|
|
small-list-digest Monday, November 23 1998 Volume 02 : Number 325 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe small-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Small - Re: About that ABS... FTE Small - Vehicle dynamics and ABS braking Re: FTE Small - Explorer Rear Wiper Blade Assembly FTE Small - ADMIN: 1999 F-100 Supernationals, Pigeon Forge FTE Small - new Ranger webring Re: FTE Small - new Ranger webring Re: FTE Small - Explorer Rear Wiper Blade Assembly Re: FTE Small - new Ranger webring ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 09:21:16 EST From: BFunk33 Subject: FTE Small - Re: About that ABS... In a message dated 11/22/98 3:47:41 AM US Mountain Standard Time, owner-small- list-digest Subject: FTE Small - About that ABS... ... So, these questions: 1. Does the ABS really kick in when the cruise control senses a significant overspeed? Don't know, but I don't think so. On my F-250 ('91) there's no way) 2. What was on Ford's mind when they made it only for the rear end? Cost. 3. Is there any advantage to rear ABS? You bet. With rear ABS, you can threshold brake the front wheels, without having to worry about your rear end waving to you as it passes. The vast majority of braking power is on that front axle. 4. Would those of use who are "Rear ABS Impaired" be better off if we were to disable our ABS systems? No. 5. Why not? See above. Rear-only ABS can be looked at as the best of both worlds. With it, you can threshold-brake to your heart's content, and not have to worry about the lighter rear axle locking up before you've gotten much braking out of the front axle. I'm one of those who learned to threshold-brake a long time ago. With the F-250, I found that it was actually much easier to do so, once I got used to the brake pedal stutter. After realizing that the stutter was just a sign of the ABS helping me out, I could brake better, whether the truck was loaded or empty. 6. Is there a way to get the most out of our rear ABS systems, reliably? Practice. Practice.Practice. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 08:00:33 -0800 From: "Alan Heaberlin" Subject: FTE Small - Vehicle dynamics and ABS braking I have followed the threads about adding weight to the Ranger's bed to improve traction and about ABS with equal amusement. Any discussion about vehicle handling and control must be accompanied by an understanding of vehicle dynamics. The (extremely) basic terms here are those of understeer (front wheels lose traction first) and oversteer (rear wheels lose traction first). Weight transfer to the front and rear under acceleration or braking will change the vehicles propensity to either oversteer or understeer. This is a result of how much contact patch there is from each of four tires under various conditions. Detroit automotive engineers have been designing more and more understeer into our vehicles for years now. This is because it is inherently safer (especially for inexperienced drivers) to have the front wheels skid first, the car travels in the direction of its inertia and then stops of its own volition or hits something with the front end. From my own experience, Rangers, Bronco II, and Explorer are all with a tendency to oversteer. Rear wheel drive and high center of gravity all contribute to this. This is why wrecks with these vehicles often end in rollover and side impact collisions (from end-swapping oversteer). In spite of one opinion I read, ABS is not for "stupid people." Everyone doesn't have the opportunity to learn advanced threshold braking. I feel safer knowing my wife has ABS in her Explorer. Whether it was a good idea or not, installing rear ABS on trucks and sport-utes was an attempt to replace a tendency to oversteer with understeer in hard braking maneuvers. Obviously they have decided that 4-wheel ABS is a better option. I'm very sure that our trucks were designed for optimal handling (and economy) with no load in the bed. Otherwise the owner's manual would direct you to load 300 lbs. of s**t in your truck before driving in the snow. My advice is to go to a high performance driving school for an introductory class in vehicle dynamics. Get a ride in a skid car if you can and take your wives and kids too. You will think differently about driving when you have some knowledge about how it really works. My expertise and knowledge comes as an Automotive Engineering Technician (Test Driver) with "B" certification for speeds of 150 mph. My employers were Kett Engineering, Honda America and Mercedes Benz. Alan Heaberlin http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.buffalorun.com Buffalo Run Enterprises "Law is a matter of statistical probability and truth is finally a matter of whichever of the many geometries best suit your needs." George Elliot == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 11:53:41 -0700 From: Bob Fiddes Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Rear Wiper Blade Assembly Jim, I haven't seen anyone answer you yet so here goes, Pull the wiper arm mechanism away from the window. When it is up as far as it will go, you will find a small tab on the bottom where the blade attaches to the shaft. This tab pivots away from the wiper arm. When it is all the way out, you will be able to slide the arm off the splined shaft. Hope it gets the job done for you. I can do it easier than trying to describe how to do it. Bob Jim Bielecki wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to remove the rear wiper blade assembly from a '93 > Explorer? I don't mean the wiper blade itself, but the entire rear arm > assembly that appears to be attached directly to the motor spindle. Are > these things just pressed on? Or is there a hidden release catch someplace > that I can't find? > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 15:16:31 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: FTE Small - ADMIN: 1999 F-100 Supernationals, Pigeon Forge The 21st annual F-100 Supernations, in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, is scheduled for May 13-16, 1999 at the Grand Hotel. This show features both old and new trucks and is the largest show of its kind. Last year, over 800 trucks were registered in the show. Ford Truck Enthusiasts had very good attendance, especially since it was our first year. We had 32 people (not including spouses) from our group there. Already we are nearly double the size we were in April of 98. We're hoping to have over 100 people attend in 1999. As many of you may know, several of us are trying to incorporate a non-profit Ford truck club. We hope to have this together by the show. Regardless of whether or not this happens by then, we'd like to put together a committee to plan for the event. If you would like to be part of the planning, and/or you plan to attend the show, you can be on this committee by sending an email to majordomo body of the email: subscribe pfgroup-list This is the only way to subscribe. Full information about the show will appear on the web site events guide this evening. Regards, Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 16:14:58 PST From: "Joe Mitchell" Subject: FTE Small - new Ranger webring I know nobody wants to hear my advertising, so I'll make it short. I have a new Ranger webring. Anybody with a Ford Ranger website may submit their site. For more information, check out my VERY new webpage. (http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.angelfire.com/tx/tru2datank/club.html) A lot of changes are being made to the webpage, so don't laugh :) Thanks for reading... - -- Joe - -- I'd push a Ford before I drove a Chevy, but I don't need to. - -- http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.angelfire.com/tx/tru2datank/index.html ______________________________________________________ == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:47:52 -0000 From: "John Becker" Subject: Re: FTE Small - new Ranger webring your are right about that Joe. I have a 92 ranger with 140k on it. Only had 2 problems with it. 1 ran out of gas once 2 had a flat tire. John Louisiana, Missouri. > I'd push a Ford before I drove a Chevy, but I don't need to. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 21:16:34 -0600 From: Jordan Subject: Re: FTE Small - Explorer Rear Wiper Blade Assembly At 09:14 AM 11/21/98 -0500, you wrote: >Can anyone tell me how to remove the rear wiper blade assembly from a '93 >Explorer? I don't mean the wiper blade itself, but the entire rear arm >assembly that appears to be attached directly to the motor spindle. Are >these things just pressed on? Or is there a hidden release catch someplace >that I can't find? > > >== FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html Just pull, I have a shop manual and I believe from reading that it is merely a friction fit. I'm going to take mine off b/c the stupid thing stopped working anyway. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: 23 Nov 98 00:24:53 -0500 From: Michael Brennan Subject: Re: FTE Small - new Ranger webring I have a 92 ranger same situation - only one problem with it in 6 years - 1 flat tire oh, and I have gone through 3 headlamp bulbs. Now if they could only make better tires :) LOVE that truck >your are right about that Joe. >I have a 92 ranger with 140k on it. >Only had 2 problems with it. >1 ran out of gas once >2 had a flat tire. >John >Louisiana, Missouri. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|