390 vs. 429/460

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-15-2011, 11:44 PM
archangel's Avatar
archangel
archangel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Joliet, Illinois
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
" Built in the same manner, with the same attention to detail and component matching, the 460 will always outpower the 390.
Well.
In favor of the FE, the low, medium, and high rise heads offered from the factory were rather sweet options, and as for the "no replacement for displacement" statement, if you got a 427 block @ a 4.23 bore and installed the 428 @ a 3.984 crank, you could get just under 450 cid with the standard bore

4.23 X 3.984 = 448
and with the recommended maximum .030 over bore gets you
4.26 X 3.984 = 454

That's only 6 cid shy of the stock 460.
4.36x3.85 = 460

Install the high rise heads, intake, and a few other go fast goodies and I think a 454 FE could give the 460 one H3LL of a run!

Stroking the 460 is another thing!
 
  #17  
Old 10-15-2011, 11:47 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by archangel
Well.
In favor of the FE, the low, medium, and high rise heads offered from the factory were rather sweet options, and as for the "no replacement for displacement" statement, if you got a 427 block @ a 4.23 bore and installed the 428 @ a 3.984 crank, you could get just under 450 cid with the standard bore

4.23 X 3.984 = 448
and with the recommended maximum .030 over bore gets you
4.26 X 3.984 = 454

That's only 6 cid shy of the stock 460.
4.36x3.85 = 460

Stroking the 460 is another thing!
All that will only cost you 4 times what the 460 cost. Not a reasonable way to go.
 
  #18  
Old 10-16-2011, 12:03 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,845
Received 1,584 Likes on 1,292 Posts
Originally Posted by archangel
Well.
In favor of the FE, the low, medium, and high rise heads offered from the factory were rather sweet options, and as for the "no replacement for displacement" statement, if you got a 427 block @ a 4.23 bore and installed the 428 @ a 3.984 crank, you could get just under 450 cid with the standard bore

4.23 X 3.984 = 448
and with the recommended maximum .030 over bore gets you
4.26 X 3.984 = 454

That's only 6 cid shy of the stock 460.
4.36x3.85 = 460

Install the high rise heads, intake, and a few other go fast goodies and I think a 454 FE could give the 460 one H3LL of a run!

Stroking the 460 is another thing!
"Built in the same manner" would not mean a custom, high performance 390 or 427--now that you're talking 4.23 bore, it's not a 390--vs. a stock 460. I can find enough stuff on line in 90 seconds to do the same things to a 460, bringing it up in true mountain motor territory, and far outpowering your examples.
 
  #19  
Old 10-19-2011, 05:18 AM
Breaker Breaker 3-3's Avatar
Breaker Breaker 3-3
Breaker Breaker 3-3 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Haiku, Hawaii
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if we're talking about 4x4 though....

and i've got an NP205 t-case...what's performing better at 0-30 mph...more torque and power?
I understand that the 460 without a doubt is gonna outrun the 390 on the highway or race settings....but whatabout street and off road??

tuning, efi and cam all the same let's just say or at least setup the engines with this in mind....
Am i missing something here or just pulling for the 390???
 
  #20  
Old 10-19-2011, 07:13 AM
archangel's Avatar
archangel
archangel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Joliet, Illinois
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
"Built in the same manner" would not mean a custom, high performance 390 or 427--now that you're talking 4.23 bore, it's not a 390--vs. a stock 460. I can find enough stuff on line in 90 seconds to do the same things to a 460, bringing it up in true mountain motor territory, and far outpowering your examples.
The FE series engines were around winning races long before your 460 was even in it's diapers!

Have some respect for your elders!

Don't make grandpa go get his walker and run your toe over!
 
  #21  
Old 10-19-2011, 07:53 AM
79superduty's Avatar
79superduty
79superduty is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1968--428 cobra jet 335hp. 440 tq. 1969--429cobra jet 365 hp. 450 tq.
 
  #22  
Old 10-19-2011, 08:57 AM
kenjh's Avatar
kenjh
kenjh is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: victoria
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
never believe all you read..
 
  #23  
Old 10-19-2011, 09:43 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,845
Received 1,584 Likes on 1,292 Posts
Originally Posted by archangel
The FE series engines were around winning races long before your 460 was even in it's diapers!

Have some respect for your elders!

Don't make grandpa go get his walker and run your toe over!
If you want to compare Hi Riser drag motors or Le Mans motors to low compression pillow barge 460s, go ahead.

As for low end and drivability, again, if you build both engines the same way, the 460 has more low end and both drive just fine.
 
  #24  
Old 10-19-2011, 04:26 PM
Sleepy445FE's Avatar
Sleepy445FE
Sleepy445FE is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Axtell, TX
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Breaker Breaker 3-3
if we're talking about 4x4 though....

and i've got an NP205 t-case...what's performing better at 0-30 mph...more torque and power?
I understand that the 460 without a doubt is gonna outrun the 390 on the highway or race settings....but whatabout street and off road??

tuning, efi and cam all the same let's just say or at least setup the engines with this in mind....
Am i missing something here or just pulling for the 390???
Really the only advantage the FE has is less weight. Like has been said, if they are built the same the 460 is always going to beat a 390 (in every way) and it's going to do it for less money.

It's not as cool though!
 
  #25  
Old 10-19-2011, 05:13 PM
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Rogue_Wulff
Rogue_Wulff is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Swapping from a 400 to either an FE or 429/460 really comes down to which parts are more easily sourced. For pre-79 trucks, the FE stuff is far more plentiful (mounts/towers/radiator&hoses/accesorries&brackets) whereas the 80+ trucks have more 460 parts available.
Some of the newer 80+ parts can be used for assisting a 460 swap into an older truck, but not all.
Of course, the 400 shares the bellhousing pattern with the 429/460, so that takes away one hurdle right off the bat.

I agree with sleepy though, the FE is cooler, even if it doesn't have quite the power potential of a well built 460.
 
  #26  
Old 10-19-2011, 07:48 PM
69cj's Avatar
69cj
69cj is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middle Tn.
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
The FE is cooler and more retro. I'm running a 428 cj in my mustang. However if not trying to stay stock or period correct the 385 block has many more options available at better prices. 460 ci. stock is much cheaper than bringing a 428 to 460 ci standards. Do the math and determine what your end goal is.
 
  #27  
Old 10-20-2011, 06:01 PM
archangel's Avatar
archangel
archangel is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Joliet, Illinois
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 69cj
The FE is cooler and more retro. I'm running a 428 cj in my mustang. However if not trying to stay stock or period correct the 385 block has many more options available at better prices. 460 ci. stock is much cheaper than bringing a 428 to 460 ci standards. Do the math and determine what your end goal is.
DUDE!! you forgot to mention that because this is the FE thread we get a 50 point lead and any other engine gets a 25 point penalty, so the FE is 75 HP ahead before the key is even turned!
 
  #28  
Old 10-20-2011, 08:24 PM
91Bronc300's Avatar
91Bronc300
91Bronc300 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kenjh
I have a 428 in my 79 bronco ,on propane

If you don't mind the thread hijack, what kind of mixer are you running on your propane 428? Just a single Impco 425?
 
  #29  
Old 10-20-2011, 08:38 PM
kenjh's Avatar
kenjh
kenjh is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: victoria
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yup just the little single right now ..but I do have a duel mixer I want to try after I get a locker for the rear ..that should find the next weak part..for the record ..I LIKE MY 428 !!! and my 7.3 diesel .and the crappy little 1600 cc in my ford Anglia was fun too..build what you want ..enjoy.. don't waste time you can play with getting annoyed with someones preference,your motor your choice ..enjoy ..I am gonna go play with my 54'flathead..all 239 cubic inches...lol...
 
  #30  
Old 10-20-2011, 08:58 PM
91Bronc300's Avatar
91Bronc300
91Bronc300 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's kind of surprise. I've got most of the stuff to do a propane conversion on a 400, but was wondering how to let that much motor breathe because I just want to use a single Impco 425 to keep things simple. Was thinking of just leaving the motor a 351M to prevent undercarburetion even though I didn't really want to do that. Your 428 feel like it runs out of air before it does cam?
 


Quick Reply: 390 vs. 429/460



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.