|
|
fordtrucks-small-digest Sunday, April 5 1998 Volume 02 : Number 100 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2 Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-small-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Wheels for sale [Luke Wells ] Air Silencer on Explorer... [Mike Krause ] Hydraulic Lifters - 2.9L [Hawk Re: Wheels for sale [Garr&Pam ] ADMIN: Article request, T-shirt and web site updates [Ken Payne ADMIN: March archives online [Ken Payne ] 94 Ranger (Mazda) Upgrade options... ["Mark Colaluca" Thule rack noise on 93 Explorer [John Eberst ] Re: Intake Mods for a '94 Ranger 4.0 [Tom Test ] Re: Intake Mods for a '94 Ranger 4.0 ["AutoTech" ] Re: Pulling... ["Lou Guerriero" ] Re: Low range upgrade for V8 Explorers and other stuff. [Tom Test ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 11:17:15 -0500 From: Luke Wells Subject: Wheels for sale If anyone is interested I have a set of 96 chrome ranger rims off my splash, I just purchase a set of 95 mustang cobra rims and need to get rid of these, they are 15x7 and only have 28,000 miles on the rims and tires(P235 60 R15 Firestone Firehawk Touring) They are in excellent condition, thanks ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 13:02:17 -0600 From: Mike Krause Subject: Air Silencer on Explorer... Could anyone tell me how to take the air silencer off on a '91 Explorer(4.0L V6). Also, does this in any way harm the engine or are there any drawbacks?? Thanks Mike ------------------------------ Date: 4 Apr 1998 13:15:18 EDT From: Hawk Subject: Hydraulic Lifters - 2.9L Jayme wrote: FO>Thanks to all those who have responded about the hyrdraulic lifter post a FO>few issues ago. Well, from what I have ascertained from this list and FO>talking with other people is that to do a complete lifter job entails the FO>following parts: FO>complete head gasket set(includes rocker cover, intake manifold, fuel FO>injection gaskets) $45 bucks FO>heads need to be resurfaced as well as possible valve job (around $100 FO>bucks here in Santa Cruz, CA) FO>stretch bolts (45 bucks) FO>new camshaft for high mileage engines (around $100 bucks?) FO>lifters ($4 bucks each x 12 = 48 bucks) FO>for a total of somewhere around $350w/tax if you do it yourself. FO>Has anyone done this job? Am I missing anything? I'm going to do this FO>in about 2 months when I have time this summer. It should be a good FO>experience, hopefully it won't take more than, what, 6 hours under the FO>hood? (and probably 3 hours of running around town when I find out I'm FO>missing something important! arhjagh!) Hi Jayme, You better check out the tool box. You will need a good half inch drive torx socket for the head bolts, T55 I think. Snap-on is worth the money here (I broke a brand new Lysle on the 4th bolt). You will probably need a good long breaker bar and cheater to properly torque the head bolts. Six hours seemes optomistic to me, but I am slow. Good luck! Buck Shoff ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 14:58:50 +0000 From: Garr&Pam Subject: Re: Wheels for sale Luke Wells wrote: > > If anyone is interested I have a set of 96 chrome ranger rims off my > splash, I just purchase a set > of 95 mustang cobra rims and need to get rid of these, they are 15x7 > and only have 28,000 miles on > the rims and tires(P235 60 R15 Firestone Firehawk Touring) They are in > excellent condition, thanks > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ How much? Chris ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 15:35:19 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Article request, T-shirt and web site updates Work on the T-shirt is underway again. I would like to ask members to send in pictures of their trucks for the design. All years wanted! We want to represent as many eras as possible. Must be stock or near stock "appearance" (lowered within reason is okay), no offense meant to modified owners but the T-shirt will be a "historial" picture. Send your photo as a JPG formated image (set image quality to highest setting) to kpayne Ford Truck Enthusiasts T-Shirt Photo PO Box 422 Lilburn, GA 30048 Those whose trucks we use will get a free T-shirt. If we choose your truck, we will email a release to you. Simply return it with your permission. Release will cover you as well as us. Proceeds, as usual, will go to fund the web site and lists. We also hope to expand the mailings if proceeds allow. The following updates have been made to the web site: 1. All pictorial pages reformated with a better layout. 2. 1960-1966, 1973-1979, 1980-1986, 1987-1996 and 1997+ pictorial pages have additions 3. Several new articles added to the articles page I would like to ask list members to send in any articles. It doesn't have to be fancy. If you can write a guide detailing something you've done to your truck, from installing a K&N filter on a 1997 F150 to installing a new cam in a 302, its wanted. Since we have all skill levels represented on the lists articles of all skill levels are useful. As with all the articles, you keep the copyright (I add a notice saying you're the copyright holder and people need your permission to republish it). Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com PS. I almost have the free web space script working. Should be up next weekend. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1998 21:31:22 -0500 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: March archives online March digest archives are now on the web site. Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 21:58:41 -0600 From: "Mark Colaluca" Subject: 94 Ranger (Mazda) Upgrade options... Have recently subscribed to this list, enjoying it immensely. Am beginning to look at upgrading my 1994 Ranger (actually Mazda B-3000) Extended Cab pickup. It is stock, was not going to do alot of upgrades if I wasn't going to keep it - now it looks like I will have it for awhile. So, was wondering if anyone has any opinions on the following upgrades: 1) I've got stock 14" alloy wheels (Bridgestone 27x8.5R14LT tires) right now. Can I put on a 15" or 16" wheel with a lower profile tire in this body? How would I go about finding out what wheel/tire combinations would fit? 2) I've been reading about K&N air filters, and their air intake systems. Would this be another suitable upgrade to look at? 3) Anyone added any subwoofer systems to this truck? I know JL Audio sells a StealthEnclosure box, wondering if anyone has any other experiences with custom stereo installs. 4) Finally, looking at a Dynomax Super Turbo Exhaust System. Any opinions? Thanks for letting me ask a few newbie questions... Mark Colaluca pepsi ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 20:09:45 -0800 From: John Eberst Subject: Thule rack noise on 93 Explorer I recently replaced the stock racks on my 93 Explorer with Thule racks. The bars are 60" (I think, didn't measure) and I have the Thule legs w/ locks which fit in the stock roof tracks. The new rack fits my needs but is far too noisy on the highway. I am not sure if the noise is caused by the Thule legs, the square bar or the fact that the bars stick out over the roof of the truck. I have spoken with two other Explore owners with Thule racks and they both have noise problems. One has solved his problem with the addition of the Thule wind screen. I wanted to try one but the dealer did not have one in stock. Must admit that I am not happy that I need to buy another $50 piece to quite down the Thule rack system. Looking for any info other Thule users may have that might solve the noise problem. Thanks, John Eberst jeberst ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 00:01:29 EST From: Tom Test Subject: Re: Intake Mods for a '94 Ranger 4.0 In a message dated 98-04-02 02:48:37 EST, you write: > On my way to work yesterday i saw a new F-250 in the parking lot. It was > simply awsome. But it was the new bodystyle. I thought the F-250 was > supposed to be the same body as the F-150? There are two kinds of F-250 (have been for at least a couple of generations). There is F-250 which is more or less a 3/4 ton F-150; the new version shares the F-150 cab. Then there is F-250 HD, which is a 3/4 ton rated medium truck, in family F-350 - F-550. This one gets the new medium truck cab (last year it still had the previous generation cab, along with the rest of the medium size Fords). The difference in styling is the small difference. The real differences are in strength of frame, axles and springs. Tom Test 92 Ranger ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 00:27:25 -0500 From: "AutoTech" Subject: Re: Intake Mods for a '94 Ranger 4.0 FORD HAS FOR MANY YEARS ALLOWED YOU TO ORDER ANY STYLE BODY WITH HD REARS AND TRANNY COMBOS AS LONG AS THE CHASSIS WAS COMPATABLE. I KNOW THIS BECAUSE I HAD A FEW AND SO HAVE MY BROTHERS BRONCO CORRAL - ---------- > From: Tom Test > To: fordtrucks-small > Subject: Re: Intake Mods for a '94 Ranger 4.0 > Date: Sunday, April 05, 1998 12:01 AM > > In a message dated 98-04-02 02:48:37 EST, you write: > > > On my way to work yesterday i saw a new F-250 in the parking lot. It was > > simply awsome. But it was the new bodystyle. I thought the F-250 was > > supposed to be the same body as the F-150? > > There are two kinds of F-250 (have been for at least a couple > of generations). There is F-250 which is more or less a 3/4 ton > F-150; the new version shares the F-150 cab. > > Then there is F-250 HD, which is a 3/4 ton rated medium truck, > in family F-350 - F-550. This one gets the new medium truck > cab (last year it still had the previous generation cab, along with > the rest of the medium size Fords). > > The difference in styling is the small difference. The real > differences are in strength of frame, axles and springs. > > Tom Test > 92 Ranger > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 01:30:35 -0500 From: "Lou Guerriero" Subject: Re: Pulling... Hi, Reference the "dumping the anti-sieze compound" idea. For me, I've had my brakes cleaned, brushed adjusted 3 times in the 2 years I've owned it. Never did I notice the major difference that I found with this. Just my personal experience. But my TRUSTWORTHY mechanic friend said never use it. He won't use it, since it promotes RUSTING, which causes the pull in the first place. That's the way I read it, and I'm happy..... Lou Guerriero ________________________________ E-Mail: loug OR loucifur ICQ UIN: 1235438 Kali NN: Loucifur ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 04:01:28 EDT From: Tom Test Subject: Re: Low range upgrade for V8 Explorers and other stuff. In a message dated 98-04-03 01:10:21 EST, you write: .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|