|
|
From: owner-small-list-digest To: small-list-digest Subject: small-list-digest V3 #191 Reply-To: small-list Sender: owner-small-list-digest Errors-To: owner-small-list-digest Precedence: bulk small-list-digest Friday, July 30 1999 Volume 03 : Number 191 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe small-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) RE: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) FTE Small - Forwarded for "Anthony Rio" Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) [none] FTE Small - Your A4LD Trans Re: FTE Small - Your A4LD Trans FTE Small - ranger question Re: FTE Small - ranger question Re: FTE Small - ranger question FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) Re: FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage Re: FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage FTE Small - Re: Leg to stand on.....I think not... Re: FTE Small - Auto Hub lock nut socket ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:20:11 -0700 From: rgstein Subject: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) The advice here is good. The way you use a 9v battery to test speaker polarity is to simply connect the battery to the speaker and see which way the cone moves at the moment of contact. Or you can disconnect the plug at the amp end and connect the battery to all the speakers there: this way, you can test all the speakers from the same source. I'd recommend keeping the amp/radio out of the loop so as not to fry the output transistors with the battery. I've also used a 1.5 volt battery for this. You won't damage the speakers either way. About imaging: it is hard enough to get it right in a home stereo system. To get realistic imaging (hell, any imaging) in a motor vehicle is a lot of BS. It's just about impossible. Richard == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:52:08 -0500 From: "Tony Rio (Chicago)" Subject: RE: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) True about getting any sort of accurate imaging in a vehicle. Especially on the low end, part of the sound is based on pressure (air movement) May sound great, but try it with the windows open. Also, too much fabric and other sound absorbing materials in the cab to make the sound reproduction "accurate". Too many right angles. Ever see a concert or symphony hall? Not a 90 degree angle in the place. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:15:51 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: FTE Small - Forwarded for "Anthony Rio" Forwarded for "Anthony Rio" Correct. If they are not hooked up correctly, they will be "out of phase". If I remember correctly, that means the sound waves from each speaker are directly opposite of each other and effectvly c*ncel each other out. Try it on your home stereo if you have spring connectors on the speakers or amp. The sound will be tinny.. no low end (and not just thump your skull low. You will barly even hear a bass guitar in music). > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Donald Paauw > To: > Sent: 28/7/99 6:31 PM > Subject: Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) > > > > > >> 2) Is there an easy way to tell which wire goes to which part of the > >> speaker? It seems that it doesn't matter, but I read that if you put > them > >> backwards, the speaker vibrates in the wrong direction. The > adapter used > on > >> my stock speakers did not work with the `95 ones, so I pulled the wires > out > >> and stuck them in the slots in the new adapter. > > > >I would think the wires can go on either way. > > > >> > >> 3) On the speakers I took out, one of them had a sticker on > the back that > >> said "Premium Sound". Does this mean my BII had the premium sound > option? > >> I know the system still sucks, but I know the premium sound > option had an > >> amp seperate from the receiver.. how do I figure out if I have this amp > and > >> where can I find it? > > > >In my '88 Ranger, the extra amp was accessible through a panel in the top > of the dash. > >WARNING: this amp is supported by plastic insulating spacers. > The case is > NOT ground > >and if you let the case touch the dash while the radio is on, the whole > system will > >be toast. Then you install an Alpine system. > > > >> > >> 4) How do remove the stock stereo from my BII? I know the new > ones have > a U > >> shaped tool, but mine doesn't look so easy. > > > >Yep, sounds like the premium sound type. The radio is attached by an > L-shaped bracket > >on each side. The dash panel has to come off & then the screws > holding the >> L brackets are > >removed. > > > > > >-- Don > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:58:27 GMT From: alannorthstar Subject: Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 18:22:22 -0500, you wrote: :Donald Paauw wrote: : : :> I would think the wires can go on either way. :=20 :Please ignore this advice, as it is dead wrong. The right and left :speakers must be wired in phase, i.e., with the cones moving in and :out simultaneously. Reverse the phasing and you will degrade both :bass response and imaging.=20 Not to mention that any mono material in the signal will tend to be canceled out completely if the speakers are in opposite phase to each other. Later, Alan == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:09:04 PDT From: "Bill Carlson" Subject: [none] Hi, I have a 90' Ford Ranger XLT with a 2.9 auto. The truck jumps whenever I put it in reverse, but does not jump into any other gear. Its not really that bad, but I am wondering why it does this, and hopefully it is pretty easy to fix. Thanks. Billy 56 Ford F100 90 Ford Ranger _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.msn.com == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:20:29 EDT From: BiggRanger Subject: FTE Small - Your A4LD Trans I'd reccomend draining all the trans fluid, dropping the pan, replacing the fluid filter, and pulling the vavle bady down and cleaning it out. It's probably a high milage trans and there's a lot of junk floating around (small bits of metal, fiber from clutch packs and bands) that's causing the pistons in the valve body to stick. I'd also reccomend a good trans book for this typee of job (Chiltons domestic trans manual) Darren == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:47:06 EDT From: Rngr86STX Subject: Re: FTE Small - Your A4LD Trans OR go to your nearest Ford dealer and buy an ATSG (automatic transmission service group) book for the A4LD. EXCELLENT book. I used to rebuild mine and its very descriptive and easy.good luck == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:16:36 -0400 From: Don Canavan Subject: FTE Small - ranger question I have a 98 ranger 4 liter v-6 with an automatic transmision and four wheel drive. It is only three quarters of a year old. I have noticed that when I come to a complete stop(such as at a red light)and start out again there is a very slight ????Quiver???? (not to sure how to explain it) It is fairly faint, but noticable. Other than this there seem to be no problem. Is this normal, it is my first truck so I have no idea. thanks in advance == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:23:29 GMT From: alannorthstar Subject: Re: FTE Small - ranger question On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:16:36 -0400, you wrote: :I have a 98 ranger 4 liter v-6 with an automatic transmision and four = wheel :drive. It is only three quarters of a year old. I have noticed that when= I :come to a complete stop(such as at a red light)and start out again there= is :a very slight ????Quiver???? (not to sure how to explain it) It is = fairly :faint, but noticable. Other than this there seem to be no problem. Is = this :normal, it is my first truck so I have no idea.=20 : thanks in advance : I have a 98 with the 3 liter engine, auto tranny and 4x4 and it has started doing a little "bump" when I start out from a stop. It sorta acts like the rear axle is rotating a bit under the thrust of the acceleration. =20 Don't know that is the cause, but it sorta feels like that. =20 Also, if you let up on the gas right away, it will "bump" back, again. This bump is a fairly solid thing, and it's coming through the frame/body of the truck-- it isn't a loose seat or anything. Anyone else have this thing happening? =20 And/or know what it is? Later, Alan == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:46:17 -0400 From: Phil Snider Subject: Re: FTE Small - ranger question Don, I had a '97 Range Xcab 4.0l 5 speed AOD that had a little vibration like that. It turned out to be a driveline vibration at approximately 1500 rpm. I could maintain that vibration if I went up a steep hill rep, Mr. Stewart Sonnan said the problem could NOT be fixed. I was amazed at his response. I've since traded that vehicle because of that problem and many others. From what I've been told, the '97 has a two piece drive shaft and that was a part of the problem. The '98 is based on the Explorer platform and has a one piece drive shaft. In your case, it may be the U-joints need to be looked at. I've heard of Rangers and Mustangs with U-joint bolts that weren't tightened. Phil Snider Don Canavan wrote: > I have a 98 ranger 4 liter v-6 with an automatic transmision and four wheel > drive. It is only three quarters of a year old. I have noticed that when I > come to a complete stop(such as at a red light)and start out again there is > a very slight ????Quiver???? (not to sure how to explain it) It is fairly > faint, but noticable. Other than this there seem to be no problem. Is this > normal, it is my first truck so I have no idea. > thanks in advance > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:47:30 -0700 From: Adam McLaughlin Subject: FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage Hi! I would like to add an oil pressure guage to my 1988 2.9 V6 Bronco 2. Has anyone ever done this? Does anyone know how easy it is to install something like this? Any suggestions of how it should be done? I was looking at the Chilton's manual, but it isn't exactly specific on where it is and how to get to it.... Thanks in advance, Adam == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 18:54:34 -0700 From: don Subject: Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) > From owner-small-list > From: alannorthstar > To: small-list > Subject: Re: FTE Small - Audio: Rear Speakers (88 EB Bii 4x4 Auto) > Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:58:27 GMT > X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Sender: owner-small-list > Reply-To: small-list > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by orlando.neomagic.com id JAA05302 > > On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 18:22:22 -0500, you wrote: > > :Donald Paauw wrote: > : > : > :> I would think the wires can go on either way. > : > :Please ignore this advice, as it is dead wrong. The right and left > :speakers must be wired in phase, i.e., with the cones moving in and > :out simultaneously. Reverse the phasing and you will degrade both > :bass response and imaging. > > Not to mention that any mono material in the signal will tend to be > canceled out completely if the speakers are in opposite phase to each > other. > > Later, > Alan > This would mean that if you hooked your speakers out of phase and tuned in to an AM radio station (mono), you would hear nothing. That has not been my experience. In a controlled home environment, phasing is PART of the correct setup. So is speaker placement and the position of the listener. Whenever you have two wave sources (sound, radio, electrical, light) interfering with each other, you're going to get peaks and nulls between them at various points at various frequencies. It's unavoidable. Add reflections from some nearby surfaces and absorption from others and the whole thing gets pretty messy. Especially in a car or truck where the distance between reflective surfaces is very small compared to the wavelengths involved. This is highly conducive to standing waves, except the surfaces aren't parallel. You can theoretically get a higher frequency synthesized from multiple reflections of a lower frequency. Of course, this requires perfect conditions and with a normal sound source such as music or speech, it would be so fleeting that it wouldn't be noticed. But that's not about phasing. On to phasing. In a vehicle, the speakers are placed who-knows-where and point who-knows-where (usually pointing at each other or bouncing off a windshield) with the listener sitting between them (or at least his legs are between them). So the waves aren't