JP-8 Jet Fuel - Page 4 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

JP-8 Jet Fuel

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #46  
Old 06-04-2014, 05:34 PM
flainn's Avatar
flainn flainn is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Lunas, NM
Posts: 1,166
flainn has a very good reputation on FTE.flainn has a very good reputation on FTE.flainn has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HT32BSX115 View Post
DON'T do it!

Think Kero mixed with gasoline............. Ask anyone here what happens to a 6.0L engine when you mix gasoline with diesel (gasoline mixed with K1 would be much worse IMHO since Kerosine has lower lubricity)
Sorry, I misspoke. I didn't mean I was going to run my 6.0 on JP-4 sooner or later. Just that I was probably going to experiment with fuels other than pump diesel sooner or later.

Quote:
I don't know where you'd get it anymore though. The USAF stopped using it in the mid 90's It was pretty much completely replaced by JP-8.
I used to have access to a ~10,000 gallon container of old, probably-will-never-be-used JP-4 that had been forgotten. Used to.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-05-2014, 11:45 AM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115 HT32BSX115 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,209
HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by flainn View Post

I used to have access to a ~10,000 gallon container of old, probably-will-never-be-used JP-4 that had been forgotten. Used to.
Now that would be REALLY cool if it were kerosine or diesel!
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-05-2014, 04:14 PM
Per4mance's Avatar
Per4mance Per4mance is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Morganville,N.J.
Posts: 2,791
Per4mance is a name known to allPer4mance is a name known to allPer4mance is a name known to allPer4mance is a name known to allPer4mance is a name known to allPer4mance is a name known to all
Just add oil to it LOL
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-17-2014, 04:47 PM
slowlanemcvane slowlanemcvane is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tacoma Washington
Posts: 160
slowlanemcvane is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.slowlanemcvane is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I'm actually considering doing this. I work on Gray Army Airfield at Fort Lewis, and we take fuel samples during preflight every time we go up. Pull a quart of fuel out of the six tanks on our CH-47s, and it goes into a fuel sample station. If the aircraft lands and takes on more fuel, then the old sample is void and not suitable for putting back into the aircraft. I may take that fuel, pour it into a fuel can, and start using it diluted with pump diesel. Maybe 5 gallons per tank. I figure it's a free source of fuel, and it should work just fine when cut with pump diesel.

Hmmmmm...
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-17-2014, 09:14 PM
Gurahl Gurahl is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: JBER, AK
Posts: 72
Gurahl is starting off with a positive reputation.
According to the TM for our FMTV JP-8 is the tertiary fuel and the Army still runs it in all of it's tactical vehicles. We have an F-350 that we use for Conus EOD Response. When one of the new guys accidentally filled it with JP-8, our maintenance guys dropped the tank, cleaned it, and replaced all the filters before they would let us use it. Take it for what it's worth.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 06-20-2014, 03:55 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115 HT32BSX115 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,209
HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowlanemcvane View Post
I'm actually considering doing this. I work on Gray Army Airfield at Fort Lewis, and we take fuel samples during preflight every time we go up. Pull a quart of fuel out of the six tanks on our CH-47s, and it goes into a fuel sample station. If the aircraft lands and takes on more fuel, then the old sample is void and not suitable for putting back into the aircraft. I may take that fuel, pour it into a fuel can, and start using it diluted with pump diesel. Maybe 5 gallons per tank. I figure it's a free source of fuel, and it should work just fine when cut with pump diesel.

Hmmmmm...
Probably "ok" in an older rotory type diesel injection system mixed with some biodiesel, light oil, 2-stroke oil, etc.

I wouldn't put it in a HEUI or Common rail engine.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-20-2014, 04:00 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390 Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,868
Bullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by HT32BSX115 View Post
Probably "ok" in an older rotory type diesel injection system mixed with some biodiesel, light oil, 2-stroke oil, etc.

I wouldn't put it in a HEUI or Common rail engine.
If anything a HEUI is the most tolerant to fuel type being the actuation is done by engine oil and the fuel supply is constant pressure.

Mechanical injection, and common rail utilize far more complicated injection pumps and parts.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-21-2014, 10:12 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115 HT32BSX115 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,209
HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.HT32BSX115 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullitt390 View Post
If anything a HEUI is the most tolerant to fuel type being the actuation is done by engine oil and the fuel supply is constant pressure.

Mechanical injection, and common rail utilize far more complicated injection pumps and parts.

Josh
I am thinking that HEUI injectors might be fairly sensitive to low lubricity fuel in the "fuel-side" of the injector, which might contribute to piston "stiction" .............Is that even a word?)

You're right though, that fuel injection pumps might be more susceptible to damage from lower-lubricity fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-21-2014, 10:24 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390 Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,868
Bullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant futureBullitt390 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by HT32BSX115 View Post
I am thinking that HEUI injectors might be fairly sensitive to low lubricity fuel in the "fuel-side" of the injector, which might contribute to piston "stiction" .............Is that even a word?)

You're right though, that fuel injection pumps might be more susceptible to damage from lower-lubricity fuel.
The earliest 6.0 injectors suffered piston scarring, but the updated injectors with the DLC are more durable.

I have been curious about plunger "stiction"... It seems some failed injectors do suffer some form of that. Though I would likely blame low fuel pressure for it.

Josh
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carb jets dwhawkins89 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 0 03-24-2016 04:28 AM
Trying to gain understanding of Carburetor Theory whisler 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 12 02-14-2016 11:54 AM
jets jets jets 1983 f150 302 v8 cubanice27 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 10-03-2015 05:42 AM
Carter YF Carb-Jet size for 5,500 ft Ira Brown 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 05-21-2015 04:53 AM
Jet size???? motor 272, carb Autolite 2100 292J C3TF-K jimcar-9 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 18 04-28-2008 02:02 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
2005, 60, burning, buy, cost, f250, fuel, gallon, jet, jp8, maximum, military, powerstroke, reuse, temperature

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.