water to it?

Tom
 
  #88  
Old 02-28-2015, 09:21 AM
TheDudeAbides's Avatar
TheDudeAbides
TheDudeAbides is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
yep it is a heat exchanger. we call it a liquid to liquid cooler. six in one hand, half dozen in the other.
being the flashpoint of pump gas is pretty different to diesel, i'm not sure how viable an option this could be. fuel system would probably need to be pressurized by means of valves/restrictions to avoid potential boiling. its very similar to the heater plate that a lot of us use...just a different take on it. a fella could plumb for coolant, or even oil by way of additional plumbing via remote oil filter kit w/ an outlet back into the valve cover cap.
 
  #89  
Old 02-28-2015, 11:23 AM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
I have seen a photo of one plate made with copper tubing tapping into the exhaust. I read somewhere that Clifford used to sell kits for that purpose, but don't know if that is true.

Very interesting with the label on the C. I would speak to a rep. at offy.
 
  #90  
Old 03-01-2015, 08:49 AM
rbtom's Avatar
rbtom
rbtom is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: northern mn
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the heat exchanger were used it wouldn't be limited to the size of the heat plate, it could potentially be made nearly as big as you want? And just bolt it on. Maybe an inlet at the front of the intake and outlet at the back, bolted to the bottom Of the intake. Or just a few coils of copper tubing.
 


Quick Reply: Offenhauser heating plate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.