Mustang Intake????
#1
#2
#6
Stock vs. stock, the Mustang intake isn't much better than the truck intake. However...5.0L Explorers are a dime a dozen, and soccer moms have been crashing them left and right for years, so they're plentiful in junkyards. They come from the factory with the GT-40 intake. They also have GT-40 "P" heads, but they require special headers.
#7
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
I guess you're not aware just how very different the three 5.0 intakes are form one another. In terms of airflow potential the HO has the least at around 135-150cfm/runner, the GT40/Explorer is in the middle at around 165-190cfm, and the truck has the most potential by far at 200-250cfm per runner. Matching that airflow capacity to the engine will produce the best results(i.e. broadest powerband), so considering that the stock heads only flow about 150cfm at 1/2" valve lift that means the HO is the best choice.
Trending Topics
#8
I guess you're not aware just how very different the three 5.0 intakes are form one another. In terms of airflow potential the HO has the least at around 135-150cfm/runner, the GT40/Explorer is in the middle at around 165-190cfm, and the truck has the most potential by far at 200-250cfm per runner. Matching that airflow capacity to the engine will produce the best results(i.e. broadest powerband), so considering that the stock heads only flow about 150cfm at 1/2" valve lift that means the HO is the best choice.
Yes I am aware, thank you very much. You may want to revise your numbers, though. You wanted to be Mister Technical about it, so here's your technical data:
#10
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
I won't dispute either of those points, but as of yet I don't think we have really nailed down what will be "better" for the OP since he hasn't really detailed where he's going with this.
#11
Well you're new around here so exactly how are we to know about your experience? You'll have to loose the attitude if you want to gain credibility around here because there are lots of people that will call you on unsupported statements. And that's not because they're asholes it just because the net is filled with more bad information than good and there are a lot of armchair experts floating around, so more often than not responses to posts are misleading or just wrong.
I won't dispute either of those points, but as of yet I don't think we have really nailed down what will be "better" for the OP since he hasn't really detailed where he's going with this.
I won't dispute either of those points, but as of yet I don't think we have really nailed down what will be "better" for the OP since he hasn't really detailed where he's going with this.
So are we in agreement? Shall we have a Slurpee Summit now? Or Beer Summit...which is it? Eh?
#12
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
Yeah we're in agreement on most things it seems, the posts I have seen from you so far seem to come from a solid knowledge base so I was kind of surprised with the tone of your previous reply.. not something I expected from somebody that's been around the block a few times. It seems people are quick to pull the snarky trigger on the Interweb for some reason.. I'm guilty of that too at times and find myself editing a post to tone it down because there's no need to be mean... usually.
#13
#14
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
Yes quite true.. but the mustang guys are ususally after top end horespower while truck users may be more interested in lowend to midrange power, and for that the smaller ports have an advantage.
#15