|
|
Return-Path: Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 03:50:16 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #233 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Monday, September 22 1997 Volume 01 : Number 233 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: heater controls??? [dave.williams Re: 1952 F1 HELP ["Lee Hardy" ] Re: 1952 F1 HELP ["Lee Hardy" ] Re: 1952 F1 HELP ["Lee Hardy" ] Re: 1952 F1 HELP ["Lee Hardy" ] Re: 1952 F1 HELP ["Lee Hardy" ] Re: 1952 F1 HELP [Don Grossman ] Re: Flathead Help [Dan Wentz ] Re: heater controls??? ["deconblu" ] Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! [danadeb Re: too much cam? [sdelanty Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! [dave.williams ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 12:02:00 -0500 From: dave.williams Subject: heater controls??? - -> heat controls???68 69?? 70??I've seen a 67 with knobs like the early - -> broncos????My 68 has slides??Could my dash been swapped??? My '68 has slides. They're quite stiff. Has anyone tried a motorcycle cable oiler or something? I'm always afraid I'm going to rip the sliders out of the dash tugging on them. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:35:00 -0400 From: "Lee Hardy" Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP - ---------- > From: Mustang262 > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP > Date: Sunday, September 21, 1997 12:42 PM > > take me off the list > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:43:48 -0400 From: "Lee Hardy" Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP - ---------- > From: Joseph B. Michels, Phd > To: fordtrucks > Subject: 1952 F1 HELP > Date: Sunday, September 21, 1997 10:35 AM > > HELP!! My 1952 F1 has been sitting for 2 years while I was overseas! It ran > before I parked it. I have installed a new battery, points, condenser, > coil, fuel pump and fuel line, however, It still does not start. Does not > seem like it "fires" right? I have poured gas right down the throat of the > carbuerator, seemed to aid, however, think that I am doing something wrong-- > this should not be difficult--the battery is new, however, I have ground on > it hard-- my thinking is to recharge it and see what happens-- it reads 6.7v > without load, however, think that the constant trying has reduced it > substantially when under load. My plan is to totally rebuild this, however, > want to get it to run before I tear it completely apart------ Please > HELP!!!!!!1 > > Joebob > > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:43:55 -0400 From: "Lee Hardy" Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP - ---------- > From: Mustang262 > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP > Date: Sunday, September 21, 1997 12:42 PM > > take me off the list > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:44:20 -0400 From: "Lee Hardy" Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP - ---------- > From: Mustang262 > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP > Date: Sunday, September 21, 1997 12:42 PM > > take me off the list > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:44:01 -0400 From: "Lee Hardy" Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP - ---------- > From: Mustang262 > To: fordtrucks > Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP > Date: Sunday, September 21, 1997 12:42 PM > > take me off the list > +-------------- Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 and Older --------------+ > | Send posts to fordtrucks > | Send Unsubscribe requests to fordtrucks-request > +-- Visit Our Web Site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ --+ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:01:58 -0800 From: Don Grossman Subject: Re: 1952 F1 HELP Are you trying to say something Lee? - -- Don Grossman duckdon 63 Ford F-250 4x4 67' 390, t-98, Spicer 24, Dana 60, Dana 44 Phase 172: rebuild front suspension ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:03:52 -0700 From: Dan Wentz Subject: Re: Flathead Help >The following is bad advise! Even modern 12v systems use resistors or >resistor wire in the circuit. I agree with using a 12v coil, but don't >remove the resistor. Of course, it may be bypassed for starting using a >modern ignition wiring system. I just double checked the wiring diagram in my manual. These systems didn't use resistors. My coil actually says "do not use external resistor" on it. I don't get the idea that the original poster was talking about a typical ignition resistor. It sounds like he's got a voltage reducer inline to the coil--same as you'd use if you wanted to run other 6 volt devices on a 12 volt system. ~Dan 1992 Ford Mustang LX 1950 Ford F1, 351C-2V Check out my F1 page: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.GeoCities.com/MotorCity/3623 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:33:43 -0700 From: "deconblu" Subject: Re: heater controls??? > My '68 has slides. They're quite stiff. Has anyone tried a motorcycle >cable oiler or something? I'm always afraid I'm going to rip the >sliders out of the dash tugging on them I used a neat little device picked up at a motorcycle show. It's an aluminum channel with a slit rubber hose in it, you clamp it on the cable turn the thumb screw and it seals around the cable and housing. There is a small hole to insert a straw. I used dry chain lube (my preference for my motorcycles. it's not as messy and stays on the cables longer. nether of my bikes have chains so I don't know how it works on them). The tool forces the lubricant into the cable housing and comes out the other end completely lubricating the cable. My controls slide with ease. Deacon Blues Visit my Homepage at http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://home1.gte.net/deconblu/ and http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.dragonfire.net/~site/tbirdknights/ or send me a fan or flame at deconblu ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:44:04 -0700 From: danadeb Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! I know this is going to sound crazy but: A very long time ago I put a 289 in a 1963 ford van. ( boy that was a fun van! 3200 lbs, 3:1 9" rear, 26" rear tires, short wheelbase, engine fit well with minor floor notch, wheeeeeeeeeee! ) after the swap I had heater problems. The only thing that seemed to work was (and I know this does not make any sense ) to reverse the inlet and outlet hoses to the heater core making sure that the inlet goes to the top side of the core first. Then fill the coolant system through a funnel into the hose that went to the top of the heater core. This seemed to fill the heater core. ( my guess, which still does not make any sense, was that the heater core had an air bubble trapped in it ) after I did this the heater blew lots of hot air. sounds like the VW heater will, work but I just thought I would put in my 2 hundredths of a dollars worth. Any concerns about carbon monoxide with the VW heater? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 21:51:04 -0700 From: sdelanty Subject: Re: too much cam? >Ok ya'll I own a '75 F100 explorer with a 390 automatic.I pulled the >motor and went thru it,while building it(to stock specs)i wanted a >little bigger cam.So I called City Motor Supply (here in DFW) and bought >ahigh pressure oil pump(opened the oil passage to 1/2 from 5/16 at the >oil pickup hole on the block and matched the pick up). >The cam I bought was a Melling (sae 282 int 292 exh.advertised >duration- 204int. 214exh >int-512exh >I am using stock heads with a 390 4 barrel intake and a 4160 >holley(750cfm vacumm secondaries) > >is this too much? Your cam should be just fine. I run a not-to-dissimilar cam in my 71 F100 w/ '73 FE390 and T-18 manual. My cam specs are: 270/290 adv. duration, 208/218 (Schnieder LSP-30H) I run D3TE heads with air injection bumps removed, and a stock D3TE 4-bbl manifold with edelbrock 600CFM carb. 1-3/4" headers, etc. I like the cam just fine. The intake manifold is about to be changed... > >Will I need better than stock springs? Probably, the stock springs are marginal when new with a stock cam. Old ones are not gonna like a high lift cam... The recommended spring for my cam is 270-290lbs open, 100-110closed. That's more than stock. Mine are actually brand "C" springs. >How can I check >valve to piston clearence (the motor is already assembled) Ummm, pull the heads and check the clearances with clay? Or try prayer and go for it... (I hear a plastic Jesus on the dash helps!) Seriously, I'd probably pull the heads and check. You *should* be O.K. with that lift, but.... > >will I need adj rocker arms? Mmmmaybe.. It depends on the cam base circle diameter, how much Your heads have been milled (if any), whether You had a valve job and how much the seats are recessed, etc. Adjustables for FE are inexpensive and let You get the correct lifter preload. I'd recommend them. I had to use adjustables with my setup, as I had some lifters that were near their compressed limit. >will a stock oil pumpdrive shaft be enough or will I >need a chrome moly one? The stock one should be O.K., but use a NEW one. I suppose chromoly would be nice if Your wallet doesn't mind. >is timing mars best at 6 >they be advanced or retarded? Cam timing? Start with it "straight up" unless the manufacturer recommends different. Happy motoring, Steve Delanty ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 23:31:00 -0500 From: dave.williams Subject: Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! - -> Wadda Ya think, a plug with about a 1/4" hole? That should restrict - -> the area to about 1/4th of the "stock" (1/2") opening. 1/4" should be fine. Also make sure that one of the heater hoses comes off the intake - the water is hotter at the back, by the way - and the other hose goes to the water pump. I saw one car where someone had run both hoses to the intake manifold. They were routed quite nicely, but there was no pressure differential to force water through the heater core. I've also seen some that route the return water to the hose side of the water neck instead of the water pump. That ensures all coolant goes through the radiator instead of recirculating in the block, as it does when you run the hose to the water pump. My 302-powered RX7 does that,.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|