|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 03:57:13 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #198 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Sunday, September 7 1997 Volume 01 : Number 198 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: F150 with 460 ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Timing, vacs and stuff ["Mark Mech" ] Re: L&L ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Timing, vacs and stuff ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] timning, advance, etc. [Kevin Kemmerer ] Re: L&L ["George Shepherd" ] carburation problem [SARHOG RE: carburation problem [Tim Baker ] Re: Electrolisis derusting process [Daver ] 76 F-150 with 460 [DWBaile Re: Timing Chain Questions [Daver ] Re: Mail, mime? [Daver ] Re: MIME and Stuff? [Daver ] Re: Bleeding Brakes [Daver ] Re: Attachments, my view.... [Daver ] Re: Bleeding Brakes [Don Grossman ] ADMIN: Voting form on-line [Ken Payne ] Re: Electrolisis derusting process ["jstrigas" Spray on Bedliners? Yes or No? ["Dale and Donna Carmine" Re: 76 F-150 with 460 ["George Shepherd" ] Re: Timing, vacs and stuff [danadeb ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 14:13:54 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: F150 with 460 > From: reedg > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 13:14:47 +0000 > Subject: Re: F150 with 460 > This conversion has definitely been a learning experience. Mostly > learning how to cuss like a sailor. I am trying to put a 460 in a > '78 F-150 4x4. It had a 351M in it. Simple? NOT!. Found out the hard > way that the frame is different in trucks with a 351M. The trucks > with the 460 has a welded in crossmember that the 351M trucks > doesn't have. I guess it is time to break down and order a > conversion kit. +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and I've never looked at the F series 4x4's too closely but the bronco has the cross member in front of the radiator with none under the engine at all. The engine mount brackets are on the frame rails. Of course this is for the 351M, 78 vintage. Have you checked with L&L for conversion mounts? Just curious :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 11:33:04 -0700 From: "Mark Mech" Subject: Re: Timing, vacs and stuff I'm only speaking from empirical knowledge of things that I have tried and that worked on my particular engine. Now that I have a stock cam again, it could all change. I was thinking about setting up the timing as I described and then hooking up the vacuum in addition. However I was going to run the vac line through the cab with a bleeder valve in line to control the advance while driving. I have an MSD and could hook up the timing control to it, but I dont want to spend the $$ at this point. It seems like a good way to experiment, but the bleeder will lean the mix a bit. Mark Mech 1913 E. El Parque Tempe, Arizona 85282 aerofoam http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home.earthlink.net/~aerofoam/ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 14:48:22 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: L&L > From: reedg > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 13:21:59 +0000 > Subject: L&L > Is there a company called L&L that makes 460 conversion kits and > what is the phone number and address? thanks. +-------------- Ford I don't have the direct L&L but here's a distributor for them: D & B sales 1-800-526-0064 or 517-625-3451 The guys say not to get the whole package, just the mounts and maybe the headers if you need them since each mount company seems to be a little different in their approach so not all headers work well with all mounts. You'll need a van (or 4x4) oil pan with tube and dipstick for side mount and 460 flex plate as the balance is different from the 335 series and possibly a bigger radiator. Modine makes the super cool 26 x 24 x 4, 4 tube which should work and can be got for a good price from "Radiators Direct" on the web. Give us a holler if you need any more info :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:01:42 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Timing, vacs and stuff > From: "Mark Mech" > Subject: Re: Timing, vacs and stuff > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 11:33:04 -0700 > stock cam again, it could all change. I was thinking about setting > up the timing as I described and then hooking up the vacuum in > addition. However I was going to run the vac line through the cab I played with the curve on my 460 with a distributor machine and tried: all in early, spread out over larger band and more total with the 21 degree rotor and nothing I tried worked as well as the stock curve. I wound up going to a junk yard and getting an old points distributor and converting it to dura spark without altering the mechanical advance and it ran very well after that. I played with the vac trying to get a flat spot out and achieved a small measure of success but the carb and cold manifold was most of the problem. I put the stock spread bore back on with the hot cross over and it runs nice now. The way I play with the vac is carry a 1/8" allen wrench with me in the ash tray and just stop on the side of the road and give it a turn and go on my way. I like to give it a turn and drive it for a day or so to get a good feel for what it's doing. That's what I did all week and now I think I have it where I want it but might still move it some more just for kicks and to try to glean more understanding. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:44:38 -0400 From: Kevin Kemmerer Subject: timning, advance, etc. i'll steer away from the theoretical for now, and just tell you about one of my engines. i ran a '68 460 with stock manifolds, 11.5:1 compression, stock heads, 600 holley, and a good street cam for 2 years. the timing was a ford destr. with the vacuum unhooked and as far as i know stock springs-weights. i ran any gas, with very few ping or detination problems. i used high octane when i knew i'd be running it hard, but just general driving 87 worked fine MOST OF THE TIME. total advance was between 33-38 degrees, i don't remember initial. gas mileage with a heavy foot, 33" mudders, 3.50 gears, in a 77 f150 4x4, c-6 auto with a close to stock converter (about 2000rpm flash) was around 10mpg. the mileage dropped to 5mpg when run harder, or during those snow storms with the hubs locked. sometimes things just plain work right, even if they seem like they shouldn't. sure, more mileage would be possible, but 10 ain't bad. i could go 4 wheeling all day on a tank sometimes. (my current motor has 9:1, and runs on 87 no matter what, but gets MUCH LESS mileage, and uses a msd timing computer, no vacuum. but makes earth spinning torque up to 5000 rpm. in fact it just took a couple of teeth of the ring gear at the last truck pull. and people say the 9" is a strong unit! mileage is slao worse with the 3000 stall converter, bigger carb, etc.) sleddog ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 16:01:20 -0500 From: "George Shepherd" Subject: Re: L&L L & L Products, 3210 Century Dr., Rowlett, TX 75088. 972-475-5202. I bought their 460 kit and am happy with it. There are several options. They will be glad to send you a catalog. - ---------- > From: reedg > To: fordtrucks > Subject: L&L > Date: Saturday, September 06, 1997 8:21 AM > > Is there a company called L&L that makes 460 conversion kits and what > is the phone number and address? thanks. > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 17:11:01 -0400 (EDT) From: SARHOG Subject: carburation problem My engine is running very rich, especially at idle, and I can't seem to solve it. I have a 460 with 429 non-CJ heads, offenhauser 4" single plane intake, tube headers to a dual exhaust, topped off with a holley model 4780 800 cfm double pumper carb with mechanical secondaries. The carb was rebuilt recently, a 6.5" power valve put in, and jetted down to #69 jets in front and #82 jets in back. Vacuum at idle is about 14-15", and initial timing is 12 BTDC. Here's the where it gets confusing....the idle mixture screws on the primary metering block are BOTTOMED, and it is still idling rich. Those mixture screws should completely shut off the fuel flow at idle, right?? Any idea where the fuel is coming from? Thanks for any insight. John Z. 67 F-100 460/C-6 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:10:09 +0100 From: Tim Baker Subject: RE: carburation problem - ------ =_NextPart_000_01BCBAD6.F7E551E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable carb may be too big---check out Hot Rod Tips and Tricks prior = issues----check library----show you how to drill and adjust ports to = make carb. tuneable at idle.. - ---------- From: SARHOG Sent: Saturday, September 06, 1997 10:11 PM To: fordtrucks Subject: carburation problem My engine is running very rich, especially at idle, and I can't = seem to solve it. I have a 460 with 429 non-CJ heads, offenhauser 4" single = plane intake, tube headers to a dual exhaust, topped off with a holley model = 4780 800 cfm double pumper carb with mechanical secondaries. The carb was = rebuilt recently, a 6.5" power valve put in, and jetted down to #69 jets in = front and #82 jets in back. Vacuum at idle is about 14-15", and initial timing is = 12 BTDC. Here's the where it gets confusing....the idle mixture screws on = the primary metering block are BOTTOMED, and it is still idling rich. Those mixture screws should completely shut off the fuel flow at idle, right?? = Any idea where the fuel is coming from? Thanks for any insight. John Z. 67 F-100 460/C-6 - ------ =_NextPart_000_01BCBAD6.F7E551E0 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IgoOAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEEkAYAPAEAAAEAAAAMAAAAAwAAMAIAAAAL AA8OAAAAAAIB/w8BAAAAUwAAAAAAAACBKx+kvqMQGZ1uAN0BD1QCAAAAAGZvcmR0cnVja3NAbGlz dHNlcnZpY2UubmV0AFNNVFAAZm9yZHRydWNrc0BsaXN0c2VydmljZS5uZXQAAB4AAjABAAAABQAA AFNNVFAAAAAAHgADMAEAAAAbAAAAZm9yZHRydWNrc0BsaXN0c2VydmljZS5uZXQAAAMAFQwBAAAA AwD+DwYAAAAeAAEwAQAAAB0AAAAnZm9yZHRydWNrc0BsaXN0c2VydmljZS5uZXQnAAAAAAIBCzAB AAAAIAAAAFNNVFA6Rk9SRFRSVUNLU0BMSVNUU0VSVklDRS5ORVQAAwAAOQAAAAALAEA6AQAAAAIB 9g8BAAAABAAAAAAAAAJSQgEEgAEAGAAAAFJFOiBjYXJidXJhdGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtAJwIAQWAAwAO AAAAzQcJAAYADwAKAAkABgALAQEggAMADgAAAM0HCQAGAA8ACQANAAYADgEBCYABACEAAAAwRTBF QUYwQ0MxMjZEMTExODExNTAwQTBDOTU3NjFEQQALBwEDkAYAnAYAABQAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAA AAAACwApAAAAAAADAC4AAAAAAAMANgAAAAAAQAA5AGAHa5XOurwBHgBwAAEAAAAYAAAAUkU6IGNh cmJ1cmF0aW9uIHByb2JsZW0AAgFxAAEAAAAWAAAAAby6zpVkDK8ODybBEdGBFQCgyVdh2gAAHgAe DAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAB8MAQAAAA0AAABtZWlAaG9tZS5jb20AAAAAAwAGEInZjK4DAAcQ NwQAAB4ACBABAAAAZQAAAENBUkJNQVlCRVRPT0JJRy0tLUNIRUNLT1VUSE9UUk9EVElQU0FORFRS SUNLU1BSSU9SSVNTVUVTLS0tLUNIRUNLTElCUkFSWS0tLS1TSE9XWU9VSE9XVE9EUklMTEFOREFE SlUAAAAAAgEJEAEAAAAXBQAAEwUAAD0IAABMWkZ1jFy6bv8ACgEPAhUCpAPkBesCgwBQEwNUAgBj aArAc2V07jIGAAbDAoMyA8YHEwKDIjMPemhlbAMgRGzqZwKDNBMNfQqACM8J2eI7F58yNTUCgAqB DbHBC2BuZzEwMxQgCwpLEvIMAWMAQCBjCsBiAiAAwHkgYmUgdMRvbx0AaWctHbARsJkFkGsgCGAF QEhvBUDpCABkIAdgcAQgAHAe4fcFEB4QBCBwBRAFsQQBClCGcx2xHdVsaWJyCsCieSDCc2hvB+B5 CGDmICIiHUAgZAUQFREfUqBhZGp1cwVAcBdBtwQgIuEAwGsdIByCLh0wqHVuZQGgbB0gYQVA5Glk JcAuLgqFCoshYAgxODAC0WktMTSeNA3wDNAoYwtZMTYKoP0DYHQFkAVAIMIqhAqHKTvrDDAqBkYD YTorjioGDIIBBgBBUkhPR0Bh9QbwLgWgbSsvLD0GYAIwry1vLnwl8AhwZBzgLAZRjQUwZQbQBJAg MDY0wBAxOTk3NbAwOjGZHGBQTTAvLD1UbzJvRy57AhALIHRydR/BQOchYCPwEfBydh+wJlAlgMZ0 Np8xPnViaipBOL//LnscgghwJfAgIAOgKgElsfMwFib9MzYpBxXCDAEqBu1Eo00c8AnwZwuAHSAE AJogOuBuAwAaoCB2BJDbHPAfoWg0wAeQcAWQBzFebBzwJfU0wB9SSRxxbr4nBUAR8DUgHTEKhXMG 8HtGUCBQdCVASHERwEoRYZQgNEMgIAPwdGhLEBAyOSBuAiAtQ0rTIpAlkGRzNMBvDdAJ8OcRwCPg NVE0IkjwRhElwf8LUSWACoULgAGQJNA0wCVgnx0RTGIEkCRjSwBkdQdAlUUgeE0idE9Rb3BHIL8e 4EzRS1RLACIgFRBlHPDzBGIDIDQ3J/AKhSfxHHCPBFAjAAhgJbJwdW1HIP8FwByDS2MHgBGxAwAc gAMgXxHwBaAfYArACJBzSmFU6xTwVWVhRbFlQLADEDwmHxegO9ACMEeASCEgNi7WNU2gJCB3NVF2 B0BKEftVACYBbkgkPmACQFGxVJDmdwOgIuEjNkvQW+EEID8LgDqAA2ACMB9CCoUjOKsSIF0WYgDQ a0phVgDQ/nVVECXmRZIBoB5CKGAoUP9aMEgkC4BKQAcxHTAHcEYSCUWhMTIKhUJURENlSmFIBJBl JyRhV7F3ZxTwF6BKMSBnXSJW4WZ/I+BGESZgJmBkkmBjYqB4/zRhHSAE8QfQBCBBEWSRCoX/IAEA wEZxB4AqMAUQRiECYA5vHhEKwB0gQk9UVPBPTUVEYaUmAQQgI/DfIzImIUYSRqJXc28R8AqF82cd IhF1bB7gL/ELUGlh/0eBIhAeUVHiZJJl4FMxGnAHIjFHtwUQZ2h0Pz/xRKBBbnlOhg2wSwBk1P9w Z0WhL/FGEgNScjFXoABw/x/ROpEfQRzwC4AAkHHxJn2oSm9oA6BaJnY2NfAORihQVCFLEi9DLTb9 CoUrKoggwi0QOqEfgTrx/CBFAjBv4ACQWEAkUXrg7TXAN0vQH1JPbvA1UXoc+isKhXxEpH72MiEe 4CQgv3wyIuE6nzunNMB++3x+eX1/01UAgD5ABPIdERegcfsgkYBeLYUVOz6DGXoBX7DLBABlMU8I cCBXWIAGAA1KQGU+oHIAdHA6L5Qvd4qQLiMQYWdlwSZpF6A78i9+iQFlL/2AuC8qcX5mQi8pBxvV KgYLCoUWwQCQwAADABAQAAAAAAMAERAAAAAAQAAHMEDtV3TOurwBQAAIMEDtV3TOurwBHgA9AAEA AAAFAAAAUkU6IAAAAAADAA00/TcAANf3 - ------ =_NextPart_000_01BCBAD6.F7E551E0-- +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 05:28:48 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: Electrolisis derusting process Deacon Blue wrote: > > You don't need to ask! You can post any thing you want. If it's out of > place we just flame you ;] > Speaking of people that get flamed where's Daver? > > Deacon Blue Present and accounted for. I've been a bit out of pocket. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 18:50:25 -0400 (EDT) From: DWBaile Subject: 76 F-150 with 460 In a message dated 97-09-05 06:01:13 EDT, you write: Does anyone have a '73 to 78 F150 that came with a 460 as original equipment? >> I have a '76 with a 460 C-6 and 9" posi. It is a SuperCab and it is for sale. It has A/C, PS, PB, cruise etc. It has good rebuildable mechanicals and a good solid rust free cab, but I took the remainder of the body panels off to put on my '78 CrewCab so it needs body parts. It is here in the yard, all together and ready if anyone is interested. Don ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 05:58:53 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: Timing Chain Questions Keith Srb wrote: > > 74 F250, I need to replace the timing chain and gears. > > 1. Does anyone make a gear drive set to replace the chain and gears? I looked high and low for a gear drive for my 406. Milodonm is the only company still making a gear drive for FE's and it requires special machining on the block, it is a single idler design and can and will come apart. Speaking of Murphy, I went as far as to call Pete Jackson and ask if they had a gear drive, "yes" they replied "in our museum and it is not for sale". Pete Jackson has not produced that drive in 20 years. > > 2. Are there any "little problems" I need to watch out for? > > 3. Timing Chain slipped a tooth or two, so what do I have to move so the marks > up on the crank shaft gear and the cam shaft gear will line up? > 1974 Ford F250 Ranger XLT, 390ci 4bbl, Automatic, Long Box, Style Side. Use a good quality roller chain with steel sprokits. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 06:14:00 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: Mail, mime? HMMMMMMMMMM. Mail Mime? Hey Jim is this not refering to a quiet guy standing on a street corner feeling up an invisable piece of glass. I guess as opposed to a Femail Mime A? Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 06:20:20 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: MIME and Stuff? Randy Collins wrote: > I guess folks deal with situations differently. > > Randy Collins > Boise, Idaho > rcollins Yeh this list is a great place but you have to remember it boasts a large membership, everything from really good people to absolute S heads and I believe you have heard from a complete cross section of that membership. Remember your in trouble only when Mom (aka Ken) says something. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 06:30:00 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: Bleeding Brakes Don Grossman wrote: > > Where can the check ball bleaders be found for sale? > > -- > Don Grossman > duckdon CarQuest carries them about 5 or 6 bucks (thats dollars not mail deer which BTW have been witnessed shooting up post offices with fully automatic weapons). Sorry could not help it Ken. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 06:39:29 -0500 From: Daver Subject: Re: Attachments, my view.... Ken Payne wrote: > It actually makes more sense, but the term "List Mom" has long > been used with mailing lists. It refers to "Den Mothers" of > Cub Scout troops who have to manage 500 screaming kids at once > without losing their cool. > > Ken, List Mo... err Dad Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Yehhhh it does fit. Molater Daver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 17:50:16 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: Bleeding Brakes Daver wrote: > > Don Grossman wrote: > > > > Where can the check ball bleaders be found for sale? > > > > -- > > Don Grossman > > duckdon > > CarQuest carries them about 5 or 6 bucks (thats dollars not mail deer > which BTW have been witnessed shooting up post offices with fully > automatic weapons). Sorry could not help it Ken. > > Molater > > Daver I just saw an article on the check ball bleeders. They look just like a regular Bleeder screw with a little spring and a ball in them and they want 5 or 6 dollars for them. That must be for a pack of 4 or something. Daver, I am looking for one of those 100 round drum magazines for my SKS, ya got one laying arround. I got a deer problem ;-) - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-250 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44 Phase 172: rebuild front suspension ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 21:50:34 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: ADMIN: Voting form on-line First, wanted to comment about something... Concerning MIME, don't worry, it takes a lot to piss me off, this issue certainly isn't worth getting upset about. ost offenders weren't even aware it was happening.... Now the announcment.... After wrestling with a hard to configure CGI voting script with no luck, I've decided to just use an email based voting form. This is real similiar to the way we had the last vote. Unfortunately, it means we can't can a running on-line tally. I'll have to count the votes. Vote results with comments will get published, no name or email addresses will appear. What are we voting on? The issue is whether we should form a third list. This would mean splitting the current 1979 and older list into two lists. This would not affect the 1980 and newer list. If the "yeas" win, then we would have the following 3 lists: 1. 1960 and older trucks 2. 1961-1979 trucks 3. 1980 and newer trucks Voting will end next weekend. To vote, use the on-line form at http://www.ford-trucks.com/vote.html If you do not have forms compatible browser, send me email (kpayne Ken ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 18:50:21 -0700 From: "jstrigas" Subject: Re: Electrolisis derusting process Daver! Your back,,, HEY, That's my kilt! No wonder you never came back! You've been with her, haven't you? That's utter nonsense! Deacon Blue jstrigas '73 F100 '83 XJ900RK '86 GL1200 Custom ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 21:22:06 -0500 From: "Dale and Donna Carmine" Subject: Spray on Bedliners? Yes or No? I had to put a different box on my '79 F-150 last year after being rear ended. I will eventually get around to painting it to match the rest of the truck, (yes, I know it's ugly). I've been thinking about whether to paint the inside of the box with a stock paint finish or use a spray-on bedliner. I'm interested in hearing what you favor and why. I would be interested in either commercially applied or DIY finishes and the costs involved, results, what works, what doesn't , etc. I don't care much for plastic bedliners, just my preference. later, dale c. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 22:13:33 -0500 From: "George Shepherd" Subject: Re: 76 F-150 with 460 Don, Where is here in the yard? - ---------- > From: DWBaile > To: fordtrucks > Subject: 76 F-150 with 460 > Date: Saturday, September 06, 1997 5:50 PM > > In a message dated 97-09-05 06:01:13 EDT, you write: > > > Does anyone have a '73 to 78 F150 that came with a 460 as original > equipment? > >> > I have a '76 with a 460 C-6 and 9" posi. It is a SuperCab and it is for > sale. It has A/C, PS, PB, cruise etc. It has good rebuildable mechanicals > and a good solid rust free cab, but I took the remainder of the body panels > off to put on my '78 CrewCab so it needs body parts. It is here in the yard, > all together and ready if anyone is interested. > Don > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 02:57:05 -0700 From: danadeb Subject: Re: Timing, vacs and stuff THIS IS NOT A FLAME! It is just my two cents worth. The mechanical advance responds to engine SPEED only. Vacuum advance responds to engine LOAD only. Vacuum advance was an attempt to gain fuel mileage and reduce emissions, it is a MECHANICAL computer trying to control the engine at various loads and speeds. Way back when, there was no such thing as vacuum advance, all dist. used only mechanical. Most high performance engines still use mechanical only. I have always seen ( stock from Ford and all other car makers ) the vacuum canister connected to the carb port which gives a reverse vacuum signal as compared to the manifold vac. Under hard acceleration, if you hook the dist vacuum advance up to manifold vacuum you will loose vacuum signal because manifold vacuum goes down under WOT thus causing the dist. to reduce the amount of advance when you need it the most. ( you need more advance, to a limit, to allow the engine to speed up. advance your timing at idle and the engine RPM increases ) Now heavy load at low engine speeds presents a different situation, too much advance then, will result in ping. At low RPM ( under 2000 or so ) the mechanical advance is less then its maximum. With the throttle open allot, like when climbing a hill but going rather slow (30 MPH in high gear) you would be lucky to see 2000 RPM but your vacuum advance is seeing high vacuum because you have your throttle plates open quite wide ( (high vacuum = more or max. vacuum advance) + (low RPM = less than max. mechanical advance) = less then max. advance = no ping!) Effectively this is sort of a retard of the total advance. "T" in a vacuum gauge on the carb port and see what it does under various RPM and load conditions. Put the gauge on the manifold and do the test again. Compare the two. What I have found with my own testing, reading books and gaining info from you folks on line, is that for most driving needs, 8-10 deg's initial, 10-15 deg's mechanical ( all in by 2000 RPM) and 15-20 deg's vacuum ( taken from the carb port ) results in a well mannered, tire burning, load hauling, good enough gas mileage ( we are talking V8's in non aerodynamic trucks here, if you can't afford gas at 8-15 miles to the gallon go get a Ford Escort ) truck. Some of the newer vacuum advance cans allow too much advance, 30 deg's or so, added to initial and mechanical and you get 50 deg's or more ( major ping, stumble, backfire etc. ) I know, I was there just a few weeks ago! Right now I am at 8 deg's initial, 10 deg's mechanical, and 20 deg's vacuum. Put the peddle to the floor and you GO! Clime a steep hill at slow speeds on a very hot day ( 95 deg's ) and then give it more gas without downshifting and you GO! ( slight Ping! on 87 octane, NO ping on 89 octane ).... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|