1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TORQUE VALUE--WHEEL BEARING STUDS

  #1  
Old 08-11-2011, 08:00 AM
Rongold's Avatar
Rongold
Rongold is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Putnam Valley, New York
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
TORQUE VALUE--WHEEL BEARING STUDS

I am starting my ball joint replacement on my 2003 F-250 4WD. I was checking some torque values in the Ford shop manual, and there is some conflicting info. In the torque chart it says that the nuts on the 4 wheel bearing studs get tightened to 55 foot pounds, but in one of the pictures, the value is given as 133 foot pounds. I checked my Ford DVD, and it's the same in there-2 different values. I know that those studs are decent size, but can the threads take 133 foot pounds ???


RON
 
  #2  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:01 AM
ak-angler's Avatar
ak-angler
ak-angler is offline
Tuned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somewhere in Alaska
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
133 seems really high. I don't remember... Is that a 1/2-inch stud, or is it bigger than that?
 
  #3  
Old 08-11-2011, 01:33 PM
Rongold's Avatar
Rongold
Rongold is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Putnam Valley, New York
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ak-angler
133 seems really high. I don't remember... Is that a 1/2-inch stud, or is it bigger than that?
I don't think it's that big--it's metric and maybe it's a 10 mm stud---that's about a 7/16" in standard size---I think 133 foot pounds is too much for that.


RON
 
  #4  
Old 08-11-2011, 01:42 PM
Rongold's Avatar
Rongold
Rongold is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Putnam Valley, New York
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
BALL JOINT JOB

Well, I've been banging my left front rotor for 5 hours now, and it has moved out about an inch. There is so much rust built up inside the rotor hat, that it won't move. I've used a full can of Kroil and a half a can of PB Blaster on it so far. I'm using a 2 pound ball peen hammer. I have a 2" pile of rust chunks on the ground already. I own an auto repair shop, and I have never come across one that is stuck this bad. One of the techs from the Ford dealer across the street stopped by, and he says that he usually smacks it until it breaks into 2 pieces. He told me to get a bigger FH. I'll get one tomorrow. My right hand has 3 blisters on it already. I'm worried that I am going to destroy the wheel bearing assembly with all the banging. I don't care about the rotor--I have new ones.


RON
 
  #5  
Old 08-11-2011, 02:13 PM
GUNNERDOG's Avatar
GUNNERDOG
GUNNERDOG is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
i have found that a 4lb hammer is just the right weight...

keep at it, she'll come loose.

I think i tightened to 55lbs when i did my ball joints last year. Wheels haven't fallen off yet!
 
  #6  
Old 08-11-2011, 02:18 PM
ak-angler's Avatar
ak-angler
ak-angler is offline
Tuned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somewhere in Alaska
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
I can't imagine putting 133 ft-lbs on a 10mm bolt, unless it's made of some pretty special material. I think the 55 ft-lb spec is more in line with what a 10mm bolt can take. Here's a couple of general torque tables by bolt size. 133 ft-lbs would get you up into the 14mm size range.

Of course, you can always follow the advice my dad gave me. "Just tighten it 'till the head breaks off and loosen it up a half a turn." But, my experience indicates that that may have been pretty poor advice.
 
  #7  
Old 01-15-2012, 10:23 AM
X11B1P-NH's Avatar
X11B1P-NH
X11B1P-NH is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque

I like your dad, thats pretty good advise and it made me laugh. i had the opposite feeling about the 55 FT LBS. i kind of thought that it was a very low number. you are suppose to torque the caliper assembly to 135ish and the lug nuts to 160 but the wheel bearing is only 55.... it just seemed strange to me that what holds the wheel on is lower than the wheel.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rongold
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
11
08-13-2011 04:45 PM
'86_150
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
09-02-2009 12:26 PM
steddy
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
6
06-04-2006 01:03 PM
minaz
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
25
01-31-2004 05:04 PM
karljay
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
07-15-2002 11:23 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: TORQUE VALUE--WHEEL BEARING STUDS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.