Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009 - 2014 F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-19-2011, 10:52 PM
boss1982 boss1982 is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25
boss1982 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Gear ratio with 3.5L Ecoboost

I'm looking into buying an F150 with a 3.5 Ecoboost. It list a 3.15 ratio rearend. I have a 6000 lb trailer to pull. After comparing the different engines I noticed the 3.7L FFV and the 5.0L come with either a 3.55 or 3.73 rearend. Will the ecoboost with the 3.15 gear ratio be sufficient to pull the trailer or would it be better to have the 3.55 or 3.73?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2011, 11:00 PM
MCDavis's Avatar
MCDavis MCDavis is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,781
MCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputation
1st gear on the 6spd trans is pretty low. With a 6k lbs trailer in tow, you should be fine with the 3.15 gear. You could benefit a little from the 3.31, 3.55, and especially the 3.73, but the 3.15 will get the job done. Plus when you're not pulling, the 3.15 should return the best efficiency of all the gear choices.
IIRC you can have the EB with either of the 4 gearing options, but that depends on whether or not you're looking at 2wd or 4wd configs...which you did not mention. From the specs list, the 3.15 is only available with the 2wd config.
http://www.ford-trucks.com/specs/201...d-f-150-1.html
To each their own, but you'd be fine with the 3.15 and the EB.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2011, 11:30 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,722
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
The lower the mechanical advantage in the drive axle the more load the transmission has to take, and considering what it costs to rebuild a modern automatic transmission I think that's a really bad tradeoff to make if you plan on using the vehicle for heavy hauling.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2011, 12:26 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx AlaskanEx is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 9,586
AlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputation
personally and maybe its an old mind set. but the lower the better...meaning if i was to buy i'd have the 3:73s.
__________________
Russ-
2011 F-150 Limited #3679 6.2 V8 4x4, Retrax bed cover, Husky mud flaps and wheel liners, HIDs, 35% tint
2002 Excursion Limited V10 4x4, 2.5/2" lift, HIDs,LEDs,20" DC wheels
1998 Expedition XLT 5.4 4x4,HIDs,16x8 ultra wheels,LEDs, HIDs
1991 F-250 lairat 4x4 5.0, 7'6" BOSS snow plow, Back Rack, Strobes, Work lights
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2011, 06:36 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 20,075
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by boss1982 View Post
I'm looking into buying an F150 with a 3.5 Ecoboost. It list a 3.15 ratio rearend. I have a 6000 lb trailer to pull. After comparing the different engines I noticed the 3.7L FFV and the 5.0L come with either a 3.55 or 3.73 rearend. Will the ecoboost with the 3.15 gear ratio be sufficient to pull the trailer or would it be better to have the 3.55 or 3.73?



This thread that I copied came from another thread in this forum, "anyone working their Ecoboost"? Check it out, it's a good read.

Quote:
Originally Posted by todd230
I look at longevity in terms of moving parts and how fast are those moving parts rotating. My ecoboost has 3.15 gears and even under spirited driving I rarely need to rev it past 3K RPMs because of the power curve. Any of the V8s are turning many more RPMs than this little 3.5 liter V6 which has less moving parts (2 less pistons) that have to change direction instantaneously every RPM. I would guess that an Ecoboost truck would have to average at least 1000 RPM less than any of the V8s and maybe more. Multiply that by 150,000 miles and think about surface wear. Friction and rotating mass are the enemy of rings and bearings. One might argue that the Turbos are spinning at insane speeds - but that is what they are designed to do, these have oil cooling, and Turbos have run well past 150,000 miles in many applications. Changing one would probably be an afternoon in the garage. I like my chances of getting 150,000 miles + out of this engine over any of the v8s.

I had a 99 7.3 liter SD that was a great truck - 210,000 miles when I sold it and it was all original except for batteries and a few misc parts. Great truck - I think RPM and maintenance are the key to engine longevity (regardless of fuel). Compression of a diesel is much higher than one of these 12 lb boosted trucks so if Ford did their homework and uses proper bearings on the rods and crank we should all be enjoying these for a long time.
I agree completely, however, comparing the ecoboost with 3.15's to a 5.0 with 3.55's is not completely fair. the eco with 3.15's tow rating is not that impressive and most people who are working these hard have the 3.55's or 3.73's, which is the same as the v8.

so yea, some less rotating mass by way of 6 holes vs 8 .... but comparing the two with the same gears, they will wear the same (some less potential for cylinder wear and oil consumption by way of less swept area in the cylinders again, 6 holes not 8). the difference then becomes how many "parts" are contained in each package that could need service.

the v8 has "X" amount of parts. the v6 has "X-2" (6 holes not 8) parts plus two turbo's. Leaving about the same number of "parts" .... but those turbos, if they ever need servicing, could be very costly.

I'd go out on a limb and guess that of all the "parts" on an ecoboost, the turbos are the most likely to give problems if subject to harsh use or abuse.

What worries me is a guy could buy a used ecoboost for 25K with 40K miles on it a year from now, and then get soaked with a 5k repair bill for turbos that are out of the 3/36 warranty (or whatever the numbers may be for the powertrain warranty ford provides on these)

at that point you'd wish you would have just bought a new one cauz you are in just as deep....

that's my big worry ... what are the used ones going to be like in a year, or two, or five, or ten .... I can't afford a new one, so if i get one it will be used .... and it wont have 3.15 gears, either.... i'm just sayin ...
__________________
Work Horses:
2004 F250 SD SCREW; V10, Auto, 3.73's
2000 Explorer XLT; 5.0 V8, 4R70W, 3.73's
1979 F350 Camper Special; 460, C6, 4.10's

#77 (permalink)
08-17-2011, 01:29 AM
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2011, 11:31 PM
tvsjr tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,974
tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.
I'm not sure I'd be terribly worried about the turbo cost. You can buy either one of them from Tasca for less than $600.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2011, 11:31 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 EcoBoost with 3.15 gear. Is it enough to tow a 5k pound trailer 6 days a week jasper7821 2009 - 2014 F150 71 10-11-2013 10:00 AM
Ecoboost rear end gears whitetail 2009 - 2014 F150 5 05-08-2013 05:06 PM
3.15 vs 3.55 Axle Ratio cschannuth 2009 - 2014 F150 20 12-27-2012 07:57 PM
Need advice michaeloac 2009 - 2014 F150 12 02-02-2012 04:07 PM
Towing with Ecoboost 3.5 eaglebqh 2009 - 2014 F150 43 09-20-2011 07:13 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009 - 2014 F150

Tags
2011, 315, 355, 35l, 373, boost, eco, ecoboost, f150, gear, pull, ratio, ratios, recalls, transmission, truck, v6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup