|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list small-list); Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:28:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: small-list digest users <listar Reply-to: small-list Subject: small-list Digest V2000 #168 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts Small Chassis Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe small-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ small-list Digest Mon, 09 Oct 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 168 In This Issue: Re: Chop top bronco gets broken into Re: [Re: Firestone Tires] Subscription to forum at http://www.ford-trucks.com/cgi-b Re: [Chop top bronco gets broken into] Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 SuperCoupe swap Re: Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 SuperCoupe Re: [Re: Firestone Tires] Re: Firestone Re: Firestone Tires Firestone Tires Re: [perf-list] Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 Re: Firestone Tires ABS Light 98 Explorer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Brian Andrews" <RICHat22 Subject: Re: Chop top bronco gets broken into Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:28:21 -0500 i would like to see more pics too adam. i have had my B II for over 6 years now, 3 paint jobs, 2 engine, 2 rear ends, etc. etc. and chop top was one of the first things i thought about. My father had a 78 or 79 full size bronco(first big body) and he had the removable top. I was just always too scared because of the dangerous stunts i pulled. Wanted roll cage and such. Plus i saw no way to re-use the factory roof and glass or anything remotely inexpensive in that manner. Lets see some pics of the work they did. Rolling, creasing, stuff like that. Great looking truck though. Even I had to drool a little myself and my is a head-turner as well :)) Brian ------------------------------ Date: 9 Oct 00 22:45:54 EDT From: Tim Turner <ManicMechanicNC Subject: Re: [Re: Firestone Tires] > "Michael D. Sheridan" <marble First remember I'm no Firestone fan either; no flaming intended in the following. > I have a set of 225 Firestones that came on my then new 1999 > Mazda B2500. Hate these tires! They are full of bumps and the > sidewalls have strange lines in them. 'Supposedly' the lines/humps in the sidewalls are a normal thing for radial tires, but I don't like seeing them either. I've seen plenty of tires that had them with no ill effects over the long haul though. > At 16,900 miles they are > more than 1/2 worn out. My driving style is a bit, ummmm.. aggressive; I'd faint if I got 17,000 out of a tire! > I'll never have a Firestone tire again, > even free. I'd take 'em free; makes it easier to save for something you like! ;-) > Mazda says they are not in the recall and for me to drop > dead. I'd imagine so. (Although I'm sure their exact wording varied! <G>) You *MIGHT* get better results from a Firestone dealer if you ask for Bridgestone replacements. (Surprisingly better IMHO). > I'll never have a Mazda again either! Just because they won't replace tires that are 'supposed' to be safe? Also if you look closely in all the warranty papers the tires should be handled by the tire manufacturer/dealer. Most dealerships do NOT handle tires. A friend of mine that has worked at a few dealerships says that tire warranty concerns were handled by taking the wheels off and running them over to the tire dealer involved. By the same logic if McDonalds had some bad 1/4 Pounders and a Burger King Cheesebuger gave you an upset tum-tum you wouldn't patronize either. > Just wait until people with the 225 size start dying, then > something will be done after the funerals. *ALL* tires fail in some (small) percentage; often due to operating outside the designed parameters. (weight/load/inflation/etc.) The Explorer has a higher incidence regardless of tire and especially so with the tires involved in the recall. > I won't drive my Mazda over 45 MPH Go for it.. compare the weight per tire and the inflation pressure between the Explorer and your Ranger (err.. Mazda clone) and remember that the hyped failures were mostly prolonged high-speed driving (70+) with loaded (overloaded?) Expy's. > and at 20,000 I'm going > to put a real set of tires on Like many consumers; replace the OEM design with something that suits them rather than the 'compromise' tire the OE decided on. Nothing wrong with that! :-) Of course some people insist on the OE tire (notably Caddy owners). > and send the Firestones to > Firestone as a Chrismas gift. It's not worth the shipping cost unless you're REALLY cheesed about it. If you're determined to do so just toss 'em in the local BFS dealers parking lot with a card. Of course if you've gotten mail from Firestone with a "postage paid envelope" you could just tape the envelope to the tires... <BG> Tim ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.netscape.com/webmail ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:21:05 -0400 From: admin Subject: Subscription to forum at http://www.ford-trucks.com/cgi-b Following are new messages posted in the Ford Truck Enthusiasts message board forums. If you have any questions, please use the contact form on the web site. To remove your subscription, visit our Message Board at www.ford-trucks.com, login, view any forum and click the subscription link. If you are subscribed to any of our mailing lists, you receive this message automatically as part of that subscription and it can only be disabled by unsubscribing from the mailing list. Messages posted in Explorer And Explorer Sport Trac =========================================================== "97 Explorer SOHC" Posted by viper on 10/09/2000 13:13:46 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/explorer/239.html#0 Messages posted in Bronco II =========================================================== "RE: bronco II" Posted by luigi on 10/09/2000 22:38:04 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/bronco2/72.html#3 ------------------------------ Date: 9 Oct 00 23:25:18 EDT From: Tim Turner <ManicMechanicNC Subject: Re: [Chop top bronco gets broken into] Adam McLaughlin <kd6poc > Sunday was beautiful here yesterday, so I grabbed a friend and headed out > to sebastopol for some home made ice cream. After that, we ran to the > mall because she wanted shoes and I, dress shirts. "She" Hmmm.. just a friend.. shoes? OK we believe you. ;-) > a sprint PCS phone and my Alpine CD player > faceplate. That sucks! I remember when my DCS phone got gone after the hurricane and of course the radio is no good without the face. I asked 'Radio Shack' about faceplates once and *IF* you can prove owning one (reciept etc.) you can probably get a new face rather than having to buy a new unit. > They did leave the CD player in the dash, however. What the heck?? Why > steal only the face plate? Might have the same unit without a face in the 'stash bin'. > They did get the phone, though. That bites. Lose all the numbers you've stored; reprogram the ones you have into the new one, etc. :-( > They left a brand new TFI module, and two EEC relays that I carry for > spares. No market for those unless they have a Ford! > After talking with police, I went home, called the sprint company and > told them what happened. They told me the phone had been used to call my > residence, (Quickdial no. 1 on the phone) and to make some calls to > mexico. When the thieves called my house, they left messages in spanish!! > No kidding. Get 'em translated? I'm sure not just Kim & I would be interested to know what they said! (Flash-back to the Seinfeld episode where he calls his car phone and talks to the car theif.) > WHat the heck man, I had the bronco chopped for one week and this > happened. Look into the lock-boxes and such that Jeep owners have. :-( As much as I like the look I'd want to make the 'removed' top into a replaceable hard-top via latches/bolts along with a soft top. > Peculiarly enough, they didn't even open up my tool box or even touch the > work gloves or shop rags. I should have hidden my faceplate in the > gloves, or better yet the tools. Huh.... That's surprising; tools are easily pawned; must of been after the electronics only. > When I got home I found out that my insurance premiums are going up. > What's the bill now? $238.40 per month for full coverage, less $500 > deductable. (USAA) YIKE!! Try searching around some, the local 'Farm Bureau' here in NC has excellent group rates for a $20/Yr membership. Kim wants to know if you collect $2 bills or Susan B Anthony Dollars; for the short time she did she got robbed 5 times and feels they're bad luck after that! Your luck's got to turn for the better soon... :-) :-) Tim ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.netscape.com/webmail ------------------------------ From: "Keith Christensen" <radiopro Subject: Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 SuperCoupe swap Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 20:51:37 -0700 "Looking for the road less-traveled" sometimes leads to answers.... As always, another 2.9L owner looking for more power. I haven't done a lot of research into this, but it looks like this could be a good alternative to the 'usual' 302 swap. I've got access to at least 3 of these motors as well as the T-Bird's electronics as donors. It appears that this engine 'should' fit without major hassles, but I haven't done a lot of measuring or verifying yet. ------------------------------ From: "Brian Andrews" <RICHat22 Subject: Re: Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 SuperCoupe Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:14:24 -0500 i dont know about the tranny and such but i am curious if the 3.8 