Pickuptrucks.com (2011 5.0L Full Review Towing Included) - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150

Pickuptrucks.com (2011 5.0L Full Review Towing Included)

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-07-2011, 11:51 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,140
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Pickuptrucks.com (2011 5.0L Full Review Towing Included)

Hey Guys. I really enjoyed reading this and thought ya'll might too.

Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8 - PickupTrucks.com News


Comment back and let me know what you think! Can't wait for that new FX4 5.0 to be sitting in my driveway.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2011, 12:37 AM
Big Bad Big Bad is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 936
Big Bad has a good reputation on FTE.Big Bad has a good reputation on FTE.
The 5.0 looks to be a real overachiever, and possibly the best overall engine in the line-up.

It will interesting to see how they respond to basic bolt-ons and LTs, if they are anything like the Mustang the gains are going to be huge!

Thank God Ford gave up on the 3V!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2011, 01:24 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,140
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bad View Post
The 5.0 looks to be a real overachiever, and possibly the best overall engine in the line-up.

It will interesting to see how they respond to basic bolt-ons and LTs, if they are anything like the Mustang the gains are going to be huge!

Thank God Ford gave up on the 3V!
I guess this kinda kills the 5.4L vs 5.0L arguement huh? Many people were worried that the 5.0L wouldn't be a good low end engine because of its above 4K RPM peak Torque. But the proof is in the pudding in this test. The 5.0 can...Outrun the 5.4L and get better fuel econmy while doing it. And it can also drag a 9,000lb trailer like its not even there. Most people I know who own a 5.4L F-150 get nausiated at the idea of dragging a 9,000lb trailer threw the mountains. Sounds like this new 5.0 has enough power on reserve to easily pull the extra weight.

I'm not bashing the 5.4L by any means, I know they are solid and dependable ''At least in my experience'' but they were just getting old is all. They weren't really competitive with the compatiton anymore. But all of the new engine's Ford has introduced is changing that.

Man its a great time to be a Ford guy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:05 AM
fordmdb's Avatar
fordmdb fordmdb is online now
PREMIUM SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,133
fordmdb has a great reputation on FTE.fordmdb has a great reputation on FTE.fordmdb has a great reputation on FTE.fordmdb has a great reputation on FTE.
Great read thanks for the post. Funny the review mentioned the 6th gear lock up issue. I can say first hand towing this 5.0L does in deed have the power to get the job done..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:46 AM
juneau76's Avatar
juneau76 juneau76 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,050
juneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud of
Interesting article. Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2011, 08:51 AM
fordtruckman's Avatar
fordtruckman fordtruckman is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kzoo
Posts: 2,834
fordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to behold
Pretty good article, thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:00 PM
johndeerefarmer johndeerefarmer is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,318
johndeerefarmer has a good reputation on FTE.johndeerefarmer has a good reputation on FTE.
Towing mpg sounded good. City/highway did not. I think the ecoboost will beat it on all counts- just gotta wait for it to get here
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2011, 05:20 PM
msalyer msalyer is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 408
msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Good article. I would still like to see a review using a trailer with a large frontal area like a travel trailer would have.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:28 PM
rb48f6's Avatar
rb48f6 rb48f6 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SE / NWL MI
Posts: 410
rb48f6 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks for posting the link to the article 640, I enjoyed the read.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2011, 07:37 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,187
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Great article!!!!!! I'm so fricken stoked right now!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2011, 07:43 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4 efx4 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,046
efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I've been wondering how the 5.0 really tows at max load in varying road elevations and the info sounds pretty impressive. Good link.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2011, 07:44 PM
senix's Avatar
senix senix is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 26,476
senix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputation
That article was a killer....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2011, 08:48 PM
JGoodish JGoodish is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 25
JGoodish is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer View Post
Towing mpg sounded good. City/highway did not. I think the ecoboost will beat it on all counts- just gotta wait for it to get here
The unloaded mileage was disappointing, but they didn't say exactly what conditions it was evaluated under (sounds like mostly a city mix with perhaps lots of idling in traffic), nor how it was determined (hand calculated or computer). I'd really like to see some on-highway and off-highway numbers, hand calculated, but those seem tough to come by right now.

I suspect that the EcoBoost will beat it, but I wouldn't expect it to do materially better. The EPA average is only 1 mpg better than the 5.0, with most of the benefit coming on the highway. During my recent test drive of an EcoBoost at my dealer, the live computer display of fuel economy tanked (appeared to be around 10-12mpg) anytime I even gently touched the accelerator, and wasn't as impressive as I had hoped for cruising at around 50 mph on rural roads (low 20s.) My observations did seem to validate the EPA numbers, though.

JKG
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2011, 10:20 PM
blueovelboy's Avatar
blueovelboy blueovelboy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: sunnyvale
Posts: 804
blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.
to op thanks for the read it dose give one a lot of food for thought
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8 - PickupTrucks.com News Fomoko1 Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter 25 11-02-2013 11:00 PM
2011 F-150 5.0 Road Test and Review powerstroke72 5.0L Coyote 5 01-02-2012 05:04 PM
(2011 F-150 Ecoboost Full Review Towing Included) 640 CI Aluminum FORD EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 7 04-17-2011 12:04 AM
2011 5.0L and Ecoboost Dyno Charts (Both Very Impressive)! 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2009 - 2014 F150 46 04-14-2011 10:44 AM
2011 Engine Pricing powerstroke72 2009 - 2014 F150 11 09-23-2010 08:40 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
20002011, 2011, 50, 50l, f150, ford, performance, pickuptrucks, pickuptruckscom, reveiw, review, towing, trailering, truck, trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.