6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

E-85

  #1  
Old 01-04-2011, 01:38 PM
PJOB2's Avatar
PJOB2
PJOB2 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E-85

Any of you guys with the 6.2 try E-85? If so, how much did your MPG suffer and was there any noticable change in performance?
 
  #2  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:22 PM
KaiserM715's Avatar
KaiserM715
KaiserM715 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have not heard any reports on a SuperDuty, but the Raptors are not rated to run E85.
 
  #3  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:30 PM
PJOB2's Avatar
PJOB2
PJOB2 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine has the "FlexFuel" logo on the back of the truck and the owners guide says that E-85 is one of the recommended fuels (pg 381). I thought all the 6.2 engines were FlexFuel. I guess not.
 
  #4  
Old 01-04-2011, 04:33 PM
2000silverbullet's Avatar
2000silverbullet
2000silverbullet is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gilbert
Posts: 5,326
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
It does support E-85. There hasn't been many mileage reports that I've found with E-85 but here's a link to a post where someone mentioned a drop:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...ml#post9399720

Searching for E85 in this forum turned up few results.
 
  #5  
Old 01-04-2011, 04:43 PM
Thenewboss's Avatar
Thenewboss
Thenewboss is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I have been wanting to try it, but I haven't been able to find any between NE North Carolina, and Central PA. I would image between the slightly lower price and the slightly reduced milage it would be a wash in the end. I guess you could get a warm and fuzzy knowing you aren't putting out as much emissions.
 
  #6  
Old 01-04-2011, 07:03 PM
postman524's Avatar
postman524
postman524 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thenewboss
I have been wanting to try it, but I haven't been able to find any between NE North Carolina, and Central PA. I would image between the slightly lower price and the slightly reduced milage it would be a wash in the end. I guess you could get a warm and fuzzy knowing you aren't putting out as much emissions.
Wouldn't put that crap in my new truck if you paid me. The loss of gas mileage more than offsets the slightly lower fuel costs. Using ethanol in gas is the most moronic thing we have ever come up with. As far as emissions go, it's just as dirty just a different type of pollution than gas produces.
 
  #7  
Old 01-04-2011, 08:46 PM
nycsteve's Avatar
nycsteve
nycsteve is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by postman524
Wouldn't put that crap in my new truck if you paid me. The loss of gas mileage more than offsets the slightly lower fuel costs. Using ethanol in gas is the most moronic thing we have ever come up with. As far as emissions go, it's just as dirty just a different type of pollution than gas produces.
Its not really about emmissions, its about $$$$$$ for agricorp. Its all B.S.
 
  #8  
Old 01-05-2011, 10:39 AM
Thenewboss's Avatar
Thenewboss
Thenewboss is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Nation & World | The hard truth about ethanol | Seattle Times Newspaper

FYI^^
I'm not trying to start an argument thread, I just know very little about E85 and this article is very educational for those interested.
 
  #9  
Old 01-05-2011, 02:34 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 296 Likes on 156 Posts
Let's not get into politics, or any other issues with Ethanol. The original poster wanted to know about MPG with E85. Let's keep it that way
 
  #10  
Old 01-06-2011, 09:54 AM
1960's Avatar
1960
1960 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PJOB2
Any of you guys with the 6.2 try E-85? If so, how much did your MPG suffer and was there any noticable change in performance?
PJ0B2 I have been running E85 in my truck from the day it was new last June I have 7800 miles on it now.
I really like the way it runs it feels like it has alot more torque than it has on reg gas.

I get around 9 to 10 mph with it short trips and around town. I get around 11 to 12 when I use reg gas in it.
I would not run anything but E85 in my truck.

I did get a tuner from Mike at 5 star and it did really bring the truck to life.
I have allways had Diesels before this I have had 7.3, 6.0, 6.4 and dodge cummins 5.9 and 6.7 I will not go back to a diesel after having this 6.2 gas.

I have a F250 CC 4X4 with 3.73 gears I also tow a 34' 11000# travel trailer
 
  #11  
Old 01-06-2011, 04:58 PM
itherrkr's Avatar
itherrkr
itherrkr is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1960, how does it tow that trailer? Toy hauler by chance?
 
  #12  
Old 01-06-2011, 05:17 PM
1960's Avatar
1960
1960 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
itherrkr
I live here in iowa so I don't get into the montains But for the hills around here and the flats it pulls as well as my Diesels did. I will run higher RPMs and will pull in 5th gear 50% of the time. But I will not go back to a Diesel After running this truck
If I went any larger with my camper I would go with the 4.30 gear.
My camper is 34" Holiday Rambler Pres. travel trailer with 2 slides
 
  #13  
Old 01-06-2011, 05:51 PM
PJOB2's Avatar
PJOB2
PJOB2 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the input. It sounds like performance doesn't suffer but mpgs do. Where i'm located, E-85 is only .20 less than 87 octane so from an economical standpoint, its probably a wash at best. I friend from Mn. said up there its .50 - .60 less than gas which would make it more tempting.
 
  #14  
Old 01-07-2011, 09:50 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 296 Likes on 156 Posts
If I remember correctly, the 6.2 running on E85 in the F150 puts out higher HP/torque numbers than plain gas. Why, I dunno, probably because they can play around with the spark timing and put more fuel in moreso than with gas, and still get good enough emissions numbers for the EPA.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mizzitch
Modular V10 (6.8l)
20
05-19-2023 02:56 PM
AB328
2015 - 2020 F150
24
01-05-2016 08:43 PM
Strokin-A-2010
6.2L V8
9
12-21-2015 12:20 PM
kpip
1997 - 2003 F150
16
09-16-2010 06:37 PM
radracing
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
08-04-2007 07:58 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: E-85



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.