Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6 and 2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:02 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
(2011 F-150 Ecoboost Full Review Towing Included)

(Part 1)
Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 FX2 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, Part 1 - PickupTrucks.com News

(Part 2)
Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 FX2 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, Part 2 - PickupTrucks.com News


The Ecoboost seemed to do pretty well, but I gotta admit I am disapointed in its towing MPG. They only managed 7.2mpg avg's with it. Seems like a decent engine though, Unloaded MPG's were more acceptable and about what I expected from it. But still not right for me. The 5.0L is my pick of the litter.

Anyway hope ya'll enjoy the read.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:28 AM
msgtord's Avatar
msgtord msgtord is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas in the heart
Posts: 647
msgtord has a great reputation on FTE.msgtord has a great reputation on FTE.msgtord has a great reputation on FTE.msgtord has a great reputation on FTE.msgtord has a great reputation on FTE.
I have driven much of that route, especially 163 out of Laughlin, and I can tell you it is a tough climb. During the summer it is not unusual to see multiple vehicles broken on the side of the road. It is also a hill that Ford uses to test tow vehicles on a daily basis. The Ford test track is in Yucca, Az. Not far from the "big hill".

I would like to know how the ecoboost would have done, had premium fuel been used during the most extreme portions of the route. Maybe that would have made some difference in fuel economy.

I predict that not to far in the future, the v6 will be the norm for most light duty trucks on the road. With CAFE standards continuing to climb, the auto makers don't really have a choice.

So, I will be taking really good care of my truck, and hanging on to the old v8 as long as I can.
__________________
2014 F250, XLT, 6.2, 3.73 4x4 Crewcab, 6.5' bed. Camper package.

USMC Retired

Neal
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:33 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
I agree with you for the most part...But I don't think V8 will be completely dead in the future. I read an article recently that said Ford still has big plans for future V8's, But Ford is speculating they will be engines more akin to the 5.0L V8 and not so much the 6.2L V8. If I can find the article again I'll repost it here for you.

Turbo'd V6's might become more the norm, but I suspect Ford will still offer a V8 option such as the 5.0L.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:40 AM
NASSTY's Avatar
NASSTY NASSTY is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ME
Posts: 1,726
NASSTY has a great reputation on FTE.NASSTY has a great reputation on FTE.NASSTY has a great reputation on FTE.NASSTY has a great reputation on FTE.
I'll be happy if I can get the same unloaded fuel mileage with mine as they got.
I seldom tow and never tow anything heavy so the crappy towing mileage doesn't matter to me.By not towing, I don't really need the 36 gallon tank either.I already can't afford to fill the 36 gallon tank in the Bronco.
__________________
2011 FX4

92 Bronco
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2011, 10:46 AM
jweidert's Avatar
jweidert jweidert is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
Posts: 184
jweidert is starting off with a positive reputation.
This article suggests what I've suspected after a few test drives in both the 5.0 & EB, and that is the EB has to work harder under certain conditions (obviously towing, but really anytime those turbos spool up). When it does, the MPG hit is more significant than a 5.0 under similar conditions. I'm having a hell of a time trying to figure out which engine would be better in a truck that will be lifted (4-6" w/ 35s), and I'm not expecting any tests to come out to help me decide that From what I'm seeing with the EB so far in these tests, my concern is that the EB will have to work harder in a lifted truck vs the 5.0, but the highter torque may be a plus in this use case, so it's a tough call overall.
__________________
2005 Ford Excursion Limited 6.0 PSD (RIP, Lemon Law)
Desire a 2011+ F150....trying to decide between EB * 5.0
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2011, 10:52 AM
jweidert's Avatar
jweidert jweidert is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
Posts: 184
jweidert is starting off with a positive reputation.
One more comment, this article confirms that the small gas tank in the EB is a weakness for those who are going to use the truck to tow no matter how frequently. Some may go out and install a larger tank like the SD guys are doing (short bed SDs come with a small tank as well), but it would only make sense to make the 36 gallon tank an option. I would go for 36 myself regardless of towing frequently. Fewer trips to the station is a good thing.
__________________
2005 Ford Excursion Limited 6.0 PSD (RIP, Lemon Law)
Desire a 2011+ F150....trying to decide between EB * 5.0
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2011, 06:16 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,177
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I'm simply fricken impressed with the unloaded MPG's! That speaks volumes for a person who lives in a fairly flat area.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2011, 11:04 PM
jimmyb08SD's Avatar
jimmyb08SD jimmyb08SD is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, Fl
Posts: 1,442
jimmyb08SD has a very good reputation on FTE.jimmyb08SD has a very good reputation on FTE.jimmyb08SD has a very good reputation on FTE.jimmyb08SD has a very good reputation on FTE.
Filled mine up this evening, reset the guage and went from Ft. Pierce, Fl to Stewart, Fl on Indian river Dr. speed limit 35-45 for approx 25 miles upon arrival in Steward average MPGs was at 27. Was as high as 28 but the last few miles was alot of traffic and some stop and go. Will post a pic of the dash showing this asap.
__________________

2014 F150 STX

Jim, Fl. Chapter Leader"Army Vet. and American for Life"
View my Gallery here- or http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/me...lorer+xlt.html
Join the
Florida Chapter Here
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 11:04 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (3.5L, 2.0L)

Tags
150, 2011, ecoboost, f150, ford, fuel, manual, mpg, owners, premium, review, reviews, road, test, towing

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup