3.7, 3.5 and 3.0 Duratec V6 Forum for the 3.7, 3.5 and 3.0 naturally aspirated Duratec V6 Engines

2011 3.7 V-6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:36 PM
riflecrank's Avatar
riflecrank
riflecrank is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 3.7 V-6

I have racked up 2000 miles on my new F-150 XLT regular cab 4X2 and all I can say is, this is the best truck I have ever owned. I currently own a 2003 F-250 Super duty 6.8 V-10 super cab. I sold my 5th wheel trailer and decided to get something with a little more fuel economy. Everyone is hot for the Eco-Boost but don't let its little brother fool you. It is an amazing engine with plenty of power and great fuel mileage. I'm averaging 21.9 MPG so far combined city and hwy. I also think the little V-6 will blow the V-10 away in a drag race. The only complaint that I have is the SYNC system voice recognition sucks. The Bitch can't understand anything I say.
 
  #2  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:46 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,128
Received 1,219 Likes on 802 Posts
Originally Posted by riflecrank
I have racked up 2000 miles on my new F-150 XLT regular cab 4X2 and all I can say is, this is the best truck I have ever owned. I currently own a 2003 F-250 Super duty 6.8 V-10 super cab. I sold my 5th wheel trailer and decided to get something with a little more fuel economy. Everyone is hot for the Eco-Boost but don't let its little brother fool you. It is an amazing engine with plenty of power and great fuel mileage. I'm averaging 21.9 MPG so far combined city and hwy. I also think the little V-6 will blow the V-10 away in a drag race. The only complaint that I have is the SYNC system voice recognition sucks. The Bitch can't understand anything I say.
Welcome to FTE! What axle ratio do you have?

Great first post sir.
 
  #3  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:50 PM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
With gas prices heading upward as rapidly as they have been, the 3.7 looks better every day as a great choice for most people who don't carry or tow really big loads.

Ford was really wise to position themselves in the marketplace with a very good, modern V6.

(I still think they would do well to build a slightly smaller truck, maybe Dakota sized, with the 3.5/3.7 engines, in addition to the F-150.)

George
 
  #4  
Old 03-05-2011, 09:33 PM
riflecrank's Avatar
riflecrank
riflecrank is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Axle

Originally Posted by tseekins
Welcome to FTE! What axle ratio do you have?

Great first post sir.
I have the 3.73 limited slip. I'm pretty good at squeezing mileage, I get 16 MPG with the 2003 V-10 when I'm not towing. When I hooked the 5th wheel on it would drop like a rock to around 7-9 MPG.
 
  #5  
Old 03-05-2011, 09:44 PM
riflecrank's Avatar
riflecrank
riflecrank is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Midsize truck

Originally Posted by YoGeorge
With gas prices heading upward as rapidly as they have been, the 3.7 looks better every day as a great choice for most people who don't carry or tow really big loads.

Ford was really wise to position themselves in the marketplace with a very good, modern V6.

(I still think they would do well to build a slightly smaller truck, maybe Dakota sized, with the 3.5/3.7 engines, in addition to the F-150.)

George
I Think Ford is really screwing the pooch by not replacing the Ranger. A true midsize Ford truck with some new technology would kick butt. If they can make a V-6 run like they are doing I'm sure the could come out with something that could approach 30 MPG and they would sell a boat load of them. Because Americans are stupider than a bag of hammers and have allowed politicians to give our souls to the turd world oil producers $5.00 gas is just around the corner.
 
  #6  
Old 03-06-2011, 05:49 AM
juneau76's Avatar
juneau76
juneau76 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Welcome to FTE. Enjoy that new ride, which it sounds like you already are.
 
  #7  
Old 03-06-2011, 08:26 AM
FoMoFun's Avatar
FoMoFun
FoMoFun is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glad you are enjoying the V6! Had dinner with friends last night and my buddy just got the 2011 3.7 in a club cab-he loves it too.
 
  #8  
Old 03-06-2011, 02:07 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,128
Received 1,219 Likes on 802 Posts
The 3.7L was a wise choice for Ford to have made. Not only is the v-6 stang fast as hell but the truck really came alive considering it replaced the 4.6L 2V.

I love the custom package that's available with it too.
 
  #9  
Old 03-06-2011, 04:30 PM
Fred Smedley123's Avatar
Fred Smedley123
Fred Smedley123 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I almost bought the 3.7 myself . When you hit 3500 with that motor in 1 2 or 3rd gear it flat out gets with the program. I bought the 5.0 as I tow 95% of the time and I felt towing 2500lbs the added torque of the V8 that the MPG would be a wash and so far I have been real happy with the choice. My wife agrees as a rice burner tried to race her to to the ramp to cut her off when we swapped vehicles last week and got smoked by the 5.0.
What I do know is that a lighter motor and thus a lighter truck will give bigger grins when the road turns twisty. Ford has raised the bar in the car world across the board IMO.
 
  #10  
Old 03-06-2011, 05:43 PM
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
94MustangGT is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty impressive! I am a fan of the Duratec V6 line up and it's good to see them in new applications.

And +1 on a need for midsized or smaller truck... 3.7 and an EB 2.0.
 
  #11  
Old 03-07-2011, 05:35 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Moved to correct forum.
 
  #12  
Old 03-17-2011, 07:36 PM
Dblosser1's Avatar
Dblosser1
Dblosser1 is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 XLT 3.7L

I bought a 2011 xlt 3.7L back in january replaced a s-10. The best move I ever made the s-10 got about 18.3mpg I'm now averaging about 20.8 combined. If your worried about the 3.7 not having enough power, don't theres plenty you just have push the pedal alittle harder. My drive to work and back is around 64 miles and truck does find. I must admit I don't run it hard but I average 60 mph. One thing to note the tach goes to 7000 and theres now red line. Theres plenty of engine I haven't explored yet. Don't need to go that fast in a truck.
 
  #13  
Old 10-30-2013, 06:18 AM
mefast's Avatar
mefast
mefast is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southwestern, Ontario
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the 3.7l in my Mustang and it pulls hard when you get into the loud pedal. I've managed to run a 14 sec 1/4 @ 99mph and impress a lot of people at autocross. This motor is a sleeper because of the 5.0l, but the aftermarket is starting to get more products out for it.

Glad to hear you are enjoying your truck!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gadiedrick
2017+ Super Duty
14
01-20-2016 06:25 PM
tylerz71
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
26
10-25-2015 02:08 PM
jerem0621
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
48
04-23-2012 09:39 AM
05 super
Modular V10 (6.8l)
12
02-24-2008 10:15 PM
Rengaw
Modular V10 (6.8l)
15
12-07-2005 02:14 AM



Quick Reply: 2011 3.7 V-6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.