Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-09-2011, 10:48 PM
Voodoo66 Voodoo66 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 80
Voodoo66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Rear End Ratio

Help guys..................I drive a 1964 F100 everyday to and from work. Round trip is about 88 miles a day. I am running a 351 windsor mated to a mechanical AOD. Traveling at 60 mph im running at 2500 rpms. Since all my driving is interstate this tends to drink a lot of gas. Im running on 15 inch rims. Does anyone else drive their truck regularly and have any suggestions for a better gear ratio to lower my rpms and try to save some money on gas? I burn about 13 gallons of fuel every 2 days. I dont feel its worth it nor can i afford buying a new truck. One of oue salesman have a new 2011 F150 and only gets 18 miles per gallon. So a new truck is not the answer. Besides mine is paid for (hahahaha). I have thought about larger wheels but dont want to take away from the originality appearance of the truck but not agianst it. Any suggestions or information y'all can give would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2011, 10:54 PM
CropDusterMan's Avatar
CropDusterMan CropDusterMan is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Valley Center, CA
Posts: 955
CropDusterMan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.CropDusterMan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I run 3.73 gearing (F250 Dana 60) and am a tad below 2000rpm at 60...I'm guessing that would help a bit with mileage, but the aerodynamics of our rigs are not exactly helping...are you timed well and have good carb settings...that can help a touch.
__________________
"Common sense is not very common".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2011, 10:55 PM
Jim W.'s Avatar
Jim W. Jim W. is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Posts: 139
Jim W. is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am guessing you have 3.89's or 4.11's. I would imagine something in the 3.25 to 3.50 range would be a big improvement.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2011, 11:03 PM
RJP66F100's Avatar
RJP66F100 RJP66F100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 397
RJP66F100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo66 View Post
I am running a 351 windsor mated to a mechanical AOD.
Well you're already in better shape than a bunch of us in that you have overdrive. If it is for sure shifting into overdrive then you need to figure out what gears you have now, if ya got 4.11 then I'd go to 3.70. If ya have 3.89 or 3.70 then I'd try 3.50s. These are common numbers for 9inch, not sure if that's what you have....
__________________
_______________________

1966 F100, 466, Comp 274 XE, RPM Air Gap,
850 Str HP, C6, PS, Pwr Disc Brks, 8.42 in 1/8 mile

Romans 6:23
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2011, 11:33 PM
Voodoo66 Voodoo66 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 80
Voodoo66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I could be wrong BUT i thought i decoded the door tag to say it was 3.73's. Is 3.01's to low for a truck like ours? I dont wanna loose the functionality of the truck if i do need to pull something and I dont have my '65 F250. Im not looking to win races running from red light to red light but want it to be a comfortable crusier, especially once I add A/C. I just worry about the 3.01's being to low of a gear.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2011, 12:03 AM
Jim W.'s Avatar
Jim W. Jim W. is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Posts: 139
Jim W. is starting off with a positive reputation.
I tend to think 3.01's would be to tall. That would be more appropriate for a car equipped with smaller tires. A truck, with OD and tall tires would likely struggle.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2011, 12:19 AM
RJP66F100's Avatar
RJP66F100 RJP66F100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 397
RJP66F100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
So I guess we're not talking about a 9" rear axle or do you know?
What size rear tires do ya run?
__________________
_______________________

1966 F100, 466, Comp 274 XE, RPM Air Gap,
850 Str HP, C6, PS, Pwr Disc Brks, 8.42 in 1/8 mile

Romans 6:23
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2011, 12:41 AM
jhooch's Avatar
jhooch jhooch is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,516
jhooch is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
3.25's seem to be a good all around ratio and they're a dime a dozen at pick & pull.
__________________
Jeff
'05 Excursion LTD 6.0 4X4, 01 F250 7.3 4X4 Crew
73 Bronco, 66 F100 CC LWB, 62 Uni LWB
69 Cobra 428CJ, 4-speed, 64 Fairlane 2dr Post
See my other projects at: www.fullsizeford.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2011, 03:08 AM
Opossum Opossum is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 3,026
Opossum is a name known to allOpossum is a name known to allOpossum is a name known to allOpossum is a name known to allOpossum is a name known to allOpossum is a name known to all
Until you find out what your ratio is right now for sure this is all a guess, so start there.

Easiest way to know for sure is to do a little counting. Jack one rear tire off the ground and mark a spot on the inside edge that lines up with something, likely the spring, and a mark on the driveline that lines up with something. Next turn the tire 2 full turns while counting how many times the driveline turns. How many times it turns is your gear ratio. Parts of turns can be hard to estimate if u want to be percise do it the same way but turn the tire 20 times and devide the number of driveline turns by 10.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2011, 06:28 AM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker jowilker is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 22,795
jowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to behold
https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn jowilker
Voodoo, I luv my ol truck, but it aint no way that I would drive it 88 miles a day unless it was related to the job. You need a little hiway cruiser that will get you 25+ mpgs, and save the wear & tear on your truck. Our trucks are like brick bats on the road with no aero at all. You would come out ahead at the end of the year.

You need to get after the math, and make sure you have the correct speedo gear for the setup that you currently have. I run 3.00 rears behind a FE C6, the truck has plenty of power on 15in tires. 2050 @ 55 mph, 3000 is about 82 mph.

The W doesn't have the gonads of the FE so I would not have a final below 3.00 in OD. I have run 2.75 gears, in the truck, it will cursed fine but take off was was wimpy. I would not be afraid to go 2.75 in OD with the FE.

Keep it tuned, are you running electronic spark?




John
__________________
In the cool still quiet hours of night, you can hear chevies rusting away.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-10-2011, 07:30 AM
Voodoo66 Voodoo66 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 80
Voodoo66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well my old truck is my only option at this point time. I am running a MSD pro billet distributor, with 6A, and blaster 3 coil, and E3 spark plugs. As far as the rear end goes it is a 9". I know my front tires are small but my rears are P275/6R15.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-10-2011, 12:56 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker jowilker is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 22,795
jowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to beholdjowilker is a splendid one to behold
https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn jowilker
Likewise I have a 9" rear. The 9 has ratios all over the place to get the best performance the ratio needs to match the need. If you were to put a 3.00 ratio with the OD it wouldn't run in OD. A 4.11 or higher and your engine is turning to many rpms.

I suspect a 3.50 or 3.75 would be a good ratio to use with the AOD.



John
__________________
In the cool still quiet hours of night, you can hear chevies rusting away.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-13-2011, 06:26 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 55,821
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo66 View Post
One of oue salesman have a new 2011 F150 and only gets 18 miles per gallon. So a new truck is not the answer.
18 MPG? That's the EPA rating. Your actual MPG will vary. I doubt anyone will get 18 MPG...unless they drive 55 with the A/C off.

Onboard computer sez: Best so far for my 2011 F150: 12.9 MPG!!! / If you want good MPG, buy an econobox.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / SoCal Chapter Member / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-13-2011, 08:52 PM
RJP66F100's Avatar
RJP66F100 RJP66F100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 397
RJP66F100 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberDummy View Post
Onboard computer sez: Best so far for my 2011 F150: 12.9 MPG!!!
Bill, you like yours so far? Tell us a little about it (besides what's in your sig.) if ya don't mind.
__________________
_______________________

1966 F100, 466, Comp 274 XE, RPM Air Gap,
850 Str HP, C6, PS, Pwr Disc Brks, 8.42 in 1/8 mile

Romans 6:23
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-14-2011, 03:36 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 55,821
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJP66F100 View Post
Bill, you like yours so far? Tell us a little about it (besides what's in your sig.) if ya don't mind.
Has every available option...except 4WD, Navigation, DVD...and a bedliner.

MSRP was $39,900.00. One would think for this price, a bedliner would be included.

It's 8 1/2" shorter than 20' so it barely fits in the garage...and this is the short bed.

As soon as I get around to taking some, will post some pics of this elephantine behemouth (which is huge compared to the 2008 Fusion I traded in).
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / SoCal Chapter Member / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2011, 03:36 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PM-22 Dilution Ratio gopackgo Super Duty & Heavy Duty 6 11-07-2014 09:21 PM
89 F250 351 Cold Start Rough & Stalls caindog110 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 5 02-12-2013 06:15 PM
Misfire at low RPMs mattocs Escape & Escape Hybrid 4 10-03-2012 03:10 PM
Fuel experiments Hybris 1997 - 2003 F150 3 02-16-2012 10:18 AM
Truck got wet, now it's running rough Big Red F250 SD Super Duty & Heavy Duty 7 02-08-2006 10:31 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
1966, 274xe, 351, comp, e3, end, f250, ford, is, plugs, ratio, rear, spark, truck, windsor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup