Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

rockers vs cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-26-2011, 09:13 PM
deljac's Avatar
deljac
deljac is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
rockers vs cam

i have a 302 in my 95 f150 and on a tight budget and was given some good advice about which cam to use the Compcams 35-512-8 and running 1.7 roller rockers i am wondering what kind of hp increase i can exspect from each addition. im on kind of a tight budget so looking to get the most bang for the buck.
 
  #2  
Old 10-22-2011, 03:20 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,043
Received 122 Likes on 103 Posts
you need to address the horrible heads that came on the truck, in addition to a cam, if you want to get any power from that 302. dont expect much from doing one or the other, but together it wakes up the motor quite a bit.
 
  #3  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:51 PM
Edgethis's Avatar
Edgethis
Edgethis is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tobyhanma, PA
Posts: 6,303
Received 378 Likes on 284 Posts
If you want bang for buck, do headers and a custom Y-pipe then new exhaust. If you've already done that then I'd say go for the cam. Rockers are super easy to swap down the road.
 
  #4  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:32 PM
cjben's Avatar
cjben
cjben is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the cam in your 95 is a decent cam,1.7 rockers will help open it up more,as will headers and complete exhaust. I put the 1.7 rockers and long tube headers on my 95 5.0,it woke it up quite a bit,still need to do a gear swap to get in engines optimum rpm range,but thinking of a 5.8 swap,so gears are going to wait for awhile.
 
  #5  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:30 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by deljac
was given some good advice about which cam to use the Compcams 35-512-8 and running 1.7 roller rockers
I think the suggestion was either/or.. not both since...

a) 1.7 rockers with the stock cam will produce pretty much the same results as the 35-512-8 with the stock(1.6) rockers.
b) 1.7 rocker and the 35-512-8 may produce more valve lift than the heads can handle
 
  #6  
Old 10-23-2011, 08:31 AM
deljac's Avatar
deljac
deljac is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thank you. i never got to get much done on that truck as it got totaled out but i bought a 96 with the 5.8 and i pulled with it for the first time yesterday and wow what a difference over pullin with the 302 in my 95. and im guessing that the rockers or cam along with the exhaust will be the same as what i was wanting to do to my 302.
 
  #7  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:47 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by deljac
and im guessing that the rockers or cam along with the exhaust will be the same as what i was wanting to do to my 302.
Yes.. though I'd suggest a different cam for the 5.8... comp 35-349-8 if it's SD and the Comp 35-320-8 if it's mass air.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rigsboo
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
24
10-26-2016 07:07 PM
cchimuk
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
02-23-2013 03:33 AM
BURNSTOUGHFORD
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
07-19-2012 05:57 AM
Hotshot869
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
06-04-2011 10:03 PM
reed1951
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
16
03-06-2008 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: rockers vs cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.