|
|
From: owner-small-list-digest
To: small-list-digest Subject: small-list-digest V3 #305 Reply-To: small-list Sender: owner-small-list-digest Errors-To: owner-small-list-digest Precedence: bulk small-list-digest Monday, November 22 1999 Volume 03 : Number 305 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe small-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Small - All sorts of '93 Explorer Diff/Trans questions FTE Small - No oil Change for 60K FTE Small - Starting Problem Re: FTE Small - ford Re: FTE Small - ford FTE Small - OBD-II FTE Small - MAF ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 14:34:16 -0500 From: Geoffrey Hoffman Subject: FTE Small - All sorts of '93 Explorer Diff/Trans questions I am thinking of doing some more major work on the 4 wheel system of my explorer, but I am trying to figure out what I have, and have not found positive info on the web yet. Anyway, some info: I have the '93 4D 4WD exp, the EB model. The EB also means that I have the tow package, so I have the 3.73 gears in the back. Now, I read somewhere that if you have the 3.73 in the back, that it is a limited slip diff. in the back. Part of the reason I am doing this is that the Exp's 4wd is not very good in _really_ ugly stuff, and I have gotten stuck in not very difficult amounts of snow becuase of the differentials. So, does that mean that I have ht elimited slip in the back? because I had heard that those can wear down after a while, and thne act like an open diff, and wondering if that is what may be happening. (I know I could take the diff. apart, but I am not wild about doing that if I don't have to.) So, If I have the limited slip in the back, that is good, and I only need to worry about the front. I was thinking of putting lockers in the front, and since this truck will still see lots of pavement use, I was thinking of the ARB Air lockers. anyone use these and like or dislike them? or any other suggestions? That way I could completely unlock them when I don't need and save on mileage and stuff. Another question, in a slightly different direction: what is there between the front and the rear gearbox as far as a differential or connection? I am wondering what it would be like to also make it so that I have more of a "natural" full-time four wheel drive. Right now, in four wheel drive I get the "hopping" from when going around turns. Since both the front and the rear diffs seem to be mostly open, then I am guess it is the binding _between_ the front and the back, and wondering if it is just a straight connection (Which is my guess). If it is just a direct connection, is it possible to put something in? like a thrid diff in the middle, or a viscous coupling or any of those other wonderful things? This is more of making it so that I can do full time 4wd on pavement and stuff more comfortably, the earlier questions are in regards to off road/sloppy stuff. Is that possible, or is it a lost cause with the explorer's 4wd system? :) just trying to get an idea of what I have and what I can do with it. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Geoffrey Hoffman http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.pobox.com/~hoffy/ ICQ: 10113556 hoffy == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 15:35:11 EST From: Blest25913 Subject: FTE Small - No oil Change for 60K In a message dated 11/15/99 6:00:44 AM, owner-small-list-digest the engine to change the oil, why did he bother to change the stat? Seems somewhat inconsistent to me. Buck Shoff >> With that many miles on the engine he was probably adding a quart every 100 miles or so so he might have thought that he was changing the oil as he went. Ron Trampe == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 15:42:07 EST From: Blest25913 Subject: FTE Small - Starting Problem My '96 Ranger with the 3.0 engine and 99K miles on it had trouble starting for the first time ever this morning. I turned the key and the engine 'started to start'. As soon as I let go of the key the engine immediately died as if there were no spark. This happened twice. On the third try it started normally. Any ideas? The Check Engine light has been on for over a year now, but the truck runs great and gets its normal 18-20 miles per gallon. Ron Trampe == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 15:22:02 -0500 From: Dave Slotter Subject: Re: FTE Small - ford At 5:42 PM -0500 11/7/99, David A. Cooley wrote: [snip] >Also, the Teflon is asking for a new engine... Teflon does not >dissolve, and does not "bond" to metal. It accumulates in the oil >passages like cholesterol in the blood stream until your engine dies >of oil starvation. Are you sure about this? Have you actually seen this happen or have you just heard about this? I would think that most of the teflon would be removed during the oil change and that any amounts of teflon would just be "trace" anyway. The point about teflon is that it does not easily bond with other substances (how "they" get teflon to bond with cookware would be very interesting for me to find out). It is very "slippery" and I would actually think it would be more useful if engine parts were actually coated with it in order to improve heat dissipation as well as slow down wear. (But do the big car manufacturers want to sell cars whose engines don't wear out as quickly?) >The top rated oil filter is the Mobil 1. Removes the most junk from >the oil with the least restriction to flow, built very well. Price, >7 to 9 dollars. I agree with the assessment with Mobil 1. I have heard only good things from others who own performance cars as well. I have never heard anything negative about it or seen any problems caused by it. However, if you have an older vehicle, it may not be wise for you to start using it if you don't want your vehicle to drip oil and stain the driveway. Over time a vehicle's gaskets start to harden up and while they may not leak with regular dino oil, synthetic oils have smaller molecules and as a result may leak. If you don't care about drips, then I say go ahead and use it on an older vehicle. - -Dave - -- ICQ# 16458879 AOL/AIM ID: "Mac XR" 1986 Ford Bronco II Gray Manual 2.9 V6 125K Pittsburgh PA == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:45:16 -0500 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: Re: FTE Small - ford At 03:22 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Dave Slotter wrote: >At 5:42 PM -0500 11/7/99, David A. Cooley wrote: > >[snip] > >>Also, the Teflon is asking for a new engine... Teflon does not dissolve, >>and does not "bond" to metal. It accumulates in the oil passages like >>cholesterol in the blood stream until your engine dies of oil starvation. > >Are you sure about this? Have you actually seen this happen or have you >just heard about this? I would think that most of the teflon would be >removed during the oil change and that any amounts of teflon would just be >"trace" anyway. I think it was Briggs and stratton did a test of long term useage of teflon containing additives... they found the oil passages with large deposits that plugged them. Dupont also states that their teflon product has no place in an engine oil. =========================================================== David Cooley N5XMT Internet: N5XMT Packet: N5XMT Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?! =========================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:46:58 -0500 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: FTE Small - OBD-II For those of you with 96 and newer vehicles with OBD-II that want to see what the engine is doing, if you have a laptop computer, Alex Peper sells a scantool with cable/software that does GM/Ford/Chrysler for 120.00 (single make) or 162.00 for all 3. Works great as I've been playing with mine all weekend! =========================================================== David Cooley N5XMT Internet: N5XMT Packet: N5XMT Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?! =========================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:51:23 -0500 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: FTE Small - MAF Hello all, A brief observation in my 97 Explorer 5.0... MAF got dirty, as evidenced by pinging at light throttle under any condition... MAF showed a max airflow at 5000RPM and WOT of 96 gm/s. Removed maf sensor assy and gently cleaned the elements with carb spray cleaner, re-installed and went for a drive... WOT roughly 220 g/s of airflow. Big difference! For those that want to play with the OBD-II in the EEC-V, check out http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.obd-2.com/ Alex has a scantool that runs $120.00 for a single interface (ford, GM, or chrysler) and $162.00 for all 3 in one. =========================================================== David Cooley N5XMT Internet: N5XMT Packet: N5XMT Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?! =========================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|