'88 4wd conversion?
#31
I am very happy with the combo Thumper has! The F250 suspension allows me way more cargo capacity than a 1/2 ton. The 4.9L is a very very reliable engine and so I have taken plenty of trips to Colo, IL, MN, etc and never been worried about breaking down.
If I had it my way, (and had plenty of money to blow) I would probably go 3.73 gears instead of 3.55's. 4.10's are a little tall and any gas savings would be lost to higher RPMs when running down the interestate. There just isn't enough gain from 3.55's to 3.73's to justify the cost. If I had 3.08's they would be replaced with 3.73's the next week! Still 3.55's are a nice mid-range gear that have done just fine for me, and to be honest the 3.55's are probably the best mix of power and mpgs for the I6... I would just lean towards a little more power than gas b/c I use it for heavy loads and it would be easier to keep highway speed with 3.73's. I have hauled a bed and trailer full of wood several times and don't have any problems keeping 65 mph on the interstate in 4th gear.
The ZF transmission hasn't given me any problems since it's overhaul 3 years ago... Well except for the ability to down shift easily from 3rd to 2nd and 2nd to 1st but I should have replaced my syncros (so that's totally my fault). If you are hauling heavy make sure to get a HD clutch put in! And yes Granny Low on the ZF is AMAZING for getting heavy loads rolling... When not loaded down I just start off in 2nd...
Thumper has been invaluable so many times it's hard to count and she's never let me down... Heck! I was even surprized when she kept 60-65 mph on the hwy when towing ol' Girl home on a tandem axle trailer!
Oh and just FYI for any I6 owners out there... The 87-91 EFI I6's have more stock horse power and torque than the 92-96!
If I had it my way, (and had plenty of money to blow) I would probably go 3.73 gears instead of 3.55's. 4.10's are a little tall and any gas savings would be lost to higher RPMs when running down the interestate. There just isn't enough gain from 3.55's to 3.73's to justify the cost. If I had 3.08's they would be replaced with 3.73's the next week! Still 3.55's are a nice mid-range gear that have done just fine for me, and to be honest the 3.55's are probably the best mix of power and mpgs for the I6... I would just lean towards a little more power than gas b/c I use it for heavy loads and it would be easier to keep highway speed with 3.73's. I have hauled a bed and trailer full of wood several times and don't have any problems keeping 65 mph on the interstate in 4th gear.
The ZF transmission hasn't given me any problems since it's overhaul 3 years ago... Well except for the ability to down shift easily from 3rd to 2nd and 2nd to 1st but I should have replaced my syncros (so that's totally my fault). If you are hauling heavy make sure to get a HD clutch put in! And yes Granny Low on the ZF is AMAZING for getting heavy loads rolling... When not loaded down I just start off in 2nd...
Thumper has been invaluable so many times it's hard to count and she's never let me down... Heck! I was even surprized when she kept 60-65 mph on the hwy when towing ol' Girl home on a tandem axle trailer!
Oh and just FYI for any I6 owners out there... The 87-91 EFI I6's have more stock horse power and torque than the 92-96!
#32
#33
It has been my experience with the TTB trucks I've driven, including my own, and my brother's SASed 82 F150 wears tires much better. If by story you mean my actual experiences, you're right. But for that matter, I really don't need to give any information to justify my choice to anyone. I choose to share my personal experiences so other people can hear personal experiences on all sides of an issue. I'm sorry my personal experiences don't agree with yours, but I most definitely won't imply that you're lying about them. Maybe your trucks have all had front swaybars and you take corners VERY slowly. Mine haven't, and I take most corners at the posted speed limit.
#34
#35
Yep I can attest to pretty much everything nstueve said. I have pretty much the same truck accept it's a 96 1/2 ton. It's just a kick a$$ combo, it's the perfect balance of power and gearing. The 300 is the perfect workhorse/dd power plant, I'd have one over a 302 anyday. Not to mention they're stubbornly tough and reliable, they will stand up to a tremendous amount of abuse for a long time. My 84 F150 4wd would pull like a freight train. It has a warmed up 300 (cam, headers, 4bbl, Offy intake, etc) with the old granny 4 speed, 4.10s, lockers front and rear... that ol truck would pull some chit as long as you had traction! My carbed I6 will mop nearly any EFI I6, I love the EFIs but for building some serious power... carbed is where it's at! That thing has ridiculus amounts of torque down low... it will take off from a dead stop in 4th gear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MR KROGOTH
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
45
04-28-2020 10:22 PM
1972RubberDuck
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
11-12-2016 01:30 PM
MY FYN 79
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
10-18-2015 04:13 PM
RotGrubestier44
Excursion - King of SUVs
4
12-30-2010 07:58 PM