|
|
Return-Path: Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 11:50:30 -0600 (MDT) From: owner-fordtrucks-digest To: fordtrucks-digest Subject: fordtrucks-digest V1 #231 Reply-To: fordtrucks Sender: owner-fordtrucks-digest fordtrucks-digest Sunday, September 21 1997 Volume 01 : Number 231 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1979 And Older Trucks Digest Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: fordtrucks-digest-request with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. For help, send email to the same address with the word "help" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: RE: semi-metallic shoes ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Acronym ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Draining Yer 9"... ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Assorted questions ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: ADMIN: List split information ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Synthetic Oil ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] Re: Drain plug info... [FORDTRKNUT RE: Seat Cover sources ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] BTUs 'R' Us..! [dave.williams heater controls??? [Joe D ] Flathead Help [Flathead52 Re: BTUs 'R' Us..! ["Gary, 78 BBB" ] RE: heater controls??? [DC Beatty ] RE: semi-metallic shoes [DC Beatty ] Re: ADMIN: New list [Mustang262 Re: heater controls??? [Mustang262 1952 F1 HELP [joebob Re: 1952 F1 HELP [Mustang262 RE: the brady bunch 9" differential [Sleddog ] RE: the brady bunch 9" differential [Sleddog ] RE: Draining Yer 9"... [Sleddog ] RE: Draining Yer 9"... [Sleddog ] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 07:41:58 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: RE: semi-metallic shoes > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 22:35:47 -0400 > From: DC Beatty > Subject: RE: semi-metallic shoes > in the wallet. I paid $55 for one set!!! And now they squeal!!! > Arrrggghhh!!! Just occured to me that if squeal is primarily caused by loose pads on disc brakes maybe there is something not quite seated in the drum? Maybe the shoes aren't being pulled all the way into the lugs by the springs so there is a little chatter on application? Just a thought :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 07:45:53 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Acronym > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 23:22:04 -0500 > From: Daver > Subject: Re: Acronym > > Chevy Chevy there the Best drive a mile and walk the Rest...Ford > > The BEST never Rest.......... > > > > JOe > > I'd rather push a ford than drive a chevy. Carry some tools and a few parts and you won't even have to do that :-) My coil came off after passing every one on the road and coming to a 4 way stop I could't keep the dang thing running long enough to get through the intersection. Had my trusty 9/16 box end handy and tightened the bolt back down (while hundreds of cars streamed past my open door) and off we went :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 07:51:34 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Draining Yer 9"... > From: sdelanty > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 21:11:40 -0700 > Subject: Draining Yer 9"... > I'm thinking of drilling a hole in mine at the back of the housing > near the bottom, and welding in a 1/4" pipe fitting so I can have a > drain plug. Never done it because I leave mine it till it dies and then change it when I rebuild about every 200k miles or so :-) Course I don't race or pull so if you feel it's necessary then why not drill a hole directly into the housing and tap it with a pipe tap? Maybe the bottom isn't a good place since it might weaken the "truss" effect of the casting, don't know? The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 07:59:47 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Assorted questions > From: danadeb > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 23:18:21 -0700 > Subject: Re: Assorted questions > If my memory serves me correctly a 1957 to 1959 ford 9" rear end out > of a pick-up is a direct bolt, in size wise. ( "U" joints may be an > issue but I am pretty sure you can find a set that will work or you > have to change the input yoke on the rear end, something like that. > ) Also be sure to get the "U" bolts and plate that mount the axial > to the spring. I did the same swap about 15 years ago on a 56 and I > think it will work on a 54. Truck frames have been 34" wide for a long time. I put a 48 GMC bus axle with dual 20" tires on the back of a 68 F-100 and made up a drive shaft from the bus and the front spline slipped right into the Ford midship bearing spline. I couldn't believe it! I just unrivited the shackle brackets from the frame and welded the whole thing from the bus on to the Ford. Worked like a charm :-) Got to pay close attention to set back when putting them on this way though. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 08:11:49 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: ADMIN: List split information > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 17:49:48 -0400 > From: Ken Payne > Subject: ADMIN: List split information > If you want to be on the 1960 and older list in addition to or > instead of the 1961-1979/1980+ lists, I need the following > information: I don't have problem with the address since Pegasus automatically puts in the address from which it came and saves all unique addresses for me when I reply so I can always dig it back up. We should all be using Pegasus, it sure works well for me and it's prettier than Microsoft stuff :-) I guess some folks are stuck with some network thing their systems gave them :-( I would like to stay on both older lists in live mode, thanks :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 08:57:37 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: Re: Synthetic Oil > From: "deconblu" > Subject: Re: Synthetic Oil > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:32:04 -0700 > So what was the lie that you seen at the links that were on my > post? Or > was this just off the cuff! Just a general observation, didn' t mean to imply that was a bad thing to do, just that if you read Split fire adds and Borla adds and if you've ever tried some of these (I haven't but certainly have read a lot of personal reports on them) products you will see what I mean. Mobil has some good general information but you can't believe all their claims or comparisons any more than splt fire's. My comment was just a reminder that we have to sift through the stuff to get to the meat no matter what product we're looking at. I wasn't implying that you were wrong or the information wasn't appreciated, sorry :-( The FAQ I was refering to had generic information on the additives, interactions of additives, environmental impacts and other properties and then rated the various oils based on these properties. I didn't find this kind of information on the Mobil site but I didn't look at every link so maybe I missed it. The tractor FAQ also had some test comparisons but I can't remember all the stuff except that the components of Mobil and Penzoil were similar and both were distinct from the others in these properties. Can't remember if Red Line was in there or not, sorry I was just comparing Mobil with Penzoil at the time :-( As I said, these are good sources of good info, just be from Missouri when you go there :-) I've gotten over 100k out of all my vehicles for many years no matter what oil I've used but I like the synthetics the best due to longer oil change frequencies. I still change every 3k or so but the added insurance of the longer life sure doesn't hurt when you don't get around to it right away :-) BTW, Mobil1 is probably the best you can buy but Red Line could be just as good and Penzoil is so close that I couldn't see switching for an additional $3/qt. so I stayed with Penzoil. I wish I hadn't lost that URL, you'd love to see that one I'm sure since it gives you all the additives by chemical name and trade name, what they do etc. and who has how much of each so you can compare for yourself. I don't like them to tell me it's rated for this or that and will do this or that, I like to see a description of the additives, their interactions etc. and make up my own mind who's doing it right but that's just my personal view :-) The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 09:05:44 -0400 (EDT) From: FORDTRKNUT Subject: Re: Drain plug info... The drain plug was removed by FORD in the early 60's I think. The cost to manufacture, punch the hole in the housing, & weld it in was small per rear...but it added up to big bucks. An engineer that worked at my company told me about it. He worked at FORD for many years until he came to our company....he drives a 1968 or 1969 429SCJ Torino to work every day!!!! Well gotta go and organize the garage....AGAIN!!! Wayne Grabley ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 09:15:29 +0000 From: "Gary, 78 BBB" Subject: RE: Seat Cover sources > > From: jack fleming > Subject: RE: Seat Cover sources > > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 19:18:57 -0400 > Sorry for the delay, I've been traveling on business. I haven't > found anything yet to use for my truck's seat covers. When I said > covers, what I meant was some type of "kit" that would enable me to > rehab the seat with "like new" materials. Custom Interiors claims > to have a line of these things available, but I still haven't gotten > anything from them (after calling them twice)...I'll keep you posted > on what I find. Jack I was going to do that too but decided that by the time I buy the covers and hope they are large enough to fit properly and replace the foam and fix the springs I could have it done by a competent reupolstery shop. I even had the "S" clips to do it myself but gave up after pricing the covers :-( BTW, your notes are coming in as binarys of unknown format which Pegasus can read but requires several extra steps to see the text. The swift of foot and slow of wit have more off road experiences - -- Gary -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 05:29:00 -0500 From: dave.williams Subject: BTUs 'R' Us..! - -> It's funny, from the people I've talked with, the 302 guys seem to - -> think the early - -> truck heaters work good, while many FE truck owners think the heater - -> is marginal.. My '68 was originally a 240 six. As far as I know all the heaters were the same. It now has a '65 330 Olds engine and the heater works just fine, even though the water temp won't go over 150-160F (with a 180 thermostat) on a 25-30F day. No engine fan, 16" Derale electric mounted ahead of the radiator. Radiator is from for a 427 FE dump truck, four.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |