|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 23:54:51 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks-small-digest To: fordtrucks-small-digest Subject: fordtrucks-small-digest V2 #72 Reply-To: fordtrucks-small Sender: owner-fordtrucks-small-digest fordtrucks-small-digest Monday, March 9 1998 Volume 02 : Number 072 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2 Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-small-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Warning Chime [Patrick Frazer ] Cruise control for '91 Explorer [Ken St John ] 3.0L 5-Speed Rear Gear Ratio [RandalDGazdecki Explorer Radius Arm Bushing... [Mike Krause ] Re: ADMIN: Aerostars [Thom Cheney ] Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement [Thom Cheney ] Front Tow Hooks! ["Andr E. Benguerel" ] A good manual on the electrics! ["Andr E. Benguerel" ] Out of round wheel? ["Andr E. Benguerel" ] Re: ADMIN: Aerostars [Ken Payne ] Re: Explorer Radius Arm Bushing... [Jordan ] Re: Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em Bars [Mark Pawlowski ] HTML [Blest25913 ] Applause [Blest25913 ] Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement ["Bryce" ] Re: Aerostar ["Pete Lawless" ] RE: 2.9 Cam mod ["Pete Lawless" ] RE: Exhaust Recomendations ["Pete Lawless" ] Re: 2.9 Cam mod [HYDROSMITH ] Re: Way to go Ken... [HYDROSMITH ] Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement ["Bryce" ] Re: Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em Bars ["Bryce" ] Re: Applause [Ken Payne ] Re: Applause [thomas.panfili 3.0L 5-Speed Rear Gear Ratio [Hawk nerf bars...again. ["Bryce" ] Re: oil prices mileage and more....... ["Lou Guerriero" ] Re: Aerostar [Diana Slyter ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 08:12:39 -0500 From: Patrick Frazer Subject: Re: Warning Chime > Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 20:49:23 -0600 > From: "Jose A. Castillo" > Subject: Warning Chime > > I have a 95 Ranger XLT what decides once in a while to play the warning > chime because it thinks the door is ajar, about 5+ minutes after the > door has closed, sometimes much longer. The door ajar light comes on > and the chime wails away. It seems to happen only when the ambient > temperature gets warm, because it never happens when its cold outside. > I am trying to figure out why, and if I can replace or repair the sensor > or > chime module. Any ideas would be appreciated???? The chime also wails > > when the key is moved to the accessory position without the door ajar > light coming on???? > > Anyone know of a good manual on the electrics on > rangers, I have tried Haynes not much on electrics. > > I have come up with a quick fix, Play the music loud, but I'm looking > for a more healthy solution (not going deaf). Any help would be > appreciated. I also have a '95 Ranger XLT that has trouble with the door switches. In my case, it's the passenger side. The temporary fix was to uncouple the connector behind the right kickpanel in the passenger footwell. When I had time I ripped the door apart, wiggled the wires, shot the latch/switch with WD-40 and tested the switch circuit with a VOM. Not finding anything wrong, I reassembled everything and haven't had a problem since. (knock on wood) I suggest you concentrate on the door switches when looking for your problem. (Unless, of course, the dome light stays OFF while the chime stays ON) Unfortunately, Ford had to get cute and make them an integral part of the latch mechanism and they're hard to get at. - -P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Patrick Frazer Computer Engineer http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.beacon.com/~frazer The Beacon Group ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:26:32 -0700 From: Ken St John Subject: Cruise control for '91 Explorer Does anyone know if the cruise control on a '91 Explorer relies on the on-board computer or does it have its own electronics and is therefore, isolated from the computer? I suspect it runs through the computer just like everything else but I'd like to know for sure. ------------------------------ Date: 9 Mar 98 08:58:35 EST From: RandalDGazdecki Subject: 3.0L 5-Speed Rear Gear Ratio I don't know who asked, but someone wanted a better gear ratio for their 3.45 rear-end. Someone else commented that 3.73 works great in their splash. I got a mail-order quote from West Coast Differentials (http:\www.differentials.com\) for Ford original parts. Here's what it cost: R+P $182.80, Install kit $73.14, and TractionLock (Ford Limited-slip) $210.53 for a grand total of $466.47. Of course you have to do it yourself. Does this sound like a deal?? How much time do you think it would take?? Opinions welcome. I am still waiting on the 5 forward gear ratio's on the Mazda tranny in my Ranger. Anybody know them??? Randy randaldgazdecki Eaton Corporation, S.I.C.D. "I'd rather be a failure at something I enjoy than be a success at something I hate." -George Burns ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 08:13:37 -0600 From: Mike Krause Subject: Explorer Radius Arm Bushing... I've heard and now know that the passenger side radius arm bushing on the older(91-94?) Explorer has a tendency to MELT cause it's so close to the exhaust. A friend (who's mom owns a Limited) and I(who owns a '91 XLT) are going to change them out ourselves(b/c the dealership wants like $400) and I was just wondering if anyone has done this before and how hard and time consuming this is. Thanks. Mike ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 07:51:33 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: ADMIN: Aerostars a mini... min....mi.... I can't even bring myself to type it! I suppose the Aerostar is the Ranger/Explorer what the Econoline is the F150 bunch. A truck is in the eye of the beholder. If an Aerostar owner has something of merit to offer this list, by all means, let them on. TC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 08:13:58 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement YIASCA wrote: > come on FORD your starting to PI_S me off > like this wimpy KEN PAYNE SITE hey pal, no one is twisting your arm to stay subscribed. Please take your whining elsewhere. TC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 09:21:08 +0000 From: "Andr E. Benguerel" Subject: Front Tow Hooks! > Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 17:47:34 -0500 > From: "Lare/Eric" > Subject: Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement > > O.K. - so anyway, if anyone has put hooks on the front of a Ranger (because > I DO push my truck beyond its limits and need pulled out of a sippy hole > every now and again - & vice versa w/ my wheelin buds) .... where did you > put them and how have they worked for you? > > Thanks in advance, > > Eric Smith - '94 Splash SC, 4x4, 4.0L, 4" Trailmast, 32x11.5 BFG's Eric, I have also thought about front tow hooks, here's two ideas. The new 98' Ranger has front tow hooks as standard equipment on the 4X4. They might fit on yours. I'm not sure where their placed but I imagine in the grill attached to the bumper mounts. Second, I think Draw-Tite now produces a Type II & III reciever for the front of a Ranger. This along with the Warn H.D. two shackle would work great also. Good luck, Andre ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 09:25:04 +0000 From: "Andr E. Benguerel" Subject: A good manual on the electrics! > Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 20:49:23 -0600 > From: "Jose A. Castillo" > Subject: Warning Chime > > Anyone know of a good manual on the electrics on > rangers, I have tried Haynes not much on electrics. > > Castillo, Jose A. > Dallas, Tx Jose, My first suggestion before attempting anything drastic is to obtain the Ford Electrical-Vacuum Troubleshooting Manual for your particular vehicle. A 95' Ranger manual is $30. They are availible from Helm 800-782-4356. Helm distibutes the factory manuals for Ford. The EVTM covers much more than the Factory Service Manual ($160, also from Helm) or the Haynes book. Later, Andre ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 09:39:21 +0000 From: "Andr E. Benguerel" Subject: Out of round wheel? > From: "Rio, Tony" > Subject: Tire out of round. > > What is my best method for testing to see if I have an out-of-round > wheel? I want to prove it to myself before I go get a new hub. > > Thanks!!! > > Tony Rio > Allstate Enterprise Help Center > PRC Analyst \ Integration Owner > Trio1 > (W) 847.402.9386 Tony, is it the tire or the rim? Your subject is tire, but you refer to the wheel(rim). If it's the rim, and you would like to do it yourself, here's an idea. You will need to unmount the tire, then affix the rim to something that rotates perfectly staight. A good metal lathe arbor would work. Then using a dial indicator, rotate the wheel by hand and note any drastic changes in the dial reading. The wheel manufacture should supply you with specs. on total wheel run-out. But if you have a metal lathe and a dial indicator, you probably already know this! You can also take it to a local shop that deals in good quality rims. Any rim that is drasically out of round could be verified on a spinning wheel balancer. Some race shops also offer this service. You may also want to look into the mounting system (hub-centric, or lug-centric) and make sure the wheel is properly balanced. The dial indicator can also be used to measure the run-out of your hub. Hope this helps, Andre ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 14:51:41 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: ADMIN: Aerostars At 07:51 AM 3/9/98 -0800, you wrote: >a mini... min....mi.... I can't even bring myself to type it! I >suppose the Aerostar is the Ranger/Explorer what the Econoline is the >F150 bunch. A truck is in the eye of the beholder. If an Aerostar >owner has something of merit to offer this list, by all means, let them >on. > >TC Its a tough issue. Minivans are used for different reasons than trucks. Full size vans, however, usually have the same use, except for conversion vans. I asked this question because I received 3 emails in the last week about this and another person emailed a picture of an Aerostar for the web site. Where do we draw the line? I don't know. I own an Aerostar myself (wife drives it) and so do my neighbors. But its used as a big station wagon. However, at the same time I would benefit from the mechanical knowledge discussed here. Anyway you look at it, its a two edged sword. So the question is, is it worth it? What it radically change the character of the list? Would Aerostar owners feel more comfortable on the Fordnatics list? Don't know. Should someone start a minivan list? Maybe. One list only costs $5/month (not including a host web site). I'm not willing to start another list, both from a time and money stand point. If it doesn't happen here, I can offer assistance setting up whoever is willing to take it on. Later, Ken ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 10:06:39 -0600 From: Jordan Subject: Re: Explorer Radius Arm Bushing... At 08:13 AM 3/9/98 -0600, you wrote: >I've heard and now know that the passenger side radius arm bushing on >the older(91-94?) Explorer has a tendency to MELT cause it's so close to >the exhaust. A friend (who's mom owns a Limited) and I(who owns a '91 >XLT) are going to change them out ourselves(b/c the dealership wants >like $400) and I was just wondering if anyone has done this before and >how hard and time consuming this is. Thanks. > Mike Go to Deja News on the web and look up the bushings. This has been brought up numerous times on the ford explorer newsgroup. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 12:26:16 -0800 From: Mark Pawlowski Subject: Re: Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em Bars Smitty Bilt does NOT have a set of bars for your truck and they will not make a set either. The ones for a 96 and lower won't fit and since things changed for the 98's they did not make a set for the 97's. I ran into this problem and ended up going with Westin for $278 installed (in Oregon). I'm not crazy about the way they install, they are hooked up to the bolts near your frame not ON the frame. I have a welder creating a new bracket for mine so I can bolt TO the frame as Smitty does. Good luck. Mark Bryce wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has had experiance with Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em > Bars?? I'm looking at the black bars that are about 66inches long for my > '97 Ranger SuperCab 4x4. Are they any good? What's a good price on > them?...I was quoted anywhere from $122 to $240 in my area. Also will the > ones from a '94-96 Ranger fit on my '97. I think the part number that I > was looking at was FN36NB. > > Thanks, > Bryce > > Bryce's 4xFord Ranger Page > http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:31:45 EST From: Blest25913 Subject: HTML In a message dated 3/8/98 6:48:05 AM, you wrote: And hey everyone. .quit posting with HTML. It's aggravating!!!!! Lou Guerriero ________________________________>> Lou, what does 'posting with HTML' mean? Ron ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:44:49 EST From: Blest25913 Subject: Applause In a message dated 3/9/98 6:47:17 AM, you wrote: due to Ken.....Way to go. Mike Krause mkrause >> So do I. Thanks, Ken. Ron ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:55:55 -0500 From: "Bryce" Subject: Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement Ok...I think I have a place to put my tow hooks on the front of my '97 Ranger...presently, I have removed the fog lights, air dam (like the STX's have) and other assorted hunks of plastic from my truck. I am now able to get clean access the the steel parts in the front end of the truck. At the front of my frame is a 1/4 inch bent piece of steel that is welded to the end of the frame in 4 places with the shortest weld being about an inch long...the brackets for the bumper bolt onto this. On the inside of the frame, the 1/4 inch plate bends in a 90 deg angle and goes back about 3 inches. there are 2 bolts that mount the 1/8 inch thick bumper brackets to this piece of 1/4 inch steel. Now what I plan on doing is removing the lower bolt on the bumper bracket and replace it with a class 5 bolt and drill another hole through the bumper bracket and the 1/4 inch piece of steel (I think that this would make this even stronger haveing the 1/4 inch and the 1/8 inch thick pieces working together) in front of it at the correct distance for the holes in my tow hooks. This hole would be slightly lower than the bumper mount hole so that the hook could be mounted at an angle so that it didn't touch the bottom of the bumper (sort of at a downward slope). I would then use a second class 5 bolt to run through the front hole of the hook. After all this, I would put my fog lights and assorted plastic do-dads back on my truck. This should work good with the STX fog light and air dam or with the standard air dam removed since the STX air dam has a hole in the top of the dam and the standard one goes with the contour of the bottom of the bumper.. I'm not sure what type of modifications it would take to put the standard air dam on. Comments??? As for the back ones...I think you can mount them where ever you drill the holes in the back. Bryce Bryce's 4xFord Ranger Page http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 - ---------- > From: Lare/Eric > To: fordtrucks-small > Subject: Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement > Date: Sunday, March 08, 1998 5:47 PM > > O.K. - so anyway, if anyone has put hooks on the front of a Ranger (because > I DO push my truck beyond its limits and need pulled out of a sippy hole > every now and again - & vice versa w/ my wheelin buds) .... where did you > put them and how have they worked for you? > > Thanks in advance, > > Eric Smith - '94 Splash SC, 4x4, 4.0L, 4" Trailmast, 32x11.5 BFG's > > ?Ranger aren't meant to TOW, they are meant to fix up and drive the F_ck > over > ?Chevy's, so if your low and high it's cool, buy a f150 to tow not a Ranger > ?with it's wimpy 4.0 V6 like mine, and i hope you don't try it with the 3.0 > or > ?even tonka toy 2.3, might blow a engine. I love ford's but their engine > picks > ?SUCK, put in a 5.0 or even 4.0l V8, come on FORD your starting to PI_S me > off > ?like this wimpy KEN PAYNE SITE > > > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:19:31 -0800 From: "Pete Lawless" Subject: Re: Aerostar I just don't think questions like "How many grocery sacks I can fit in the back of my mini-van?" or "Which baby car seat fabric will best match the interior color scheme of my Aerostar?" will blend well with "How difficult is it to drop a blown 460 into my Ranger?" The Aerostar boomers (God bless'um) should have their own sight. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 11:12:45 -0800 From: "Pete Lawless" Subject: RE: 2.9 Cam mod Hydrosmith: Sorry for the delay in responding I've been out of town. Prior to installing the cam shaft I had installed a computer module from JET Performance. The module improved seat-of-the-pants horsepower quite a bit on its own. It took several miles after installation for the computer to "learn" the program. Once my rebuild was done and the new cam installed, it seems to work quite well with the module. Horsepower and low end grunt are vastly improved over stock. I'm running 35" BFG M/Ts with 4.56 gears and if I put my foot into it, the big meats will spin. I had to swap out the 7.5 rearend (ring&pinion too small) for the 8.8 with a posi. By the way: when we got into the little 2.9 for the rebuild the engine showed very little wear and was still not using any oil after 150,000+ miles of not-so-gentle driving (but good maintanance). ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:57:24 -0800 From: "Pete Lawless" Subject: RE: Exhaust Recomendations Keith, I used the JBA headers for my '88 2.9 Ranger. Had to mod (slightly grind) a small spot of frame on the passenger side so they wouldn't rub under excelleration. I got the coated ones. I'm very pleased with them. They're in front of 2 new hi-flow Cats, a Flowmaster, and 2 1/4" exhaust pipe out the back. Sounds great. Later, Pete Lawless ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 19:06:44 EST From: HYDROSMITH Subject: Re: 2.9 Cam mod In a message dated 98-03-09 18:28:15 EST, you write: Lawless5: That's ok. Thanks for getting back to me. Prior to installing the cam shaft >> Where did the cam come from? Tim ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 19:11:02 EST From: HYDROSMITH Subject: Re: Way to go Ken... In a message dated 98-03-08 18:19:23 EST, you write: about this site and Ford in general needed to be dealt with >> I agree.Thanks once again Ken! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 19:35:31 -0500 From: "Bryce" Subject: Re: '97 Ranger tow hook placement Sorry if this got posted multiple times... Ok...I think I have a place to put my tow hooks on the front of my '97 Ranger...presently, I have removed the fog lights, air dam (like the STX's have) and other assorted hunks of plastic from my truck. I am now able to get clean access the the steel parts in the front end of the truck. At the front of my frame is a 1/4 inch bent piece of steel that is welded to the end of the frame in 4 places with the shortest weld being about an inch long...the brackets for the bumper bolt onto this. On the inside of the frame, the 1/4 inch plate bends in a 90 deg angle and goes back about 3 inches. there are 2 bolts that mount the 1/8 inch thick bumper brackets to this piece of 1/4 inch steel. Now what I plan on doing is removing the lower bolt on the bumper bracket and replace it with a class 5 bolt and drill another hole through the bumper bracket and the 1/4 inch piece of steel (I think that this would make this even stronger haveing the 1/4 inch and the 1/8 inch thick pieces working together) in front of it at the correct distance for the holes in my tow hooks. This hole would be slightly lower than the bumper mount hole so that the hook could be mounted at an angle so that it didn't touch the bottom of the bumper (sort of at a downward slope). I would then use a second class 5 bolt to run through the front hole of the hook. After all this, I would put my fog lights and assorted plastic do-dads back on my truck. This should work good with the STX fog light and air dam or with the standard air dam removed since the STX air dam has a hole in the top of the dam and the standard one goes with the contour of the bottom of the bumper.. I'm not sure what type of modifications it would take to put the standard air dam on. Comments??? As for the back ones...I think you can mount them where ever you drill the holes in the back. Bryce Bryce's 4xFord Ranger Page http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 19:47:15 -0500 From: "Bryce" Subject: Re: Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em Bars > From: Lare/Eric > To: fordtrucks-small > Subject: Re: Smitty Bilt Nerf'Em Bars > Date: Saturday, March 07, 1998 10:01 AM > > Bryce, > > I have the Smittybilt's on my '94 Splash SC - love 'em 'cause they hang very > close to the body - don't take away any ground clearance .... I got mine for > about $135 in PA ..... I also think they look better than any others that > I've seen because they are the only ones that go beyond the supercab (wheel > well to wheel well) ... I'm not sure if they'll fit on a '97 ...... also, I > only had to drill two holes on each side (other 4 on each side used existing > holes in the frame/leaf spring bracket) OK..my leaf springs and fame mounts seem to be rivited on, and not bolted...are they this way on the '94s also?? if so, how did you get these off?? if not, I guess that they won't work the same on a '97... Bryce Bryce's 4xFord Ranger Page http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 21:03:09 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: Applause At 03:44 PM 3/9/98 EST, you wrote: > >In a message dated 3/9/98 6:47:17 AM, you wrote: > > >due to Ken.....Way to go. > Mike Krause > mkrause >>> > >So do I. Thanks, Ken. >Ron > Thanks Guys (and Gals). Its appreciated. Now if I could only get some of you over to prep my truck for the new paint job.... :^) just kidding. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 02:10:22 GMT From: thomas.panfili Subject: Re: Applause On Mon, 09 Mar 1998 21:03:09 -0500, you wrote: >Thanks Guys (and Gals). Its appreciated. Now if I could only >get some of you over to prep my truck for the new paint job.... >:^) just kidding. > >Ken > Are you buying the BEER ??? (Windows:Just another pain in the glass!) ------------------------------ Date: 9 Mar 1998 20:31:46 EDT From: Hawk Subject: 3.0L 5-Speed Rear Gear Ratio FO>I don't know who asked, but someone wanted a better gear ratio for their 3.4 FO>I am still waiting on the 5 forward gear ratio's on the Mazda tranny in my R FO>Randy FO>randaldgazdecki FO>Eaton Corporation, S.I.C.D. Are you sure that you want to tackle installing and "setting up" a ring and pinion? I only ask, because if you had the understanding of what was involved you would know about how long it would take. If you do not know what run out, preload, backlash, heel, toe, and pinion depth mean in relation to set up, I would advise you to take it to a qualified shop or individual. You might want to price parts while you are there, too. I am not slamming you or knocking your mechanical ability, but from the tone of your post, it just seems like you know just enough to be real dangerous. buck ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 22:28:26 -0500 From: "Bryce" Subject: nerf bars...again. Ok..since it looks like the Smitty Bilt Nerf bars don't work on a '97 extended cab, at least Smitty Bilt won't 'fess up to them working on a '97. What ones will work on a '97 SuperCab 4x4????..I know that the Westin bars fit, but I was wondering about other options...I was JC Whitless sells some, but I'm not sure what brand they are...maybe I'll give them a call in the morning...thanks, Bryce Bryce's 4xFord Ranger Page http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:50:56 -0500 From: "Lou Guerriero" Subject: Re: oil prices mileage and more....... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BD4BBE.96327300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK here's my reply.... 1) Yes, US oil is subsidized, the gov't buys tons of oil every year, = and when prices rise, it sells off it's reserves to keep the price down. = When prices drop, the opec nations have to sell more oil to meet their cash needs, and that makes prices drop more. That is called an indirect = subsidy. And it's true. 2) Canada was one of the first Nations to formally adopt the UN resolution to Oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. For us, it was not about = oil. We have tons of the stuff here. And we were in the trenches. I am in = the military, I know. Perhaps because the US has over 10 times our = population, our contribution did not seem significant. Deserve more of it? Huh, I = bet the guys on the USS princeton might have a different view of your energy consumption needs.. they were the ones that took a MINE just so you = could waste oil? Rather simplistic view.. but possibly right. Sorry, perhaps = you as an US citizen (which I have nothing against, My mom is US), forget = that there were over 30 countries involved in that conflict, trying to free Kuwait. Which, by the way, was definitely about oil for George Bush!!! = Who has large personal oil interests in Ba'hrain... hmmmmm interesting eh? Finally, taxes are higher in most countries on oil, due to the high cost = of cleaning up after it all the time, which the US doesn't seem to take = into affect... Not my policy.. just the way it is... Ok, enough of that.. we = are waaaaaay off subject. 3) As for the Jap/US vehicle thing... My friend had a toyota, I = don't remember the brand/number but it was 4WD, was jacked about 6 inches, had = 31 inch tires on a 6 cyl engine, and got 25 mpg city. Just a fact. I do = agree about the torque ... low end is important to many, but these days, = people buy trucks instead of cars.... just because... otherwise, they wouldn't cost so much now!!!! Not so long ago trucks were almost given away, due = to the fact that most people looked at trucks as working vehicles only. Now they are much more daily drivers for many more people..... So... why don't they do something about the mileage? Ans: They = don't want to. Anyway, no offence intended if anyone feels there is.... sorry! Hope that doesn't fan the flames too hard! Lou ________________________________ E-Mail: loug lou_guerriero ________________________________ - ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BD4BBE.96327300 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http-equiv=3DContent-Type> OK here's my=20 reply.... 1) Yes, US oil is subsidized, the = gov't buys=20 tons of oil every year, andwhen prices rise, it sells off it's = reserves to=20 keep the price down. Whenprices drop, the opec nations have to sell = more oil=20 to meet their cashneeds, and that makes prices drop more. That = is=20 called an indirect subsidy.And it's true. = 2)=20 Canada was one of the first Nations to formally adopt the = UNresolution to=20 Oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. For us, it was not about oil.We = have tons=20 of the stuff here. And we were in the trenches. I am in = themilitary, I=20 know. Perhaps because the US has over 10 times our = population,our=20 contribution did not seem significant. Deserve more of it? = Huh, I=20 betthe guys on the USS princeton might have a different view of your = energyconsumption needs.. they were the ones that took a MINE just = so you=20 couldwaste oil? Rather simplistic view.. but possibly right. = Sorry,=20 perhaps youas an US citizen (which I have nothing against, My mom is = US),=20 forget thatthere were over 30 countries involved in that conflict, = trying to=20 freeKuwait. Which, by the way, was definitely about oil for = George=20 Bush!!! Whohas large personal oil interests in Ba'hrain...=20 hmmmmm interesting eh?Finally, taxes are higher in most=20 countries on oil, due to the high cost ofcleaning up after it all = the time,=20 which the US doesn't seem to take intoaffect... Not my policy.. just = the way=20 it is... Ok, enough of that.. we arewaaaaaay off=20 subject. 3) As for the Jap/US vehicle = thing... =20 My friend had a toyota, I don'tremember the brand/number but it was = 4WD, was=20 jacked about 6 inches, had 31inch tires on a 6 cyl engine, and got = 25 mpg=20 city. Just a fact. I do agreeabout the torque ... low = end is=20 important to many, but these days, peoplebuy trucks instead of = cars.... just=20 because... otherwise, they wouldn'tcost so much now!!!! = Not so=20 long ago trucks were almost given away, due tothe fact that most = people=20 looked at trucks as working vehicles only. Nowthey are much more = daily=20 drivers for many more people..... So... why = don't they=20 do something about the mileage? Ans: They don'twant=20 to. Anyway, no offence intended if anyone = feels there=20 is.... sorry! Hope that doesn't fan the flames = too=20 hard!Lou________________________________E-Mail: = =20 loug href=3D"mailto:loug href=3D"mailto:lou_guerriero href=3D"mailto:loucifur ________________________ - ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BD4BBE.96327300-- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:54:45 -0600 (CST) From: Diana Slyter Subject: Re: Aerostar Yeah, but I need the enclosed cargo space of the Aerostar to hide the mid mounted 8V92 Detroit. Should still leave plenty of space behind the rear axle for groceries and beer. Sorry that the Ranger can only accomodate a.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|