Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009+ F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2009+ F150 Discuss the 2009 through 2014 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-26-2011, 03:42 PM
Ford-Trucks Editors Ford-Trucks Editors is offline
Host
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 168
Ford-Trucks Editors is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Does anyone want a F-150 diesel option?

Ford's new global Ranger has two new diesel options. Could one of them show up in the F-150? Does anyone in America care?

2012 Diesel Options; New Ranger Gets Two, Could F-150 Be Next?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2011, 04:28 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro preppypyro is offline
Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon Sk.
Posts: 37,553
preppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud of
Ill take a diesel in an f150 please! I need something to replace my grand cherokee diesel when that thing needs to be replaced!
__________________
$Sheldon$
2003 F-250 supercab shortbox 4x4 lariat
~Everythings legal man as long as ya dont get caught~

A good fist fight never hurts anyone... except my opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2011, 05:25 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,306
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I think it would be a nice choice but the ecoboost is doing darned near the same work with less over all costs.

I think it will be a tough sell in great quantities.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2011, 06:26 PM
spdmpo's Avatar
spdmpo spdmpo is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 2,466
spdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to beholdspdmpo is a splendid one to behold
I wouldnt buy one. The engine option would cost too much and diesel cost is higher, maintenance is higher. With the gas engines available now I'm not sure many would bite.
__________________
Keith
"The Wicked Flee When No Man Pursueth, But The Righteous Are Bold As A Lion."
2006 F250 Lariat 6.0 CC 4x4, Gearhead Tunes (SRL+, 8K/Unlimited Tow), ARP head studs, Powermax turbo, 4" exhaust, Atlas 40, EGR delete, updated Ford oil cooler, Detroit TrueTrac, blue FPR spring, stand pipes/dummy plugs, 08 Trans Pan/Filter, STC update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2011, 07:47 PM
Chris Anchor's Avatar
Chris Anchor Chris Anchor is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cecil County, Maryland
Posts: 587
Chris Anchor is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Chris Anchor is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I would love a small block diesel. Chris
__________________
2009 F-150 XLT 4x4 5.4 Regular Cab 8' box 3.73 rear/max tow/8200 lbs GVW/built in controller-One towing/ hauling machine
2012 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost SuperCrew 6.5 box 3.31 rear A fancy Loaded Sunday go to meeting Truck-Wendy's
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2011, 08:25 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72 powerstroke72 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 23,365
powerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
I think it would be a nice choice but the ecoboost is doing darned near the same work with less over all costs.

I think it will be a tough sell in great quantities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdmpo View Post
I wouldnt buy one. The engine option would cost too much and diesel cost is higher, maintenance is higher. With the gas engines available now I'm not sure many would bite.

Agreed. The other thing to keep in mind is that these trucks are already outrageously expensive whether it's an F-150 or a Super Duty. Stick a turbo diesel in an F-150 and you're going to be getting really close to the price point of the Super Duty line. At that point, it would almost be crazy to buy the F-150 rather than a Super Duty. I think the EcoBoost was the best choice for the F-150 in terms of fuel economy and power. The torque band is huge and almost as flat as a pancake. With the EcoBoost available now, I think Ford would have difficulty arguing the value and added cost of putting a diesel in the F-150 at this point in time.

The EcoBoost is a low cost option compared to a diesel. How much would a diesel add to the price of a new F-150? As it stands now, it's a $7,835 option in the Super Duty. Even at say $5k, that's a huge chunk of change to add to the price of an F-150. Add that to an MSRP of a loaded Platinum, KR, or Lariat and you'll be in the mid $50k range at best.
__________________
John
2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 10th Anniversary Edition, Black / Black Leather
2013 Ford Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black / Black Leather
2011 F-350 4x4 Lariat Ultimate, Oxford White / Pale Adobe 6.7L PSD 3.55 ELD / Gone but not forgotten.
Moderators, Guidelines, and How They are Enforced / FTE Forum Guidelines

RIP Steve (Bricks) Price........Godspeed my good friend. RIP Paul / Hdslider.....you are truly missed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2011, 09:11 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro preppypyro is offline
Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon Sk.
Posts: 37,553
preppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud ofpreppypyro has much to be proud of
The thing I think stands out for most guys that would choose the diesel, is longevity. With the exception of the 6.0, and maybe the 6.4, the diesel engines thrown in ford trucks were known to last a long assed time!

Since we are speculation on extra costs, why not speculate the added value of a diesel engine that MAY just last twice as long?

Important to all, nope, but important to the guys that drive their trucks till there just aint nothing left to drive, you bet!

Of course longevity is just a speculation, as could many other things be, like real world towing and economy. If the diesel performed on par with almost every other diesel out there, guys that had to tow, and couldnt quite justify a superduty, would eat these trucks up!

5k difference on a brand new truck isnt the end of the world for most, and I think the diesel would sell, even if just for the fad phase of it.
__________________
$Sheldon$
2003 F-250 supercab shortbox 4x4 lariat
~Everythings legal man as long as ya dont get caught~

A good fist fight never hurts anyone... except my opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2011, 09:58 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Sure I think a diesel F-150 would be cool to see...But not really practical anymore because they would charge an arm, leg and first born child for it.

...Now on the other hand, if Ford could produce a diesel F-150 that got 25+mpg combined then yes I think it might be a viable option. But I don't really see that happening.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2011, 10:02 PM
meborder's Avatar
meborder meborder is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sioux Falls Area
Posts: 2,828
meborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud ofmeborder has much to be proud of
Ladies and Gentlemen:

I'd like to announce that we, the American public, are officially getting screwed out of a viable diesel option for the F150.

