Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009 - 2014 F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-07-2011, 10:51 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Pickuptrucks.com (2011 5.0L Full Review Towing Included)

Hey Guys. I really enjoyed reading this and thought ya'll might too.

Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8 - PickupTrucks.com News


Comment back and let me know what you think! Can't wait for that new FX4 5.0 to be sitting in my driveway.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2011, 11:37 PM
Big Bad Big Bad is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 936
Big Bad has a good reputation on FTE.Big Bad has a good reputation on FTE.
The 5.0 looks to be a real overachiever, and possibly the best overall engine in the line-up.

It will interesting to see how they respond to basic bolt-ons and LTs, if they are anything like the Mustang the gains are going to be huge!

Thank God Ford gave up on the 3V!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2011, 12:24 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bad View Post
The 5.0 looks to be a real overachiever, and possibly the best overall engine in the line-up.

It will interesting to see how they respond to basic bolt-ons and LTs, if they are anything like the Mustang the gains are going to be huge!

Thank God Ford gave up on the 3V!
I guess this kinda kills the 5.4L vs 5.0L arguement huh? Many people were worried that the 5.0L wouldn't be a good low end engine because of its above 4K RPM peak Torque. But the proof is in the pudding in this test. The 5.0 can...Outrun the 5.4L and get better fuel econmy while doing it. And it can also drag a 9,000lb trailer like its not even there. Most people I know who own a 5.4L F-150 get nausiated at the idea of dragging a 9,000lb trailer threw the mountains. Sounds like this new 5.0 has enough power on reserve to easily pull the extra weight.

I'm not bashing the 5.4L by any means, I know they are solid and dependable ''At least in my experience'' but they were just getting old is all. They weren't really competitive with the compatiton anymore. But all of the new engine's Ford has introduced is changing that.

Man its a great time to be a Ford guy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2011, 05:05 AM
fordmdb's Avatar
fordmdb fordmdb is offline
PREMIUM SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,012
fordmdb has a very good reputation on FTE.fordmdb has a very good reputation on FTE.fordmdb has a very good reputation on FTE.
Great read thanks for the post. Funny the review mentioned the 6th gear lock up issue. I can say first hand towing this 5.0L does in deed have the power to get the job done..
__________________
Custom Tuning for F-E-Series Engines 6.8L V10 / 5.4L V8 / 4.6L V8 / 6.2L V8 / 5.0L V8 / 3.7L V6 / 3.5L EB and more!
SCT Custom Tuning Dealer
www.5startuning.com email me here:mike@5startuning.com 843-536-1244
https://www.facebook.com/pages/5-Sta...92086367552400
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2011, 05:46 AM
juneau76's Avatar
juneau76 juneau76 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,050
juneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud ofjuneau76 has much to be proud of
Interesting article. Thanks for posting.
__________________
Brad
2010 F-150 XLT Supercrew 4x4 5.4L
2013 Explorer Limited (The wife's family truckster)

Quote:
You haven't lived life until you've done 110mph in a Yugo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2011, 07:51 AM
fordtruckman's Avatar
fordtruckman fordtruckman is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kzoo
Posts: 2,821
fordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to beholdfordtruckman is a splendid one to behold
Pretty good article, thanks for posting.
__________________
Matt | 2004 F150 SCAB 4.6l 4x4 |

[URL=http://www.fuelly.com/driver/MatthewSimmons08/f150]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2011, 01:00 PM
johndeerefarmer johndeerefarmer is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 593
johndeerefarmer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Towing mpg sounded good. City/highway did not. I think the ecoboost will beat it on all counts- just gotta wait for it to get here
__________________
2015 F-350 SCREW 4x4 Lariat with 6.7 PSD & Off Road Package, Ruby Red Metallic, 3.55 with E-locker, 20" wheels and tires, chrome packeage, B&W gooseneck hitch, Weathertech mats, Line X bedliner
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2011, 04:20 PM
msalyer msalyer is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 406
msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.msalyer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Good article. I would still like to see a review using a trailer with a large frontal area like a travel trailer would have.
__________________
2012 Oxford White F150 Screw HD XLT 6.5 4x4 5.0 3:73 LS
2008 Bright Red / Parchment Mustang Convertible 4.0 Auto
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2011, 05:28 PM
rb48f6's Avatar
rb48f6 rb48f6 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SE / NWL MI
Posts: 410
rb48f6 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks for posting the link to the article 640, I enjoyed the read.
__________________
Bob
'48 F6.5; 391FT, 5x3, 2spd (progress - stalled), '77 F750 CC
'11 F150 5.0L FX4 157 Supercrew (on order), '09 Fusion, '62 641, '01 FLHTCUI, '10 FLHTK
Prev: '00 F250 SC 7.3 4x, '92 F350 CC 7.3 4x, '89 F250 4x, '86 Rngr 4x, '68 Bronco 4x
FTE Albums:
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/members/rb48f6-416521-albums.htm
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:37 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,529
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Great article!!!!!! I'm so fricken stoked right now!
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:43 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4 efx4 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 989
efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I've been wondering how the 5.0 really tows at max load in varying road elevations and the info sounds pretty impressive. Good link.
__________________
2013 Keystone Outback 33' Travel Trailer
2013 F-150 Max Tow Ecoboost Lariat
2014 Ford Fusion SE Ecoboost
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2011, 06:44 PM
senix's Avatar
senix senix is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 20,418
senix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputation
That article was a killer....
__________________
Scott-2013 F350 with a lot of tires.
2013 40' 4-slider stoneridge 5th wheel coming in at 15,400; 2015 Lincoln MKC
http://www.ford-trucks.com/guidelines.html

Previous Truck 2008 F250 6.4 with lots of upgrades and a suspension upgrade from Torklift International StableLoads
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2011, 07:48 PM
JGoodish JGoodish is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 25
JGoodish is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer View Post
Towing mpg sounded good. City/highway did not. I think the ecoboost will beat it on all counts- just gotta wait for it to get here
The unloaded mileage was disappointing, but they didn't say exactly what conditions it was evaluated under (sounds like mostly a city mix with perhaps lots of idling in traffic), nor how it was determined (hand calculated or computer). I'd really like to see some on-highway and off-highway numbers, hand calculated, but those seem tough to come by right now.

I suspect that the EcoBoost will beat it, but I wouldn't expect it to do materially better. The EPA average is only 1 mpg better than the 5.0, with most of the benefit coming on the highway. During my recent test drive of an EcoBoost at my dealer, the live computer display of fuel economy tanked (appeared to be around 10-12mpg) anytime I even gently touched the accelerator, and wasn't as impressive as I had hoped for cruising at around 50 mph on rural roads (low 20s.) My observations did seem to validate the EPA numbers, though.

JKG
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2011, 09:20 PM
blueovelboy's Avatar
blueovelboy blueovelboy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: sunnyvale
Posts: 739
blueovelboy has a good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a good reputation on FTE.
to op thanks for the read it dose give one a lot of food for thought
__________________
2012 F150 XLT 4X4 crew cab 5.0 with 3:55 lockable rear end
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 09:20 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009 - 2014 F150

Tags
20002011, 2011, 50, 50l, f150, ford, performance, pickuptrucks, pickuptruckscom, reveiw, review, towing, trailering, truck, trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8 - PickupTrucks.com News Fomoko1 Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter 25 11-02-2013 10:00 PM
2011 F-150 5.0 Road Test and Review powerstroke72 5.0L Coyote 5 01-02-2012 04:04 PM
(2011 F-150 Ecoboost Full Review Towing Included) 640 CI Aluminum FORD EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 7 04-16-2011 11:04 PM
2011 5.0L and Ecoboost Dyno Charts (Both Very Impressive)! 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2009 - 2014 F150 46 04-14-2011 09:44 AM
2011 Engine Pricing powerstroke72 2009 - 2014 F150 11 09-23-2010 07:40 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup