Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Other Fords > 1968 - Present Full Size Vans
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 08:47 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverE350 View Post
Trans G= C6
Axle 23= 3.31

With 225/75 16 tires you are doing 2333 RPM @ 60 MPH.

But you probably have 16.5 wheels right?
Yep, I think they are 235/16.5 but let me go take a quick look to verify.

Nope 235/16. The extra width may be from a previous owner going wide. I replaced at the same size that were mounted when I bought her. If narrower will increase mileage, then she gets that later this year.

Don't have traction problems. She weighs 7000lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 08:56 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
2333 rpm @ 60, huh? lower than I thought. Must be road and rear end noise that's making me think she's working harder than that. I'm glad to find out she's not laboring as hard as I thought.

Got any idea what red-line is for the 351? I'm figuring 4500-4800 tops. She'll never get close to that long as I own her, but she occasionally needs a kick in the pants on a steep grade.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:07 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
BTW, my B pillar says stock tires are 215/16R, so someone previous to me put on wider ones. Oh well, there's another 800 bucks this summer.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:07 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350 SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 339
SilverE350 is starting off with a positive reputation.
20800 / Tire Dia. = Tire Rev per Mile

Tire rev per mile x rear end ratio x trans final drive = Engine RPM @ 60 MPH
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:13 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cool, thanks. That one will go on a google sheet I keep with misc. info I might need later.

I think my speedo might be off by about 3mph. That's pretty much inside normal tolerance, right? My Pontiac seems to be the same 3mph off, so it may be some standard I didn't know about.

This has nothing to do with anything, just something that I noticed during the summer, when I was keeping an eye on my speed using my GPS.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:17 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350 SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 339
SilverE350 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntwo View Post
Cool, thanks. That one will go on a google sheet I keep with misc. info I might need later.

I think my speedo might be off by about 3mph. That's pretty much inside normal tolerance, right? My Pontiac seems to be the same 3mph off, so it may be some standard I didn't know about.

This has nothing to do with anything, just something that I noticed during the summer, when I was keeping an eye on my speed using my GPS.

Different size tires and even same tires from different manufacturers will give you some differences.

215 to 235 is probably, around, off the top of my head, 4 % maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:39 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Might be almost 9.5%, but I could be using the wrong math. Either way it's significant. I'm going back to 215s soon as I get a few more miles out of these. Wider rubber isn't going to make her handle any better than the tank she is.

This is all very interesting, I don't see it affecting my mpgs drastically, but it's probably noticeable. Don't have my consumption numbers at hand, but the diff between say 14 and 15 is, I think about 9%, so @ oh, say an average of 2.50 a gal. last summer, at 500 gal. is (tap, tap, tap)....only about a hundred fifty bucks. Not a lot. But not anything to sneeze at.

I need to go through my books from last year to get the real numbers, but that's probably a low-end estimate. I'm sure I went through more than 500 gallons between March and November.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:54 PM
SilverE350's Avatar
SilverE350 SilverE350 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 339
SilverE350 is starting off with a positive reputation.
All new E350's come with 225/75 16 or 245/75 16 tires. If it was me I'd put on 245/75 16 LTX M/S2's. Michelin calls it a "Fuel Efficient" tire. Yuo will find great handling and will probably save the cost of the tires in fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 09:57 PM
gearloose1 gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GIGGER View Post
WB wheel base is the distance between the center of the front wheel to the center of the rear wheel.in inche's.

And all this time I thought it meant Warner Brothers.... Looney Toons!
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:00 PM
gearloose1 gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.gearloose1 has a good reputation on FTE.
Aerodynamic things known to work:

A dam underneath front bumper, as close to road as practical (that means 4" or so), to block air entering chassis underneath.

A hard rubber reinforced with fabric one will bend rather than be damaged by dings.

An air deflector to direct air from top / side to rear to fill in the vacuum created in van rear.

Wheel covers to make things as "flat" as possible on the side of wheels.

All the above done right is worth maybe a few percent at highway speeds only.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:01 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
So you say the wider tire is more fuel efficient? I thought it would be the other way around. That would mean that all those previous consumption estimates mean nada.

Well, it works for me. I don't mind paying for something that pays for itself, although handling isn't really an issue. She does wallow like a pig in mud and x-winds can be a real thrill sometimes, but I think playing with the springs and the swaybar might be the answer to that. That was going to be a discussion with one of my customers in Philly, who just happens to own a shop that does that kind of work.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:05 PM
Milwaukee1979F150's Avatar
Milwaukee1979F150 Milwaukee1979F150 is online now
Posting Guru
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Trenton, MI
Posts: 2,192
Milwaukee1979F150 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Have you put vacuum gauge?

can you get picture of rear of van? Have you notice all van that was on dirt road would have dusty dirt mud on rear of van? It act like vacuum due flat body on rear. At ecomodder they do this. Project: Geo Metro boat tail prototype - 15% MPG improvement @ 90 kph / 56 mph - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com


I think you should add tachometer for peace mind.
__________________
Sorry for my bad grammar.
Currently drive 2000 f350 7.3L XL 4wd auto. mpg vary 15-17.

1999 F250 5.4L 2wd 5.4L auto with over 246K miles. Got used 5.4L with 100K miles. Need find motivation to install 5.4L.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:13 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gearloose1 View Post
Aerodynamic things known to work:

A dam underneath front bumper, as close to road as practical (that means 4" or so), to block air entering chassis underneath.

A hard rubber reinforced with fabric one will bend rather than be damaged by dings.

An air deflector to direct air from top / side to rear to fill in the vacuum created in van rear.

Wheel covers to make things as "flat" as possible on the side of wheels.

All the above done right is worth maybe a few percent at highway speeds only.
Good ideas. The wing. You mean a rooftop mount or a hood mount? Oh wait, you're talking about something like they used to put on the back of station wagons back in the 60s and 70s, right? Makes a lot of sense.

I am thinking about having the access panels recessed, when I get the body work done before repainting, but that's a year away. Make everything flush, if for no other reason than I like the look better. Adding a dam, and maybe flaring the fenders at that time would be no problem.

Yeah, one thing is I do a fair amount of city driving when I'm working somewhere. I'm usually in a given city for a week to ten days, then on to the next town. I try to keep the city/hwy consumption numbers separate, but I figure the city mileage is around 10-11, maybe as low as 8-9. My consumtpion in the city is def going down next year, because last year was a learning process, and I plan on keeping her parked more, and maybe using public trans around the city. I work in big cities mostly, so it's not really a hassle. All those two mile drives add up, so I need to cut them down.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:21 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee1979F150 View Post
Have you put vacuum gauge?

can you get picture of rear of van? Have you notice all van that was on dirt road would have dusty dirt mud on rear of van? It act like vacuum due flat body on rear. At ecomodder they do this. Project: Geo Metro boat tail prototype - 15% MPG improvement @ 90 kph / 56 mph - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com


I think you should add tachometer for peace mind.
No, only time she leaves pavement is in a gravel parking lot. I don't even like doing that. I'll look at the boat tail idea, but I have a feeling it's going to add unwanted length. I have to stay small because I drive and park in Northeastern cities. At 19' I am filling up every inch of a Philly or DC parking space now.

Tach is listed for a summer project, more so I don't over-work her than anything else. I've got a pretty light foot, so it's not a big problem. I drive like a grandma, even in my passenger car. Drives my wife nuts, but she likes motorcycles so go figure.

Edit: I have seen that Geo page before and I think it's a great idea, but like I said, length of the vehicle is an issue. Thanks though.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 10:44 PM
glenntwo's Avatar
glenntwo glenntwo is offline
Junior User
1989 Ford E-Series Van
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 70
glenntwo is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well, if nothing else, I really need to finish organizing all my data from the past summer, so I can get a grip on just how much fuel I consume and also because I have to have the dollar numbers ready for tax season.

A lot of this looks really promising though, even if it's only a break-even proposition. I know there's a fair amount of waste going on, some of it because of sheer laziness on my part, but I think I can do some things that will be worthwhile in the long run. I plan on trying to coax this girl to at least 120K miles and maybe more before she needs a new heart and legs, so I'm definitely in it with her for the next few years.

I really appreciate all the input. I hope I can return the favor sometime. But I need to get to bed since I have a ton of household things I have to get done tomorrow.

Thanks and have a good night. I'll be back around during the day tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Other Fords > 1968 - Present Full Size Vans

Tags
1994, add, class, ford, home, improve, intervec, motor, motorhome, motorhomes, mpg, reduction, urlclass, weigh, weight

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup