1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Options for getting more MPH range

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:44 AM
pwroftheswartz's Avatar
pwroftheswartz
pwroftheswartz is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: God's country
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Options for getting more MPH range

I have a 78 f250 with a 351M and 4 speed t18 transmission. I am having trouble driving her on the interstate because of a lack of an OD and my factory gears (turning too many RPMs). I am looking for options to increase my MPH range?

Has anyone done a trans swap to a ZF5 or a NV4500? Do you think this would be a good option in order to keep the same gears but have a OD for the interstate?

Also, I will be stripping her down to the frame soon and I would have plenty of room to work on a trans swap.

RTR




 
  #2  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:48 AM
PA74F250's Avatar
PA74F250
PA74F250 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: York, Pa
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
If it has 4.10's in the rear get them changed to a set of 3.55's. If you're satisfied get the front done.
 
  #3  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:53 AM
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
HIO Silver is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 20,676
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Lose the weight of that honking grill guard too.
 
  #4  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:58 AM
jbehuniak's Avatar
jbehuniak
jbehuniak is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The NV and ZF have been done in these trucks. The NV sounds like a easier swap if you're keeping the 351M/400. TMyer has a kit for the ZF also.
I am doing a ZF & 460 swap right now in my 78 but a lot of people do the NV swap.


My thoughts on the gear vendors is that all said and done it on paper its less expensive to do a NV/ZF swap if you find a good trans for the right price. Regardless you need new driveshafts so add that cost in.
If you do the ZF swap look at this link ZF5 adapter kit
I moved my trans crossmember back about 4.5 inches. Then got a pre-blead clutch master cylinder kit from rock auto. Mounted it on the outside of the brake M/C and drilled a hole through the clutch pedal. Put a grade 8 6" bolt in it with spacers to get the pushrod straight and tried it out. Then welded a pedal stop to the floor to prevent over travel. I just need to measure driveshafts and order them next along with a lot of other stuff that isn't related to the trans swap. I kept the BW T-case also. I don't do crazy off roading, the BW is alittle more quiet and runs cooler.
Theres a guy whose local and all his dents have a NV in them. He swears by that swap.
 
  #5  
Old 09-07-2016, 12:08 PM
77&79F250's Avatar
77&79F250
77&79F250 is offline
Moderator & parts seller
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: S/W Missouri
Posts: 44,997
Received 3,280 Likes on 2,438 Posts
Taller and skinnier tires would help, but you look to not have much more room. Other than that, gear change time.

When is the last time you did a basic tune up? Plugs, plug wires, PVC valve, dizzy cap and rotor bug? X2 on that removing that deer killer heavy looking bumper. Espicially since you have a bed net gate.
 
  #6  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:22 PM
pwroftheswartz's Avatar
pwroftheswartz
pwroftheswartz is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: God's country
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 77&79F250
Taller and skinnier tires would help, but you look to not have much more room. Other than that, gear change time.

When is the last time you did a basic tune up? Plugs, plug wires, PVC valve, dizzy cap and rotor bug? X2 on that removing that deer killer heavy looking bumper. Espicially since you have a bed net gate.
Recently rebuilt then engine. I think it has 2k miles on it as of now. Also checked dizzy cap, rotor bug and rebuilt the rear drum brakes. This was a farm truck and the bumper was hand made to push cows out of the way

I will be adding 35s and a 4 in suspension lift so that makes me question replacing the 4.10 gears with any smaller gears
 
  #7  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:24 PM
pwroftheswartz's Avatar
pwroftheswartz
pwroftheswartz is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: God's country
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jbehuniak
The NV and ZF have been done in these trucks. The NV sounds like a easier swap if you're keeping the 351M/400. TMyer has a kit for the ZF also.
I am doing a ZF & 460 swap right now in my 78 but a lot of people do the NV swap.


My thoughts on the gear vendors is that all said and done it on paper its less expensive to do a NV/ZF swap if you find a good trans for the right price. Regardless you need new driveshafts so add that cost in.
If you do the ZF swap look at this link ZF5 adapter kit
I moved my trans crossmember back about 4.5 inches. Then got a pre-blead clutch master cylinder kit from rock auto. Mounted it on the outside of the brake M/C and drilled a hole through the clutch pedal. Put a grade 8 6" bolt in it with spacers to get the pushrod straight and tried it out. Then welded a pedal stop to the floor to prevent over travel. I just need to measure driveshafts and order them next along with a lot of other stuff that isn't related to the trans swap. I kept the BW T-case also. I don't do crazy off roading, the BW is alittle more quiet and runs cooler.
Theres a guy whose local and all his dents have a NV in them. He swears by that swap.
Do you recommended using a ZF or a NV trans for my 351M. I wish it was a 460 but I've already re-built it and added some fast goodies.
 
  #8  
Old 09-07-2016, 05:27 PM
Blue and White's Avatar
Blue and White
Blue and White is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Cruising RPM w/o overdrive will be higher yet many of these trucks were run that way for many years. With a healthy engine I think running up to around 3200 or 3300 is OK. My 4.10 equipped '78 with 31" tires gets run at 70 pretty regularly.

Also a good idea to check the speedometer, especially if running bigger than stock tires. When the spedo says "65" for example you may be actually running 75 true MPH.
 
  #9  
Old 09-07-2016, 11:17 PM
7Ford6's Avatar
7Ford6
7Ford6 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To increase range = Bigger Fuel Tank.. 35's and 4.10 are perfect..
 
  #10  
Old 09-08-2016, 12:16 AM
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
HIO Silver is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 20,676
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Factors..

Vehicle weight
Rolling resistance
Aerodynamics
Mechanical efficiency (trans and rear end gear) vs parasitic losses
Engine efficiency
Engine HP and TQ vs RPM...
Traffic/roadway conditions

Maximize or minimize, as applicable.
 
  #11  
Old 09-08-2016, 05:31 AM
Blue and White's Avatar
Blue and White
Blue and White is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Just to build on HIO's comment... pushing these trucks at higher speeds takes some HP. They are not very aerodynamic, especially with an added cow catcher up front.

The engine needs to spin decent RPM to make the HP. Overdrive or at least too much overdrive can put the engine in deep lug which is hard on it over time and may reduce both performance and economy. With 34" tires and 4.10's I don't think I would want any overdrive.
 
  #12  
Old 09-09-2016, 01:03 PM
pwroftheswartz's Avatar
pwroftheswartz
pwroftheswartz is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: God's country
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue and White
Just to build on HIO's comment... pushing these trucks at higher speeds takes some HP. They are not very aerodynamic, especially with an added cow catcher up front.

The engine needs to spin decent RPM to make the HP. Overdrive or at least too much overdrive can put the engine in deep lug which is hard on it over time and may reduce both performance and economy. With 34" tires and 4.10's I don't think I would want any overdrive.
I have recently rebuilt the engine and it should have around 400 hp ( bigger cam, long tube headers, 4 barrel, bigger intake, block was bored 30 over, ETC)
so HP shouldnt be an issue. Right now with 33s and 4.10 gears she will do 65 with the RPMs fairly high. I don't know what the RPMs are just yet because I havent installed a tach. Installing a tach is next on my list.

What do you think?
 
  #13  
Old 09-09-2016, 01:42 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 120 Posts
Install a tach FIRST... Then see what you're actually doing. I bet it's not as high as you think.
 
  #14  
Old 09-09-2016, 04:33 PM
gatorfor88's Avatar
gatorfor88
gatorfor88 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Panama City
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
And most likely not near 400 hp.
 
  #15  
Old 09-09-2016, 04:58 PM
Blue and White's Avatar
Blue and White
Blue and White is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Sounds like a really nice engine build. Did you use TM Meyer parts?

Agree good idea to get a tach and also check your speedo. It should be able to cruise at 75 true MPH easy I think with that combo.

I am comfortable at 70 or a bit more with my 4.10/31" combo.

The other thing that has an impact is noise. My bigger than stock but stock type muffler is pretty quiet. No big bellow when she is spinning on the highway.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sosa
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
04-20-2019 05:49 PM
jbsmith_84
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
02-26-2012 08:00 PM
jazz77
Excursion - King of SUVs
4
12-28-2011 12:38 AM



Quick Reply: Options for getting more MPH range



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.