rockers vs cam
#1
rockers vs cam
i have a 302 in my 95 f150 and on a tight budget and was given some good advice about which cam to use the Compcams 35-512-8 and running 1.7 roller rockers i am wondering what kind of hp increase i can exspect from each addition. im on kind of a tight budget so looking to get the most bang for the buck.
#2
#3
#4
the cam in your 95 is a decent cam,1.7 rockers will help open it up more,as will headers and complete exhaust. I put the 1.7 rockers and long tube headers on my 95 5.0,it woke it up quite a bit,still need to do a gear swap to get in engines optimum rpm range,but thinking of a 5.8 swap,so gears are going to wait for awhile.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
a) 1.7 rockers with the stock cam will produce pretty much the same results as the 35-512-8 with the stock(1.6) rockers.
b) 1.7 rocker and the 35-512-8 may produce more valve lift than the heads can handle
#6
thank you. i never got to get much done on that truck as it got totaled out but i bought a 96 with the 5.8 and i pulled with it for the first time yesterday and wow what a difference over pullin with the 302 in my 95. and im guessing that the rockers or cam along with the exhaust will be the same as what i was wanting to do to my 302.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cchimuk
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
02-23-2013 03:33 AM
BURNSTOUGHFORD
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
07-19-2012 05:57 AM
reed1951
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
16
03-06-2008 07:17 PM