Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 6.2L V8
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-04-2011, 01:38 PM
PJOB2 PJOB2 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
PJOB2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
E-85

Any of you guys with the 6.2 try E-85? If so, how much did your MPG suffer and was there any noticable change in performance?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:22 PM
KaiserM715's Avatar
KaiserM715 KaiserM715 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 107
KaiserM715 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have not heard any reports on a SuperDuty, but the Raptors are not rated to run E85.
__________________
2010 Raptor
1967 Jeep Kaiser M715 - sold
Join the BlueRibbon Coalition . . . it's YOUR Public Land!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:30 PM
PJOB2 PJOB2 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
PJOB2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Mine has the "FlexFuel" logo on the back of the truck and the owners guide says that E-85 is one of the recommended fuels (pg 381). I thought all the 6.2 engines were FlexFuel. I guess not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2011, 04:33 PM
2000silverbullet's Avatar
2000silverbullet 2000silverbullet is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,314
2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold2000silverbullet is a splendid one to behold
It does support E-85. There hasn't been many mileage reports that I've found with E-85 but here's a link to a post where someone mentioned a drop:

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/98...ml#post9399720

Searching for E85 in this forum turned up few results.
__________________

Matt
2011 F350 - 6.2 CC, LB, 4.30s, Lariat Ultimate pkg, FX4, Amp steps, Lockpick, AC LC6i, JL HD900/5, JL 13TW5, JL C5-570's, Bilstein 7100 stabilizer, Rancho RS9000XL's, Leveled w/ 35" Toyo M/T's and 5 Star tuned
**Sold - 2000 F250 V10, 6.5" Pro Comp, 37" Toyo MT's
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2011, 04:43 PM
Thenewboss's Avatar
Thenewboss Thenewboss is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 207
Thenewboss is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have been wanting to try it, but I haven't been able to find any between NE North Carolina, and Central PA. I would image between the slightly lower price and the slightly reduced milage it would be a wash in the end. I guess you could get a warm and fuzzy knowing you aren't putting out as much emissions.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2011, 07:03 PM
postman524 postman524 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 72
postman524 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenewboss View Post
I have been wanting to try it, but I haven't been able to find any between NE North Carolina, and Central PA. I would image between the slightly lower price and the slightly reduced milage it would be a wash in the end. I guess you could get a warm and fuzzy knowing you aren't putting out as much emissions.
Wouldn't put that crap in my new truck if you paid me. The loss of gas mileage more than offsets the slightly lower fuel costs. Using ethanol in gas is the most moronic thing we have ever come up with. As far as emissions go, it's just as dirty just a different type of pollution than gas produces.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2011, 08:46 PM
nycsteve nycsteve is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 178
nycsteve is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by postman524 View Post
Wouldn't put that crap in my new truck if you paid me. The loss of gas mileage more than offsets the slightly lower fuel costs. Using ethanol in gas is the most moronic thing we have ever come up with. As far as emissions go, it's just as dirty just a different type of pollution than gas produces.
Its not really about emmissions, its about $$$$$$ for agricorp. Its all B.S.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2011, 10:39 AM
Thenewboss's Avatar
Thenewboss Thenewboss is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 207
Thenewboss is starting off with a positive reputation.
Nation & World | The hard truth about ethanol | Seattle Times Newspaper

FYI^^
I'm not trying to start an argument thread, I just know very little about E85 and this article is very educational for those interested.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2011, 02:34 PM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 34,361
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
Let's not get into politics, or any other issues with Ethanol. The original poster wanted to know about MPG with E85. Let's keep it that way
__________________
- art k. - Moderator for the Superduty, V10, 6.2L and FE forums
'13 Taurus SHO 3.5L Ecoboost w/Perf Pkg
'01 F250SD SC SB XLT V10 4x4 Volant CAI Hedman headers 5-star custom tunes on SCT X3
'97 Cougar XR7 30th Anniv Edition 4.6L
'74 F250 Highboy FE390 deceased!
I've been wrong before, I'll be wrong again. Just wait and see. ®
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-06-2011, 09:54 AM
1960 1960 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 12
1960 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJOB2 View Post
Any of you guys with the 6.2 try E-85? If so, how much did your MPG suffer and was there any noticable change in performance?
PJ0B2 I have been running E85 in my truck from the day it was new last June I have 7800 miles on it now.
I really like the way it runs it feels like it has alot more torque than it has on reg gas.

I get around 9 to 10 mph with it short trips and around town. I get around 11 to 12 when I use reg gas in it.
I would not run anything but E85 in my truck.

I did get a tuner from Mike at 5 star and it did really bring the truck to life.
I have allways had Diesels before this I have had 7.3, 6.0, 6.4 and dodge cummins 5.9 and 6.7 I will not go back to a diesel after having this 6.2 gas.

I have a F250 CC 4X4 with 3.73 gears I also tow a 34' 11000# travel trailer
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-06-2011, 04:58 PM
itherrkr's Avatar
itherrkr itherrkr is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
itherrkr is starting off with a positive reputation.
1960, how does it tow that trailer? Toy hauler by chance?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-06-2011, 05:17 PM
1960 1960 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 12
1960 is starting off with a positive reputation.
itherrkr
I live here in iowa so I don't get into the montains But for the hills around here and the flats it pulls as well as my Diesels did. I will run higher RPMs and will pull in 5th gear 50% of the time. But I will not go back to a Diesel After running this truck
If I went any larger with my camper I would go with the 4.30 gear.
My camper is 34" Holiday Rambler Pres. travel trailer with 2 slides
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-06-2011, 05:51 PM
PJOB2 PJOB2 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
PJOB2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for all the input. It sounds like performance doesn't suffer but mpgs do. Where i'm located, E-85 is only .20 less than 87 octane so from an economical standpoint, its probably a wash at best. I friend from Mn. said up there its .50 - .60 less than gas which would make it more tempting.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-07-2011, 09:50 AM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 34,361
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
If I remember correctly, the 6.2 running on E85 in the F150 puts out higher HP/torque numbers than plain gas. Why, I dunno, probably because they can play around with the spark timing and put more fuel in moreso than with gas, and still get good enough emissions numbers for the EPA.
__________________
- art k. - Moderator for the Superduty, V10, 6.2L and FE forums
'13 Taurus SHO 3.5L Ecoboost w/Perf Pkg
'01 F250SD SC SB XLT V10 4x4 Volant CAI Hedman headers 5-star custom tunes on SCT X3
'97 Cougar XR7 30th Anniv Edition 4.6L
'74 F250 Highboy FE390 deceased!
I've been wrong before, I'll be wrong again. Just wait and see. ®
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2011, 09:50 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 6.2L V8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup