Another Duramax, Powerstroke & Cummins Tow Test - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Another Duramax, Powerstroke & Cummins Tow Test

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-06-2011, 11:01 AM
Troy Buenger's Avatar
Troy Buenger Troy Buenger is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 2,747
Troy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to behold
Another Duramax, Powerstroke & Cummins Tow Test

And not surprising the Duramax comes out on top as the towing champ.

Enjoy...

2011 Heavy-Duty Truck Comparison Test
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2011, 12:24 PM
Biggziff's Avatar
Biggziff Biggziff is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 2,402
Biggziff is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Biggziff is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
They're all way more than most of us need, but I can't get past the looks of the Chevy and I won't even consider a Dodge. When I have 2 different multi-line dealers (Dodge, etc) tell me to avoid the Dodge there has to be a reason.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2011, 12:41 PM
bassdude bassdude is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 783
bassdude is starting off with a positive reputation.
that was almost all subjective. 8 seconds difference on 11.5 miles up hill? meh.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2011, 12:56 PM
srkr srkr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arlington,Tx
Posts: 1,330
srkr has a very good reputation on FTE.srkr has a very good reputation on FTE.srkr has a very good reputation on FTE.
Gee,,,that makes me really hate my Truck...

.... oh wait......one more.....

Shane
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:10 PM
Med Sun Med Sun is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 29
Med Sun is starting off with a positive reputation.
GMC is a Great truck I own a Duramax, but I am buying a ford this time. I like them better, however I hope their powertrain proves itself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:15 PM
Tomahawk's Avatar
Tomahawk Tomahawk is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,721
Tomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputationTomahawk has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassdude View Post
that was almost all subjective. 8 seconds difference on 11.5 miles up hill? meh.
I want to know what the times would be if the trucks max. speed was 65mph?
They also don't tell you exactly how long each truck was at full throttle.
It's also funny that in each of these "tests" they don't dare have a heavy
towing/hauling mileage comparison. I can only wonder why???
It sounds like they picked the best speed for the government motors truck. IMHO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2011, 01:38 PM
rickatic rickatic is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.
I am not casting the doubt on this test like I did with the Chevy commercial known as the "Rumble". This test validated my position that altitude was the real and only factor in the Rumble. I do find the wording of the test criteria confusing. I am not sure if they used full throttle all the way up or were pedaling it to stay at the speed limit. The 1/4 mile times on the Ford were the slowest I have seen to date. In the long uphill pull, 8 seconds slower in just under 12 minutes is about 1%. There is likely more difference than that in individual trucks. With all that said, this was a 400/800 Ford and it came up short. I did not buy my truck to be first anywhere and would not trade it for a faster GM. It would be nice though if Ford would get us up front...

I would like the power engineering types to help me with this question. If horsepower is a calculated derivative of torque and rpm, why is it that the horsepower number is what everybody like's to hang their GM hat on? Not trying to find an excuse, I really would like to hear a solid science answer.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-2011, 02:26 PM
Troy Buenger's Avatar
Troy Buenger Troy Buenger is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 2,747
Troy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to beholdTroy Buenger is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickatic View Post
I am not casting the doubt on this test like I did with the Chevy commercial known as the "Rumble". This test validated my position that altitude was the real and only factor in the Rumble. I do find the wording of the test criteria confusing. I am not sure if they used full throttle all the way up or were pedaling it to stay at the speed limit. The 1/4 mile times on the Ford were the slowest I have seen to date. In the long uphill pull, 8 seconds slower in just under 12 minutes is about 1%. There is likely more difference than that in individual trucks. With all that said, this was a 400/800 Ford and it came up short. I did not buy my truck to be first anywhere and would not trade it for a faster GM. It would be nice though if Ford would get us up front...

I would like the power engineering types to help me with this question. If horsepower is a calculated derivative of torque and rpm, why is it that the horsepower number is what everybody like's to hang their GM hat on? Not trying to find an excuse, I really would like to hear a solid science answer.

Regards
GM is not hanging their hat on horsepower but is hanging their hat on the fact that the Duramax is been out for 10 years and has a proven track record; whereas the new Powerstroke is brand new with a very little track record.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-06-2011, 02:37 PM
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse Painted Horse is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,742
Painted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud ofPainted Horse has much to be proud of
Now if Ford couldn't tow the load, I'd be worried, But 8 sec difference isn't anything to worry about.

both of these trucks are well built and tow well. Buy the one that you like. I prefer the Ford. And as long as GM and Dodge keep making better trucks, Ford will keep on improving the brand I like. Comparisions like there are like going to a horse show. Never is everybody happy with the judges results.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2011, 02:40 PM
Med Sun Med Sun is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 29
Med Sun is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Painted Horse View Post
Now if Ford couldn't tow the load, I'd be worried, But 8 sec difference isn't anything to worry about.

both of these trucks are well built and tow well. Buy the one that you like. I prefer the Ford. And as long as GM and Dodge keep making better trucks, Ford will keep on improving the brand I like. Comparisions like there are like going to a horse show. Never is everybody happy with the judges results.
AGREED!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:19 PM
roadkingfl's Avatar
roadkingfl roadkingfl is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 747
roadkingfl is a name known to allroadkingfl is a name known to allroadkingfl is a name known to allroadkingfl is a name known to allroadkingfl is a name known to allroadkingfl is a name known to all
They mention several times that, the Ford is several hundred pounds heavier, hum, a heavy truck, what a novelty....How was the weight on the GMC reduced, lighter frame, maybe not as strong or durable......just sayin.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:26 PM
rickatic rickatic is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Buenger View Post
GM is not hanging their hat on horsepower but is hanging their hat on the fact that the Duramax is been out for 10 years and has a proven track record; whereas the new Powerstroke is brand new with a very little track record.
Troy

Have you read some of the posts in other forums about the horsepower being king in this comparison? The Ford clearly has more torque. This is totally ignored. My question was serious and not intended to provoke another debate. In the real world, what matters more? Torque or horsepower.

By the way, that 10 year track record has a few holes in it. The 2011 is 60% new. They are having widespread DEF issues that span a much wider geography and include more temperate climates. The trucks don't just set a CEL, they go into limp mode.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:56 PM
kper05's Avatar
kper05 kper05 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: AL
Posts: 5,335
kper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant futurekper05 has a brilliant future
Not that I want to defend GM but you (anyone, not you directly) can't really count the DEF into their 10 year category. Shouldn't Ford and GM be about even on their DEF adventure?

Anyways to the article, 8 seconds. Boo hoo.
That's 8 seconds more I got to enjoy the scenery driving my heavier, good looking Ford truck. That GMC...well, if we go on looks alone (all I can talk about, never owned one), I can't stand it.

I live down south so the elevation issue that others have discussed doesn't exist.
For those of you up north I'm sure that is an honest concern for the Ford's but I bet you they'll have it figured out on the 2012MY or whenever they start a new build 1.

If this 6.7L last 10 years well then Ford figured it out on their first try!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-06-2011, 04:08 PM
cummins cowboy's Avatar
cummins cowboy cummins cowboy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: herriman utah
Posts: 642
cummins cowboy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I do have to agree on the steering, that is probably the thing I dislike the most about my truck. they should have really speed up the steering box that would have made the truck feel a ton more agile, instead the slow steering ratio makes it just feel like a huge truck.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-06-2011, 04:19 PM
rickatic rickatic is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.rickatic has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kper05 View Post
Not that I want to defend GM but you (anyone, not you directly) can't really count the DEF into their 10 year category. Shouldn't Ford and GM be about even on their DEF adventure?

Anyways to the article, 8 seconds. Boo hoo.
That's 8 seconds more I got to enjoy the scenery driving my heavier, good looking Ford truck. That GMC...well, if we go on looks alone (all I can talk about, never owned one), I can't stand it.

I live down south so the elevation issue that others have discussed doesn't exist.
For those of you up north I'm sure that is an honest concern for the Ford's but I bet you they'll have it figured out on the 2012MY or whenever they start a new build 1.

If this 6.7L last 10 years well then Ford figured it out on their first try!
I was not lumping the GM DEF issue in with their 10 year track record. I was referencing it to the fact that the 60% new engine is not the same as the the old engine. While not an infant, it is proving to be a toddler at best. The Ford DEF issue, extremely small in numbers and isolated to the very far north, is a nuisance CEL. The GM's problem is much more widespread, not limited in geographical scope and places the truck in limp mode. I would not consider the problems to be equal.

I have 22000 miles on my truck and drive it daily. It has been a long cold 2 months. It has performed perfectly in temps down to -5 F. I am not at all concerned with the Ford DEF system.

They are both great trucks but I am keeping my Ford.

Regards
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8 page 1/2 ton shootout. 640 CI Aluminum FORD Ford vs The Competition 9 09-25-2011 06:50 PM
AMCI Pickuptrucks New Testing Posted Today defiant 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 91 04-24-2011 12:24 PM
2011 HD Shootout nico963 6.2L V8 2 01-25-2011 10:16 PM
The Competetion... smlford 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 23 03-16-2010 04:13 PM
New 2011 Duramax with Urea tank powerstroke72 General Diesel Discussion 30 09-07-2009 02:53 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
46, 67, 800, cummins, duramax, gear, high, output, powerstroke, psd, ratio, size, torque, tow, towing, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.