|
|
From: owner-small-list-digest To: small-list-digest Subject: small-list-digest V3 #159 Reply-To: small-list Sender: owner-small-list-digest Errors-To: owner-small-list-digest Precedence: bulk small-list-digest Saturday, June 26 1999 Volume 03 : Number 159 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe small-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam Re: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam RE: FTE Small - Explorer Cam FTE Small - Tranny Cooler RE: FTE Small - intake, exhaust, and head questions. Re: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler RE: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler FTE Small - Shocks FTE Small - snow plows & Explorers FTE Small - ADMIN: Extended Warrantees FTE Small - V6 emblem Re: FTE Small - V6 emblem FTE Small - WarranteeWise... what a joke RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 06:41:25 -0700 From: Ray Scheidnes Subject: RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer Ping/Spark knock/detonation is caused by the fuel charge being ignited before the spark plug fires then when the plug does fire all of a sudden there are two flame fronts (explosions!) heading towards each other with predictable results. Joesph Merchak wrote: > > I bought a 99 Ranger XLT 4x4 supercab with a 4 speed auto. Since the warm weather, the engine pings, even when its not under any load. I have taken back to the dealer and was told nothing is wrong, but they wont explain to me why I am forced to use plus or better fuel. Has anyone seen this problem? Keep going back to the dealer until it's resolved. The same additives that raise octane in today's gasoline are the prime cause of carbon deposits that increase the octane need. (catch-22!) There is *NO* reason to use a fuel of higher octane than Ford specifies for your engine when it's working as designed and there are TSBs that state that this will cause more harm than the (intended) good. A couple quick pings under load aren't anything to worry about but I gather it's more severe than that! Keep us posted and feel free to e-mail me off list. Tim Turner/Manic Mechanic Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Pinging is caused by improper detonation of the fuel air mixture in the combustion chamber. In a typical new car it is only noticed when the engine is under load at lower RPM's like going up a hill in overdrive or something. The engine in a current car should run without pinging when using the gas rated the same as what is printed in the owners manual. Some cars have detonation sensors that will restrict timing and adjust the fuel/air mixture to stop detonation in case you end up having to use a fuel that is below the grade the engine is designed for. A engines designed rating is usually determined by the compression ratio of the cylinders, though not only by this. Of course older vehicles (prior to unleaded fuel) tend to Ping more easily because of many reasons including: Higher than optimum compression ratio for the fuel made today, carbon deposits in the cylinders causing "hot" spots, Poor fuel air mixture and incorrect timing. Here is a nice web page that goes through pinging and engine kocking: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.virtualsoftware.com/intellipro/happycar/Demo/Prophet/prob82.htm - --Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 14:07:31 -0400 - --From: "Kenneth J. Nagy" - --Subject: Re: FTE Small - Pinging on a 3.0L > ---------- > From: J.S.H.[SMTP:F428 > Reply To: small-list > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 10:25 PM > To: small list > Subject: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer > > My 91 Explorer is pinging.I know this was covered before, > and if I remember correctly the consensus was EGR valve. > Is that correct? > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 07:34:58 -0700 From: George Freese Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam That sounds scary. I wonder if this would be covered under a warranty if mine goes out. Or is this only on a 4x4? At 02:48 PM 6/24/99 -0400, you wrote: >"Rasmussen, Tim" wrote: > >> I have a '93 Explorer XLT 4x4...been very happy. I'm just about to turn 50k >> miles on it. I took in today to get a front end alignment. The guy at the >> shop says I need a new cam on the passenger side. He wants to buy and >> install a cam kit (will cover both sides) for $170. Does this sound right? >> Too much? Good deal? Am I getting jerked around? > >Right on the money, at least for the newer models. I just got concentric >adjusters installed on both sides of my '97 Explorer, at 19k miles, by the >local Ford dealer. Total was $169, including the $45 alignment fee. Granted, >this is not the TTB front end, but Lou, the service manager, is a close >personal friend of mine-- He says Ford should have installed them on every >Explorer, because they ALL need them. > >-- >Chris Slaw >-- >'97 Explorer V8 19k >'93 626ES auto 50k >'90 MustangGT 5spd 60k >-- >"If you find a path with no obstacles, > it probably doesn't lead anywhere." >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:53:19 -0400 From: "Kenneth J. Nagy" Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam My '96 XLT has about 65K miles and is on it's second set of Goodyear Wranglers. Still drives like new. Haven't had any front end problems as of yet. - ----- Original Message ----- From: George Freese To: Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 10:34 AM Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam > That sounds scary. I wonder if this would be covered under a warranty if > mine goes out. Or is this only on a 4x4? > > At 02:48 PM 6/24/99 -0400, you wrote: > >"Rasmussen, Tim" wrote: > > > >> I have a '93 Explorer XLT 4x4...been very happy. I'm just about to turn 50k > >> miles on it. I took in today to get a front end alignment. The guy at the > >> shop says I need a new cam on the passenger side. He wants to buy and > >> install a cam kit (will cover both sides) for $170. Does this sound right? > >> Too much? Good deal? Am I getting jerked around? > > > >Right on the money, at least for the newer models. I just got concentric > >adjusters installed on both sides of my '97 Explorer, at 19k miles, by the > >local Ford dealer. Total was $169, including the $45 alignment fee. Granted, > >this is not the TTB front end, but Lou, the service manager, is a close > >personal friend of mine-- He says Ford should have installed them on every > >Explorer, because they ALL need them. > > > >-- > >Chris Slaw > >-- > >'97 Explorer V8 19k > >'93 626ES auto 50k > >'90 MustangGT 5spd 60k > >-- > >"If you find a path with no obstacles, > > it probably doesn't lead anywhere." > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:10:07 -0400 From: Chris Slaw Subject: Re: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer "J.S.H." wrote: > > My 91 Explorer is pinging.I know this was covered before, > and if I remember correctly the consensus was EGR valve. > Is that correct? I would pull the codes before you start throwing parts at it. There is a possibility that the egr system is fine. Of course the valve is relatively cheap so you could start there if you have no way to pull codes. Another common cause of pinging-- You may have excessive carbon buildup. This can do one of two things; create a hot spot which preignites the intake mixture, or it bumps up the compression as the buildup reduces chamber volume. I found this out reading a Ford TSB (technical service bulletin) on the V6 Probe GT, which has common pinging problems due to high compression ratio. If it is pinging excessively, they (Ford) recommend the following procedure-- get the engine hot, bring the rpms up to about 2500 rpms, disconnect a vacuum line going into the intake manifold, and allow the vac line to suck up about a half pint to a pint of water out of a can or jar. The water will actually nicely steam-clean the combustion chambers. I thought this sounded silly, sucking water into an engine in any manner, but I tried it on my '85 Bronco (195,000 miles, and nothing to lose) and it worked very well! Hope this helps. Also remember, if you have a problem that is causing premature carbon buildup, you are only treating the symptom here, not the problem, which is oil consumption or rich mixture condition. - -- Chris Slaw - -- '97 Explorer V8 19k '93 626ES auto 50k '90 MustangGT 5spd 60k - -- "If you find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn't lead anywhere." == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:22:26 -0400 From: Chris Slaw Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Cam George Freese wrote: > > That sounds scary. I wonder if this would be covered under a warranty if > mine goes out. Or is this only on a 4x4? Whether or not you need parts for good alignment depends on whether or not your truck will align within specs with the factory hardware. Mine was obviously not under warranty-- alignment problems are alsways blamed on some sort of abuse, hitting a pothole etc. > >but Lou, the service manager, is a close > >personal friend of mine-- He says Ford should have installed them on every > >Explorer, because they ALL need them. What he meant is every Explorer he sees with a chronic alignment problem needs them, which is to say, every Explorer HE sees! ;^) There are of course many Explorers that do hold a good alignment. Lou just never sees them too often. - -- Chris Slaw - -- '97 Explorer V8 19k '93 626ES auto 50k '90 MustangGT 5spd 60k - -- "If you find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn't lead anywhere." == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:55:08 -0500 From: "Herring, Bobby" Subject: RE: FTE Small - Explorer Cam Are these parts on the Explorer/Rangers with the twin i-beam frontend? I took my '93 Ranger in a while back and he said the ball joints are fine but it needed a cam on the top on the passenger side before he could adjust the caster/camber(?). The toe-in was fine but it still pulls to the right. He said they were fairly expensive and I should probably just wait. It needed front shocks so I put those on and swapped the tires from side to side. Changed the way it handles but still pulls some. I think I will wait until I get ready to buy new front tires to have the front end fixed. The tires already have the waved edges from the bad shocks and being out of balance at the same time. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:11:01 -0700 From: Brian Pynn Subject: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler My friend has recommended I install an auxilliary tranny cooler on my 97 Ranger. It's a 3.0L 5spd Rebel Youth model...and as such is only rated for max GVW trailer towing of 2000 pounds. Which is exactly what my new tent trailer weighs. I already have the larger rad, and haven't noticed any problems with overheating. Would an aux tranny cooler be of real benefit? Also, are they inexpensive and easy to install? == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:11:01 -0500 From: Mike Harms Subject: RE: FTE Small - intake, exhaust, and head questions. >Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:49:08 -0400 >From: "Carl Schmidt" >Subject: FTE Small - intake, exhaust, and head questions. ... >name that has a head for this engine (2.9L). The vehicle is my fathers but I >am hoping to inheret it some day and want to do some research on it. What >sorts of exhaust can I put on here. It's an 87 Bronco II eddiebauer edition. >I wonder, would dual exhaust be worth it? Where can I purchase headers? I ... >Scorpio intake I heard about, anyone know what it is, what it does, and >where it can be bought? Thanks for an help that be offered! Check out Kunz Korner: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ford ranger. com/wwwboard3.html This is a web message board dedicated to the Ford 2.9 v6. A couple people there have built up their 2.9's quite a bit and are always willing to give information. If you read through the messages there I bet you will already find answers to many of your questions. Someone there is even in the process of installing a Scorpio Intake onto their truck to see what it does for them. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:29:46 -0400 From: Chris Slaw Subject: Re: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler Brian Pynn wrote: > > My friend has recommended I install an auxilliary tranny cooler on my 97 > Ranger. It's a 3.0L 5spd Rebel Youth model...and as such is only rated for > max GVW trailer towing of 2000 pounds. Which is exactly what my new tent > trailer weighs. I already have the larger rad, and haven't noticed any > problems with overheating. Would an aux tranny cooler be of real benefit? > Also, are they inexpensive and easy to install? The inexpensive models (copper tubes running thru fins) are not worth sh*t. Before you create alot of work/expense for yourself, why not install a tranny temperature gauge? If it starts to overheat where you will be driving, at least you can pull over before doing damage, and install a "good" oil cooler when convenient (one that is built like a small radiator). - -- Chris Slaw - -- '97 Explorer V8 19k '93 626ES auto 50k '90 MustangGT 5spd 60k - -- "If you find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn't lead anywhere." == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:38:37 -0700 From: Ray Scheidnes Subject: RE: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler Are there any oil cooler kits available for the Rangers that are easy to install? (I have a '94 4.0) > ---------- > From: Chris Slaw[SMTP:cslaw > Reply To: small-list > Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 10:29 AM > To: small-list > Subject: Re: FTE Small - Tranny Cooler > > Brian Pynn wrote: > > > > My friend has recommended I install an auxilliary tranny cooler on my 97 > > Ranger. It's a 3.0L 5spd Rebel Youth model...and as such is only rated > for > > max GVW trailer towing of 2000 pounds. Which is exactly what my new > tent > > trailer weighs. I already have the larger rad, and haven't noticed any > > problems with overheating. Would an aux tranny cooler be of real > benefit? > > Also, are they inexpensive and easy to install? > > The inexpensive models (copper tubes running thru fins) are not worth > sh*t. > Before you create alot of work/expense for yourself, why not install a > tranny > temperature gauge? If it starts to overheat where you will be driving, at > least you can pull over before doing damage, and install a "good" oil > cooler > when convenient (one that is built like a small radiator). > > -- > Chris Slaw > -- > '97 Explorer V8 19k > '93 626ES auto 50k > '90 MustangGT 5spd 60k > -- > "If you find a path with no obstacles, > it probably doesn't lead anywhere." > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:41:57 -0400 From: "Eric Davis" Subject: FTE Small - Shocks Hey gang. I would like to put some Edledbrock shocks on my 98 Ranger. Does anyone know if these are good off-road. Also some one was telling me that I have to get a realignment after I install the shocks. Is this true?? Thanks Eric Davis 99 4x4 EB Expedition 99 4x4 F-150 Lariat 98 4x4 Ranger, Custom Exhaust with Edlebrock muffler, Superchip, K&N. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:45:08 -0600 From: "Joseph L. Casey" Subject: FTE Small - snow plows & Explorers I am curious if anyone has attached a snow plow to Explorers. Is it successful? Am I correct that Ford might not approve? What is the cost and is it worth the expense? And, the pros and cons? Thanks! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:03:25 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Small - ADMIN: Extended Warrantees Dear Ford Truck Enthusiasts list members: We have a new advertiser on our web site. Since the beginning, our practice with web site advertisers has been to make a brief announcement for 2 days (this is day 1 of 2). This is our only exception to commercial advertising on our mailing lists. Please show your appreciation to them for helping to support the web site and the lists by checking out their site: WarranteeWise offers FREE ON-LINE QUOTES for vehicle service agreements (extended warrantees) on new, pre-owned, and even the vehicle you are currently driving. (Including "Bumper-to-Bumper" plans). Prices are significantly lower than factory extended warrantees. To visit them, go to the Ford Truck Enthusiasts web site, ( http://www.ford-trucks.com ) and you'll find their link on the left side of the screen about half-way down. We would like to you to let then know you heard about them via Ford Truck Enthusiasts. Now returning you to our regularly scheduled program... Ken Payne Admin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:04:06 -0400 From: J Cope Subject: FTE Small - V6 emblem I recently came across a pair of "V6" emblems for the side of my BII. It didn't come with them stock, and I've been wanting to put them on for a while. What would be the best way to put them on? I know the stock ones have that foam behind them.... Thanks! JC '88 BII XLT ________________________________________________________ NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you? Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:08:19 -0400 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: Re: FTE Small - V6 emblem At 06:04 PM 6/25/99 -0400, you wrote: >I recently came across a pair of "V6" emblems for the side of my BII. It >didn't come with them stock, and I've been wanting to put them on for a >while. What would be the best way to put them on? I know the stock ones >have that foam behind them.... Any paint and body supply store will have the proper double sided foam adhesive. (not just plain double sided foam tape) but before you put them on, use wax remover from the paint supply store and scrub the areas they will be installed to ensure they stick. Also, ensure it's warm out when you do install them so the adhesive bonds well... after 24 hours, re-wax the fenders etc to seal the paint and keep them looking good. =========================================================== David Cooley N5XMT Internet: N5XMT Packet: N5XMT Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?! =========================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:01:15 -0400 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: FTE Small - WarranteeWise... what a joke Well, Went to WarranteeWise when I saw the advertisement here on the list... I highly recomend that we all AVOID them. They quoted me for their warrantee, then said I also qualified for a better package, but refused to quote me a price until after I purchased the standard plan... I asked about payment plans (That all other companies offer... one year interest free etc) and they said Payment in full period. These guys are for people that could pay cash for major repairs without a warranty. Not a good company. Thanks, Dave =========================================================== David Cooley N5XMT Internet: N5XMT Packet: N5XMT Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?! =========================================================== == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:21:50 -0400 From: "Joe Merchak" Subject: RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer Well got the truck back from the dealer today. They said found nothing wrong - could not validate customer's claims. Of course they could not, I have to run super in the truck to keep it from pinging. This is the third time back without any positive results. Any suggestions would be helpful. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-small-list [mailto:owner-small-list Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 9:41 AM To: 'small-list Subject: RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer Ping/Spark knock/detonation is caused by the fuel charge being ignited before the spark plug fires then when the plug does fire all of a sudden there are two flame fronts (explosions!) heading towards each other with predictable results. Joesph Merchak wrote: > > I bought a 99 Ranger XLT 4x4 supercab with a 4 speed auto. Since the warm weather, the engine pings, even when its not under any load. I have taken back to the dealer and was told nothing is wrong, but they wont explain to me why I am forced to use plus or better fuel. Has anyone seen this problem? Keep going back to the dealer until it's resolved. The same additives that raise octane in today's gasoline are the prime cause of carbon deposits that increase the octane need. (catch-22!) There is *NO* reason to use a fuel of higher octane than Ford specifies for your engine when it's working as designed and there are TSBs that state that this will cause more harm than the (intended) good. A couple quick pings under load aren't anything to worry about but I gather it's more severe than that! Keep us posted and feel free to e-mail me off list. Tim Turner/Manic Mechanic Custer Auto Repair Wilmington NC > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Pinging is caused by improper detonation of the fuel air mixture in the combustion chamber. In a typical new car it is only noticed when the engine is under load at lower RPM's like going up a hill in overdrive or something. The engine in a current car should run without pinging when using the gas rated the same as what is printed in the owners manual. Some cars have detonation sensors that will restrict timing and adjust the fuel/air mixture to stop detonation in case you end up having to use a fuel that is below the grade the engine is designed for. A engines designed rating is usually determined by the compression ratio of the cylinders, though not only by this. Of course older vehicles (prior to unleaded fuel) tend to Ping more easily because of many reasons including: Higher than optimum compression ratio for the fuel made today, carbon deposits in the cylinders causing "hot" spots, Poor fuel air mixture and incorrect timing. Here is a nice web page that goes through pinging and engine kocking: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.virtualsoftware.com/intellipro/happycar/Demo/Prophet/prob82.htm - --Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 14:07:31 -0400 - --From: "Kenneth J. Nagy" - --Subject: Re: FTE Small - Pinging on a 3.0L > ---------- > From: J.S.H.[SMTP:F428 > Reply To: small-list > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 10:25 PM > To: small list > Subject: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer > > My 91 Explorer is pinging.I know this was covered before, > and if I remember correctly the consensus was EGR valve. > Is that correct? > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:37:47 -0400 From: "David A. Cooley" Subject: RE: FTE Small - Pinging Explorer At 11:21 PM 6/25/99 -0400, you wrote: >Well got the truck back from the dealer today. They said found nothing >wrong - could not validate customer's claims. Of course they could not, I >have to run super in the truck to keep it from pinging. This is the third >time back without any positive results. Any suggestions would be helpful..... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|