|
|
Return-Path: Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 16:22:42 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #213 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Friday, September 12 1997 Volume 01 : Number 213 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: Welding and fabrications ["John F. Bauer III" ] Re: Future plans ["deconblu" ] RE: attachments and email software ["Payne, Kenneth" Owner's/Shop Manuals [schrozak Attachment test...Let me know if there is an attachment [Randy Collins Mail and attchment stuff [Randy Collins ] Re: Attachment test...Let me know if there is an attachment ["deconblu" RE: 2WD to 4WD Conversion [Keith Srb ] Re: Future Plans [Tom Hogan ] Replacment Steering Wheel [Keith Srb ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 08:22:19 -0400 From: "John F. Bauer III" Subject: Re: Welding and fabrications 1. I use a Lincoln 225/140 AC/DC stick welder. 2. Used at least 1/4" plate steel to make shock mounts, bumper addons for winch mounts, etc. I am definitely a, um, errr, tightwad at times and I really don't have any elaborate welding setup. I just a guy working out of his garage. I use a Dewalt 15amp body grinder with a 14" metal grinding disc to do most metal cutting. Its not too bad, just cut through 1.25" steel slab to form a "turning radius arm" to affix to the driver's side wheel on a Dana 60 axle with a 78 Bronco steering tie bar welded to it to extend parallel with the axle to act as a steering arm with the fulcrum on the driver wheel itself with tie rod connecting to the passenger wheel to provide steering in my 77 Ford E250 4WD van (breath in, the continue). Must say, requires some pretty creative solutions that those parts chimps just scatter when they see me walking into the parts store! Hope this helps, fast become a pretty good stick welder by the sheer number of welds on my van! John 77 E250 4WD, 460, C6, custom van 96 F150 302, daily driver At 12:01 AM 9/12/97 -0500, you wrote: >Questions: > >1. What's the heaviest material you can weld with one of those SP100 >Lincoln wire feed welders? Can you safely do frame welding with it? >Or just sheetmetal type repairs? What size equipment do you need to >safely do chassis/frame welding? > >2. Does anyone out there fabricate their own brackets etc? What >thickness of steel etc do you use for brackets? Is a metal brake >essential for this type of operation? What about cutting the metal to >size...Inquiring minds want to know...Any other considerations? I >realize this is pretty general but maybe you could give a sample of >something you've fabricated (and I do mean truck related, not women >related or anything else :) > > >Thanks, > Don >Allen, Texas > >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request >+-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:24 -0700 From: "deconblu" Subject: Re: Future plans From: Donald R. Screen >I will be out of the country working for UPS (can you say second strike, I thought >you could (grin)). I commute out of DFW airport to go to work I worked at Ontario International Airport and have to say you UPS guys have large kahonies! When one of your 747's would take off it would be so loaded down there were times it had to be Angels lifting the plane cause it didn't look like air speed and landing we could tell UPS by the thrust reversers hard and long. We could set our clocks by you, always on time! Is it true your planes are so loaded you have packages on your laps? :) >Gonna degrease the entire wiring harness too and repair it if needed (rewrap >it for sure). Just wanted to say when I did my wiring harness on my '73 F100 I didn't wrap it. I made the harness using the wax string that GE uses on the Turbo Fans wiring harness. Also made good use of the RTV tape on any splices! Good luck! No one wants to see these guys go on strike. They need our support! Working on engines (The other guys, UPS do their own) You hear "It's OK they carry packages" They just don't deserve better they need better! I'm not a Union man! Deacon Blues Visit my Homepage at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ or send me a fan or flame at deconblu ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:31:11 -0400 From: "Payne, Kenneth" Subject: RE: attachments and email software At 03:01 PM 9/12/97 -0500, you wrote: > > >I have no problem with receiving attachments in emails I use Microsoft >Outlook and seem to have no problems. Maybe you all just don't have your >receiving software setup right? I am no expert but it is a thought. >Bear.... > The problem is not in others software. The attachments used for text "formating" are not yet standard and most email software doesn't support it so it comes in as an attachment rather than text formating. My software can receive them just fine. However, they inflate the email sizes, put ugle garbage in the middle of the digests, make the on-line archives take more space and have caused problems for me because there are still many 7-bit only mail systems out there (some on purpose to prevent binaries). As admin, I get a copy of bounced messages in my personal email "inbox." Everytime someone posts a message with binaries I get greeted with several dozen additional emails, not including the "hey, I didn't get a copy of the digest" complaints. I have no problems with people like Randy who take the time to track down the problem, I think thats great (thanks Randy). If after notifying someone that they're posting binaries they don't take any action or at least ask for help, I'm faced with a decision: deal with the constant bounces or unsubscribe them. Frankly, with the 100-300 emails a day I receive I'd rather unsubscribe them. Maybe the next release of Majordomo list software will filter out the binaries so it won't be an issue. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:30:46 -0400 From: schrozak Subject: Owner's/Shop Manuals Can anyone steer me toward a source for manuals for my truck? Chuck Schroeder 64 F600 Stake Dump ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:09:16 -0700 From: Randy Collins Subject: Attachment test...Let me know if there is an attachment This is a test to see if the "reply to" feature creates an attachment. Randy Collins Boise, Idaho rcollins 1975 Ford F250 4WD Supercab "Muscle Truck" Soon to have the following Randy installed options: 460 C-6 - -----Original Message----- From:Payne, Kenneth [SMTP:Kevin.Payne Sent:Friday, September 12, 1997 6:31 AM To:'fordtrucks Subject:RE: attachments and email software At 03:01 PM 9/12/97 -0500, you wrote: > > >I have no problem with receiving attachments in emails I use Microsoft >Outlook and seem to have no problems. Maybe you all just don't have your >receiving software setup right? I am no expert but it is a thought. >Bear.... > The problem is not in others software. The attachments used for text "formating" are not yet standard and most email software doesn't support it so it comes in as an attachment rather than text formating. My software can receive them just fine. However, they inflate the email sizes, put ugle garbage in the middle of the digests, make the on-line archives take more space and have caused problems for me because there are still many 7-bit only mail systems out there (some on purpose to prevent binaries). As admin, I get a copy of bounced messages in my personal email "inbox." Everytime someone posts a message with binaries I get greeted with several dozen additional emails, not including the "hey, I didn't get a copy of the digest" complaints. I have no problems with people like Randy who take the time to track down the problem, I think thats great (thanks Randy). If after notifying someone that they're posting binaries they don't take any action or at least ask for help, I'm faced with a decision: deal with the constant bounces or unsubscribe them. Frankly, with the 100-300 emails a day I receive I'd rather unsubscribe them. Maybe the next release of Majordomo list software will filter out the binaries so it won't be an issue. Ken Attachment Converted: "C:\Internet\DOWNLOAD\WINMAIL9.DAT" +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:12:55 -0700 From: Randy Collins Subject: Mail and attchment stuff Ford folks, I believe that I finally have a workaround for the mail problems that M/S Outlook was creating for the list. To set up the program go to: TOOLS, SERVICES, PROPERTIES, MESSAGE FORMAT, "uncheck" the mime box, then, CHARACTER SET, select US ASCII. This should enable the software to post to the list in the proper format. Unfortunately, I believe that this is only a work around for the problem. I believe that anytime the "reply to" button is used the attachment will be created. For now the only solution for me is to create a new post to the list and cut and paste part of the post into the newly created message. Following this post I will try the "reply to" again. If it creates an attachment someone be sure to let me know because remember that I can't see them. Thanks for everyone's patience, Randy Collins Boise, Idaho rcollins 1975 Ford F250 4WD Supercab "Muscle Truck" Soon to have the following Randy installed options: 460 C-6 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:58:06 -0700 From: "deconblu" Subject: Re: Attachment test...Let me know if there is an attachment Yes it does. I'm using Outpost also and don't have the directories you explained early. Are you using Outpost or Exchange AKA Inbox? Outlook doesn't even give me a choice of character set! Is there an attachment in this reply? Damn the Microsoft god! Deacon Blues Visit my Homepage at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ or send me a fan or flame at deconblu - -----Original Message----- From: Randy Collins To: fordtrucks Date: Friday, September 12, 1997 11:11 AM Subject: Attachment test...Let me know if there is an attachment >This is a test to see if the "reply to" feature creates an attachment. > > >Randy Collins >Boise, Idaho >rcollins > >1975 Ford F250 4WD Supercab "Muscle Truck" >Soon to have the following Randy installed options: >460 C-6 > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Payne, Kenneth [SMTP:Kevin.Payne >Sent: Friday, September 12, 1997 6:31 AM >To: 'fordtrucks >Subject: RE: attachments and email software > >At 03:01 PM 9/12/97 -0500, you wrote: >> >> >>I have no problem with receiving attachments in emails I use Microsoft >>Outlook and seem to have no problems. Maybe you all just don't have >your >>receiving software setup right? I am no expert but it is a thought. >>Bear.... >> > >The problem is not in others software. The attachments used for text >"formating" are not yet standard and most email software doesn't support > >it so it comes in as an attachment rather than text formating. My >software can receive them just fine. However, they inflate the email >sizes, put ugle garbage in the middle of the digests, make the on-line >archives take more space and have caused problems for me because there >are still many 7-bit only mail systems out there (some on purpose to >prevent binaries). As admin, I get a copy of bounced messages in my >personal email "inbox." Everytime someone posts a message with binaries > >I get greeted with several dozen additional emails, not including the >"hey, I didn't get a copy of the digest" complaints. I have no problems > >with people like Randy who take the time to track down the problem, I >think thats great (thanks Randy). If after notifying someone that >they're posting binaries they don't take any action or at least ask for >help, I'm faced with a decision: deal with the constant bounces or >unsubscribe them. Frankly, with the 100-300 emails a day I receive I'd >rather unsubscribe them. > >Maybe the next release of Majordomo list software will filter out the >binaries so it won't be an issue. > >Ken >+-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ >| Send posts to fordtrucks >| Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request >+-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ > > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 08:49:05 -0700 From: Keith Srb Subject: RE: 2WD to 4WD Conversion Thanks for the info everyone! I know this will not be easy to do, but then again who said life was easy! Besides, how many F1's, and 50's vintage F100 are running around with Mustang II frame clips on them? In the lastest issue of "Custom Trucks", I think it was "Custom Trucks", the is a 50's vintage F100 with a Corvette rear end under it. Later Guys and Gals Keith Srbherbie Mesa, AZ 1986 Ford Bronco II, 2.9L (I HATE LITERS) V-6, Mitsubishi 5-Speed. 1980 Harley Davidson, XLH, Rebuilt from the frame up. 1974 Ford F250 Ranger XLT, 390ci 4bbl, Automatic, Long Box, Style Side. 1966 Ford F100, 240 C.I. Straight Six, Warner T-18 4-Speed, Short Box. My Blood runs "TRUE BLUE FORD on Four Wheels and Pure HARLEY on Two Wheels!" - -----Original Message----- From:Don Grossman [SMTP:duckdon Sent:Wednesday, September 10, 1997 5:04 PM To:fordtrucks Subject:Re: 2WD to 4WD Conversion Keith Srb wrote: > Lets try this again. I would like to find a 4X4 that has been rolled, or > totaled in some way and is sitting in a wrecking yard. I am would like to take > all of the 4x4 parts, Front Axle, Rear Axle , Driveshafts, Transfer Case, > Steering Parts, what every I need off of it. I then plan on bringing them > home, cleaning them up and attaching them to my 74 F250 2WD Frame. Once this is > done, I am going to apply some type of black paint to this setup and then > proceed to put as many of my 74 F250 Parts back onto the 74 F250 4WD, don't > lose me hear, this is the 74 2WD Frame converted to a 74 4WD Frame. I want to > convert my 74 2WD F250 into a 74 4WD F250 by using as much of the74 2WD Truck > as I can. > > I hope it all makes more sense now. > > TTFN > > Keith Srb herbie > Mesa, AZ I think most of us got you the first time. ;) For all the time of putting all the little things on the 2x frame it would be quicker to use the 4x frame. I know you have all the time in the world but this is JMO here. Lets start from rear to front here..... Taking the rear springs and hangers off the frames and reattaching in the proper location. The 2x used a thinner spring than the 4x's. Also changing the rear end if the gear ratios are different. The T-case will be a divorce mount style so you will have to remove the frame x-member from the 4x and add to the 2x. You may need something to spread the frame apart to get the crossmember out of the 4x and into the 2x. I was looking at some and they can be a tight fit. If both trucks are the same WB you can reuse the drive shafts except it one is an auto and the other is a stick transmission, you could change trannys to match or have custome shafts made. Front end here. 2x use coil springs and 4x use leaf springs. You will be removing all the coilspring towers shock mounts and radius arm mounts and reattaching the 4x springs and hangers from the 4x. Most likely will have to drill a few extra holes here and there to match up. I might be wrong but the frames are different just a little between the 4x and 2x. If that frame crossmember under the engine isn't in the way the oilpan might be. You might need to add a lift to clear the oil pan or crossmember. Off come the front and rear springs and on go the lifted springs. I can't see your truck from here so this might not be needed. Steering: next is the removal of the 2x steering box. I'm working off the top of my head here so I might be wrong in the location of the steering box but is it behind the front axle under the cab? This will have to come off and the 4x box added in front of the new 4x axle. Some models mounted inside the frame with an arm on the outside moving front to rear. IF you happen to get the Power Steering option you will be adding the pumpand brackets to the engine and attaching the lines. I am sure I have missed a few steps but they will be filled in at 2 a.m. when you come accross them. Come to think of it the frame horns are different. The 2x and 1/2 ton 4x have rounded frame horns and the 3/4 4x's have square frame ends for the crossmember to attach. Laters - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-250 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44 Phase 172: rebuild front suspension +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:38:26 -0700 From: Tom Hogan Subject: Re: Future Plans >Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:51:09 -0500 >From: "Donald R. Screen" >Subject: Future plans > > (snip) Still have all the brackets off of >it for the alternator, steering pump, A/C....gonna try a paint technique >that I just read about. You take something like a coffee can...fill it >mostly with water..float about 1/4 inch of Rustoleum black paint on the >surface of the water...then dip the part to be painted...hang the part >to dry. Suppossed to give a factory look to the paint on the part. Let us know how the paint job goes. (snip) >effort to remove the old ones. The engine compartment is about 1000 >times cleaner than when I got the truck home two years ago. Gonna >degrease the entire wiring harness too and repair it if needed (rewrap >it for sure). What do you use to wrap the harness? I have part of my harness out right now (the harness that includes the regulator connector) and I was going to rewrap mine with black vinyl electrical tape. >Sorry for the rambling...I tease my wife..she sighs when I tell her I am >going to work on "the truck". Kinda like going off to war or Siberia >never to be seen again. I hear you man!!! Same thing at my house. The only way I get time to work on mine is if I tell her it won't run and she'll have to loan me HER car. Most wives don't understand why we enjoy spending our weekend day working on some "ratty old truck". "Bite your tounge woman!! That's no ratty old truck, it's a classic!" (snip) Tom H. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:27:07 -0700.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|