How many mpg will a 435 save over a C6? - Page 2 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Log In 


1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck

How many mpg will a 435 save over a C6?

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16  
Old 12-29-2012, 05:07 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390 Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,825
Bullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant future
joshjones.thewelder
Good to know... I felt the same way with mine, the mpg was the same between the C6 and T19

Josh
__________________


2016 F150 Lariat Screw 4X4 5.0 Coyote V8 Blue Jean Metallic Two Tone Ford VCM II IDS Clone Custom Y-Pipe FabricationDASHBOSS
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-29-2012, 06:55 PM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen Ken Blythen is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,081
Ken Blythen has a very good reputation on FTE.Ken Blythen has a very good reputation on FTE.Ken Blythen has a very good reputation on FTE.
Running empty @ 55mph, I gained 1-1.5 mpg (hilly area & 351w), but I think the gain would be more on towing.
There was a noticeable power gain though.......more proportionally, than the fuel saving.

A few months later I swapped the NP435 for a close ratio T19.
Night & day driving difference, due to both the ratios themselves, & the reduced gaps between - also a short-throw shift into 1st, unlike the T18 & NP435.
__________________
1983 F250 XLT 2WD, 351W, T19, 3.54 Dana 60
1942 GMC 6x4
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-30-2012, 10:55 AM
tbear853's Avatar
tbear853 tbear853 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 2,129
tbear853 has a good reputation on FTE.tbear853 has a good reputation on FTE.tbear853 has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nothercrash View Post
I've actually always wondered what driving in only front wheel drive would do to performance and mileage. You can do it if you twin stick the T case. With our knobby tires, and the crazy resistance these trucks put up to moving, ...etc...
NO difference, you'ld still be turning all the same parts and same tires carrying same loads with same flexing and same power needed.
Only by eliminating the turning of parts do you save, hence using 2 HI with unlocked hubs that then let front axles, front differential, front driveshaft stay still or just loaf along with minimal windage as some will do with thick grease in the transfer case. They do so at the equilibrium point where the windage of lube in the case spinning the gears creates enough force to turn the front drivetrain agaisnt frictional losses and the lube in the front differential.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ford390gashog View Post
If you are losing 500 to the converter then its bad!!! The more realistic number is about 230-320 rpms ( That is from Dave at Hughes ) consider one of their Fuel Miser conveters!! I really enjoy mine over the sloppy stock converter!! really brought the truck to life with the 1200 rpm stall and dropped the rpms at 55 mph about 200 !! Well worth the 220.00 cost of the unit and my trans temp is down over 20 degrees on the highway which is a huge help!!
Agree, 500 rpm loss to a factory convereter is way excessive at road speed. If what he's doing is power on and then power off and seeing a 500 rpm drop .... still seems high but near half of that change is in coast and is an rpm somewhat less than would show with a locked TC or clutch.

Fuel Miser converters huh? Might look into them myself when the 400 goes in.
__________________
There's 2007 and there's 1977...
...
two good years for trucks ...



...
and whatever you do, Have a Safe Trip!
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1975 F250 460 to Np435 1975-F250-4X4 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 9 04-10-2016 09:34 PM
Steering column NP435 T_Cooksey88 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 03-17-2016 11:23 AM
MPG's Spoonman75 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 26 11-29-2015 05:30 PM
NP435 or ZF5 in a 78-79 Bronco ManfredVonRichtofen 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 6 09-16-2013 05:40 PM
SMOD and NP435 swap flyhound Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case 5 12-15-2003 12:21 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
1947, 1972, 2007, c6, custom, diesel, ford, gallon, international, miles, mpg, spotter, t19, truck, vans

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.

 

Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup