|
|
Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list pre61-list); Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:20:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:20:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Ford Truck Enthusiasts List Server <listar To: pre61-list digest users <listar Reply-to: pre61-list Subject: pre61-list Digest V2000 #176 Precedence: list ========================================================== Ford Truck Enthusiasts 1948-1960 Truck Mailing List Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com To unsubscribe, send email to: listar the words "unsubscribe pre61-list" in the subject of the message. ========================================================== ------------------------------------ pre61-list Digest Thu, 14 Sep 2000 Volume: 2000 Issue: 176 In This Issue: Subscription to forum at http://www.ford-trucks.com/cgi-b Re: Steering Pics of my 55, go here.... Re: narrow rearend Re Re: Bushing reamer? Re: narrow rearend 51 ford ID Re: narrow rearend Re: narrow rearend backfiring flatty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:08:10 -0400 From: admin Subject: Subscription to forum at http://www.ford-trucks.com/cgi-b Following are new messages posted in the Ford Truck Enthusiasts message board forums. If you have any questions, please use the contact form on the web site. To remove your subscription, visit our Message Board at www.ford-trucks.com, login, view any forum and click the subscription link. If you are subscribed to any of our mailing lists, you receive this message automatically as part of that subscription and it can only be disabled by unsubscribing from the mailing list. Messages posted in 1948-1960 Ford trucks =========================================================== "RE: F-2 HUB CAPS" Posted by adbecker on 09/13/2000 07:16:35 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/302.html#6 "'49-'51 heater hoses, 6 cyl." Posted by adbecker on 09/13/2000 07:35:46 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/396.html#0 "Heater" Posted by barry on 09/13/2000 10:17:04 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/396.html#1 "RE: Heater" Posted by adbecker on 09/13/2000 11:44:31 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/396.html#2 "RE: Heater" Posted by barry on 09/13/2000 19:14:02 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/396.html#3 "1960 Wiindshield Wipers" Posted by strk1960 on 09/13/2000 19:26:26 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/397.html#0 "RE: F-2 HUB CAPS" Posted by iron57370 on 09/13/2000 19:39:05 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/302.html#7 "RE: 1960 Wiindshield Wipers" Posted by Kenny on 09/13/2000 22:19:53 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/397.html#1 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by johna on 09/13/2000 23:25:52 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#6 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by Kenny on 09/14/2000 01:02:41 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#7 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by johna on 09/14/2000 01:22:02 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#8 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by johna on 09/14/2000 01:27:07 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#9 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by johna on 09/14/2000 01:29:12 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#10 "RE: mercury trucks" Posted by Kenny on 09/14/2000 01:31:46 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/325.html#5 "RE: '59 F100 - Pretty good cab/bed - blown motor, ? auto tranny, 52k - what's she worth?" Posted by johna on 09/14/2000 01:35:07 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/395.html#2 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by johna on 09/14/2000 01:37:50 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#11 "RE: 1960 Wiindshield Wipers" Posted by viking on 09/14/2000 10:07:56 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/397.html#2 "Chassis Swap" Posted by 58Model on 09/14/2000 10:42:15 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/398.html#0 "RE: '59 F100 - Pretty good cab/bed - blown motor, ? auto tranny, 52k - what's she worth?" Posted by Kenny on 09/14/2000 12:39:48 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/395.html#3 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by Kenny on 09/14/2000 13:02:05 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#12 "RE: 4X4 conversion" Posted by dinosaurfan on 09/14/2000 16:50:48 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/385.html#5 "RE: 4X4 conversion" Posted by sled_dog on 09/14/2000 20:09:12 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/385.html#6 "RE: '59 manuals" Posted by Kenny on 09/14/2000 22:34:20 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/375.html#13 "RE: Run To The Rock" Posted by jowilker on 09/14/2000 23:16:33 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/382.html#3 "RE: 460 in 59 F100" Posted by tschiller on 09/14/2000 23:24:00 http://www.ford-trucks.com/dcforum/48_60/389.html#9 ------------------------------ From: checker Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:20:15 -0700 Subject: Re: Steering You might want to try installing a ram system. I did that with my '60 F-100 and it works very nicely. You will need to do some welding fabrication but, it's not so expensive. You can find the parts at your local wrecking yard off some older Ford mid-size sedans. I installed mine so nicely I can remove the whole setup and have my back to stock without anyone knowing the better. As a matter of fact it looks so OEM that many would find it hard to know the better as it looks now. So... good luck. All parts may run you about $100. > From: FISHROT1 > Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:38:33 EDT > Subject: Steering > > Hey, > I have a '60 F-100 with the 223 six in it, and am in need of doing > something with my steering gearbox. As always money is a primary issue. I > would like to upgrade to power steering, and was wondering if anyone had any > ideas on a late model power steering unit that would go into it with little > or no modifications? I know the no mods is asking a bit much, but you never > know. -- Tulio Solorzano '50 F-1 (newest member to the family) '60 F-100 Custom Cab '77 280z, '78 Jeep CJ5 & '79 Harley Sportster ------------------------------ From: LSTYRGT Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 02:40:39 EDT Subject: Pics of my 55, go here.... Listees A couple of months ago, I told you all that, I wanted to sell my 55, but after getting the tranny rebuilt, I have decided to keep it. Just wanted to share with everyone, the resto pics, that I have done to the truck, since the late 80's to date. Copy and paste this address: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=1182411&a=8708088 Let me know, what you think. BTW, I'll try to make it to next years' Nat's with it. Thanks Jason Maples 55 Aqua F100 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:21:24 +1000 From: brian falkner <falken Subject: Re: narrow rearend 8888888888888888888------ <From: "Douglas R." <my59f100 <Subject: narrow rearend <Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 00:31:31 EDT <Is there a Ford product out there with a 9" Ford rear end with a width from <backing plate to backing plate about 50"-51". 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 The only meaningfull measurement is taken from Drum To Drum [the wheel facing]. 57/8 Ford Custom/Fairlane are from memory 58" wide which would be close to your requirements. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:39:34 +1000 From: brian falkner <falken Subject: Re Re: Bushing reamer? <From: "Terry" <kartrace <Subject: : Re: Bushing reamer? <Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:50:05 -0500 <Thanks group for heads up. My brother is toolmaker at local machine shop and <will perform the necessary installation and reaming of the new bushings. He <will also press in the new king pins. -------------- <<Let him know the kingpin bushing reamer is piloted and is supposed to line <<ream them together. Most non atomotive machine shops wont have this style <<reamer available. The size is also very critical. The kingpin should fit <<very tight in the bushing. You should have to hammer it in when you assemble <<it. 8888888888888888888888888888888888888 If proper time & care is taken to ream & align the bushes they should not be VERY tight or binding/galling will occur, resulting in shorter bush life. There has to be some room for grease. Yes I would use a hammer, but only a plastic or copper ended one for a FIRM PUSH fit. Brian ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:09:31 -0400 From: 47Fred <zelda_1 Subject: Re: narrow rearend brian falkner wrote: > > <Is there a Ford product out there with a 9" Ford rear end with a width from > <backing plate to backing plate about 50"-51". > Here is a site page that has this kind of data. To rephrase the answer of a few days ago, NO. http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://idt.net/~windxi19/9inch.html 47Fred ------------------------------ From: "Corry Winchester" <cwinches Subject: 51 ford ID Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:18:53 -0400 Could someone help me decipher these numbers off a 51 Ford: Style : C2C-81B Bodyno: 2126 BCBP-1237 Paint Code: 39 Trim: 13 Serial - BDA83-BHP-9960 made in Windsor Ontario. Any help would be great, as always thanks in advance, Corry ------------------------------ From: "Brian" <F100nut Subject: Re: narrow rearend Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 20:10:03 -0700 > <Is there a Ford product out there with a 9" Ford rear end with a width from > <backing plate to backing plate about 50"-51". I don't think you can find exactly what you need in a 9", but you should be able to find an 8" of proper width. This page might be helpful: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.ridgenet.net/~biesiade/Fordrears.html. -Brian ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:14:01 -0400 From: David Russow <drussow Subject: Re: narrow rearend brian falkner wrote: > 8888888888888888888------ > <From: "Douglas R." <my59f100 > <Subject: narrow rearend > <Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 00:31:31 EDT > > <Is there a Ford product out there with a 9" Ford rear end with a width from > <backing plate to backing plate about 50"-51". > > 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 > The only meaningfull measurement is taken from Drum To Drum [the wheel > facing]. > 57/8 Ford Custom/Fairlane are from memory 58" wide which would be close to > your requirements. 1957-59 ford fairlanes are 57 1/4" from flange to flange. You cannot measure from drum to drum since drums (brakes) come in different sizes (widths). 1957-59 Rancheros and SWs are also are 57 1/4" from flange to flange. These are the narrowest 9" rear ends. 66-77 Broncos are 58" flange to flange Hope this helps Dave 54 > > > > > ============================================================= > To unsubscribe: www.ford-trucks.com/mailinglist.html#item3 > Please remove this footer when replying. ------------------------------ From: PWPTRUCK1 Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:16:15 EDT Subject: backfiring flatty Hi Gang, I parked my truck about a month ago and haven't run it any until today. When I parked it, the engine ran perfect. Now, it is backfiring something awful out the tailpipe. It starts fine and doesn't seem to do it much at idle, but does it bad at high idle and acceleration. I took the carb apart and cleaned it, timing is ok, checked for clean fuel and made sure a plug wire wasn't cross-firing with another one. I even unplugged one spark plug wire at a time while running and it still didn't stop. Any suggestions would help. Thanks Paul '52 F-3 ------------------------------ End of pre61-list Digest V2000 #176 *********************************** ---------------------------------------------------------- <><><><><><> Serious Help Finding That Part! <><><><><><> Ford Truck Enthusiasts now has "Ford Products Interchange" manuals in its online store. Two editions: 1950-1965 and 1963-1974. Cross references thousands of Ford parts. <a href="http://www.motorhaven.com/"> .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|