Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Exhaust Y-pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:53 AM
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
atccracing is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Martins Creek, PA
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exhaust Y-pipe

I was on another post yesterday discussing exhaust, but can't find it today. It was a nicely done van using Pacesetter headers and a custom 3" y-pipe.

I was so impressed with te fit of the headers, I ordered a set.

Now here's my question, and with some other posts I've seen, it may be more of an opinion. He used a 3inch y-pipe, into a single 3 inch exhaust. With the pacesetters having a 3" slip collector it was probably the easiest. I want to make my Y-pipe also, and am debatting (mostly with myself) whether to go 3 inch and keep it simple, or try to reduce it to 2.5" Y-pipe, into the 3" inch single.
 
  #2  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:24 AM
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
73FOMO is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, AL
Posts: 1,462
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Personally I would stay with the 2.5". I have some pics of a 2.5" Y-pipe I built on this thread....https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1034582-y-pipe.html
 
  #3  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:36 AM
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
atccracing is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Martins Creek, PA
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I checked it out, 73FOMO, nice work. My only concern is, that with the long tube headers into a 2.5 reducer, I won't have enough room for my y-pipe to turn nicely. With the 3" it simplifies things because there is no reducer to worry about.

I'd prefer 2.5 at the Y, but 3 is so much simpler. But if the popular oppinion is that it won't matter, then 3 it is!
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:50 AM
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
73FOMO is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, AL
Posts: 1,462
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Go with what your comfortable with. 2.5" worked nicely for me and I didn't want to go to big and lose torque. I used Mandrel pipes so that makes a diff.
 
  #5  
Old 02-18-2011, 12:00 PM
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
atccracing is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Martins Creek, PA
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The loss of torque, is why I'm debating. If running a 3in Y will be that counter productive, then I'll figure out how to make the 2.5 in work!
 
  #6  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:58 PM
atccracing's Avatar
atccracing
atccracing is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Martins Creek, PA
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some times the obvious is so close you look right past it!! I'll weld a 3in 90 to the drivers collector, then reduce it to 2.5 right after it turns. The pass. collector can go right into a reducer. Then I can run 2.5 into the Y, and 3in out.
 
  #7  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:01 PM
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
73FOMO is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, AL
Posts: 1,462
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
That should work. I picked up my 2.5 merge collector from Summit for around $26.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atlfan65
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
07-13-2017 07:19 AM
powerstroke8806
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
3
03-29-2016 01:09 AM
duetsch65
Modular V10 (6.8l)
92
01-28-2012 10:48 PM
ericmarino
1997 - 2003 F150
2
04-28-2009 12:05 AM
CJK440
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
1
12-16-2005 08:40 PM



Quick Reply: Exhaust Y-pipe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.