Gear ratio with 3.5L Ecoboost - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150

Gear ratio with 3.5L Ecoboost

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-19-2011, 10:52 PM
boss1982 boss1982 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25
boss1982 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Gear ratio with 3.5L Ecoboost

I'm looking into buying an F150 with a 3.5 Ecoboost. It list a 3.15 ratio rearend. I have a 6000 lb trailer to pull. After comparing the different engines I noticed the 3.7L FFV and the 5.0L come with either a 3.55 or 3.73 rearend. Will the ecoboost with the 3.15 gear ratio be sufficient to pull the trailer or would it be better to have the 3.55 or 3.73?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2011, 11:00 PM
MCDavis's Avatar
MCDavis MCDavis is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RVA
Posts: 10,320
MCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputation
1st gear on the 6spd trans is pretty low. With a 6k lbs trailer in tow, you should be fine with the 3.15 gear. You could benefit a little from the 3.31, 3.55, and especially the 3.73, but the 3.15 will get the job done. Plus when you're not pulling, the 3.15 should return the best efficiency of all the gear choices.
IIRC you can have the EB with either of the 4 gearing options, but that depends on whether or not you're looking at 2wd or 4wd configs...which you did not mention. From the specs list, the 3.15 is only available with the 2wd config.
http://www.ford-trucks.com/specs/201...d-f-150-1.html
To each their own, but you'd be fine with the 3.15 and the EB.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2011, 11:30 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 23,562
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
The lower the mechanical advantage in the drive axle the more load the transmission has to take, and considering what it costs to rebuild a modern automatic transmission I think that's a really bad tradeoff to make if you plan on using the vehicle for heavy hauling.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2011, 12:26 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx AlaskanEx is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 11,841
AlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputation
personally and maybe its an old mind set. but the lower the better...meaning if i was to buy i'd have the 3:73s.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2011, 06:36 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by boss1982 View Post
I'm looking into buying an F150 with a 3.5 Ecoboost. It list a 3.15 ratio rearend. I have a 6000 lb trailer to pull. After comparing the different engines I noticed the 3.7L FFV and the 5.0L come with either a 3.55 or 3.73 rearend. Will the ecoboost with the 3.15 gear ratio be sufficient to pull the trailer or would it be better to have the 3.55 or 3.73?



This thread that I copied came from another thread in this forum, "anyone working their Ecoboost"? Check it out, it's a good read.

Quote:
Originally Posted by todd230
I look at longevity in terms of moving parts and how fast are those moving parts rotating. My ecoboost has 3.15 gears and even under spirited driving I rarely need to rev it past 3K RPMs because of the power curve. Any of the V8s are turning many more RPMs than this little 3.5 liter V6 which has less moving parts (2 less pistons) that have to change direction instantaneously every RPM. I would guess that an Ecoboost truck would have to average at least 1000 RPM less than any of the V8s and maybe more. Multiply that by 150,000 miles and think about surface wear. Friction and rotating mass are the enemy of rings and bearings. One might argue that the Turbos are spinning at insane speeds - but that is what they are designed to do, these have oil cooling, and Turbos have run well past 150,000 miles in many applications. Changing one would probably be an afternoon in the garage. I like my chances of getting 150,000 miles + out of this engine over any of the v8s.

I had a 99 7.3 liter SD that was a great truck - 210,000 miles when I sold it and it was all original except for batteries and a few misc parts. Great truck - I think RPM and maintenance are the key to engine longevity (regardless of fuel). Compression of a diesel is much higher than one of these 12 lb boosted trucks so if Ford did their homework and uses proper bearings on the rods and crank we should all be enjoying these for a long time.
I agree completely, however, comparing the ecoboost with 3.15's to a 5.0 with 3.55's is not completely fair. the eco with 3.15's tow rating is not that impressive and most people who are working these hard have the 3.55's or 3.73's, which is the same as the v8.

so yea, some less rotating mass by way of 6 holes vs 8 .... but comparing the two with the same gears, they will wear the same (some less potential for cylinder wear and oil consumption by way of less swept area in the cylinders again, 6 holes not 8). the difference then becomes how many "parts" are contained in each package that could need service.

the v8 has "X" amount of parts. the v6 has "X-2" (6 holes not 8) parts plus two turbo's. Leaving about the same number of "parts" .... but those turbos, if they ever need servicing, could be very costly.

I'd go out on a limb and guess that of all the "parts" on an ecoboost, the turbos are the most likely to give problems if subject to harsh use or abuse.

What worries me is a guy could buy a used ecoboost for 25K with 40K miles on it a year from now, and then get soaked with a 5k repair bill for turbos that are out of the 3/36 warranty (or whatever the numbers may be for the powertrain warranty ford provides on these)

at that point you'd wish you would have just bought a new one cauz you are in just as deep....

that's my big worry ... what are the used ones going to be like in a year, or two, or five, or ten .... I can't afford a new one, so if i get one it will be used .... and it wont have 3.15 gears, either.... i'm just sayin ...
__________________
Work Horses:
2004 F250 SD SCREW; V10, Auto, 3.73's
2000 Explorer XLT; 5.0 V8, 4R70W, 3.73's
1979 F350 Camper Special; 460, C6, 4.10's

#77 (permalink)
08-17-2011, 01:29 AM
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2011, 11:31 PM
tvsjr tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.
I'm not sure I'd be terribly worried about the turbo cost. You can buy either one of them from Tasca for less than $600.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2015, 03:10 PM
Ecoboost lover Ecoboost lover is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1
Ecoboost lover is starting off with a positive reputation.
Guess you dont know much

The ecoboost turbos are very tuff and of there was a flaw in the turbo it would show up way before warranty is over. And if your not cheap Ford sells extendered warranty to 150 k so Im sure the turbos will be fine. I drive mine hard and it runs great it one of the best trucks iv ever owned
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2015, 01:07 AM
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium PrinceValium is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,918
PrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to all
Besides if the turbos fail....you can buy the stock turbos that have been "BEEFED UP" for about $1300 and they will flow MUCH better!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-24-2015, 11:01 PM
Truckpilot1329 Truckpilot1329 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 158
Truckpilot1329 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Truckpilot1329 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Do diesel owners, or prospective owners worry about their turbos failing, as much
as guys on the 150 forum?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-25-2015, 05:30 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckpilot1329 View Post
Do diesel owners, or prospective owners worry about their turbos failing, as much
as guys on the 150 forum?
I certainly hope not. If so, Ford's superduty line of trucks would hardly ever sell.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-25-2015, 05:30 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckpilot1329 View Post
Do diesel owners, or prospective owners worry about their turbos failing, as much
as guys on the 150 forum?
I certainly hope not. If so, Ford's superduty line of trucks would hardly ever sell.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-25-2015, 05:30 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckpilot1329 View Post
Do diesel owners, or prospective owners worry about their turbos failing, as much
as guys on the 150 forum?
Duplicate post.

Last edited by tseekins; 03-25-2015 at 05:31 AM. Reason: Duplicated.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-25-2015, 08:07 AM
Robbgt's Avatar
Robbgt Robbgt is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,232
Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.
As mentioned, 1st gear is much lower on the 6R80 trans, so the rear gear ratio isn't the limiting factor that it used to be.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-25-2015, 09:56 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250 seventyseven250 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 4,793
seventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud of
That chart also explains why guys like me do fine towing with a 3.31 axle, which would have been awful with the previous 4-speed transmissions.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ordering a 2016, what rear end? ClarkM 2015+ F150 15 03-17-2016 11:05 PM
Changing rear end axle ratio AlAbramson Flatbed, Car, Boat, Utility, Horse & Misc. Trailer Towing 10 09-23-2015 05:58 PM
2013 EcoBoost with 3.15 gear. Is it enough to tow a 5k pound trailer 6 days a week jasper7821 2009 - 2014 F150 71 10-11-2013 10:00 AM
3.15 vs 3.55 Axle Ratio cschannuth 2009 - 2014 F150 20 12-27-2012 07:57 PM
Towing with Ecoboost 3.5 eaglebqh 2009 - 2014 F150 43 09-20-2011 07:13 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
2011, 315, 355, 35l, 373, boost, eco, ecoboost, f150, gear, pull, ratio, ratios, recalls, transmission, truck, v6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.