would have the torque to snatch the BII around like a 302 would. Would the 3.8 be enough to justify the swap? I would be under the impression that it would not take off the line very well. Coupld be wrong. Could be too impressed with the 302 in mine :) It would only seem troublesome simply because it is not done much. Would love to know how it goes though. I have no acess to a 3.8 to look and give you ideas. Check out mine Brian http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://southeastern.webjump.com ------------------------------ From: "Hans Luckoff" <hluckoff Subject: Re: [Re: Firestone Tires] Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 21:44:21 -0700 I have Firestone 225-15 HT's on my 99 Ranger and I can't complain about them, they seem like good tires but I keep them at 30psi (like it says on the door jam) and I don't drive like a dork. They work for me. Hans ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Turner" <ManicMechanicNC To: <small-list Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:45 PM Subject: [small-list] Re: [Re: Firestone Tires] > > > I have a set of 225 Firestones that came on my then new 1999 > > Mazda B2500. Hate these tires! They are full of bumps and the > > sidewalls have strange lines in them. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 01:12:26 -0400 From: Donald Canavan <dcanavan Subject: Re: Firestone The firestones that came on my 98 ranger have 50000 miles on them and are still in fairly decent shape. I am not seeing what everyone is talking about. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:06:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Springer <jim_springer Subject: Re: Firestone Tires From: "Michael D. Sheridan" <marble Subject: Re: Firestone Tires Jason Holmes wrote: > > nope...still riding > > >From: "Flynn Einhorn" <feinhorn > >Reply-To: small-list > >To: small-list > >Subject: [small-list] Firestone Tires > >Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 23:10:15 EDT > > > >Has anyone had trouble with their firestone tires. I had a pair of > >firestones that were not under the recall and I had to change them after > >16,000 miles. I am very very unhappy with their quality! Anyone have a > >similar story? I have decided to boycott the companies products. -I have a set of 225 Firestones that came on my then -new 1999 -Mazda B2500. Hate these tires! They are full of -bumps and the -sidewalls have strange lines in them. At 16,900 miles -they are -more than 1/2 worn out. I'll never have a Firestone -tire again, -even free. Mazda says they are not in the recall and -for me to drop -dead. I'll never have a Mazda again either! -Just wait until people with the 225 size start dying, -then -something will be done after the funerals. -I won't drive my Mazda over 45 MPH and at 20,000 I'm -going -to put a real set of tires on and send the Firestones -to -Firestone as a Chrismas gift. I have a B4000 with 265x15 Firestone Wilderness AT's and they have been very good tires. Currently have 36,500 miles and more than 50% of the tread, and I live in south Florida. They aren't the quietest but they have proven to be a good on/off road compromise. For everyone who thinks Michelins are great one of the Michelin X rated brand new tires on my wifes car had a catostrophic blow out at less than 1,000 miles and they have had to be rebalanced every 5,000 miles. I am not very impressed with Michelins lately. Jim Springer <jim_springer __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ From: "Ron & Madeline Trampe" <telh Subject: Firestone Tires Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:48:21 -0500 > From: "Flynn Einhorn" <feinhorn > Subject: Firestone Tires > Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 23:10:15 EDT > > Has anyone had trouble with their firestone tires. I had a pair of > firestones that were not under the recall and I had to change them after > 16,000 miles. I am very very unhappy with their quality! Anyone have a > similar story? I have decided to boycott the companies products. > _________________________________________________________________________ > I have 109,000 miles on my '96 Ranger 4X4 and it still has the original Firestone Wilderness AT tires on it. They are not under the recall because they are P215's instead of P235's. They will last another 20K-30K by the looks of them. I rotate them regularly (all five). So each tire has 87,000 miles on it. A lot of that mileage has been highway, high speed. But they are used regularly on gravel (like the road on which I live). Also use them in 4 wheel drive hauling wood from the woods. I love Firestone tires. I have never had a set of tires last anywhere near this long. I think though that the vehicle that the tires are on has a lot to do with it. Ron Trampe telh ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:12:16 -0700 From: john yee <johny Subject: Re: [perf-list] Probably asked before : What about a 3.8 Here's a really excellent site for ranger/bronco modifications. engines, axles, etc... http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.therangerstation.com/ http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://therangerstation.homestead.com/3_8_Conversion.html Keith Christensen wrote: > "Looking for the road less-traveled" sometimes leads to answers.... > > As always, another 2.9L owner looking for more power. > > I haven't done a lot of research into this, but it looks like this > could be a good alternative to the 'usual' 302 swap. I've got > access to at least 3 of these motors as well as the T-Bird's > electronics as donors. > > It appears that this engine 'should' fit without major hassles, but > I haven't done a lot of measuring or verifying yet. ------------------------------ From: "Mike Haight" <mhaight1 Subject: Re: Firestone Tires Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:49:32 -0400 I had Firestone Radial ATX P215/75/15 on my 92 Ranger 4x4 SC and had no problems whatsoever with them and only replaced them last winter after getting 72,000 miles out of them.....then I took it into the local Ford dealer, since they also sell tires and they convinced me to UPGRADE to P235/75/15....well, you guessed it, these are the recalled tires and you know I never noticed it in the first 30 days but shortly after that I started noticing a shimmer in the front end that I never had before so I took it back to have them double check the wheel balance and alignment and all was OK there...it was the new tires that actually caused the shimmer but no body would believe me until the recall came out on them. I'm still waiting for Ford to call me to replace them. I started out 104 on the list for replacement and now I'm down to 35 on the list..........figure that in about two more weeks I should have my new replacements.........told them I prefer Michelins or BF Goodrich or anything else for the truck except another set of those Firestones.......unless they can guarantee me a set of the 215's like I had before not a problem and over 70K miles...........oh well, such is life! Take Care and Have a Good Day. CUL, Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Springer" <jim_springer To: <small-list Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:06 AM Subject: [small-list] Re: Firestone Tires > From: "Michael D. Sheridan" <marble > Subject: Re: Firestone Tires > > Jason Holmes wrote: > > > > nope...still riding > > > > >From: "Flynn Einhorn" <feinhorn > > >Reply-To: small-list > > >To: small-list > > >Subject: [small-list] Firestone Tires > > >Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 23:10:15 EDT > > > > > >Has anyone had trouble with their firestone tires. > I had a pair of > > >firestones that were not under the recall and I had > to change them > after > > >16,000 miles. I am very very unhappy with their > quality! Anyone > have a > > >similar story? I have decided to boycott the > companies products. > > -I have a set of 225 Firestones that came on my then > -new 1999 > -Mazda B2500. Hate these tires! They are full of > -bumps and the > -sidewalls have strange lines in them. At 16,900 miles > -they are > -more than 1/2 worn out. I'll never have a Firestone > -tire again, > -even free. Mazda says they are not in the recall and > -for me to drop > -dead. I'll never have a Mazda again either! > > -Just wait until people with the 225 size start dying, > > -then > -something will be done after the funerals. > > -I won't drive my Mazda over 45 MPH and at 20,000 I'm > -going > -to put a real set of tires on and send the Firestones > > -to > -Firestone as a Chrismas gift. > > I have a B4000 with 265x15 Firestone Wilderness AT's > and they have been very good tires. Currently have > 36,500 miles and more than 50% of the tread, and I > live in south Florida. They aren't the quietest but > they have proven to be a good on/off road compromise. > For everyone who thinks Michelins are great one of the > Michelin X rated brand new tires on my wifes car had a > catostrophic blow out at less than 1,000 miles and > they have had to be rebalanced every 5,000 miles. I > am not very impressed with Michelins lately. > > Jim Springer <jim_springer > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://mail.yahoo.com/ > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:23:55 -0700 From: Dan Wentz <dwentz Subject: ABS Light 98 Explorer This has happened 2 times to me and it happened to my girlfriend this morning. Something on the dash catches your attention and you look down just in time to see the ABS light go out. Is this likely to be cause for concern? I'm inclined not to worry. By the way, are there inexpensive OBD scanners out there? I had a $15 one .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|