|
|
Return-Path: Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:41:19 -0700 (MST) From: owner-fordtrucks-small-digest To: fordtrucks-small-digest Subject: fordtrucks-small-digest V2 #9 Reply-To: fordtrucks-small Sender: owner-fordtrucks-small-digest fordtrucks-small-digest Friday, January 9 1998 Volume 02 : Number 009 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2 Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-small-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Question for the Explorer owners ["Larry Coffman" RE: Question for Explorer owners [John Bartin Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger [Rodney ] Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger [mark fitzgerald Re: Ranger stx [mark fitzgerald ] wheel size q's [Luke Wells ] Re: Ranger Manual Trans. Slave Cylinder [Thom Cheney Re: here's your riceboy [Thom Cheney ] Re: New Ranger owner [Thom Cheney ] Re: wheel size q's [mark fitzgerald ] Sway Bar Disconnects [Brad Allerheiligen ] Re: Sway Bar Disconnects [mark fitzgerald ] RE: New Ranger owner [KNBD87D re: here's your riceboy [KNBD87D Re: BroncoII help [mark fitzgerald ] Re: CBs: antennas and mounting [Midwest96 ] Re: Question for the Explorer owners [Uri Blumenthal ] Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger [Gardner ] Re: Question for the Explorer owners [bmrickman Re: Ranger stx ["Jerry Dean" ] Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger [bmrickman Re: here's your riceboy [bmrickman Re: Question the Explorer owners-answers [KNBD87D Re: New Ranger owner ["R. Carson" ] Finally Got it Back!!!! was: Ranger Manual Trans. Slave Cylinder ["Bryce] Re: Instant Tach Jumps [Amosil ] Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger ["Lare/Eric" Re: Engine RPM [Dave Armbruster ] Ricers ["Mike Wiatt" ] Stx [David ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 09:34:42 -0500 From: "Larry Coffman" Subject: Re: Question for the Explorer owners Ken, We have a 96 Explorer with 30k on it now. We love it! My brother just bought a 98 Explorer, about 10 guys at work have Explorers and I have never heard a complaint yet! I dont think you could go wrong buying one! Larry - ---------- > From: Ken Payne > To: fordtrucks-small > Subject: Question for the Explorer owners > Date: Friday, January 09, 1998 12:26 AM > > I already have one Ford truck and one Ford car. My wife > and I are looking to add another Ford this month or > early next month. The Explorer is a definate possibility. > > How pleased with it are the Explorer owners? Any > "gotchas", problems, etc? How well do they hold up? > Our 93 Escort has 130,000 miles and it drives like new. > The 67 F100 was rebuilt at 265,000 miles and has been > going strong ever since. I would hope to have similar > success with an Explorer. > > Ken Payne > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:58:29 -0600 From: John Bartin Subject: RE: Question for Explorer owners I have a 95 XLT Explorer with about 18000 mi. I have had few problems, none that haven't been taken care of under warranty, although I will be taking it in for rough idle, before the warranty expires. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 09:04:13 -0600 From: Rodney Subject: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger Hello I am new to the list and I just picked up my '96 Ranger XLT Supercab yesterday, it was leased and only has 13,000 miles on it. My question is about the I4 and the 8 spark plugs....What is the purpose for the 8 plugs, I haven't got a really good answer from the people I have talked to and was wondering if anyone on the list has a good explination. What little I have driven the truck I love it. Also is there a good source for tonneu covers someone could suggest? Thanks Rodney Rodgers '96 Ranger XLT Supercab ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 07:00:32 -0800 (PST) From: mark fitzgerald Subject: Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger I believe the reason for the 8 spark plugs, (two per cylinder) is to provide a better level of efficiency and complete combustion by providing more spark. Could be wrong though..... Fitzy - ---Rodney wrote: > > Hello > > I am new to the list and I just picked up my '96 Ranger XLT Supercab > yesterday, it was leased and only has 13,000 miles on it. > > My question is about the I4 and the 8 spark plugs....What is the > purpose for the 8 plugs, I haven't got a really good answer from > the people I have talked to and was wondering if anyone on the list > has a good explination. > > What little I have driven the truck I love it. > Also is there a good source for tonneu covers someone could suggest? > > Thanks > Rodney Rodgers > '96 Ranger XLT Supercab > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 07:10:40 -0800 (PST) From: mark fitzgerald Subject: Re: Ranger stx what brand and model of 31' tires are they and how much tread is left? also, how wide are the rims? 8' or 10'? thanks. fitzy - ---Jerry Dean wrote: > > If you are interested in a set of 15" wheels, I have a set that I am > selling. They are the stock Ford Aluminum rims that have the 5 teardrop > design. They have 31x10.5x15 Tires mounted on them. If you are interested > in them, let me know. > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:30:59 -0500 From: Luke Wells Subject: wheel size q's What is the largest rim/tire combo that i can put on my ranger without modification not exceeding 17's? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 07:47:16 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: Ranger Manual Trans. Slave Cylinder Midwest96 wrote: > > Slightly off the subject topic, but when should the clutch be replaced. I > have a friend who just replaced his '94 Rangers at ~55000, and I'm > ('96F150XLT) just crossing 32500. Is there a specific mileage, time when it > should, or do you use it till it goes. TIA, > 55000 seems really soon. I replaced the clutch on the last truck at 93,000 miles and I know I had shortened its life with some pulling, climbing and just generally abusing the truck. I suppose it depends on how you are using the truck. TC ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 08:15:08 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: here's your riceboy You are correct, this is America. Do what you want to your truck. Don't let anyone give you sh*t about it. Remind me not to bring my 4X4 to your area... it really p*sses me off to be called a redneck when I am really a new age, yuppy scum. TC ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 07:59:22 -0800 From: Thom Cheney Subject: Re: New Ranger owner EdDSP wrote: > > Hello Fordnatics, > I'm a first-time Ford owner, a 1998 Ranger XLT SuperCab. Actually it's still > being built at the Edison,NJ plant :-) > I'd like to hear from other 98 Ranger owners, especially regarding > available aftermarket parts such as tonneu covers, side steps, etc. > Also, does anyone know if any 97-older Ranger parts will work on a 98? Congrats on your yet-to-be-new truck! I got my '97 about 4 months ago, right before the '98s hit the lot. I have since crawled around one while I was waiting for my free oil change. The front facia (and definitely the front suspension) was different, and maybe the tailight area. The interiors are identical (as far as I can tell). Not sure about the bed dimensions, but probably similar. In looking for aftermarket parts, I still can't find many listed for a '97 even thought it is basically the same truck back to 1993. I suspect you will be in the same boat. They probably exist, you will just have to ask. good luck... happy trucking, Thom Cheney '97 Ranger 4X4 S-cab STX ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:15:06 -0800 (PST) From: mark fitzgerald Subject: Re: wheel size q's what year and type of ranger please? stx etc.....any suspension modifications? Do you want mega-articulation?? fitzy - ---Luke Wells wrote: > > What is the largest rim/tire combo that i can put on my ranger without > modification not exceeding > 17's? > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 08:24:24 -0800 From: Brad Allerheiligen Subject: Sway Bar Disconnects Does anybody know where to get a set of those quick swaybar disconnects for a 94 Ranger, or has anyone made there own? I really like the extra travel in the front when it's disconnected but it's a pain having to bolt and unbolt constantly. Brad 94 Ranger PreRunner (NSTYXLT) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:32:27 -0800 (PST) From: mark fitzgerald Subject: Re: Sway Bar Disconnects why not just switch over to a solid front axle and use a modified bronco sway bar setup? much more durable, less expensive to fix, and can be tweaked for really good articulation... fitzy - ---Brad Allerheiligen wrote: > > Does anybody know where to get a set of those quick swaybar > disconnects for a 94 Ranger, or has anyone made there own? I really like > the extra travel in the front when it's disconnected but it's a pain having to > bolt and unbolt constantly. > > Brad > 94 Ranger PreRunner (NSTYXLT) > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:48:42, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: RE: New Ranger owner Ed, As far as I can tell, the 98 and 97 Rangers share the same box, so any tonneau to fit a 97 will a 98. In fact, I have a soft tonneau off a '95 on my '98. I think Ford has some side steps available. Ford also has abug deflecters, bedliners, hood bras, and stuff like that. If you want aftermarket wheels, ford did NOT change the bolt pattern or anything for '98s, so anything to fit 97s or older would work. The aftermarket is just getting into the new '98 stuff. Josh 98 Ranger reg cab, 4x2, 4.0L, 5 speed manual ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 12:05:18, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: re: here's your riceboy Luke, I simpathize with you. In matter of fact, my truck is kinda like it is "riced out" in a way. I am getting rid of all the chrome, but I do have a 3" tip of 2.5" cat back system and no muffler. It kinda sounds like the "rice trucks" but atleast I have a 4.0L behind it. I guess we will all get stereotyped one way or another...like "rednecks" or "weasel salesmen" or "cheeseheads (people from Wisconsin)" or whatever people call ya. It's just a way to catorgorize the way people think or act....just words, no hurting intention. Josh ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:16:58 -0800 (PST) From: mark fitzgerald Subject: Re: BroncoII help Jerad, i installed everything myself, as well as built the motor myself. all you have to do is find a good, used block, and send it out to be cleaned up and bored however you like it. And then, find yourself a great book on 302 torque specs or whatever. take it slow. some of these projects take years and hurrying will only lead you into an expensive hack job. don't worry about money, scrounge around. visit the speed shops, most of them provide unlmited sources for used heads or intake manifolds etc...i'm in college right now paying almost 15 grand a year for an Mechanical Engineering degree, so trust me, i know about money being tight. Just take your time, and make sure it;s done right the first time. fitzy - ---Jerad Heffner wrote: > > ok, here's a question for you. . . did you install the motor yourself or > hire someone to do it? what was the approx. cost of the engine itself? was > it new or used? if you hired someone, what was the approx. cost? and how > long was your truck in the shop or your garage :) ? A V8 is a definite > yes for me, but I can't do it yet because of lack of funds. It sucks being > a high school student sometimes. I have big plans for my '84 Ranger, and > the V8 or bodywork (rust! ack!) is next. . . I am satisfied with everything > else, and have it at a very happy medium ('cept for new rims!) > > Thanx > Jerad Heffner > '84 Ranger 4x4 > > mark fitzgerald wrote: > > > Currently I own two Rangers, an 83 two wheel drive, as well as an 84 > > four wheel drive. Both are V8's. Since the Ranger front clip is almost > > identical to the fiont clip on a Bronco 2, I'll be mnore than happy to > > provide you with any answers I can. > > > > Mark > > > > ---Hiphipyou wrote: > > > > > > I am wanting anyone that has a Bronco II thats been V8ed to please > > contact > > > me.I would like to V8 my 85. Is there any sort of BroncoII > > club,Assoc etc. I > > > would like to be contacted by other BroncoII owners to exchange how to > > > tips,and learn where to find parts.Thanks Dan > > > If its ok to do so my e-mail is hiphipyou > > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco > > 2--------+ > > > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > > | > > > | List removal information is on the web site. > > | > > > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ > > ----------+ > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > DO YOU YAHOO!? > > > > > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > > | List removal information is on the web site. | > > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > > > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - ----------+ > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 14:25:18 EST From: Midwest96 Subject: Re: CBs: antennas and mounting In a message dated 98-01-08 20:08:02 EST, you write: work? Jerad >> There just clips - On the end of the coax, you add a mounting piece, and the antenae slips down, twists slightly and locks into place. I call them spring detachments because the peice that fits to the end of the coax is coiled metal that looks like a spring. Does that help? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 14:28:22 -0500 (EST) From: Uri Blumenthal Subject: Re: Question for the Explorer owners Ken Payne says: > How pleased with it are the Explorer owners? Very pleased so far, but it has only 1000 miles on it (and 2 months). - -- Regards, Uri uri - -=-=-=-=-=-=- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 17:17:35 -0500 From: Gardner Subject: Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger mark fitzgerald wrote: > > I believe the reason for the 8 spark plugs, (two per cylinder) is to > provide a better level of efficiency and complete combustion by > providing more spark. Could be wrong though..... > > Fitzy > > ---Rodney wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > I am new to the list and I just picked up my '96 Ranger XLT Supercab > > yesterday, it was leased and only has 13,000 miles on it. > > > > My question is about the I4 and the 8 spark plugs....What is the > > purpose for the 8 plugs, I haven't got a really good answer from > > the people I have talked to and was wondering if anyone on the list > > has a good explination. > > > > What little I have driven the truck I love it. > > Also is there a good source for tonneu covers someone could suggest? > > > > Thanks > > Rodney Rodgers > > '96 Ranger XLT Supercab > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco > 2--------+ > > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | > > | List removal information is on the web site. > | > > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ > ----------+ > > > > _________________________________________________________ > DO YOU YAHOO!? > > > +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks-small > | List removal information is on the web site. | > +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ The plugs on the exhaust side are for reducing emissions. It burns off extra fuel instead of spitting out the exhaust! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 16:26:27 -0600 From: bmrickman Subject: Re: Question for the Explorer owners Bought our 91 model used in 1995 with 81k on the odometer. It now has 155k miles on it and it's doing very well, I think. It's the wifes primary car/truck (her last was an Escort GT) and she loves it. The view from the seat is great, not too big and it's painted "money green". I like it because I've found it easy to work on and it's still basically a truck. Bad things are: it rattles. I suspect that this was due to being the first model made and that the problem has been taken care of.(as much as new ones cost they better have!) I have replaced: starter, radius arm bushings, radio (it failed), shocks, and then the usual filters, plugs, battery, brakes etc. The auto hubs even still work! I'm in this one for the long haul and would recommend one for anyone who can afford it. (I couldn't afford a new one now, 32k???) B Rickman bmrickman 91 Explorer 4X4 EB AOD 81 F100 2wd 351w AOD ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:39:16 -0500 From: "Jerry Dean" Subject: Re: Ranger stx The rims are 8" wide and the tires are brand new with only 2,000 miles on them. Bought them for last winter, but never used them. I left my 33" tires on all year due to lack of snow. They are Trailking Radial HV tires with a real mean tread pattern to go in the snow and mud. Bought them strictly for that purpose, but now the truck has been changed to a show truck, and not my daily driver. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 16:39:41 -0600 From: bmrickman Subject: Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger On Fri, 09 Jan 1998 17:17:35 -0500 Gardner writes: >mark fitzgerald wrote: >> >> I believe the reason for the 8 spark plugs, (two per cylinder) is to >> provide a better level of efficiency and complete combustion by >> providing more spark. Could be wrong though..... >> >> Fitzy >> >----------+ > >The plugs on the exhaust side are for reducing emissions. It burns off > >extra fuel instead of spitting out the exhaust! >Gardner >+--------- Does any one know if this head flows any better/worse than the old style head? Is the compression ratio the same? Warren, are you listening? (big smile) B Rickman bmrickman 91 Explorer 4X4 EB AOD 81 F100 2wd 351w AOD ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:08:49 -0600 From: bmrickman Subject: Re: here's your riceboy hey Luke, I hope you like your truck, I really do. I hope all you rednecks like your trucks too. (I was born n raised in Oklahoma so I'm automatically a redneck) I have seen nice trucks modified both ways, have seen some dogs too, but I like mine stone stock FORD. (well, i did put a bigger engine in it) I am glad if you can modify your truck to suit you and frankly I think a "rice burner" makes my truck look better, but I hope that you think the same about yours. At least you are driving a TRUCK instead of a genuine rice burner! If anyone thinks this is a dig on Jap car-trucks then, congratulations, you are correct! Off subject, a little, around here a redneck was someone who worked the oil fields all day in the sun, hense red-neck. But the term does translate well. :-) B Rickman bmrickman 91 Explorer 4X4 EB AOD 81 F100 2wd 351w AOD ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 18:41:00, -0500 From: KNBD87D Subject: Re: Question the Explorer owners-answers Ken, We have a 1998 Explorer demo for sale. Eddie Bauer-leather everything V8 AWD-4 Door 4 speed auto moonroof Automatic Ride Control Electrichromatic mirror/autolamp Block heater Front Overhead Consol (shows outside temp and direction) Message Center Ford MACH audio system Dual media radio (cd AND tape deck) 6 disc changer Trailer Tow Package 3.73 gears 255/70R16 Tires 2400 miles Pacific Green/Light Prairie Tan Medium Prairie Tan Interior MSRP: $35605 Invoice: $31902 Selling Price: $29,500 Josh KNBD87D Lakeland Truck Center ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 18:48:31 -0500 From: "R. Carson" Subject: Re: New Ranger owner I love my Ranger. I owned a 97 regular cab for two months before I purchased my 98 XLT SuperCab FlareSides. I really love the truck. It rides great, has plenty of horsepower (stock 2.5 litre), a nice plush interior, lots of room, and a nice stereo. All and all I have no complaints with the truck. Ron *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 1/8/98, at 10:15 PM, EdDSP wrote: >Hello Fordnatics, > I'm a first-time Ford owner, a 1998 Ranger XLT SuperCab. Actually it's still >being built at the Edison,NJ plant :-) > I'd like to hear from other 98 Ranger owners, especially regarding >available aftermarket parts such as tonneu covers, side steps, etc. > Also, does anyone know if any 97-older Ranger parts will work on a 98? > >Ed >98 Ranger SuperCab, torreador red >+---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks-small >| List removal information is on the web site. | >+---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 18:58:56 -0500 From: "Bryce T. Beyler" Subject: Finally Got it Back!!!! was: Ranger Manual Trans. Slave Cylinder I finally got to pick up my truck this afternoon...The clutch works great...Totally silent and a new feel to it too (less pressure on the peddle maybe??)...All covered under warranty. All I know right now is that they replaced my slave cylinder and pressure plate since I got there just at closing time and they didn't have my paperwork ready yet. They're going to mail the paperwork on Monday when they finish it up. Bryce '97 Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.geocities.com/baja/2995 - ---------- From: Mark Pawlowski To: fordtrucks-small Subject: Re: Ranger Manual Trans. Slave Cylinder Date: Thursday, January 08, 1998 7:34 PM Bryce T. Beyler wrote: > The clutch still sorta works, but it never failed totally... this time I > dropped it off at the dealerbefore it got really noticeable. In fact, it > didn’t even make the noise every time and I was afraid that it wouldn’t do > it for the service rep. when I brought it in. Luckily, it didn’t make a > fool out of me! The first time I had a hard time putting it into 1st gear > when I was rolling to a stop, and it seemed "ratchety" when I was up > shifting from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd. Other than that it's just noisy, > but I'd imagine that driving this way would greatly shorten the rest of the > parts in the clutch assembly, especially if DOT 3 fluid started getting > everywhere. BTW: I didn't notice any lose of fluid either time... > I'm having problems putting it into 1st and I ground 3rd twice and I don't shift fast either. > As for my truck, Cherokeeford (http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.cherokeeford.com) has my > redesigned slave cylinder, but are still waiting on my new pressure plate. > Then they can put it back together, and I can give ‘em back their Walrus... > er, Taurus... > Hahaha, that's funny. We have a 95 SHO (far from a Walrus) and while it was in the shop they gave me a 96 Walrus. My wife wouldn't ride it it! She couldn't stand the way it looked outside or all of that round business inside. Mark - ---------- +---------Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Ranger, Explorer & Bronco 2--------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks-small | List removal information is on the web site. | +---------- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ ----------+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 19:56:52 EST From: Amosil Subject: Re: Instant Tach Jumps Was your Ranger an automatic or manual transmission? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 23:12:17 -0500 From: "Lare/Eric" Subject: Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger If the two plug per cylinder design is useful, why do the oem's not include this design on 6's and 8's - why just 4 cylinders? Eric S. - '94 Splash SC 4x4 4.0L - -----Original Message----- From: Gardner To: fordtrucks-small Date: Friday, January 09, 1998 5:15 PM Subject: Re: Just picked up (new to me)'96 Ranger >mark fitzgerald wrote: >> >> I believe the reason for the 8 spark plugs, (two per cylinder) is to >> provide a better level of efficiency and complete combustion by >> providing more spark. Could be wrong though..... >> >> Fitzy >> >> ---Rodney wrote: >> > >> > Hello >> > >> > I am new to the list and I just picked up my '96 Ranger XLT Supercab >> > yesterday, it was leased and only has 13,000 miles on it. >> > >> > My question is about the I4 and the 8 spark plugs....What is the >> > purpose for the 8 plugs, I haven't got a really good answer from >> > the people I have talked to and was wondering if anyone on the list >> > has a good explination. >> > >> > What little I have driven the truck I love it. >> > Also is there a good source for tonneu covers someone could suggest? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Rodney Rodgers >> > '96 Ranger XLT Supercab > >The plugs on the exhaust side are for reducing emissions. It burns off >extra fuel instead of spitting out the exhaust! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:17:42 -0700 From: Dave Armbruster Subject: Re: Engine RPM > >What type of transmission do you have? I have a 95 SHO ATX with over drive and >it's supper touchy and down shifts if you press you toe a tad too hard. > > >Amosil wrote: > >> I am having an intermittent problem with the engine rpm suddenly >>increasing to >> between 2500-3000 rpm while driving down the road. This has happened twice >> last month. The problem disappears soon after it happens (within 15-20 >>secs). >> Anyone ever experience this problem? Mine does this sometimes, too. I have a '97 with the 5R55, 5 speed auto. It seems to do it mostly on the highway, betwen 70 and 75, it can't seem to hold itself in OD, and will unlock the torque converter, causing the RPMs to jump to about 3,000. Otherwise, taking the OD off will elimate the transmission hunting when driving around town or in commuter traffic (it mentioned this in my manual). A lot of times it depends on things like headwind, etc. I am not sure, but I'll bet this has something to do with how the transmission is programmed from the factory. I know that the 5R55 is controlled electronically, so a Superchip or similiar upgrade *could* change the shift patterns and torque converter lock-up. Dave ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 20:19:29 PST From: "Mike Wiatt" Subject: Ricers While we are on the subject of ricers, akid in a lowered toyota pickup pulled up to me yesterday and wanted to race. I kind of laughed and reved the engine a little and the light turned green. The poor kid didnt know what happened. At the next light he asked me what I had done to the engine and I told him just a K&N filter and exhaust. He said he had done everything from a chip to heads to exhaust. Poor guy spent too much money for too little. I guess he tried to redeam himself by turning up his stereo really loud while we were waiting for the light to turn .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|