going to reach each ear as they would at home. Also, the listener is usally not equidistant from each speaker. Not good for phase matching on some point of the spectrum. And the driver is next to the left speaker while the passenger is next to the right. Who has the better listening experience? (The passenger, but it's because he's not driving). It's this haphazard positioning and unpredictable reflection/absorption charateristics that make me question the importance of speaker phasing in an automotive environment. In a high end luxury car with an umpteen speaker stereo option, I would say some thought may have been given to the acoutics. But not in a truck. Now I'm not saying that changing the phase relationship of the speakers won't make a difference; it will. But is it an important difference, considering everything else? Could be. If you are convinced that it is, connect the wires with the stripes to the speaker terminals with the dots. ( It's the wires that can be tricky; the speaker terminals are usually easy to identify since the speakers should be identical. If they're not, you've got another factor involved.) And I'll agree that it's usually best to hook things up the way the manufacturer intended. But for me, I've tried it both ways and all I have to say is: You might be a redneck if -- You wire your truck speakers out of phase and can't notice a difference. Or maybe my muffler has something to do with it (ruins the signal-to-noise ratio, don't ya know). - -- Don == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:31:48 -0700 From: don Subject: Re: FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage > > Hi! > > I would like to add an oil pressure guage to my 1988 2.9 V6 Bronco 2. > Has anyone ever done this? Does anyone know how easy it is to install > something like this? Any suggestions of how it should be done? I was > looking at the Chilton's manual, but it isn't exactly specific on where > it is and how to get to it.... > > Thanks in advance, > > Adam > I was going to put one in my '88 Ranger a while back and as I recall, the stock sender is on the bottom of the engine, driver's side and looks like a small, bell-shaped can. It's screwed in and has a wire clipped onto a terminal on the bottom. I wanted to add a mechanical guage to mine but also wanted to keep the idiot light, since I've never had a guage & wouldn't be in the habit of checking it often. My plan was to use a brass tee fitting to mount the original sender & attach the tubing for the mechanical guage but the result put the sender pretty low & I was afraid it would get knocked off. Anyway, the Ranger's getting a 5.0 soon so that's history. Hope this helps. - -- Don == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:57:17 -0700 From: Adam McLaughlin Subject: Re: FTE Small - Oil Pressure Guage Yeah, I had heard about the brass t fitting and all. The motor in there doesn' burn or leak any synthetic, so I would like to keep the motor in there.... It would be a nice addition to someone who combs his car all of the time... Adam Donald Paauw wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I would like to add an oil pressure guage to my 1988 2.9 V6 Bronco 2. > > Has anyone ever done this? Does anyone know how easy it is to install > > something like this? Any suggestions of how it should be done? I was > > looking at the Chilton's manual, but it isn't exactly specific on where > > it is and how to get to it.... > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Adam > > > I was going to put one in my '88 Ranger a while back and as I recall, the > stock sender is on the bottom of the engine, driver's side and looks like > a small, bell-shaped can. It's screwed in and has a wire clipped onto a > terminal on the bottom. I wanted to add a mechanical guage to mine but > also wanted to keep the idiot light, since I've never had a guage & wouldn't > be in the habit of checking it often. My plan was to use a brass tee fitting > to mount the original sender & attach the tubing for the mechanical guage but > the result put the sender pretty low & I was afraid it would get knocked off. > Anyway, the Ranger's getting a 5.0 soon so that's history. > > Hope this helps. > > -- Don > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:09:58 -0700 From: "Robert Eberhardt" Subject: FTE Small - Re: Leg to stand on.....I think not... If you are the same person I remember a couple of months back, then I still can't believe they tried to fix your Explorer. Over here in the States, it would have surely been considered "totaled". Your insurance company would have paid you the total amount that similar equipped Explorers were selling for. Does the UK have insurance? Over here in the States I would say you are well within your rights to demand a replacement vehicle or the value of an identical one to buy what you want. If the UK is even remotely similar to the States then I would say that it would apply there as well. Don't accept your Explorer in that condition! And, continue to keep us informed as to what happens. I am sure there are several people here besides myself that are interested. Robert >------------------------------ > >Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 21:42:52 +0100 >From: "Neil Brownlee" >Subject: FTE Small - Leg to stand on.....I think not... > >Hi, > >You may or may not remember me, I've been hanging around the list for ages, >and my Explorer was in an accident some 20 weeks ago, well on Friday I got >it back. It's not taxed, and after doing a whole 200 yards up the drive it's >clunking into gear, shaking, hissing in reverse and p*ssing water out of the >exhausts about midway along the vehicle. > >Anyway to top it all, the check engine light is now on. The paintwork is >amateurish, the cubby box won't close anymore, the windscreen is 7.5mm too >far over allowing you to put your fingers in the gap between it and the >body...the front tyre is torn, there is overspray all over the plastic...oh >and the nearside glass is all scratched. > >Sucks...do you think I am within my rights to demand a vehicle of similar >age and mileage in replacement? Plase help....we have no rights over here in >the UK :( BTW it had a new frame....so they have tried to rebuild it...... > >Neil.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|