6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Waterless coolant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-01-2011, 06:34 PM
SUPERDUTY_WILL's Avatar
SUPERDUTY_WILL
SUPERDUTY_WILL is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Waterless coolant

Hi all, I'm getting ready to change and flush the coolant on my 03 6.0 liter. I've done alot of reading and got alot of good info on here as to how to do it and what coolant to use and using the distilled water and so on. I will be installing a coolant filter at the same time. I was on the Dieselsite website and was reading about the Evans coolant they sell. If it does all that they claim it sounds like a good product and would be worth the price. Does anyone have any experience or an opinion on this NPG+ Evans diesel waterless coolant ?
 
  #2  
Old 01-01-2011, 06:49 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
If it was me, simple answer:

Don't touch it.

What this says is that they basically have a blend of the same common base ingredients everyone else uses:


Evans coolants contain proprietary blends of glycols, including ethylene glycol.
Maintenance » Engine Cooling Systems

I couldn't find a MSDS --- the bible for quick peek at what they are really doing --- not exhaustive, but enough to guess.





They want you to basically, operate your engine at a significantly higher operating temperature with a kludge mod.


You can attain all of the benefits of the Evans Cooling System with ease. Quite simply, Evans Cooling Systems require no major mechanical changes, just a parts exchange. You may need the specialized NPG™ coolant pump, NPG™ radiator with a non - pressurized radiator cap as well as the new Evans NPG™ Coolant. With a few tools and our easy to follow, step - by - step, instructions, you can easily and safely convert your vehicle to the Evans NPG™ Cooling Systems in a couple of hours.

OK, let me see.. simultaneously claiming less cavitation while telling you to operate a non-pressurized system (which increases cavitation)... which is which? I am confused.

Kludging a resistor to spoof the fan thermostat? Um.. the 6.0 fan is electronically controlled by the ECT and other sensors.

Who are they kidding?





On top of this, a claim of improving fuel efficiency by up to 10%???


Give me a break... this is a free lunch claim.


Look at what the study on their own site said:


Using the first three valid runs, it was determined that the addition of Evans NPG + waterless coolant alone (Test # 09-1A) showed no change or impact on fuel economy. While the addition of Evans NPG + Waterless coolant and operation at a higher temperature (Test # 09-1B) would be expected to produce an actual improvement in fuel economy of between +2.04 and +4.04 percent.

http://www.evanscooling.com/assets/p...vans-final.pdf

This is done on a heavy truck --- not readily comparable to a 6.0




The risk you run is to use an unapproved coolant that do not have any Ford certification / approval.

Insofar as modding the vehicle to operate at a higher temperature, that throws every EPA certification, etc. out the window and have unknown effects as to how it would affect other components --- especially the already highly thermally stressed ones like the FICM.

With this, EOT inevitably will go up --- are you over the "limit"? Who knows.

Don't forget, you also got yourself a higher transmission temperature!

It is nearly gospel in the transmission life that above the "normal" range, the higher the operating temp, the lower the life of the transmission.

All for free.


If your are under warranty, use of this stuff almost certainly voids it.
 
  #3  
Old 01-01-2011, 07:49 PM
SUPERDUTY_WILL's Avatar
SUPERDUTY_WILL
SUPERDUTY_WILL is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks gearloose1. I thought it sounded to good to be true. Why would a company that has so many other good products for the 6.0 sell something that could possibly not be doing what the write up on the product claims ? Unless I am reading the info on their site wrong this coolant sounds like the cure all of all coolant issues.
 
  #4  
Old 01-01-2011, 07:54 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
More info:

-40F Freeze point?

Um... Many places in the US (Alaska, north, etc) and Canada routinely go below this temp.

You got to be joking to have a coolant that risk a cracked block and severe engine damage.


NPG+

Evans NPG+ Waterless Coolant is the most popular of Evans Waterless Coolants, recommended coolant for all gasoline and diesel engines. NPG+ is a year round, lifetime coolant. No other cooling system modifications are required for stock vehicles to run NPG+. Simply drain the entire system and fill. NPG+is safe for stored vehicles and vehicles operated in extreme cold conditions. Motorcycles and small engines are suggested to use Prep Fluid as a flush prior to installing NPG+. NPG+ meets or exceeds both the ASTM D 1384 corrosion test and the ASTM D 3306-94 specifications.

Boils 375F @0psi
Freezes -40F
Viscosity 2.3cp @ 212F
Surface Tension 44dyn/cm




Evans NPG is the Original Waterless Coolant. NPG is a lifetime coolant. NPG is recommended for racing engines that run on tracks or in series where there is a "NO Ethylene Glycol" rule, and can be used in high performance street vehicles with high flow cooling systems. NPG is NOT recommended for daily drivers or cold weather operation, and may require system modifications to ensure a successful conversion.

Boils 369F@0psi
Freezes -79F
Viscosity 2.8cp@212F
Surface Tension 36dyn/cm

NPG » Engine Cooling Systems

Oh... every one of their products have a fairly high freezing point...

e.g.



Evans HDTC waterless coolant boils at 375° F. In use, it features a huge separation between the operating temperature of the coolant and its boiling point. HDTC can therefore control metal temperatures at coolant temperatures that are well above the boiling point of water. With engine metals protected at higher coolant temperatures, fan turn-on temperatures can be safely increased. Evans has found that raising the fan temperature to about 230° F decreases fan-on time over 50 percent. Engine and truck builders often use giant radiators and amazingly powerful radiator fans for the sole purpose of keeping water-based coolants cold enough to remain functional. Released from the burden of avoiding the boiling point of water, HDTC waterless coolant enables the safe use of higher coolant temperatures and sharply reduced fan usage. Thousands of dollars in fuel savings annually result from that technique.

Boils 375F @0psi
Freezes -40F
Viscosity 2.3cp @ 212F
Surface Tension 44dyn/cm

HDTC » Engine Cooling Systems
 
  #5  
Old 01-01-2011, 08:01 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_WILL
Thanks gearloose1. I thought it sounded to good to be true. .

Every bit of information I posted came from the Evans Cooling site.

I didn't make this up.
 
  #6  
Old 01-01-2011, 08:02 PM
amadas350's Avatar
amadas350
amadas350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gearloose1 is right, lower pressure increases cavitation.

and if you need to change the pump, radiator, and cap. why go through all that trouble for something thats not going to really help much at all.

i heard somewhere that for every 10 degrees you lower your transmission, you can increase its life by 20%( i think that was right). so possibly increasing you trans temp would automatically kill this coolant for me.
 
  #7  
Old 01-01-2011, 08:08 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The real thing is, Ford spent millions monkeying around with the 6.0 cooling system, ultimately coming out with a boiler cleaner VC-9 to fix problems.

They got it right... with millions of units on the road to learn from and hundreds of millions of warranty claims.

Do we really want to use our ride for a free product test evaluation stand for this outfit?
 
  #8  
Old 01-01-2011, 08:18 PM
amadas350's Avatar
amadas350
amadas350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just thinking if it boils at alot higher temp, then the pressure drop to cause cavitation will have to be greater, which is probably why the use a unpressurized system.
 
  #9  
Old 01-01-2011, 08:26 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by amadas350
just thinking if it boils at alot higher temp, then the pressure drop to cause cavitation will have to be greater, which is probably why the use a unpressurized system.

Cavitation is something that I have had an interest in for other reasons.... like marine undersea....

The thing is, just because it tests with lower cavitation on a standardized ASTM test does not mean it will actually do so in real life --- not without evidence.

Many factors are involved --- if you want to know, even changes in salinity changes cavitation characteristics (salty water is denser).

In an engine, you got debris, casting sand, crud... rust... all of which interacts.

How do we know how this stuff really performs without having the history and use experience equivalent to hundreds of millions of hours / miles of operation?

Not something to trust an ASTM standardized test on when it is a totally new stuff.
 
  #10  
Old 01-01-2011, 09:15 PM
amadas350's Avatar
amadas350
amadas350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is part of the reason i went into engineering, i like know why things happen the way they do and several classes i took involved cavitation (which i agree is some pretty neat stuff).

cavitation is from the pressure drop from accelerating the fluid. just how a airplane wing has different pressures on top and bottom of the wing. the turbine or prop is the same way. if the low pressure side falls below the vapor pressure (boiling point) then cavitation occurs. like u mentioned earlier higher pressure, higher boiling point. so by pressurizing the system, the vapor pressure point is increased making it harder to boil over.

the debris u mentioned will only affect cavitation if they change the properties of the fluid, thus changing the vapor pressure (which is why salt effects the system).
 
  #11  
Old 01-01-2011, 09:24 PM
gearloose1's Avatar
gearloose1
gearloose1 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Porno pics...

Diesel Technician Society


Originally Posted by amadas350
the debris u mentioned will only affect cavitation if they change the properties of the fluid, thus changing the vapor pressure (which is why salt effects the system).
We don't know how this proprietary stuff will interact with the stuff in the debris, and whether it will do so.

Will it form soluble acids?

We know water is reactive, and you can never get all the water out (and even if you did, some remains).

Same reason why brakes rust from the inside out (water) as well as outside in (normal everyday corrosion).
 
  #12  
Old 01-01-2011, 09:41 PM
amadas350's Avatar
amadas350
amadas350 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree, we have no idea how it will react. thats why i also voted against it also
 
  #13  
Old 01-01-2011, 11:49 PM
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook
Beachbumcook is offline
Got Diesel?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,345
Received 20 Likes on 7 Posts
The Ford Premium Gold coolant (OEM coolant for our 6.0L motors) is a good coolant when mixed in a 50/50% concentration per the manual. It can be had at most dealerships for around $10.00 - $12.00/gallon if you ask or negotiate off the list price they all try to sell it for.

I personally change mine every 50,000 miles since new... but the Ford manual originally stated to drain and refill at 100,000 miles and then every 50,000 miles after that (believing that people would use tap water or the dealership would).

This is why I just chose to use the 50,000 miles interval to drain, flush and refill on a more than recommended interval.

Ford and their OEM suppliers makes some pretty good fluids for the money. Just because it has the Ford name on it versus some "exotic brand name" does not make it bad.

Ford Premium Gold coolant is a good coolant, as is their Mercon SP fluid for the tranny... and even their Motorcraft 15W-40 motor oil is as good a dino oil as any other out there (I ran it for 50,000 miles with perfect oil analysis results before changing to Rotella 5W-40 synthetic for better cold weather protection/starts).

Ford Premium Gold = Good coolant
Evans coolant = expensive and may or may not work... so why risk it... and does not meet Ford's specification per their manual?

Remember, the Evans coolant is waterless... so you will have to drain your entire motor and system and use double the coolant to fill your cooling system... so instead of 3-1/2 gallons of Ford coolant, you will have to buy 7 gallons of Evans... ouch that is expensive!!!!
 
  #14  
Old 01-02-2011, 09:06 AM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Being forced to use Ford stuff for many years myself. I will say 95% of there chemicals are really top notch.
from there coolant to there teflon based blue greese
 
  #15  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:02 AM
flamebuster's Avatar
flamebuster
flamebuster is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mattawa Washington.
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a system for racing only. Has no practicality on a 6.0 diesel. Not even close to proper temps. for a towing or daily driver.. In my opinon not worth consideration and a waste of money and time.
 


Quick Reply: Waterless coolant



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.