|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 16:48:21 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #234 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Monday, September 22 1997 Volume 01 : Number 234 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Header help w/302 [Joe D ] Re: Header help w/302 ["deconblu" ] Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: too much cam? ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: 351M Cam Timing ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] RE: too much cam? [Sleddog ] RE: 351M Cam Timing [Sleddog ] RE: too much cam? [Sleddog ] Re: heater controls??? [rick RE: 52 F1 Help [RICHARD_GARBER thank but... [KEVIN ] RE: 351M Cam Timing [pharrell RE: thank but... [Sleddog ] Re: 351M Cam Timing ["Dave Resch"] Re: Flathead Help ["George Shepherd" ] Re: Another Acronym [BigDogF250 Re: Header help w/302 [Joe D ] Re: Header help w/302 ["deconblu" ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 06:49:09 -0400 From: Joe D Subject: Header help w/302 Anybody know where i can find Headers for a 302 in a 4x4 68 f100???? I see them for the 2wheel drive but no 4wheel????anybody from 68-72 have a small block w/headers???will 2 wheel drive ones work or interfer with the front driveshaft etc... joe ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 04:35:47 -0700 From: "deconblu" Subject: Re: Header help w/302 >Anybody know where i can find Headers for a 302 in a 4x4 68 f100???? >I see them for the 2wheel drive but no 4wheel????anybody from 68-72 have >a small block w/headers???will 2 wheel drive ones work or interfer >with the front driveshaft etc... >joe Sounds like your interested in long tube headers, but I used stock '93 shorties off a 5.0 Mustang. There's a huge weld inside that blocks-up the exhaust. I ground the welds smooth and they flow much better. I used the EGR connection for my choke. Best thing is they don't interfere with anything and you can pick up sets dirt cheap. I think there was a guy on the fordnatics list that was selling his for $35. I have a picture at my site of the engine. They are hard to see (I painted them black) but if you look close you can see them on the drivers side. Good luck with yours! http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/mytruck.htm Deacon Blues Visit my Homepage at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ and http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ or send me a fan or flame at deconblu ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:01:34 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! > From: danadeb > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:44:04 -0700 > Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! > seemed to fill the heater core. ( my guess, which still does not > make any sense, was that the heater core had an air bubble trapped > in it ) after I did this the heater blew lots of hot air. Yes it does. The water pump doesn't really do a heck of a lot to circulate the water like you might think and air pockets can form in the heads and heater core on some applications which is why I always pull the top heater core hose when filling a dry engine to let the air out. I also crack the thermostat seal till coolant runs out to let the air out of the heads. Theoretically if you take the top hose off at the thermostat or water pump and leave it off till coolant runs out it does the same as cracking the thermostat housing but I've had them not cooperate this way so I do both to make sure now. I've had engines spit and sputter with the radiator completely full when they started to warm up which led me to this "new technique" which I now use on all engines I work on. BTW, on Ford engines if the radiator is not completely full (hot) the heater won't work since it won't circulate through the core. You can easily prove this to yourself buy lowering the radiator level a few inches below the top of the core and run the heater. The heater core is located at a horizontal height right at the top level of the radiator and is essentially gravity fed. In spite of having a pump the coolant still tends to seek it's own level. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:13:21 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:31:00 -0500 > From: dave.williams > Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! > Also make sure that one of the heater hoses comes off the intake - > the > water is hotter at the back, by the way - and the other hose goes to > the water pump. I saw one car where someone had run both hoses to Since the heater core is part of the circulation system before the thermostat opens you should have a line on both sides ot the thermostat by what ever means is availiable. Usually one line to the manifold or thermostat housing and one to the pump. Some I've seen have two coming off the pump which is a little confusing. With water fed intakes it's easier to figure out :-) On systems with control valves the principles are the same except there is pobably a bypass for the pre hot block circulation and for summer operation. These are generic principles you can use to analyze your system and figure out the best solution but the block must have a free route around the thermostat or it will over heat before the thermostat can open and if the heater core is connected to the same side of the thermostat on both hoses it can't circulate so won't get hot as already mentioned by someone :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:28:06 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: too much cam? > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 17:01:05 -0500 > From: KEVIN > Subject: too much cam? > The cam I bought was a Melling (sae 282 int 292 exh.advertised > duration- 204int. 214exh > int-512exh I am using stock heads with a 390 4 barrel intake and a > 4160 holley(750cfm vacumm secondaries) > > is this too much?Will I need better than stock springs?How can I I used a Melling similar to yours in my 460 with dished pistons and had no problem. It was rated as a stock repalcement with no modifications and had a .520 lift as I recall but comments about the springs probably are in order. I didn't know much about it at the time but if I did it now I would at least invest in new stock springs > and probably go for better than stock as well as checking for bind which I never did either. My roller cam will have dual springs and I will be checking for bind for sure. The consensus seems to be to have at least .100" clearance with the piston throughout the cycle on both valves. That can mean that if you break a timing chain the valves can hit and destroy the engine > but as long as the timing chain or gears are intact it allows for some float and some timing inconsistancys due to wear etc.. I certainly wouldn't want any less than that :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:32:39 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: 351M Cam Timing > From: "Dale and Donna Carmine" > Subject: 351M Cam Timing > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 22:09:24 -0500 > "some '70's and '80's 351M and 400M engines had their cam > timing retarded for emissions purposes. Going back to the "0", > or straight-up spec on these engines really wakes them up. I was told that the change was made in 1971 and another one in 1973 on the 460's so the M's may follow the same schedule. I alway buy cams and timing gear for pre 71 vintage motors for this reason. Don't know how much of it is true but I do know they made some serious changes it 73 to several models especially the 351W. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:10:36 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: too much cam? no, i don't think it is too much. that size cam should run very well. as for the springs, call the cam company - they'll tell you what spring pressure you need, if you need more than stock. if the springs are old i would replace them with all new hardare (springs, retainers, etc.) you have to check for binding and "proper" geometry, but i think the stock rockers are fine for that cam. you need to remove a spring and turn engine > by hand with a indicator to check clearance, or remove head and use clay. most importantly, GET A GOOD OIL PUMP SHAFT!!! really, it is worth the money. sleddog - ---------- From: KEVIN[SMTP:oldsmo Sent: Sunday, September 21, 1997 6:01 PM To: fordtrucks Subject: too much cam? Ok ya'll I own a '75 F100 explorer with a 390 automatic.I pulled the motor and went thru it,while building it(to stock specs)i wanted a little bigger cam.So I called City Motor Supply (here in DFW) and bought ahigh pressure oil pump(opened the oil passage to 1/2 from 5/16 at the oil pickup hole on the block and matched the pick up). The cam I bought was a Melling (sae 282 int 292 exh.advertised duration- 204int. 214exh int-512exh I am using stock heads with a 390 4 barrel intake and a 4160 holley(750cfm vacumm secondaries) is this too much?Will I need better than stock springs?How can I check valve to piston clearence (the motor is already assembled)will I need adj rocker arms?will a stock oil pumpdrive shaft be enough or will I need a chrome moly one?is timing mars best at 6 they be advanced or retarded? thanks to all of you!!!!!!!!mongo +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ | Send posts to fordtrucks | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:21:10 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: 351M Cam Timing the same change was made to the 460's. but, every company i have talked to for cams mentioned that their cam should still be straight up. the difference is already ground in. only moving the factory cam makes a difference, as ford ground the cams 4 or so degrees off. sleddog - ---------- From: Gary, 78 BBB[SMTP:gpeters3 Sent: Monday, September 22, 1997 4:32 AM To: fordtrucks Subject: Re: 351M Cam Timing > From: "Dale and Donna Carmine" > Subject: 351M Cam Timing > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 22:09:24 -0500 > "some '70's and '80's 351M and 400M engines had their cam > timing retarded for emissions purposes. Going back to the "0", > or straight-up spec on these engines really wakes them up. I was told that the change was made in 1971 and another one in 1973 on the 460's so the M's may follow the same schedule. I alway buy cams and timing gear for pre 71 vintage motors for this reason. Don't know how much of it is true but I do know they made some.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |