General Diesel Discussion  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Passive regens, DPF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-19-2010, 08:10 PM
KC8QVO's Avatar
KC8QVO
KC8QVO is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,541
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Passive regens, DPF

Theoretically, is there any way to get a passive regen in normal driving? In otherwords, why burn so much more fuel to boost the exhaust temps for a "cycle"? What is the temperature difference between normal running and a regen cycle? Is there any way to get close with the engine "working" that will require little help to get up to regen temps? City driving obviously wouldn't work for this, but running at elevated speeds/rpm's (highway driving, cruise on the country routes) should allow an opportunity to get up to temp better. I know regens work best at elevated speeds for extended times, but instead of a "cycle" why can't highway driving in and of itself burn out the filter?

Tractors do this - and the practice of "shift up, throttle back" boosts efficiency for lower-demand operations (lower RPM's, same ground speed, harder to push the same speed = working the engine harder than a higher rpm). In a nutshell it boosts fuel economy (hp-hr/gal) by better utilizing the power of the engine over a wider range. Because the engine spins slower the torque has to go up to do the same amount of work, which means the engine load is increased. By keeping the load on the engine up the system is able to initiate a regen in a passive state - theres very little, if any, extra fuel burned for the sole purpose of boosting EGT's.

If a truck engine is already working in propelling the truck/load down the road, shouldn't that be enough work to require minimal help in cleaning the filter through a regen process? Instead it appears quite the opposite - the higher the engine load the more active regen cycles (towing a trailer = less miles between regens than empty, the harder the trailer to pull the less miles between regens). I guess I don't fully understand the background on why a regen happens in a diesel (mainly the 6.4). I know why it does - to clean the filter of the soot it trapped - but that isn't a complete explaination. There are other systems that don't necessarily require active regens. Why the difference?

What is the threshold of regen temperatures? Are those temperatures ever reached in a non-active regen state? Can a curve be fitted to those parameters? (boost pressure/RPM? I would assume those would be a function of the engine loading).
 
  #2  
Old 11-25-2010, 12:54 PM
don.joyce59's Avatar
don.joyce59
don.joyce59 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is my understanding that towing a heavy load results in less regens, not more. Also normal driving just does not cause the exhaust to get hot enough to burn the soot out.
 
  #3  
Old 12-14-2010, 07:57 PM
rob_nc's Avatar
rob_nc
rob_nc is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a NOx based or passive regen, soot oxidizes at 300C. O2 based or active regens reach temps of nearly 600C to oxidize soot. The 6.4L will regen passively under the right conditions, but less frequently than the 6.7L because it has less NOx in the exhaust after the engine.

A 6.4L should regen passively more often if loaded at 50% load than it will at 100% load simply because the engine is producing more soot than it can get rid of at 100%. The 6.7L has less EGR which means more NOx at engine outlet. Less EGR means less soot produced. Less EGR also means more NOx or lower regen temps.

Operators of 6.4L engines can benefit somewhat by using bio diesel fuel. Bio diesel produces less soot that also oxidizes at a lower temp than fossil fuel based soot. Due to the lack of energy in bio diesel, fuel economy will/may suffer.
 
  #4  
Old 12-18-2010, 07:19 AM
senix's Avatar
senix
senix is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 36,555
Received 1,407 Likes on 1,003 Posts
There is more cause for concern with bio then less mpg's. I also has more potential for water so avoid it period...unless you are the one controlling the manufacture of it.

I agree with the thought process on the passive and active regens. If I am cruising empty I can go 400 + miles sometimes without a regen...passive ones are happening.

Loaded to 100% then my regens are around 130 miles apart. Simply too much soot to be handled by a passive regen.
 
  #5  
Old 12-26-2010, 11:57 PM
carltonwebb's Avatar
carltonwebb
carltonwebb is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
We use Bio-diesel at thejob and it has a tendency for the fat in it to clot together and glop up the fuel filters in colder weather. They look as though u covered them in cake iceing. We also have the h20 issues Senix mentioned. The 6.0 engines hate the bio and it appears as though the 6.4 is starting to feel that same. The cummins and the Cats do not seem to particularly care for it either.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
my50F1
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
32
08-13-2018 10:04 PM
kcwolf200
2017+ Super Duty
33
04-25-2017 10:52 PM
747Driver
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
24
04-17-2017 07:20 AM
city_dweller
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
1
01-10-2016 05:16 PM
KC8RXQ
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
7
05-18-2011 01:12 PM



Quick Reply: Passive regens, DPF



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.