|
|
small-list-digest Thursday, June 11 1998 Volume 02 : Number 163 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer, Bronco 2 and Aerostar Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe small-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE Small - Liquid Electrical Tape FTE Small - '96 Explorer V8 K&N Filter FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? FTE Small - Update on the California Get Together. FTE Small - Fake Oil Pressure Gauges FTE Small - Motor Oil Additives FTE Small - Horn Relay & door bushings Re: FTE Small - Door lock and window motors Re: FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? Re: FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 06:44:56 -0500 From: John Cassis Subject: FTE Small - Liquid Electrical Tape I either purchased it from an auto parts store or a boating supply store like Boat US. Cant remember which one, but its one of the two. John Cassis == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:41:41 -0500 From: balusek Subject: FTE Small - '96 Explorer V8 K&N Filter - -------------------Original Posting---------------- >Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 21:12:41 -0400 >From: "Butler, Rick" >Subject: FTE Small - 1996 Explorer V8 Performance Products - Continuing Saga > >I followed many links from a suggestion made earlier, but could not find >any products specific to my 96 V8 Explorer. Most, if not all, were for >the V6 engine. Perhaps if someone would spoon feed me the specific >URL's ... > >I received a catalog today from Performance Products. They list several >items that would apply to my Explorer. What would be the best to >purchase first? They are: > >JET Performance Module - 294 dollars >Borla Exhaust System - 545 dollars >K&N Performance Kit - they list the 5.0 V8 for the F Series 86-93 and >1994-95, and I'm sure one of those engines is the same as mine. >However, I'm not sure if the air cleaner kit would be a bolt-on scenario >the Explorer. They are 135 or 180 dollars. Any comments? > >If I were to install these components, how much additional wear will >there be on the transmission or other parts of the vehicle? I have the >tow package, which includes the additional trans fluid cooler. Am I >looking at possible expensive repairs down the road? > >Any opinions or other suggestions would be most welcome. > > >Rick Butler >Atlanta, GA - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I just purchased a K&N filter for my '96 V8 Explorer from Summit Racing Equiptment P/N KNN-E-0996 ($38.95) Fits perfectly. Just installed yesterday so can't comment on mileage or performance yet. Danny Balusek Garland, Tx. == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:07:20 -0700 From: "Pete Lawless" Subject: FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? >>>A tech from another Ranger BB claims that 2.9ltr engines manufactured later >>>than 1988 do not suffer from the cracking problems experienced with '88 and >>>earlier engines. >>>Later.... Pete >> >> I thought the good heads didn't come along until late 90. My 89 cracked >> a head at about 160K. Cracked the other soon after. >> Buck Shoff >Sorry guys, but a buddy of mine had a 91 with a 2.9, and that was the >first head replacement i ever did. As for as i know the problem was >never remedied. > >best regards, >Fitzy Could be.... I've got a interesting 2.9 Ltr head story for ya though: Was getting an intermittent mis on my '88 a couple of years ago, so I stopped by the Ford Dealership after-hours were my bro's a heavy trucks tech to hook up to the scope (once again it's who ya know!!) We determined it must be one of the Splitfires (they suck) gone bad. We replaced all the plugs with a set of &^%$$# on the way home that night "Kapowww" an extremely loud explosion with an impressive flash of flames shooting out the drivers side wheel well and gaps in the hood. It looked like the fender and hood flexed up and out about an inch. This was at about 65 mph in traffic... talk about sending you to the dresser for a clean pair of boxers (o) Pulled over to take a look, the plug wire was laying back with the remnents of the new plug in the boot. The plug base was still in the head but completely hollow. Drove it the rest of the way home (kinda loud!) Later inspection revealed a cracked head. Although, "probably" cracked prior, admitting coolant and causing the sparkplug to explode... the dealership turned it in as a warranty to &^%$$# a brand new (not remanufactured) head and labor out of the deal (I bought the passenger side head). Later.... Pete == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:40:17 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: FTE Small - Update on the California Get Together. Hello List Members. I am sending this update on the CA Get together to all of the lists. First I would like to thank Pat Brown for taking the time to research, and send me a list of possible activities. This list was forwarded to Deacon, (from the 61-79 List, who lives in CA). Deacon spent a lot of time researching Pat's list, and searching for other activities we could attend. Unfortunately Deacon did not find much for Truck related events. Most of them were for cars. So Deacon sent me the following message. Deacon Message to Keith Hi Keith. Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. I checked out the places Pat suggested and though some of the ones that weren't just Mustang related looked like fun, none of them were truck related. I tried to look at it objectively because I didn't want to reject an idea because it wasn't in So. Ca. and I don't think I did. If there was a Harley show, sure you and I would have a blast but would anyone else. So no matter what the event some of the people would come just to meet with other members. If the event had nothing to do for a family no ones wife or kids would want to come with them. I looked for something with it in mind, if there wasn't something that was Ford truck or American truck related that was big enough to get and keep people interested it wouldn't be worth doing. I tried to find a west coast Ford Nat's and there isn't anything to compare with PF in California. I was at my wits end and ready to throw in the towel. It had been 2 days and knew I had to send you something or you might think I'd lost interest in helping. Last night I gave in, there was nothing happening I thought would be the right environment for our west coast get together. Not wanting to give in, this morning I sat here in front of my computer ready to send you one of two messages "I've got it" or "I give up" so here it is. I've got it! :) FTE's Weekend at Disneyland! There's an airport with shuttle service, hotels, dining, things to keep a family happy and plenty of local attractions to get us in trouble. We can plan it so it doesn't conflict with PF or other holidays. We can and make our own day. It can be "FTE's annual weekend at Disneyland" so people can make plans. End of Deacon's Message to Keith I know some of you will say, "What does going to Disneyland have to do with Ford Trucks." For one, I am sure some of the list members will be able to drive to Disneyland. This would give us a close-up look at some of their modifications to their Trucks. After attending the show in Pigeon Forge, I am confident that the simple fact of meeting some of these people face to face, would also include a lot of Truck talk. This would also give us time to socialize a little with each other and discuss other topics as well, one being, what else could we do to make the list more enjoyable and useful for everyone. What it takes to brew beer at home, (one of the list members, that I talk to off list, has a very nice setup for brewing beer at home). I am sure there are other list members that converse off list about different things. Now, as far as when to have this get together. I am going to pick a weekend. October 3rd and 4th. Now I know some of you may not be able to make it this weekend. But that is going to happen no matter what weekend this event is planned for. This is similar to what Pat Ford does with the Pigeon Forge show, He picks a weekend, and everybody plans around it. More details about the get together will follow later. Now if anyone has any complaints or comments, please send them to me off list. My Email Address is herbie I would also like to thank Deacon and Ken for their help with this. Thanks! Keith Srb herbie http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://members.netvalue.net/herbie Mesa, AZ == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:00:57 -0700 From: Richard Subject: FTE Small - Fake Oil Pressure Gauges Pat Brown replied to my query about the fake oil pressure gauge circuits. In the private post, he mentioned something about Ford's changing to this radical (and to my mind, deceitful) redesign in order to kill warranty problems. Pat, would you please go into some detail about this warranty issue? I've never owned a vehicle with a real oil pressure gauge. So, I'd appreciate some replies here about how a real oil pressure gauge appears to the driver during use of the vehicle. Does the needle constantly change position, reflecting a constant increase and decrease of actual oil pressure as the motor goes faster and slower? Is the needle movement damped through the use of a bi-metal thermal design (as is the fuel gauge)? Are different mechanical designs used? Can I restore "real world" gauge indication just by removing the resistor and replacing the switch-type sender with an "honest" variable-resistance sender? Thanks Richard - -- !! NOTE: TO REPLY, REMOVE THE STRING: "REMOVE.THIS.TO.REPLY" FROM MY ADDRESS !! == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:48:36 -0700 From: Richard Subject: FTE Small - Motor Oil Additives == original post == Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:23:06 -0400 From: Chuck Anderson Subject: FTE Small - Motor Oil Does any one on the list place their trust in additives such as Slick 50 or Duralube? I used Duralube a couple of times with no ill effects? The additive seems to work much like the semi-senthetic oil I used last winter. Is there any relation between the two? The oil is a much cheaper way to go. Chuck Anderson == my reply == This subject is covered in depth on a web site in which some research info was brought together -- and added to -- by some college students. Go digging and you'll find it (I forgot how I got to it, and didn't bookmark it, but I read it just last week). I'll paraphrase from memory: The results were incontestable: all motor oil additives are just a lot of hype. Most are sourced by the same company. Most contain TFE (teflon), which has been publicly disclaimed for this purpose by the mfr. The manufacturer artfully dodges requests for test results and even the names of testers, replying that all this is "proprietary." Further, they haven't replied to requests for info by Tom and Ray Magliozzi (Car Talk, National Public Radio). There's some debunking there of the "engine-without-oil" tv demo. But worse: TFE (Teflon) is a solid. It settles out, a you'd suspect. Now, your oil filter does what it is supposed to do: it filters out the solid TFE particles, which may, in turn, clog your oil filter, engaging sooner the bypass valve, and increasing your engine wear by now passing other solids through the filter. And that's what you get for your money when you buy Slick 50: faster engine wear. How about that? Richard - -- !! NOTE: TO REPLY, REMOVE THE STRING: "REMOVE.THIS.TO.REPLY" FROM MY ADDRESS !! == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 18:28:24 -0500 From: Jonathan Smith Subject: FTE Small - Horn Relay & door bushings I've got a couple of questions for the list. I've posted one of them before and was advised to buy the ford shop manual. While I may do that, I'm a poor college student and I can't afford to lay out $100+ just to find out where the problem in my horn is. :> Here goes: The horn on my truck doesn't work. As far as I've been able to tell the problem is in the horn relay (switch is OK, horns are plugged up, but I don't get any sound). I'm assuming there IS a relay on this truck but I could be wrong. :> It's a 1989 Bronco II XLT w/ the 2.9 engine (and I'm getting scared by the discussion of the heads on the 2.9 btw :>). Anyway, the question: Is there a relay and if so where is the thing? I'd appreciate any help on this. Other question: The bushings on the bottom hinge of the driver's side door are worn entirely out. Is it possible to replace these or do I have to just buy a new hinge? The hinge-pin doesn't look like it's going to be easy to remove (it appears to have a heat shrunk fastener on it). I've got some bushings that should work, but I want to know if it's possible to replace them before I tear the hinge up trying to do the impossible. :> Well, thanks in advance for any help anybody can offer me. So far I'm loving my Bronco II, but I'd like to get these little problems fixed. == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:17:13 -0700 From: KDRESSEL Subject: Re: FTE Small - Door lock and window motors In my 86 ranger the gears wore out in my power window I got a new gear for 20 bucks I think. The moter was around $90 with a life time warrenty. Mine still woked so I didn't get the moter. It took about an hour and a half to pull out and put back in ( about 8 hours after driving all aroung San diego to find the part). As far as for the power door locks my passanger one quite woking. To get it out you have do drill out some rivets. Havent replaced it yet but hopefully will soon. Matt Dresselhaus 1986 ranger 4x4 Chuck Anderson wrote: > > I have a 90 Bronco II with power windows and door locks. After almost 9 > years of usage the door lock and window motors are going bad. Is there an > after market company that sells these items? I could go through Ford, but > would love to save some $$$$$$$. In the past I have put junk yard motors on > past vehicles but with little success. > Chuck Anderson > > == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:19:57 -0400 From: daner Subject: Re: FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? My '89 Ranger Custom with a 2.9L cracked it's heads. At 08:52 AM 6/9/98 -0700, you wrote: >Jayme Uldarico Newell wrote: >>But my best guess is that anything that I >>put in will have to be a rebuilt 2.9l with the same crappy heads. > >A tech from another Ranger BB claims that 2.9ltr engines manufactured later >than 1988 do not suffer from the cracking problems experienced with '88 and >earlier engines. > >Later.... Pete >== FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html > == FTE: Unsubscribe and posting info www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 23:28:20 EDT From: FrdRngrLvr Subject: Re: FTE Small - RE: 2.9L engine swap or replace heads? My 90' Ranger lost it heads around 108, 000 miles, had them replaced, 9 months.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|