Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

f-150 Light Duty v6 Diesel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 01-30-2011, 04:39 PM
akalogan's Avatar
akalogan
akalogan is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MobyDick22
First off, I didn't fudge numbers. There's a bigger difference between the city and highway mpg on the diesesl so it was a fair comparison. But yes I could have taken an average. I feel like most people drive in the city which is why I chose lower numbers. I also did not know the ecoboost is a 10,000 mile oil change so thanks for pointing that out. Second, did you not read the whole thread? I specifically mentioned the fact that "a diesel costs more initially"...twice actually. My point was that people think since the fuel is more expensive, it's a waste of money when it really comes out close to the same.
You are correct I missed the part about the higher cost point of a diesel engine. It was the first thing I had read this morning before work. I also would love a diesel f 150. I just think that most people will balk at the higher costs That come with them. So that being said Ford is not going to offer them do to low sales volume. Plus They now have a gas comparable. The ecoboost. Love them or hate them they are here.
 
  #32  
Old 01-31-2011, 10:23 PM
Nogyro's Avatar
Nogyro
Nogyro is offline
5th Wheeling
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Tennesse
Posts: 46
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by MobyDick22
I have been following the Ford light-duty diesel craze over the past few years and while I do understand the initial cost of the diesel engine is greater than the gas engine, the diesel is a far better choice for the long term. As a civil engineer, I tend to crunch numbers out of habit, so being curious, I did some simple math to compare costs. Bear with me...

According to ford's website, the 2011 f150 4x4 gets 16city/21hwy mpg. While I don't have a reference for the articles, I have seen multiple times where they claim the light duty diesel will give a 20% increase in fuel economy. This puts the diesel getting 19.2city/25.2hwy mpg. I live in north Texas where current fuel prices are $2.90 for gas and $3.20 for diesel. Considering those prices, let's compare over a 60,000 mile period with slightly above the city mileage.

Gas f150 - Using 17 mpg...
3530 gallons used = $10,237
Oil change every 3000 miles, roughly $40 per visit = $800
Total cost over 60,000 miles = $11, 037

Diesel f150 - Using 21 mpg...
2858 gallons used = $9,145
Oil change every 10,000 miles, roughly $100 per visit = $600
Emissions additives, roughly $100 per oil change = $600
Total cost over 60,000 miles = $10,345
I don't see any expense listed on the diesel for fuel filters every 10,000 to 15,000 miles...... They were running $65 a change on my 6.0 with me installing them.
 
  #33  
Old 02-01-2011, 05:48 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,128
Received 1,219 Likes on 802 Posts
Back when the 7.3L was still roaming the country, there was a significant difference in MPG's. That difference has changed over the last 8-10 years. Diesels are strangled right now like gassers were in the late 70's and early 80's. Just like the gassers, the car makers will figure out how to make them breathe, harness and get the expected economy that they once did.

Right now the ecoboost is a $1750 increase over the base 3.7L engine. I would expect that a small diesel would be an additional 3K-4K over the ecoboost.

The 6.7L seems to get fairly good mpg's but at the expense of the rear axle gearing. 3.31.1 seems to be the norm. This engine carries and $8000 premium over the 6.2L.

Until things change in the light truck diesel world, ie. cheaper to purchase, own and operate, I'll have no interest in owning one. But, that's just me.
 
  #34  
Old 02-01-2011, 10:51 AM
3bands's Avatar
3bands
3bands is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And they have no interest in making them available either.
 
  #35  
Old 02-02-2011, 03:11 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I would never buy a light duty diesel... even at the above calculations the payoff would not break even until 300k miles, about 200k miles longer than most new truck buyers keep their vehicles.

I drive very little, 5k or so per year and live in a climate that does not befriend diesels (it was -43 here the other morning). Gas engines for me!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cody Abshire
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
8
03-17-2017 06:50 PM
2011f250sd
Other; Brakes, Electrical, Hitches, Weight Distribution & CDL Discussion
25
11-12-2015 11:20 AM
bigblueknight
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
141
03-20-2014 01:49 PM
p51mustang23
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
66
10-22-2013 01:20 PM



Quick Reply: f-150 Light Duty v6 Diesel?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.