Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6 and 2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-02-2011, 11:41 AM
ccm14 ccm14 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
ccm14 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Concerns about turbos on ecoboost

Hi,
I am thinking hard about the new 3.5 Ecoboost but have reservations about the turbos. Have not had any experience with turbo's but have always felt the more complex something was the more trouble prone it would be. Also, the thought of replacing turbos after the warranty period makes me nervous.

Tell me something that makes me feel better about a vehicle with turbo.

Thanks in advance for the replies.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2011, 06:08 AM
Joe Finn's Avatar
Joe Finn Joe Finn is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 956
Joe Finn is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
If history is any indication, when a new engine has "issues", they seem to pop up in unexpected areas. For example, spark plugs on the 5.4 or piston slap. Not saying that the turbos or DI on the EB won't have any problems (knock on wood), but I think the odds of the new EB having a problem are the same as any of the other new motors (3.7, 5.0 or 6.2). I'd bet if any of these engines have a problem, it will be something nobody has talked about.
__________________
'11 F150 4x4 Lariat 3.5 EB Screw
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2011, 03:32 PM
johndeerefarmer johndeerefarmer is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 593
johndeerefarmer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Turbos are not a common item to fail, especially now that Ford has added water cooling to cool them off. Farm tractors have had them for years and they work hard and long hours.

The turbo's on the 6.0 Powerstroke had issues because they were variable vane and the soot clogged them up. The ecoboost has fixed vane turbos.

Main problem with turbos in the past was people would turn them off with out letting them cool down. This caused coking of the oil and bearing failure. Through siphoning of coolant after you turn off the engine Ford has prevented this problem.

If I was to worry about anything on a new Ford truck it would be the new electric steering and they all have it except for the 6.2.
__________________
2015 F-350 SCREW 4x4 Lariat with 6.7 PSD & Off Road Package, Ruby Red Metallic, 3.55 with E-locker, 20" wheels and tires, chrome packeage, B&W gooseneck hitch, Weathertech mats, Line X bedliner
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2011, 10:29 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,507
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
In about 30K miles I'll be talking to partsguyed about a Ford ESP. I'm actually less concerned about his truck mechanically than I am the paint and sheet metal thickness / integrity.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-20-2012, 09:04 PM
BANJO213 BANJO213 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
BANJO213 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer View Post
Turbos are not a common item to fail, especially now that Ford has added water cooling to cool them off. Farm tractors have had them for years and they work hard and long hours.

The turbo's on the 6.0 Powerstroke had issues because they were variable vane and the soot clogged them up. The ecoboost has fixed vane turbos.

Main problem with turbos in the past was people would turn them off with out letting them cool down. This caused coking of the oil and bearing failure. Through siphoning of coolant after you turn off the engine Ford has prevented this problem.

If I was to worry about anything on a new Ford truck it would be the new electric steering and they all have it except for the 6.2.
Johndeerfarmer, I am very interested in reading and learning about the ecoboost cooling, siphoning and lubricating system. Please provide some links to good articles where I can do some research. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2012, 08:58 AM
jeffdoerr jeffdoerr is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MI -- farmboy
Posts: 737
jeffdoerr is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would be more worried about which financing model to choose than the turbos. These are proven engines and have been in production for several years, in other models of Fords. I have 18,000 trouble free miles, and many of them hard.
__________________
[B]08 F150 CC XLT 4x4 5.4 - bone stock
[B]07 GL450 - for wife and kids
[B]07 Saab 9-3 Aero - for when I wanna go real fast real quick
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-15-2012, 01:32 AM
kermmydog kermmydog is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,265
kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoerr View Post
I would be more worried about which financing model to choose than the turbos. These are proven engines and have been in production for several years, in other models of Fords. I have 18,000 trouble free miles, and many of them hard.
These EcoBoost engines have been in production for several years in other Fords? I thought these were something new? What models were these engines used in?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-15-2012, 04:47 AM
EcoboostKev's Avatar
EcoboostKev EcoboostKev is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Meriden,Ct
Posts: 212
EcoboostKev has a good reputation on FTE.EcoboostKev has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermmydog View Post
These EcoBoost engines have been in production for several years in other Fords? I thought these were something new? What models were these engines used in?
They first came out in the Lincoln and the Taurus SHO 2009 I think? But then rebuilt it for the trucks with stronger internals to handle the abuse of towing and heavy payloads.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-15-2012, 05:14 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,507
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
A little Ecoboost history lesson for you all. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...N8JRAEnBtof4Rw

The first engine debuted in 2007 in a Lincoln and was named the TwinForce.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:03 PM
kermmydog kermmydog is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,265
kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.
Thanks for the link, but I don't call two years a proven engine with several years of production.
my interests in this engine is also the turbos, & will they hold up under real world conditions. Ford sure in the past hasn't had what I would call good luck with turbos. I read some things on the F150 board that added a few questions also.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-16-2012, 05:32 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,507
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Ford has had their issues with turbo charged engines for sure but I'm not aware of any large scale turbo failures.

The turbos have never been an issue for me. In the beginning I was more concerned about the transmission but not anymore.

My only issue now is how the heat from the turbos and piping will affect the engine and electronics over a lifetime.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-24-2012, 02:42 PM
Shake-N-Bake's Avatar
Shake-N-Bake Shake-N-Bake is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,835
Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.Shake-N-Bake has a spectacular reputation.
I wouldn't be too concerned about the turbos. The V6 Ecoboost has quite a few things in common with the 7.3 Power Stroke diesel and that engine has more than proven itself in the truck community. Garrett makes the turbos for both engines and there are lots of them out there with hundreds of thousands of miles without any issues. The fixed vane turbos are rock solid (at stock boost levels).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-26-2012, 10:56 PM
nitrogen's Avatar
nitrogen nitrogen is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Carstairs Alberta
Posts: 1,394
nitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to beholdnitrogen is a splendid one to behold
well if two years in service isn't a decent starting point, you'd better go back to horse an buggy. with tighter emmission specs every year, next years engine will have changes either to design or to programming. those changes may or may not affect reliability
__________________
2005 F350 Lariat crew 4x4
traded F350 XLT supercab 4x4 what a stinker
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2012, 01:04 PM
Greg B Greg B is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,421
Greg B has a good reputation on FTE.Greg B has a good reputation on FTE.
Probably the only difference on the EcoBoost is the block castings for a rear drive may be different than for a front drive to facilitate engine mounts. Otherwise the design would be the same. The only issues that I know of at this time are the intercoolers accumulating moisture and causing some driveability issues. It doesn't appear to be major, just irritating. Turbos don't seem to be a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-29-2012, 12:34 AM
kermmydog kermmydog is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,265
kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.kermmydog has a spectacular reputation.
I agree two years is a good starting point but not yet proven. Yes the 7.3 was in my opinion the best diesel Ford ever had. It was proven. I saw my share of 7.3s with over 300,000 miles & still going strong.
The more I read about the EcoBoost in the F150 the less impressed I get. I'm hearing 17.5 mpg, Any air disturbance on the front may cause inter-cooler trouble. Then the scariest thing is Dealers threatening to void warranties with any add-ons, cold air intakes or exhaust mods, the ability according to one post that the dealers can tell if you ever added a chip or tuner. Ford has a real reputation for bad dealers & voiding warranties. As far back as the 1970s.
So as with everything new I will wait & see what a few years & miles do in the real world. If they are still around in 10 years I might buy a used one, if I'm still alive that is the thing with being old time is getting shorter & shorter.
But I will keep checking in to see how things work out. These forums seem to bring out the good & bad of whatever brand your looking at.
Craig
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 12:34 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)

Tags
150, 35, 35eccoboost, 50, coyote, ecoboost, engine, ford, issues, l, mexico, sale, torbos, turbos, v6, video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
has anyone put bigger turbos on an EcoBoost F-150? ibheretoo EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 5 04-11-2014 05:16 PM
Curious about my Turbos aeroskies EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 1 11-17-2013 11:25 AM
Eco-boost durability Feedguy 2009+ F150 63 05-21-2012 08:38 AM
The Ultimate Showdown! (6.2L vs Comparably Equipped Ecoboost F-150) ''Drag Race Clips'' 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2009+ F150 40 08-19-2011 06:48 AM
Super Duty getting Ecoboost? LSchicago2 Super Duty & Heavy Duty 31 10-21-2010 01:54 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup