Q-jet on 300?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-26-2011, 08:53 AM
fordboy300's Avatar
fordboy300
fordboy300 is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Q-jet on 300?

Has anyone tried using a quadrajet on a offy intake? My nieghbor has three Q-jets in garage, he said he would sell me one I have my eye set on this edelbrock he has but its for Q-jet applications. I wanna see if this is doable before I go waist my money on something that won't work.
 
  #2  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:01 AM
f100jim's Avatar
f100jim
f100jim is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The quadrajet is rather large for the 300. I would look for something a lot smaller, like a 390 CFM Holley or a 500 CFM Edelbrock.
 
  #3  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:13 AM
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Harte3 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Some use the Qjet. It has small primaries like the 390 and huge secondaries which can be adjusted to the flow requirements of the engine so as not to "bog" it when mashing the gas.
 
  #4  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:37 AM
76F100guy's Avatar
76F100guy
76F100guy is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harte3
Some use the Qjet. It has small primaries like the 390 and huge secondaries which can be adjusted to the flow requirements of the engine so as not to "bog" it when mashing the gas.
What he said.

I ran a Q-Jet for about a year. Had it built especially for this application. Never satisfied, I moved on to an Edelbrock 500. The dialed Q-Jet worked a little better, but the Edelbrock is really simple (comparatively).
 
  #5  
Old 03-26-2011, 12:23 PM
kedwinh's Avatar
kedwinh
kedwinh is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Casa Grande
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There was a small Q-Jet used on some 3.8L and 4.1L V6 GM's, got one on a shelf. They came in feedback and non-feedback. I think they were 390's but not real sure. They work great for off roading but the Edelbrock or Holley would be allot easier to work on and maybe turn.
 
  #6  
Old 03-26-2011, 02:11 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
Of course you need the Offy C, right? I'm not an expert on the Qjet, but I've read a lot about them. From what I gather, it all depends on how much time and work you want to put into tuning/dialing in the Qjet for the 300.

You can buy a new Edelbrock 500 and it will bolt right on and run great right out of the box, with only minor adjustment of the mix, idle.
 
  #7  
Old 03-26-2011, 02:55 PM
fordboy300's Avatar
fordboy300
fordboy300 is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wow guys thanks the info I forgot I posted this thread I'm at work right now but thanks, I guess my best bet is to buy the eddy 500 or the holley 390! Does anybody have a preference in brand and what's easier to work on?
 
  #8  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:05 PM
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Rogue_Wulff
Rogue_Wulff is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
My opinion, the edelbrock is much easier to setup. They rarely need much more than idle speed and mixture adjustment to just work right.

Only trouble area I have encountered with a brand new edelbrock, was one of the metering rods was assembled incorrectly, causing the carb to drip fuel thru one of the primaries at idle. Popped out that rod, corrected the retainer spring/clip, and put it back together, worked great. This was a brand new, out of the box install. I could have returned it, and waited a couple days for a replacement, but I chose to just jump in and spend 2 minutes fixing the issue.
 
  #9  
Old 03-26-2011, 03:24 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
I love my 500. Bought it new and it worked great. I also bought $50 jet kit for it, so I could adjust the secondaries, make it leaner, richer, etc., and I laughed when I changed the metering rod to lean it out one stage. With the carb on vehicle, it was one screw, pull it out, insert new one, retighten screw! Gotta love it.


 
  #10  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:04 PM
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Rogue_Wulff
Rogue_Wulff is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
I love my 500. Bought it new and it worked great. I also bought $50 jet kit for it, so I could adjust the secondaries, make it leaner, richer, etc., and I laughed when I changed the metering rod to lean it out one stage. With the carb on vehicle, it was one screw, pull it out, insert new one, retighten screw! Gotta love it.

LOL. You know just how stupidly simple my repair was then.....
I will admit, I have no first hand experience with either a holley or edelbrock on a 300. But, I have played with both on one of my rotary engines. The holley is a royal pain to tune. The edelbrock came out of the box tuned pretty much right on the money, aside from idle speed/mix, and that one metering rod.
As odd as the rotary is, the edelbrock just works right. That says a lot in my book. FWIW, there's a company in cali that has been selling custom holley's for rotaries for many years, and they claim they have to do extensive reworking inside them to make them work right. Hmmm, edelbrock must have done something wrong then..........
 
  #11  
Old 03-26-2011, 08:03 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Yeah, Edelbrock FTW.
 
  #12  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:44 PM
dwrestle's Avatar
dwrestle
dwrestle is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brumley, MO
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a Q-Jet, and I never got along with it, but my motor is too tired for a big carb like that. Maybe a low miles, or a stock rebuilt 300 might be ok with a Q-jet, but it's still a batch to tune LOL. I had to downgrade to Motorcraft 2bbl.
 
  #13  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:15 AM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
6CylBill is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think if it were me I'd just go with a good 2BBL.
 
  #14  
Old 03-28-2011, 06:49 PM
Bdox's Avatar
Bdox
Bdox is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 28,609
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I think that you would need an adapter to install the Q-jet. Isn't the Edelbrock manifold a "square bore?"

Most Q-jets are around 750cfm. It might work just because it has vacuum secondaries so they will only open as much as needed. On the up side, the tiny primaries provide pretty good mileage.

Just thinking...
 
  #15  
Old 03-29-2011, 09:59 PM
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Harte3 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What Bdox said. Any spread bore will need a spread bore/square adapter especially if using the Offy DP. The Qjet secondaries operate like the AFB/Edelbrock with an air flap...not vacuum operated like the Holley. And like with any other carb, if rebuilding a Qjet pay particular attention to the throttle shaft...they wear and should be rebushed and replaced.
 


Quick Reply: Q-jet on 300?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.