2008 F-250 SD 5.4L 4WD Power issue
#16
I took the truck to the dealer and as usual their answer revolves around the check engine light only this time I spoke to one of the techs who basically said not to expect any kind of performance hauling 6000 to 7000 lbs. with high geared 5.4 on a F-250. Evidently Ford sacrificed the very necessary lower gearing on the 5.4 to allow for higway travel. If I were going to be pulling a load for any distance I would concider gearing down to the optional lower gear package but the distance and number of trips per year are minimal. I am going to try a tuner and see if that helps since I really only need a little more umph. (Which I might add the Ford Tech did not advocate)
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
#20
The 5.4 definitely underperforms compared to the other motors Ford had available. I feel mine struggles with just 5000lbs behind it, heck I think it has trouble moving itself without tipping into the 3500-4000rpm range (I know people say its ok and I do it). The 5.4 in my 05 F150 fell stong, but that truck weighed a lot less. I'm ok with what I have and am really just looking forward to not having any vehicle payments soon or if its worth something, sell it, and then get what I want. Since most of my towing is local on flat roads that probably average 35mph, it is no real issue. I think I went with the 5.4 because I figured it would get better mpg than the V10. Well after finding this site I came to realize that the difference between the two is negligible and the V10 has more power. Oh well. I may change my opinion this coming year as I will hopefully be towing more with heavier loads. For me as long as its doing the job, not destroying the truck, and helping me out I'll be good.
#21
I took the truck to the dealer and as usual their answer revolves around the check engine light only this time I spoke to one of the techs who basically said not to expect any kind of performance hauling 6000 to 7000 lbs. with high geared 5.4 on a F-250. Evidently Ford sacrificed the very necessary lower gearing on the 5.4 to allow for higway travel. If I were going to be pulling a load for any distance I would concider gearing down to the optional lower gear package but the distance and number of trips per year are minimal. I am going to try a tuner and see if that helps since I really only need a little more umph. (Which I might add the Ford Tech did not advocate)
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
#22
I took the truck to the dealer and as usual their answer revolves around the check engine light only this time I spoke to one of the techs who basically said not to expect any kind of performance hauling 6000 to 7000 lbs. with high geared 5.4 on a F-250. Evidently Ford sacrificed the very necessary lower gearing on the 5.4 to allow for higway travel. If I were going to be pulling a load for any distance I would concider gearing down to the optional lower gear package but the distance and number of trips per year are minimal. I am going to try a tuner and see if that helps since I really only need a little more umph. (Which I might add the Ford Tech did not advocate)
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
Evidently this dilema seems to happen over and over. You would think that American Car manufacturers would have learned their lesson after the dog years of the late 70's and 80's.
Here is the Ford Towing guide for the 08/09/10 F250/350 5.4L gasoline engine trucks:
As you can see the maximum rated load is 9700 lbs with the 3.73 in a 4x2 (11,700 lbs with the 4.10 gears). Your 6000-7000 range is well below that so you *SHOULD* have no problem whatsoever.
I think people see a 3/4 ton truck and just immediately think towing power. This thing is not a diesel so it won't pull like one, however, it is MORE than adequate for towing a trailer. It may be a case where your performance expectations are set too high for this vehicle. Wouldn't recommend pulling any heavy duty type trailers bordering on 10,000 lbs. but in the range you are talking (6000-7000) with a proper WDH setup, it should be all good. Even pre-tuner when my truck was bone-stock, I had absolutely no issues towing my 8000 lb camper from Anchorage to Kenai and keeping it at 65 mph (while allowing slow downs to ~50-60 during steep hill climbs). And this is by no means a flat drive (several inclines as you ascend into the mountains).
Actually had a few family friends from Minnesota visiting last summer and had the truck loaded up with 5 full size adults and my trailer fully loaded, plus my truck bed fully loaded with luggage and several fully loaded fish coolers - Made it from Whitter to Kenai @ 65 mph with ease. One of my dad's relatives actually asked if I had a Powerstroke. I just laughed and told him it was a gas truck. (note: this was after my X3 SCT tuner with custom performance tow tune which works FANTASTIC btw.)
I know the 5.4L gets a lot of hate because its the low engine on the totem pole (for the 08-10's) but it's a very respectable engine. Just put that ******* into tow/haul and let the TorqShift do its thing.
#23
#24
5.4 no problem
My 2006 F250 pulls a 40ft Newmar triaxle (20300 lb) all over the country.
5.4 works great only because of my manual trans. I tell the truck what
gear to use, not the truck telling me. I stay in the power band and can
coast down hills. 99% of the time youre not pulling so the gas milage from
the 5.4 is great. approx 12000 mi last year pulling. Added KN, catback,
Firestone air springs and jet programmer. By the way I work all over, not recreation pulling. Ive tried pulling with an Automatic in the past and it don't work for me. Just another opinon.
5.4 works great only because of my manual trans. I tell the truck what
gear to use, not the truck telling me. I stay in the power band and can
coast down hills. 99% of the time youre not pulling so the gas milage from
the 5.4 is great. approx 12000 mi last year pulling. Added KN, catback,
Firestone air springs and jet programmer. By the way I work all over, not recreation pulling. Ive tried pulling with an Automatic in the past and it don't work for me. Just another opinon.
#25
Actually the civic would probably do better.
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!
+1
What exactly is your definition of ease? Headed down a 20% grade with a tailwind?
Is this just another underpowered Ford dog...
+1
What exactly is your definition of ease? Headed down a 20% grade with a tailwind?
#27
I would like to thank everyone for all their input.
Yesterday I reprogrammed using a Superchips programmer for a 2008 Ford 5.4L F-250 4WD and right off the bat I have noticed quite a difference. After initiallizing the preset economy (light towing) program which requires 87 octane fuel throttle response seems quicker, the truck seems to shift smoother, and highway mileage has increased about 1.5 MPG. I figure to try the economy setting a few more days and then switch to the preprogrammed heavy tow mode which will require 92 octane fuel. The real testament to the programmers effectiveness going to be lugging around the additional 8000lbs. The Superchips programmer does allow for custom settings but I need to establish a baseline before I start to experiment and the preprogrammed modes are a good place to start. Realizing that most companies overstate their performance results while hiding behind perfect conditions disclaimers I am suddenly optimistic that the additional 32HP and 49Lb ft of torque that Superchips boasts may actually be possible. My first impressions are positive so I hereby award 10 tenative Kudos to Superships.
Yesterday I reprogrammed using a Superchips programmer for a 2008 Ford 5.4L F-250 4WD and right off the bat I have noticed quite a difference. After initiallizing the preset economy (light towing) program which requires 87 octane fuel throttle response seems quicker, the truck seems to shift smoother, and highway mileage has increased about 1.5 MPG. I figure to try the economy setting a few more days and then switch to the preprogrammed heavy tow mode which will require 92 octane fuel. The real testament to the programmers effectiveness going to be lugging around the additional 8000lbs. The Superchips programmer does allow for custom settings but I need to establish a baseline before I start to experiment and the preprogrammed modes are a good place to start. Realizing that most companies overstate their performance results while hiding behind perfect conditions disclaimers I am suddenly optimistic that the additional 32HP and 49Lb ft of torque that Superchips boasts may actually be possible. My first impressions are positive so I hereby award 10 tenative Kudos to Superships.
#28
I thought the trolls were hibernating during the holidays....
It seems like your intent is just to bash the 5.4L's towing abilities. In my post I actually stated that the 5.4L will not perform as well as a diesel for towing, but for the OP's relatively light towing range, the 5.4L would be more than adequate.
As I said earlier, there seems to be a lot of hate against the 5.4L based on the fact that it pumps out the least power among the three engines offered in the 08-10 Super Duty's. I'm not trying to say that the 5.4L is better in ANY category compared to either of the other two engine configurations, however, it is WELL within the towing specifications for the OP's towing payload.
Don't want to start a war of words, just wanted to make sure you understood what I was trying to convey in my initial post.
#29
It seems like your intent is just to bash the 5.4L's towing abilities.
...it is WELL within the towing specifications for the OP's towing payload.
Don't want to start a war of words, just wanted to make sure you understood what I was trying to convey in my initial post.
#30
You can certainly say I'm pleased.