35/12.50/20 vs 295/70/18
#1
35/12.50/20 vs 295/70/18
I've been running Yoko G015's in 35/12.50/20 since last fall for the snowflake rating. I really prefer the 295/70/18 size and weight rating. The weight savings of dropping down will be roughly 10-12 lbs per tire/wheel vs my existing setup, depending on the tire. Does anyone think I will notice any real difference in performance or mpg if I make the swap?
#2
Maybe a little, but not a whole lot. I just went kind of the other direction, from 275/65r20 (34.1x10.8) to 295/65r20 (35.1x11.6) and didn't see enough of a difference to really make it be worth it to switch back to the smaller size.
The 295/65r20 size is one you might consider...it's a hair taller than 35/12.50x20 but if I remember right, it was actually a bit lighter (because it's not as wide).
Going to the 295/70r18 size will affect how it fills up the wheel wells a bit, as well as the stance from front/back.
The 295/65r20 size is one you might consider...it's a hair taller than 35/12.50x20 but if I remember right, it was actually a bit lighter (because it's not as wide).
Going to the 295/70r18 size will affect how it fills up the wheel wells a bit, as well as the stance from front/back.
#3
#4
Well, I shall see. I went ahead and ordered the 295's in Michelin Defenders. I will report back any noticeable difference.
#5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Moundainner
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
15
02-17-2016 10:57 AM