302 performer rpm vs summit stage 2 vs ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-06-2011, 04:47 PM
Cerpindicular's Avatar
Cerpindicular
Cerpindicular is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 performer rpm vs summit stage 2 vs ???

I have a 302 2 barrel in my truck (77 f150) that is leaking due to stripped threads in the tstat housing. Since i have to pull the intake to fix the problem i figured i might as well upgrade to 4 barrel but can't decide on the intake. The only one i have experience with is the performer rpm i had on a 350 which i really liked and the summit looks like its a copy of that intake so i was considering going that route. Anyone have experience with these intakes or have suggestions for other intakes to look into?
 
  #2  
Old 02-16-2011, 09:55 PM
ilovemy60ford's Avatar
ilovemy60ford
ilovemy60ford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your engine is mostly stock, you'd be better off with a dual plenum set up, like Edelbrock's Performer (not RPM) or the Weiand Action+.

The open plenum of the Performer RPM or Summit Stage II sacrifices low end power in order to feed the engine at high revs. For a stock/street type setup keep it smaller and you'll appreciate the torque...

Good luck!
 
  #3  
Old 02-17-2011, 07:19 AM
gfw1985's Avatar
gfw1985
gfw1985 is offline
Cranky Old Guy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raphine, Virginia
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Totally agree, especially with the small 302 and heavy truck. You may gain a little MPG with the four barrel if you keep your foot out of it, but you are already running one of the better carbs Ford used. Personally, having changed a number of them to four barrels, I'd leave it be unless you plan on upgrading to a different cam etc.
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2011, 06:19 PM
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Beanscoot is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: May 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2,030
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
With care, it should be possible to repair the stripped thermostat housing threads with helicoil thread inserts without removing the intake manifold.
 
  #5  
Old 02-18-2011, 09:50 PM
Cerpindicular's Avatar
Cerpindicular
Cerpindicular is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
been looking at the weiand stealth intakes seem to be perfect for what i want. On the 302 i could do it without taking the intake off but with everything in the way i think it would be the simpler route
 
  #6  
Old 02-19-2011, 10:04 PM
ilovemy60ford's Avatar
ilovemy60ford
ilovemy60ford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stealth is pretty solid from what I've read. I had one, but some *&^%&^ stole it. I've seen a couple comparisons on Action+, Performer RPM, and Stealth. But still...a bit much, in my opinion, for a mostly stock usage.

Consider the heads, exhaust, intake, and carb as a whole system. The stock heads/cam will never let the engine breathe to the point where the Stealth will be any more fun. If you over intake or over carburate, you are doing nothing except killing power down low on the RPM band that you actually could have used.

You know what carb you plan to run? I've got a 600 CFM Holley on mine, and I really think I'm quite over carbed. I want the 470 truck Avenger
 
  #7  
Old 02-19-2011, 10:16 PM
Ziegelsteinfaust's Avatar
Ziegelsteinfaust
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I personally like Weiland they have a tendency to be the thickest castings.
 
  #8  
Old 02-19-2011, 11:37 PM
Cerpindicular's Avatar
Cerpindicular
Cerpindicular is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if they aren't already on my engine i was planning in the future to do a gt40 head swap maybe a rv game. My engine actually makes pretty good power already so it possible it may be a little worked and i just dont know it. I know the trans and tcase where rebuilt by catt but nothing about the engine other then its not original. Exhaust will probably go with headers into straight pipe and some turbo mufflers maybe glass packs. Carb i am not sure on probably something in the 600 range. I tend to like trails and mud holes more then rock climbing so not to worried about angles.
 
  #9  
Old 02-20-2011, 06:28 AM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The Summit manifolds are Edelbrock knock-offs. RPM FTW!
 
  #10  
Old 02-23-2011, 03:20 PM
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
HemiEater is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've always run the rpm... gonna run a Pro-comp rpm style on my next 351w it was cheap got it for like 130.00 new
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mercmeister
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
38
03-27-2022 11:45 PM
BigCountry1978
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
01-04-2016 09:37 PM
jonny.redneck
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
04-23-2014 04:43 PM
Ranger92
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
10
05-17-2011 07:30 PM
352 blue
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
18
12-01-2004 09:00 AM



Quick Reply: 302 performer rpm vs summit stage 2 vs ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.