I was on the jobsite today and saw a cab-over box van with a badge that said:
"LCF
POWER STROKE 4.5L V6"

And then it had a "Woodhouse" badge underneath that indicating it was sold by Woodhouse Ford in Blair NE.

According to the Contractor this box van knocks down 20-25mpg.

Enough with the "it would cost too much to develop it" line of crap I keep hearing. Ford has it ..... and refuses to put it in a platform in which the buying masses could make good use of it. The public wants it, and Ford has it .... what's the friggin problem here?

If this powerstroke v6 can get that kind of mileage in a 11ft tall cab-over box van, immagine what it could do for us in a pickup.

To me this is just another case of the big three only offering us what they think we need and the bare minimums of what they can get away with from a CAFE standards standpoint.

excited to see that they have such an animal, but irritated to see that they refuse to offer it to the public.
__________________
Mike
2004 F250 SD SCREW; V10, 4R100, 3.73's -- 2006 Expedition XLT; 5.4 V8, 4R75 3.73's -- 1979 F350 Trailer Special; 460, C6, 4.10's
Moderation Guidelines and how they are enforced
Be yourself - Always ... Unless you can be Batman, then Always be Batman
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2011, 10:37 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72 powerstroke72 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 23,365
powerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputationpowerstroke72 has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by meborder View Post
Ford has it ..... and refuses to put it in a platform in which the buying masses could make good use of it. The public wants it, and Ford has it .... what's the friggin problem here?
Actually Ford doesn't have it. Navistar / International does / did. It was basically a 6.0L with two cylinders chopped off. It was rated at 200 HP and 440 lb./ft. of torque in the LCF and was also marketed as the MaxxForce 5 by Navistar after the 2007 emissions update. It was rumored to be going in the F-150 and it was being developed for many applications. When Ford was considering fitting a diesel in the F-150 after the Navistar debacle that ended their relationship, it was to be a 4.4L V8 that ultimately landed in the Land Rover. It was going to be built at the Chihuahua Engine Plant in Mexico when it was destined for the F-150. Not sure if that's where they're building it for the Rover.

The 4.5 Powerstroke was discontinued as of 2010. I know that Mark Kovalsky said that he was there on the development of the program on the 4.5 and when they tried to make it meet emissions required for the F-150, it would barely run and had 0-60 times of approximately 25 seconds. Here's a link to that thread:http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/72...5l-diesel.html

Considering how Ford and Navistar ended their relationship, I wouldn't look for this 4.5 engine to go into the F-150 in our lifetime.
__________________
John
2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon 10th Anniversary Edition, Black / Black Leather
2013 Ford Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black / Black Leather
2011 F-350 4x4 Lariat Ultimate, Oxford White / Pale Adobe 6.7L PSD 3.55 ELD / Gone but not forgotten.
Moderators, Guidelines, and How They are Enforced / FTE Forum Guidelines

RIP Steve (Bricks) Price........Godspeed my good friend. RIP Paul / Hdslider.....you are truly missed.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-26-2011, 11:10 PM
dilas dilas is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 382
dilas is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would if it gives us at upper 20's or lower 30's in MPG range. The 3.2 diesel is being sold on Ranger overseas.
__________________

2007 F150 Supercrew Lariat 4x4 5.4L
Michelin LTX AT2

2002 F150 Supercrew Lariat FX4 - Traded 6/11
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-27-2011, 12:30 AM
Grodyman Grodyman is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 62
Grodyman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Absolutely not. Maybe in 10-20 years when they figure out how to make these things less complicated, more reliable, less expensive, and more practical.

Gman
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-27-2011, 05:41 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,306
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Not all is lost gentlemen. I just got my truck trend last night.

The USPS has contracted with Navistar to back fit the small mail trucks with a 3.2L diesel. According to the article, this is a Navistar / Mahindra joint venture.

Most of the USPS LLV's, (long life vehicles) are plain wore out. The powers that be and we're speaking of our government here, seem to think that back fitting a vehicle with an unproven diesel wil be cheaper than replacing the whole damned truck.

I can't wait to see this abortion unfold.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-27-2011, 12:33 PM
peety37 peety37 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 22
peety37 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I for one would love to see a small 4 cyl diesel, 250+hp with a 6 or 8 speed manual transmisson. They would have plenty of working power and get great mileage. If you want a truck to tow, haul or, work, this would be perfect. If you want to do the same but tow at 70+mph then go EB.

I had a 73 F100 with a 240 I-6, 3sp on the coloum. If you could tie it to it, it would move it, you just didn't do it fast. So I think we could do the same with a small diesel and alot of shifting and gearing NO AUTOMATIC
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-27-2011, 09:03 PM
Hybris's Avatar
Hybris Hybris is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Olathe
Posts: 2,035
Hybris is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Hybris is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I would want it but Ford will have to get the pricing situation under control.

I can understand charging more early on to cover R&D costs but when I could almost buy a Chevy Aveo outright for the price of Powerstroke it no wonder that diesel engines are a hard sell in the US because they are so expensive.

I will state now though I am aware that all the EPA requirements don't help things either.

All that said if Ford were really wanting to get me in a 1/2 ton diesel I would like to see the 6.7L in the F150 not just because of the power to weight ratio it would have but all so getting parts for it would be simpler down the road after the truck has aged some.
__________________
1999 F-150 XL 5.4, Auto, 4x4, 8ft bed, ~171750 miles Mods: K&N high flow filter, 2" suspension lift, and Moog Sway Bar Links and Sway Bar Frame Bushings. Aries Brush Guard
KS Chapter - Jared
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 09:03 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009+ F150

Tags
07, 32l, 45, diesel, diesel options, engine, f-150, f150, ford, halfton, llv, mahindra, mail, navistar, trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup