You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!
Ok, first time posting, but have been an avid reader for years. I have read so many posts that my head is spinning. I have an '01 EX with 7.3L, stock other than the added tranny cooler. I am looking for monitoring gauges. I have read in some post that digital readers are not as accurate as analog gauges, specifically the trans.
I'm looking at the Edge Evo on XDP (not the CS or CTS) and the ISSPRO gauges (Boost, Pyro, Trans) on Diesel Manor. Before someone launches into the programmer part of it, I am not looking to use the Evo for progamming, so lets not open that can of worm. The Evo through XDP and the ISSPRO through Diesel Manor are about the same cost, but the Evo boasts monitoring more parameters (engine oil temp, intake temp, barometric pressure (not sure if that is important), battery voltage, and diagnostic trouble code count.
Help me out guys. I know that some of my post is asking for opinion, and opinions are appreciated. But I am also looking for reasons that the digital tans temp would not be as accurate as the analog.
First off, Welcome to the 7.3 side of FTE. I'm glad you finally posted. 5 yrs is a long time to be a lurker
I personally use the Xmonitor from BD power. I have used this setup in two trucks. My reasons are #1 compact size. I don't like the big guage pods adding more size to an already oversized A piller. I like to see whats coming at me.
#2 I don't like lights in my eyes at night. My night vision isn't what it used to be and the piller pods just add more distraction.
while its true some digital guages only plug into the vehicle harness therefore
only reporting what the computer sees. the BD uses an actual temp sender in the pan or where ever you chose to install it.
to each his own, but thats my .02
some think I'm dumber than a bowl of soup! some don't. both groups are right.
02 F550 380hp/800Tq
Barney, thanks for the info on the Xmonitor, looks good. I agree, had an '03 F250 with gauge pod and had to turn off the gauge lights at night, blinding! Marriage and 4 kids later the Excursion came into the picture and I need some monitoring equip. Never really thought of myself as posting. Glad I did. Thanks again.
Gary - Don't sweat the accuarcy part. Digital or analog will typically get you +/- 3 to 5 Deg 5. No better. Reality is if that uncertaintiy is the difference in making a temp decision or not, you are already there...
External vs. Internal is an interesting question. Personally, I like the patient being able to tell me how it is feeling... In my experience, the transducer itself is the flakiest part of the gage "system." It's highly unlikely that a bad gage gives good readings, so if you see an odd reading on the truck's computer bus, then you can quickly locate a point of interest, validate the reading and add additonal intrumentation as required... The more bus data you can get, the better. Think AutoEnginuity...
Just my $.02.
__________________ 2001 7.3 4x4 SC
Dp Tuner, John Wood VB, OBA, Edge Evo II (gages/codes), 6637 w/cover, 4" exh, H&H, CCK, HPX, FPR, WARNs, Leveling Kit, Stancor GPR
Digital vs. Analog is a personal preference. I prefer analog for rapidly changing parameters like Boost, EGT, & fuel pressure since I can see where the needle is without having to look directly at it and "think", if that makes sense. IMHO, the A-pillar gauge pod doesn't do much to obscure your view -- I've had mine for over 4 years now and never thought it's been in the way (and I have a 4 gauge pod!). I use a digital meter for things like intake air temp, Volts, etc. I do use it for HPOP pressure, even though it's a rapidly changing parameter as well, but that's more of a diagnostic measurement than something that needs constantly monitored so no problem there.
Of course, there are a lot of "digital" displays out there that emulate analog gauges too -- best of both worlds there. I'm happy with my full-time analog gauges for the important stuff though, so no regrets here.
Running the Edge Evo for 2 years now. Really did it for the gauges and not a programmer or for tuning. Overall it has been great and would not do anything else but a digital combo gauge. I like seeing data based on what the PCM is putting out. Good size foot print and looks like it belongs there. I like to glance at a gauge and see an actual number and not a moving needle. Just how my eyes work. I find it is not an issue for fast moving numbers like exhaust temps while excelerating. The 1st digit is what you are really paying attention to. Built in code reader is a nice add for on the fly checking without needing to hookup anything additional. I have mine set to display EGT, Boost, oil temp, voltage. You can set the color and brightness to match what works for your eyes too. I like the ability to display oil temps when towing. Good flexibility.
i would say more difference in electric & mechanical than digital and analog. mech not needing a sender or electricity to work like temp gauges, pressure gauge's for example i have always used mech gauges when i can less parts to brake . more accurate i think as well .. as for the a pillar in the way thats why i did the 2 gauge and added the others to the dash. more visibility in my old age. and the new autometer leds have a dimmer you can install on all of them so i turn it down to match the dash lights. just finished my hpop boy that gauge is very busy as is the icp solenoid i guess.
