Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 07-16-2011, 10:21 AM
CJM8515 CJM8515 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Freehold
Posts: 871
CJM8515 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I highly dislike the 5.0. Load it down with weight or pull something and I dont care what gears you use its a dog and will rev out like crazy. For work I once had a E250 with 5.0 and 3.55's. It regularly hauled over 2000lbs and complained every single moment I drove it. I do not like pulling out of traffic and making the engine scream nor making it scream so I can pass someone.

On the other hand I owned a 92 F150 with 5 speed and 300 six and 3.55's. No it wasnt fast but it had more available power where it was needed, didnt ever need to drag the rpms out and scream to get power. It hauled anything I ever wanted within reason, never once complained really and to me felt like a better overall truck.

Friend of mine has an 86 carbed bronco 6 with the C6 in it, we cannot kill that truck. It just refuses to die no matter how we mistreat it, has plenty of power and to both of us we just like it.

Not saying the 5.0 is a bad engine, but it just doesnt make the power a v8 should and doesnt belong in a 4000lbb truck.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-16-2011, 11:57 AM
currituckF150's Avatar
currituckF150 currituckF150 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 342
currituckF150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I bought new a 93 F150 RCLB 2wd 302 w/ 3.55LS & now have a 93 F150 RCSB 4x4 300 5spd w/ 3.08. I used both to tow the 18 ft bass boat I've owned for the last 12yrs & hands down, the 302 pulled it way better, got better fuel mileage doing it & would pull the boat up the ramp w/out any problem. The 300 won't get out of it's own way w/ the trailer in tow & I feel like that if I don't lock it in 4wd low when pulling up the ramp, the clutch will burn up. That is my $.02 worth from my experiences.
__________________
Brett Laws
93 F150 XL 4x4, new ride
95 F150 Lightning #1308, totalled
93 F150 XLT LB, Sold!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-16-2011, 12:07 PM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l SideWinder4.9l is offline
Skipper of the KY Chapter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,433
SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.SideWinder4.9l has a spectacular reputation.
Wesley R. Cole
BUT...If the 300 had the 3.55 gears under it, that wouldn't be a issue at all...
__________________
Wesley-KY Chapter Leader
1992 F-150 Michelle-300I6 w/ 5 Speed
Hurst Short Throw Shifter & Not enough gear!

19.31 E/T @ 68.78mph in a 1/4 mile
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-16-2011, 12:12 PM
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly big-ugly is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,125
big-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant future
My combo is a 4.9/m5od with 3.55 gears. My truck has a 4" lift and 33" tires, and I have not had an issue pulling anything. One time I did smoke the clutch a little trying to push a 91 crew cab F350 in a muddy field, but that was my own stupidity.
__________________
Brandon - A.K.A Bman, Ace, and Shadow
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67nukeford View Post
I am dainty, you know.
The highboy project - http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/11...y-project.html
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-16-2011, 12:40 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52 lew52 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,555
lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I towed a 21ft boat with my I6 and 302 but the gearing was the other way around , the I6 had 3.55 and the 302 had 3.08 , the 302 was much better period...Lew
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-16-2011, 12:48 PM
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly big-ugly is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,125
big-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant futurebig-ugly has a brilliant future
^^^ highly unlikely.
__________________
Brandon - A.K.A Bman, Ace, and Shadow
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67nukeford View Post
I am dainty, you know.
The highboy project - http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/11...y-project.html
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-16-2011, 01:05 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52 lew52 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,555
lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.lew52 has a very good reputation on FTE.
^^^^ but thats the way it was , im not saying the I6 was bad just that the 302 was much better to drive , thats a 95 with the good roller cam and MAF with the 4R70W wide ratio trans , this was when the truck was stock....
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-16-2011, 01:35 PM
currituckF150's Avatar
currituckF150 currituckF150 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 342
currituckF150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l View Post
BUT...If the 300 had the 3.55 gears under it, that wouldn't be a issue at all...
I tried that. It did tow a little better but gas mileage went way down towing or no. It was so bad, I swapped it back to 3.08. The 302 still did better, mileage & power wise.
__________________
Brett Laws
93 F150 XL 4x4, new ride
95 F150 Lightning #1308, totalled
93 F150 XLT LB, Sold!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-16-2011, 03:16 PM
TexasGuy001 TexasGuy001 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,381
TexasGuy001 has a very good reputation on FTE.TexasGuy001 has a very good reputation on FTE.TexasGuy001 has a very good reputation on FTE.TexasGuy001 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Here is what I have to say on the subject. The 4.9 liked to lug around so hauling or towing is much easier for it. The 5.0 does not like to lug and takes too many rpm to make torque. I have had both. They are both good engines, but the 5.0 really just isn't a great combination for a truck. The 4.9 with is torque at low revs definitely is better for a work truck.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-16-2011, 05:58 PM
jodaddy jodaddy is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 132
jodaddy is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 4.9/m5od/3.08's with 31's. It does 68mph at 2k. Hit a hill and it won't accelerate up it. If I drop it into 4th it runs at 2600 and will climb right up without losing too much speed. I think the 3.55's would put my truck in the sweet spot so I could use 5th and accelerate without having to downshift. So my coworker has a 5.0/a40d/3.55's and 235/75/15's. we drive around 90 miles to the job site. His truck seems to outperform mine. Neither of us push them real hard but his seems to pull the hills better. I think with proper gearing they are both suitable engines. Neither of us would do well pulling anything other than an aluminum boat.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-16-2011, 06:23 PM
rangergirl94's Avatar
rangergirl94 rangergirl94 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Geneva,Ohio
Posts: 656
rangergirl94 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 302 compares fine with other v8 engines besides that joke of a 318 ,but the 4.9 is just abnormal.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-16-2011, 08:09 PM
93f250tn's Avatar
93f250tn 93f250tn is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 438
93f250tn is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am not sure how anyone could say the inline 6 is a better engine then the 5.0... The inline 6 is a pretty good little engine but i have driven both a 93 f150 2wd reg. cab short bed with the inline 6 with the 5 speed manual and also a 95 f150 4x4 reg. cab with the 5.0 (yes i know gears make a a diffrence but once again this is stock vs stock). Stock for stock i felt both engines were fairly close the inline 6 felt alittle bit better getting going but from then on i liked the 5.0. The main reason i say you cant really compare the 4.9 to the 5.0 is the HUGE amount of things you can buy, add, modify on the 5.0 were with the 4.9 your options are extremely limited and other then a full exhaust and i am not even sure they sell longtube headers for the inline 6 your basically stuck with what you got. Once again the inline 6 is a great little engine and defiantly dont have anything bad to say about it but i would go with the 5.0 all day long. The main reason i am adding the fact it is easy to find aftermarket parts and modify the 5.0 is because we all know these trucks are heavly underpowered and anybody that wants more power your opitons with the 5.0 is endless where like i said with the 4.9 your stuck with basically a full exhaust inless you do alot of custom work but by the time you did that you would save alot of time, alot of money and get alot more power with the 5.0. Every little bit of power you can get from these trucks makes a huge difference towing/pulling or even just driving around so you dont have to basically put half the pedal down to get going. Just my .02
__________________
1997 F250HD 4x4 7.3 powerstroke ext. cab long bed - Straight piped factory exhaust, MBRP 3" downpipe, Napa air filter, TW custom 6 pos chip, shift kit, Add-a-leafs on all 4 corners, 325/60r18 Toyo's, 20% tint, Isspro gauges
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-16-2011, 08:17 PM
dieseltruckjunkie dieseltruckjunkie is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 18
dieseltruckjunkie is starting off with a positive reputation.
I started out pulling with a 4.9 5sd and had less problems than our 5.0 and far out done our 5.8 for dependablity. the 4.9 F.I. are the only good ones, if your going to run a carb then go 5.0. To all that hate the 4.9, you just can't drive, I hauled junk cars with them both and got better mpgs with the 4.9
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-16-2011, 08:28 PM
ryito1122334455's Avatar
ryito1122334455 ryito1122334455 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: ohio
Posts: 125
ryito1122334455 is starting off with a positive reputation.
ryan bielobockie
gotta "little" 4.9 and love it.........its only .1liter "littler" than a 5.0 c mon now... ne ways love my straight six to death!!! no the frikkin e40d....another story, had a 88 straight 6 with 5 speed, and loved it! shoulda never sold it, imho, straight 6 should be paired up to a manual, where 5.0 it dosent really matter
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-16-2011, 08:36 PM
dieseltruckjunkie dieseltruckjunkie is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 18
dieseltruckjunkie is starting off with a positive reputation.
good point, the 4.9 is best with a 5sd
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2011, 08:36 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
1988, 300, 49, 49l, 50, downshifting, engine, f150, ford, hits, inline, lariat, powerband, straight, swap, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1988 F-150 2WD to 4X4 Conversion BS51993 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 3 08-06-2014 10:55 AM
oil & fuel filter cap removal; a third option bbender85 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 4 03-07-2014 01:55 PM
97 4.6 converted to PI intake and maybe heads question and suggestions chloichina 1997 - 2003 F150 5 06-26-2013 03:28 PM
why not a 5.8l quincyj34 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 7 12-13-2012 11:50 PM
Performance: 3.5L vs 5.0L seminaryranger EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 63 11-06-2012 08:54 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup