Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Really bad gas mileage on 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 04-29-2011, 01:41 PM
f_150_4chris's Avatar
f_150_4chris
f_150_4chris is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
That's not possible.. with larger tires the truck travels further so if nothing else changed(it never does but for the sake of simplicity in this example) your milage should have increased with the bigger tires. Bottom line is you aren't calculating fuel milage correctly and the main device used to calculate milage(the odometer) is no longer accurate, so you need to recalibrate your speedo for those tires and then divide the distrance travelled between fillups(using the trip meter) by the gallons needed to refill the tank, that is your MPG. Do this at every fillup and you'll get a average of what milage the vehicle really gets over various conditions and driving styles.

I have done that i do that everytime i fill up and thats what it gets 8 mpg
 
  #47  
Old 04-29-2011, 03:07 PM
Quick69's Avatar
Quick69
Quick69 is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a stock 93/RCSB/302/auto/2wd and it get 13 in town/15-17 on hwy
 
  #48  
Old 04-29-2011, 03:56 PM
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
73FOMO is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, AL
Posts: 1,462
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by f_150_4chris
I have done that i do that everytime i fill up and thats what it gets 8 mpg
So you're only getting about 125 miles per tank?

I would go back and read all of these threads and start implementing some of the suggestions. Something is WAY wrong.
 
  #49  
Old 04-30-2011, 08:52 AM
punkandpissed138's Avatar
punkandpissed138
punkandpissed138 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albany, Georgia
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
at 190-198 miles on the front tank i run completely dry, rear tank i can get about...ehhh....231-236. i got 31x10.50's and im running 4:11 rear and 4:10 front(when in 4x4) with an E4OD and a 302..my mileage is pretty good when im empty when it comes to these trucks!!
 
  #50  
Old 01-05-2017, 02:26 PM
Cjfan6's Avatar
Cjfan6
Cjfan6 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HELP PLEASE!!!!!!

I have recently received a free 79 ford f150 ranger 2wd, Ive been cleaning it up and did some things to the motor. It previously sat in a garage for 25 yeas and i have done water pump, plugs, freeze plugs, radiator, oil, hoses, etc. I have the original 302 and 2 barrel carb and it isn't very good on gas. I have ran sea foam through it and it made it runs bit better. Im looking to improve the MPG because it isn't good at all, maybe change the carb and intake or rebuild the old 2 barrel? Thanks
 
  #51  
Old 07-20-2018, 08:18 AM
Lugnut54's Avatar
Lugnut54
Lugnut54 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fustrated

My truck is a 1996 f150 4x4. And im getting 8.4 miles per gal granted ive got 31.10'50s mudtires on it and I have a wooden box I haul trash but I went from 14 to 8.4 miles in the last 5 months and ive been hauling for over ayr and a half help me fix it ive changed wires plugs cab ritor button fuel filter air filter map sensor one o2senser new exhaust.radiator...
 
  #52  
Old 07-20-2018, 10:17 AM
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Mudsport96 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chillicothe
Posts: 3,282
Received 372 Likes on 285 Posts
Check codes to see if there is a problem. Best place to start.
 
  #53  
Old 05-15-2021, 04:04 AM
Pat Flynn's Avatar
Pat Flynn
Pat Flynn is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry 91 F-150 5.0 EFI terrible mileage

I have a 1991 F-150 XLT Lariat 5.0L EFI Standard Cab Longbed that has only 112K miles and is immaculate and runs great but the mileage is about 10! What might be wrong? 15" wheels and all bone stock.
 
  #54  
Old 05-15-2021, 09:55 AM
torq'ta 5 8's Avatar
torq'ta 5 8
torq'ta 5 8 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: N.W. Alabama
Posts: 4,546
Received 691 Likes on 512 Posts
Last time tune-up performed? What is rear gear? trans?
The common, denominator/answer, is that nobody is checking for codes, to see what truck is telling you is wrong.
 
  #55  
Old 03-13-2024, 05:36 AM
Henry302FlyinHooveEd.'s Avatar
Henry302FlyinHooveEd.
Henry302FlyinHooveEd. is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
__ economy

Originally Posted by ItsAFord55
Im gettin horrible gas mileage on my 1991 f150 with a 302. Iv changed the plugs and wires cap and rotor ..air filter..oil..it has long tube headers with glasspacks ..i think Im gettin some where between 8-9mpg
If you're in an area where emmisions arent regulated like the flow of immigrants currently...

Take off all the smog pump crap, bean cans, char filter box, and the EGR, and the fuel trim thermactor air bypass valve and regulator, leave all those electric connectors in place and cover with tape in case it doesnt help or you decide to sell the vehichle you add parts back on and have more original value. Cap all vacuum ports with vacuum line caps. Or duct tape.. leave the fuel pressure regulator vacuum line attached, or don't. I took it off and have put it back on, really don't notice a difference. I have oem style exhaust manifolds, 3 inch from collectors to rear axel, a 3 inch glass pack into a 2.5 over the axel. I have found an increase in fuel economy with this set up. Always having heard true dual exhaust with long tube headers is best for fuel efficiency. Maybe you should add a high air flow filter, or cold air intake? Maybe dual high flow/cold air. Biggest thing also, is if you're anything like me, don't try and race all the idiots that are jealous you're in a truck thats paid for and will last 100000000 miles, and they are in debt with a brand new everything in life, including a new truck that is designed to fail just after its out of anyone else's hands and fully into thine own hands. so if a heavy foot, proving to everyone what was built then squashes what they build now. Just act like you're in the year the truck was made. In the 90s the road was for commute, especially in town. I don't know that's my input
 
  #56  
Old 03-13-2024, 05:50 AM
Henry302FlyinHooveEd.'s Avatar
Henry302FlyinHooveEd.
Henry302FlyinHooveEd. is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lugnut54
My truck is a 1996 f150 4x4. And im getting 8.4 miles per gal granted ive got 31.10'50s mudtires on it and I have a wooden box I haul trash but I went from 14 to 8.4 miles in the last 5 months and ive been hauling for over ayr and a half help me fix it ive changed wires plugs cab ritor button fuel filter air filter map sensor one o2senser new exhaust.radiator...
Injectors? I recently had a similar problem. Wind obviously doesn't help when we drive big Ole bricks. I ended up touching a couple wires together one day trying to fix a high idle problem, I figured it had something to do with the ECU, and the response the TPS was giving, so I spent 100+ dollars in tps sensors thinking I kept on breaking them or not calibrating them correctly. Well when I touched these two wires 😁 she SHUT DOWN... I was stranded. It was total ****. Ate the blade, got a new ECU eventually, also spent 1000 bucks on other parts in between death and revival. As it turns out though, this new computer changed some things, smooth 800 rpm idle at running temp, better fuel economy, but then again I had 3 inch pipe for 3 foot after the headers, and it was like open headers, no velocity back pressure. That is important, get a 3 inch cherry bomb style muffler any kind I got a ricer brand UPOWER that went after that 3' 3 " pipe, making it around 4.5 ' and the reduce to 2.5 over the axel and as far back as you'd like. It seems to have helped for me, and I've got over 400,000 miles on her if it doesn't help for you, or this isnt news to you. Well hope you got a good laugh at least
 
  #57  
Old 03-13-2024, 07:17 AM
White Max's Avatar
White Max
White Max is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Imperial, MO
Posts: 959
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Henry302FlyinHooveEd.
If you're in an area where emmisions arent regulated like the flow of immigrants currently...

Take off all the smog pump crap, bean cans, char filter box, and the EGR, and the fuel trim thermactor air bypass valve and regulator, leave all those electric connectors in place and cover with tape in case it doesnt help or you decide to sell the vehichle you add parts back on and have more original value. Cap all vacuum ports with vacuum line caps. Or duct tape.. leave the fuel pressure regulator vacuum line attached, or don't. I took it off and have put it back on, really don't notice a difference. I have oem style exhaust manifolds, 3 inch from collectors to rear axel, a 3 inch glass pack into a 2.5 over the axel. I have found an increase in fuel economy with this set up. Always having heard true dual exhaust with long tube headers is best for fuel efficiency. Maybe you should add a high air flow filter, or cold air intake? Maybe dual high flow/cold air. Biggest thing also, is if you're anything like me, don't try and race all the idiots that are jealous you're in a truck thats paid for and will last 100000000 miles, and they are in debt with a brand new everything in life, including a new truck that is designed to fail just after its out of anyone else's hands and fully into thine own hands. so if a heavy foot, proving to everyone what was built then squashes what they build now. Just act like you're in the year the truck was made. In the 90s the road was for commute, especially in town. I don't know that's my input
This thread is from 2011.

Pulling the manifold reference line off the fuel pressure regulator is a bad idea. That will result in a variable delta across the injectors. The FPR is there to maintain the 39.15 psi delta across the injectors no matter the manifold vacuum.

The stock air intake IS a cold air intake.

Exhaust backpressure will always hinder performance on a 4-stroke ICE. Backpressure doesn't equal velocity or scavenging.

Thanks for the reminder that these forums exist. I'll have to tool around and see what's new.
 
The following users liked this post:
  #58  
Old 03-15-2024, 12:24 PM
torq'ta 5 8's Avatar
torq'ta 5 8
torq'ta 5 8 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: N.W. Alabama
Posts: 4,546
Received 691 Likes on 512 Posts
He seems to have a few bad ideas, that need not done.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dklein91
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
13
12-29-2023 11:14 AM
bedmondo
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
05-28-2007 08:33 PM
splitmaster
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
03-31-2003 05:18 PM
jellybellyjean
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
02-13-2003 05:17 PM
sitlet
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
5
09-18-2002 07:39 AM



Quick Reply: Really bad gas mileage on 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.