all fords in my garage 65 f-100 429-c6 // e-99 f-350 super duty w/ 320000 mi /sb/ sc 4x4 7.3 6 sp manual /new ac ss. inj /50 cent mod / bellowed up pipes / mbrp 4in single /38r / t-500 / dp tuner / clays ocr and frx / intank mods / autometer gauges / ebpv delete pedestal / 6637 / ccv / clays late model conv. /05 frt end / 16.50 dash / *********** // 03 ranger flair side 4x4 4.0 (wifes) // a couple of old bronco projects 70 + 69 . ford rules
I've never had digital gauges, but I've had my triple gauge pillar ISSPRO's for about 4 years now.....and don't even notice them there now. It's definitely a personal preference, but one more reason to NOT have digital gauges is if you have a short somewhere, it'd create that much more of a nightmare to find it. Good luck.....either way you decide, gauges are a MUST
EDIT: Don't be scared to post! You've been lurking a long time, your only going to learn more being active here!
When you say "Digital vs Analog", I presume you are referring to how the information is displayed compared to "Electric vs Mechanical" which is how the information is transmitted. These days, most analog gauges are electric which basically means the information is transmitted exactly the same as digital gauges so I don't expect to see any difference in accuracy. The difference would be in how the electrical signal is processed and then converted into some sort of visual representation of the measurement. Because of the variety of methods of processing the electrical signal, the readings are going to vary by product to product. However, they all should be fairly close to each other so it's not really a big issue.
If your question is should you get a digital number readout or round gauge with increments and a needle....then that comes down to personal preference. For me, it's very hard to look at a digital readout unless the number is really small such as volts (14.1 for example). My eyes would freak out trying to monitor HPOP for example because the number would always be changing and my brain wants it to stay still for a second so I can read the number. My eyes prefer the analog style of readouts since I have to think less.
Since I am somewhat familiar with these engines, I have a fairly good idea what numbers to expect for the various functions but other drivers may not. If someone else is driving my truck for whatever reason and they are towing something heavy then it would be easier for them to monitor the gauges because some of them have the danger zone clearly labeled (ISSPRO Pyro for example). The Dash Daq can do the same thing....
But a digital readout doesn't really communicate anything special. Meaning, 1100 degrees looks about the same as 1400 degrees so whoever is driving my truck won't know that anything is wrong unless the gauge also has some sort of alarm feature.
My wife's truck has analog type gauges (Autometer) and she asked me to mark them with a thin piece of pin striping tape (yellow and red) so she can know if something is approaching the danger zone. If her truck had a digital readout, she would completely ignore the gauge because she won't know what any of the numbers mean. It's even easier for her when she tows with my truck because I have the temp gauges in the A-pillar pod and the pressure gauges on my F650 dash. So, she knows to keep the temp gauges low and the pressure gauges high and things will be golden.
Again, it just comes down to what you like and how you like to drive. Hopefully we all have given you some good options to consider.
My wife's truck has analog type gauges (Autometer) and she asked me to mark them with a thin piece of pin striping tape (yellow and red) so she can know if something is approaching the danger zone. If her truck had a digital readout, she would completely ignore the gauge because she won't know what any of the numbers mean.
ISSPRO gauges have this feature built right into them. They are color coded Green, Yellow & Red......comes in handy
ISSPRO gauges have this feature built right into them. They are color coded Green, Yellow & Red......comes in handy
Yeah, I like ISSPRO better myself. My truck has the EV2 style and I find them very easy to read, especially at night. Her truck came with the Autometer Phantoms so we just haven't felt the need to change them out yet. The most she tows with her truck is about 8000 lbs so I'm not too worried about it.
I think that after all that I have read that I need to rephrase my question. I have had had analog gauges and am not opposed to having them again. I should have inquired about mechanical versus electrical. If the difference between digital and analog is personal preference, then what about the accuracy of the mechanical versus electrical. Some have already answered this as well stating that there is not much difference, but just to be clear is there an big enough accurace difference where mechanical is more accurate that electrical?
Another question would be reagrding the degree of difficulty with installation. Having read installation instructions for electrical monitors, it sounds pretty easy, just unplugging a few clamps and plugging in the monitor. I am aware that I will have to drill for the EGT and there should be an spot for the tranny temp, but what about boost, oil temp, fuel pressure, etc? I have plenty of experience with the wiring aspect and I think that I can handle drilling and tapping the exhaust. What about the rest?
Final question. Greg and Travis have stated that they prefer ISSPRO. The EV2 are alittle more than I wanted to spend. Are the performax good enough?
The Performax gauge line from Isspro are more expensive than the EV2 since you need the ESP for them to run.
I prefer and sell Isspro EV2 at a 4:1 ratio to the Autometer line. They are a great gauge the is made right here in Oregon and not overseas which is also very nice. If you have any questions give me a call and we can talk through it all.
Here is an EV2 kit we have that has everything you will need for install.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.