Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-28-2003, 11:45 AM
Alz Ryde Alz Ryde is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: S.E.Mo
Posts: 91
Alz Ryde is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question 351 Long Rod Question

I am curious about this,can someone explain what you'd gain?Is there a certain range rpm for example over stock 351 where the difference would show up?For example,I have a 63 Ford p/u that turns 26-2800 RPM's at cruise speed (60-65 mph),probly see's 35-4000 max very seldom(maybe goin thru the gears).I have a 69 351/auto out of a 69 LTD that I've been thinking of redoing and putting in my truck,and am curious if this would be a worthwhile/worthless mod.Any advice/info on this would be greatly appreciated,as courious minds want to know.Thanks,Al
__________________
Old Beaters are Neater. . . . '63 Ford F-100 Factory 4WD, a work in progress, mild 390, T-98, Spicer Mod 24, 3.89's w/33"'s
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2003, 12:12 PM
HotWhlz85's Avatar
HotWhlz85 HotWhlz85 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 1,020
HotWhlz85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

Hey Alz, welcome to FTE.

I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer but I'll take a stab at your question until the real engine gurus get here. It sounds like you're talking about building a stroker motor out of the 69 351. The biggest gains you'll see are more low end torque and horsepower lower in the rpm band. A longer stroke produces more torque.

Engines that have a shorter stroke turn up faster than one with a long stroke (ex. a fast revving 302 vs. a 351W) but produce less torque and their horsepower comes higher in the rpm band.

There are threads in this forum on stroking a 351W that are very informative and may held you decide if it's what you want to do.

Here's a couple:
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/sh...t=351W+stroker

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/sh...t=351W+stroker

You can do searches yourself for more info. Just search 351W stroker.

Again, welcome to FTE and good luck.
__________________
Ron

2006 F350 SD CC 6.0 FX4 Dually (real trucks don't need sparkplugs)
1985 F150 4x4 351W- ol Blue
1989 Full size Bronco 5.0 5spd 3.75
1976 F150 SC 360/C6
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2003, 12:35 PM
Alz Ryde Alz Ryde is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: S.E.Mo
Posts: 91
Alz Ryde is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

Hi Ron,thanks for the reply,not talking about stroking,just long rod conversion(400M rods swapped for the stock 351's)which I believe changes the rod ratio.The reason for my original question is because of the rpm's the truck turns at cruise,I was basically wondering if I would gain anything.A gear swap is out,since this is a 4WD,so I was just weighing my options.I don't know how this would apply to my application(just a well built truck motor,with some goodies).Truck is 5000lbs,3.92 gears w/33" tires.Al
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2003, 04:47 PM
HotWhlz85's Avatar
HotWhlz85 HotWhlz85 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 1,020
HotWhlz85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

My bad Al, I read 351 and assumed Windsor. You know how us Windsor guys are, we think the world revolves around us. lol

Maybe one of the gurus I mentioned earlier will stop by and give us some input.

Question so I know we're both talking about the same thing; you have a 351M engine (shouldn't that be a 351C due to it coming from a 69 LTD?) and want to put in 400M rods, is that correct? If it is, we need to move this to the modified forurm where the right gurus can find it.
__________________
Ron

2006 F350 SD CC 6.0 FX4 Dually (real trucks don't need sparkplugs)
1985 F150 4x4 351W- ol Blue
1989 Full size Bronco 5.0 5spd 3.75
1976 F150 SC 360/C6

Last edited by HotWhlz85; 02-28-2003 at 05:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2003, 07:11 PM
Quantrex Quantrex is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 423
Quantrex is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

Rod length directly effects how an engine breathes because it controls the speed of the piston during both the intake downstroke and exhaust upstroke. Longer rod motors also tend to run cleaner as the piston dwells longer at TDC, creating a more complete mixture burn and increasing combustion pressure efficiency. A side benefit of that is that the motor becomes less detonation prone for a given fuel octane. Longer rods also decrease piston thrust against the cylinder walls during the power stroke so more force is sent to the crankshaft. The horsepower and torque ranges of a motor are more dependent on camshaft timing than rod length, however.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2003, 10:37 AM
lvmoose007 lvmoose007 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon: Land of the Majes
Posts: 434
lvmoose007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

Yeah, what he said....lol. According to Wayne's Engines(they do a lot of the long rod setups), they are claiming 50-80 hp increases over similar 351w setups with just the stock rods. I have seen 3 on dynos, the 302 was pushing 400 hp(with mild components), and both 351's were over 450 hp(with big low rpm torque, flat all the way to 5000 rpm), and both 351's were able to run 11.1 compression on pump gas and aluminum heads. I will be building either a long rod 302 or 351(351 takes priority) for my Mustang, and eventually redoing the 351w in my van with a long rod engine. Speedomotive has a couple of dyno sheets on both engines,(click on the long arm kits). I am impressed with both, especially the 302 with low compression.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2003, 04:28 PM
Alz Ryde Alz Ryde is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: S.E.Mo
Posts: 91
Alz Ryde is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile 351 Long Rod Question

Thanks for the replys,guy's.Yes Ron,this is a 351 Windsor(first year production I believe)we're talking about.Forgot to mention that little important detail(didn't even think of the 351M when I first posted).OK,now that I have an idea of what benifits the long rods would give me,does using the '69 block present any problems since it apparently has a lowwer deck height?My game plan is something around 9-9.5 cr,is this possible using the 69 heads?Also,would a camshaft with 214 @ .050 on the intake side be to much for a truck motor(ex-Isky dual pattern 264 Megacam)?This is all in the thinking plan right now,just trying to gather info.Thanks guy's for any advice.Al
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2003, 04:45 PM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.
351 Long Rod Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Quantrex
Rod length directly effects how an engine breathes because it controls the speed of the piston during both the intake downstroke and exhaust upstroke. Longer rod motors also tend to run cleaner as the piston dwells longer at TDC, creating a more complete mixture burn and increasing combustion pressure efficiency. A side benefit of that is that the motor becomes less detonation prone for a given fuel octane. Longer rods also decrease piston thrust against the cylinder walls during the power stroke so more force is sent to the crankshaft. The horsepower and torque ranges of a motor are more dependent on camshaft timing than rod length, however.

GREAT POST!!!!

A trick I've used in building 5.0's is putting pistons in backwards. Because of the offset wrist pin it essentially gives you a few thousanths more rod length. Joe Sherman, who is a Ch*** guru taught me this and claims near 20 HP on a modified motor.

The draw back is less cylinder loading on start up which is supposed to cause cold start rattle. But with the TRW forged pistons @.003 clearance I haven't noticed.
__________________
If Ford, GM, Chrysler and even the U.S. government can buy foreign, why can't we???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2003, 06:16 PM
HotWhlz85's Avatar
HotWhlz85 HotWhlz85 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Elon, NC
Posts: 1,020
HotWhlz85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

I knew we had some real gurus in here.

I learn something new every day. Thanks for the input guys.
__________________
Ron

2006 F350 SD CC 6.0 FX4 Dually (real trucks don't need sparkplugs)
1985 F150 4x4 351W- ol Blue
1989 Full size Bronco 5.0 5spd 3.75
1976 F150 SC 360/C6
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2003, 09:52 PM
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006 EPNCSU2006 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 9,222
EPNCSU2006 has a very good reputation on FTE.EPNCSU2006 has a very good reputation on FTE.EPNCSU2006 has a very good reputation on FTE.EPNCSU2006 has a very good reputation on FTE.
351 Long Rod Question

I think I picked this website up from someone on this board a while back. They use GM engines for examples, but the principles are the same.
http://www.grapeaperacing.com/grapea...rodslength.cfm
I found it to be very informative. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-01-2003, 10:13 PM
DOHCmarauder's Avatar
DOHCmarauder DOHCmarauder is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,074
DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.DOHCmarauder has a great reputation on FTE.
351 Long Rod Question

Here's another!!! http://www.chevytalk.com/tech/engine/rod_angle.html


I was always taught that longer was better(no dirty remarks people ) There's always two sides to every story!!!
__________________
If Ford, GM, Chrysler and even the U.S. government can buy foreign, why can't we???
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2003, 01:45 PM
Quantrex Quantrex is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 423
Quantrex is starting off with a positive reputation.
351 Long Rod Question

Getting back to the original post; the 351M/400 rod-late 351W would use the same compression height piston as a 331ci SBF stroker (1.17"). You'll have to rebush the rods, (check with Scat Cranks for rod bushings) for the smaller pins. The new r:s ratio would be 1.88:1 vs. the stock 1.70:1. In the early 351W block, you might have to deck the pistons to get zero deck height. With a mild cam and stock heads, you should wind up with a very wide powerband/high-torque motor. The longer rods will help overcome(not cure) the restrictive porting of the stock heads.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2003, 01:45 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)

Tags
302, 351, 351w, 69, engine, ford, horsepower, length, long, longrod, motors, rod, rodlength, stock, windsor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup