Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-15-2011, 09:38 PM
danger-ranger93's Avatar
danger-ranger93 danger-ranger93 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,607
danger-ranger93 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.3l questions

Alright guys well due to gas prices I'm looking for a beater to drive on the week days and I've found a good little prospect its a '85 ranger 4x4 with the 2.3 and somethings wrong with the motor the guy wasn't to clear on his ad about what's wrong with it but at the price he's got it up for I could have it running and driveing for about 1,200-1,300 bucks if I just replace the whole motor and be done with the headace.
Now for my question. Where orwhat can I get another 2.3 out of and pretty much just drop it right in and got?
Thanks guys.
__________________
Michael: rides '87 f150 4x2 reg cab short box, 302, M5OD-R2, custom cab sold.
'96 f150 4x2 extended cab, 302, M5OD-R2. XL FOR SALE
'78 F250 4x4 reg cab long box. Project, sold
'00 F150 4x4 supercab, 5.4, auto XLT, DD
'97 ranger 4x2 reg cab short bed, traded
'84 Bronco 4x4 (duh) mud toy/project
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2011, 11:34 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,737
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
The 2.3 came in so many different vehicles in the '80s...they were even used as industrial motors. The basic engine is going to be pretty much the same (short of the turbo version) for most applications, you might have to change intakes but that's easy. And don't limit yourself to the '80s in your search for one, they came out in 1974 and were used in quite a few vehicles in that decade. Here's a list (probably not complete, but close) of vehicles that came with that engine, some as the base model (like the Mustang, which of course also was offered with a V6 or V8.)

Aerostar
Courier
Pinto
Ford Ranger/Mazda B-Series
Mustang II ('74-'78)
Mustang (Fox body, '79-'93)
Fairmont
Mercury Bobcat
Mercury Capri
Mercury Zephyr

And I haven't even touched on the turbo version models here, which would require a bit more work to adapt (especially the EFI models.)
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2011, 03:43 PM
danger-ranger93's Avatar
danger-ranger93 danger-ranger93 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,607
danger-ranger93 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks man, that's good to know, means my chances of finding one for dirt cheap looks a lot better.
I know its a really rough estamate but would you or anybody out there have a clue what a '85 ranger 4x4 2.3 M5-R1 might get as far as mpg's?
Thanks man, you just backed my argument up really well with my dad on how its a pretty good investment.
__________________
Michael: rides '87 f150 4x2 reg cab short box, 302, M5OD-R2, custom cab sold.
'96 f150 4x2 extended cab, 302, M5OD-R2. XL FOR SALE
'78 F250 4x4 reg cab long box. Project, sold
'00 F150 4x4 supercab, 5.4, auto XLT, DD
'97 ranger 4x2 reg cab short bed, traded
'84 Bronco 4x4 (duh) mud toy/project
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2011, 04:49 PM
whitefordexplorer's Avatar
whitefordexplorer whitefordexplorer is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 287
whitefordexplorer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.whitefordexplorer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
cooksmobile@yahoo.com MUSCLEDRIFTER
keep in mind bro, the crank they put in the rangers have larger journals than the mustangs did. i learned this the hard way when i bought my '92 ranger. it needed a new top end, but i decided to get a whole new motor for it. bough one off craigslist for $100 complete and the fella said it came out of a '92 mustang lx. as it turns out, the block was from a truck, and the head was off a trubo coupe t-bird. so really do your homework before you buy.
__________________
-Landon

My wife said if i didnt stop spending money on my truck and not her, she would leave..... My new girlfriend loves my truck!

if it has t**ies, tires or tools, it has my full attention.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-09-2011, 10:24 PM
jimbbski jimbbski is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 454
jimbbski is starting off with a positive reputation.
The turbo engines are good swap candidates. They have forged pistons and some other parts that helped make the engines more robust. They did come with lower compression but that can be fixed by just having the head milled. The Ford 2.0L and the 2.3L heads can be milled quite a bit. In the case of the 2.0L over 0.100 inches! The 2.3L not so much but more then enough to get a turbo engine compression up from 8:1 to something like 9:1 or a bit more if used with a carb or FI but no turbo. You will need to get an adjustable cam gear to get the carm timing back to stock. Milling the head changes the cam timing. Not a big deal.

Another thing to do is to swap in a roller cam and lifters if the engine you get does not have one. You just have to find a Ranger 2.3L with the roller cam and pull it and the rockers, swap out the older style slider cam and your good to go. The roller cam has a bit more lift and less friction so it produces a bit more power.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 10:24 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines

Tags
1974, 23, 23l, air, cam, cleaner, engine, ford, incorrect, pinto, ranger, timing, troubleshooting, turbo, universal

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup