|
|
From: owner-pre61-list-digest
To: pre61-list-digest Subject: pre61-list-digest V3 #279 Reply-To: pre61-list Sender: owner-pre61-list-digest Errors-To: owner-pre61-list-digest Precedence: bulk pre61-list-digest Wednesday, September 29 1999 Volume 03 : Number 279 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1948 - 1948 truck and vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe pre61-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford FTE Pre61 - Wiring Harness FTE Pre61 - Front Fender FTE Pre61 - Power brakes Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford KEEP EM CLEAN FTE Pre61 - an inviation to write two FTE Pre61 - 9" Rear end Ratios ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:23:19 -0700 From: "shawn" Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford Speaking of engines, i have decided to go with a small inline ford six (newer) Anyone recommend a good year to find that doesnt have all the polution stuff required (canada ) up to 1978 and enough ummfff" to push the 54 f100 along nicely. - ----- Original Message ----- From: Morgwn To: Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 1:57 AM Subject: FTE Pre61 - F100/Chev > Gents, forgive me for this sacrilege, but, has anyone here put a 350 Chev > into a 53-56 F100 (and is game enough to own up?) I could use some advise on > transmission, cooling, and other bits and pieces. > > == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:46:39 -0400 From: 47Fred Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford shawn wrote: > > Speaking of engines, i have decided to go with a small inline ford six > (newer) Anyone recommend a good > year to find that doesnt have all the polution stuff required (canada ) up > to 1978 and enough ummfff" to > push the 54 f100 along nicely. > Why not go with a 300 cubic inch, plenty of nuts, fairly common, bolts up to 302/351 bellhousings, so transmission is not a problem. Has to be close in size to the '54 motor, maybe different mounts. I saw a couple of these babies running in altered dragsters a week or so ago, ran in the 8's at 175mph. And by the way, what's wrong with pollution prevention? I think we all ought to do as much as we can to keep the exhaust of our little toys as clean as we can. When you see a F150 Lighting pickup run as fast as a late '60's big block, get better millage and meet 1990's emissions standards, I think someone's on the right track. 47Fred == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:55:36 -0500 From: "Brian C Nyman" Subject: FTE Pre61 - Wiring Harness JRFiero >> Anyone know where I can find an OEM style wiring harness for a 1960 f-100. I >> know that there are these after market style painless wiring kits and stuff, >> >> but I would like to stay with the original style harness. >> > Fishrot, eh? Is that what happens to the insulation on the original >wiring? > I bought all the original style wiring for my '51 from "Wiring Harnesses >from Tyree Harris" at one of the Carlisles this year. Unfortunately for you, >his business card says "Ford-Mercury Cars - Trucks 1909-1959. Just missed. >>I'd give him a call anyway, 14271 Boondock Lane, Montpelier, VA (no, not VT) >23192, 804-883-5200. Correct color, fabric coated, on and on. I have a >spotlight, so he just reeled off about 6' of black and threw it in, along >with some extra bullet connectors If this guy IS familiar with Ford trucks up through 1959, it's likely to be the same harness as the 58-59-60 as they all have 4-bulb headlights and relatively basic electric setup. Brian Nyman bnyman == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:45:02 -0500 From: "Thomas Kurzawski" Subject: FTE Pre61 - Front Fender I'm in need of the left and right fender for my 59 F100 4X4. The 2X may do it too. I got two new fiberglass ones but there are not so good. In fact to worth the money. I got them from a place in BC that sells parts for a company in FL. I like two metal fenders with no or littel rust. Please contact Thomas Thank's == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:57:14 +0100 From: "Paul Young" Subject: FTE Pre61 - Power brakes Better late than never; I'm still reading mail from the beginning of the month, but incase anyone out there is still wondering about power brakes; I'm just about to order a power brake system from Mid50 F-100 Parts (1-800-252-1956). I have installed a 9" rear with 3.11 gears and drum brakes and found the difference in the size of brake shoe made a big difference to my braking ability. Also it was suggested I go from single to dual cylinder brakes. This kit does both, and with an auto-fill reservoir option that mounts on the firewall so there's no awkard bodily contortions whilst checking levels. And, even better, they have a disc/disc, disc/drum, drum/drum option on the kit to suit all configurations. They all sit around the $500 mark which is a lot, but I drive it every day and the expense is worth the safety. Sorry I'm behind, Paul '54 waiting for paint! == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:38:11 EDT From: GILASAILR Subject: Re: FTE Pre61 - F100/ford KEEP EM CLEAN Right on Fred ! To the emissions situation AND to the 4.9L, if we dont keep our act clean we will find our selves at odds with "the powers that be", and goodness knows we do not want the sport to become any more expensive or controlled. Loading a 4.9L in a 47 panel any day now.. Gary O. == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:06:00 EDT From: MilFam3 Subject: FTE Pre61 - an inviation to write two i've been recieving quite a few respondses from my request to write about your CLASSICS! interesting stories etc.. keep them coming they've been great! i assure you there only for enjoyable reading only. who knows if i get enough sent to me maybe i'll print copies and mail to anyone interested. there not limited to just restoring truck but anything interesting you might want to share about your trucks. so if your thinking about writing be my guest. if your interestedin reading others stories then let me know. e-mai DAN at milfam3 == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:16:45 -0700 From: Tulio Subject: FTE Pre61 - 9" Rear end Ratios I have a rear end question: I have a 9" Rear in my Ford '60 F100. Today I decided to finally check the ratio on the unit. I jacked up the rear of the truck and then spun the rear tires and observed how many times the driveshaft rotated in relation to the tire rotation. I descovered that for each complete revolution of the driveshaft the tire rotated 1.25 revolutions. Hmmm.. that really confused me... does that make it a 1.25/1 ratio?? - -- Tulio Solorzano '60 F-100 Custom Cab '79 HD Sportster == FTE: Uns*bscribe and posting info http://www.ford-trucks.com/faq.html ------------------------------ End of pre61-list-digest V3 #279.... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
|